Abstract
In this erratum, we correct the mistakes in Eqs. (2) and (2a) in
Opt. Lett. 45, 443 (2020). [CrossRef]
© 2020 Optical Society of
America
Equations (2) and (2a) in Ref. [1]
should read
(1)$${I_{{\rm TE}}}(x) =
{I_0}\left[ {1 + \cos \left(\frac{{4\pi {n_1}\sin {\theta
_1}}}{\lambda }x \right)} \right]$$
and (1a)$${I_{{\rm TM}}}(x) = {I_0}\left[
{1 + \cos (2{\theta _1})\cos \left(\frac{{4\pi {n_1}\sin {\theta
_1}}}{\lambda }x \right)} \right],$$
respectively.
Equation (3), which we use to calculate the peak intensity in the
interference pattern for the TM polarization, is not affected by the mistakes
in Eqs. (2) and (2a), and remains valid.REFERENCE
1. N. Abdukerim, D. Grobnic, C. Hnatovsky, and S. J. Mihailov, Opt. Lett. 45, 443 (2020). [CrossRef]
Cited By
Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.
Alert me when this article is cited.
Equations (2)
Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.
(1)
(1a)