Abstract
We present an erratum to our Letter [Opt. Lett. 45, 3601 (2020) [CrossRef] ]. Labeling errors in two figures and an incorrect sentence are revised. The corrections have no influence on the conclusions of the original Letter.
© 2020 Optical Society of America
In
Figs. 2(b) and 4 of [1], the respective labeling of TE and TM reflection peak is corrected, as it is interchanged in the original publication. According to Fig. 4, the TM peak’s wavelength shift is approximately 5% greater than that of the TE reflection signal. This circumstance is also interchanged in the original Letter [1].Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2018CFB551); National Natural Science Foundation of China (61575151).
Acknowledgment
The authors are thankful to Steffen Hessler for discovering the error.
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCE
1. S. Kefer, J. Dai, M. Yang, B. Schmauss, and R. Hellmann, Opt. Lett. 45, 3601 (2020). [CrossRef]