Abstract

One of the plots in Fig. 2 of our previous Letter [Opt. Lett. 36, 289 (2011)] was mislabeled with an incorrect parameter value and is corrected here.

© 2011 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. E. Shore and A. Small, Opt. Lett. 36, 289 (2011).
    [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2011

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

(This is a corrected version of Fig. 2 of [1].) p γ versus E 2 for different b and f 1 values. E 2 ranges with different qualitative features are noted.

Metrics