Abstract

Scattering can result in erroneous determination of the concentrations of constituent absorbers in spectrophotometry. This is due to the relationship between attenuation and absorption coefficient becoming nonlinear; hence, the use of the Lambert–Beer law becomes invalid. It has previously been shown that application of polarization techniques can reduce these effects, resulting in a more linear relationship. Here we quantify the impact of this improvement on measurement of the ratio of concentrations for two general absorbing species and show that measurement using polarization-maintaining light is more accurate. This is performed using a generalized version of theory previously dependent on selection of isosbestic wavelengths. For the absorbing species and geometries considered here, the mean error on the estimation of absorber concentration ratio is 18.2% for the case of detection without polarization discrimination. When polarization-maintaining light is extracted, mean errors of 1.2% and 5.1% are achieved for linear and circular polarizations, respectively. The improvement provided by the polarization techniques is observed regardless of the illuminating wavelengths but is achieved at the expense of a reduced signal-to-noise ratio. Taking this into account, for the detection scheme considered with a detector well capacity of 4 × 10⁵ electrons the improvement provided by linear polarization-maintaining light is reduced to a factor of 3.6 and for circular polarizations a factor of 2.2.

Quantitative spectrophotometry of scattering media via frequency-domain and constant-intensity measurements

John Crowe, David Morris, Malcolm Woolfson, Paul Rodmell, and John Walker
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24(7) 1969-1974 (2007)

Description and time reduction of a Monte Carlo code to simulate propagation of polarized light through scattering media

Franck Jaillon and Hervé Saint-Jalmes
Appl. Opt. 42(16) 3290-3296 (2003)

Measuring absorption coefficient of scattering liquids using a tube inside an integrating sphere

Yolanda Villanueva, Colin Veenstra, and Wiendelt Steenbergen
Appl. Opt. 55(11) 3030-3038 (2016)

Discriminating turbid media by scatterer size and scattering coefficient using backscattered linearly and circularly polarized light

Michael D. Singh and I. Alex Vitkin
Biomed. Opt. Express 12(11) 6831-6843 (2021)

Polarization-difference imaging: a biologically inspired technique for observation through scattering media

M. P. Rowe, E. N. Pugh, J. S. Tyo, and N. Engheta
Opt. Lett. 20(6) 608-610 (1995)