Problems testing diffractive intraocular lenses with Shack-Hartmann sensors

Jim Schwiegerling; Edward DeHoog

doi:10.1364/AO.49.000D62

Problems testing diffractive intraocular lenses with Shack–Hartmann sensors

Jim Schwiegerling and Edward DeHoog

Applied Optics
Vol. 49,
Issue 16,
pp. D62-D68
(2010)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.49.000D62

Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Jim Schwiegerling and Edward DeHoog, "Problems testing diffractive intraocular lenses with Shack-Hartmann sensors," Appl. Opt. 49, D62-D68 (2010)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Get PDF (437 KB)
Set citation alerts
Save article

Related Topics
Table of Contents Category
- Vision Optics
Optics & Photonics Topics
?

The topics in this list come from the OSA Optics and Photonics Topics applied to this article.
Previously assigned OCIS codes
- Diffractive optics (050.1970)
- Phase measurement (120.5050)
- Visual optics, ophthalmic instrumentation (330.7327)

About this Article
History
- Original Manuscript: December 11, 2009
- Revised Manuscript: February 5, 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: February 22, 2010
- Published: March 15, 2010
Virtual Issues
Virtual Journal for Biomedical Optics Vol. 5, Iss. 10

Not Accessible

Your account may give you access

Abstract

Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensors have found widespread application for testing ocular aberrations. These sensors provide an accurate map of the wavefront emerging from an eye in most cases. However, there is a growing class of patients with diffractive intraocular lenses that will potentially be measured incorrectly with Shack–Hartmann devices. We explore the pitfalls of measuring diffractive lenses with this technology.

Full Article | PDF Article

OSA Recommended Articles

Visual axial PSF of diffractive trifocal lenses

Pedro J. Valle, José E. Oti, Vidal F. Canales, and Manuel P. Cagigal
Opt. Express 13(7) 2782-2792 (2005)

Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens image quality

Michael J. Simpson
Appl. Opt. 31(19) 3621-3626 (1992)

Optimizing distance image quality of an aspheric multifocal intraocular lens using a comprehensive statistical design approach

Xin Hong and Xiaoxiao Zhang
Opt. Express 16(25) 20920-20934 (2008)

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Figures (6)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Tables (2)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Equations (6)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Metrics

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Ring Number j	Radial Distance $r_{j}$	Local Grating Period d
0	0	0.524404
1	0.524404	0.217215
2	0.74162	0.166675
3	0.908295	0.140514
4	1.048809	0.123795
5	1.172604	0.111919
6	1.284523	0.10292
7	1.387444	0.095796
8	1.48324	0.089974
9	1.573213	0.085099
10	1.658312	0.08094
11	1.739253	0.077337
12	1.81659	0.074177
13	1.890767	0.071375
14	1.962142	0.068868
15	2.03101	0.066608
16	2.097618	0.064557
17	2.162175	0.062685
18	2.22486	0.060966
19	2.285826	0.059382
20	2.345208	0.057915
21	2.403123	0.056552

Lenslet Position	Nearest j	Local Grating d	$Δ x (λ = 550 nm)$	$Δ x (λ = 780 nm)$
0	0	0.524404424	0.015732141	0.744616174
0.4	1	0.217215425	0.03798085	0.30811496
0.8	2	0.166675258	0.049497718	0.236403887
1.2	5	0.111919318	0.073714706	0.158728911
1.6	9	0.085099123	0.096947795	0.120687414
2	15	0.066608095	0.123863042	0.094461042
2.4	21	0.056551807	0.145890832	0.080198098

Ring Number j	Radial Distance $r_{j}$	Local Grating Period d
0	0	0.524404
1	0.524404	0.217215
2	0.74162	0.166675
3	0.908295	0.140514
4	1.048809	0.123795
5	1.172604	0.111919
6	1.284523	0.10292
7	1.387444	0.095796
8	1.48324	0.089974
9	1.573213	0.085099
10	1.658312	0.08094
11	1.739253	0.077337
12	1.81659	0.074177
13	1.890767	0.071375
14	1.962142	0.068868
15	2.03101	0.066608
16	2.097618	0.064557
17	2.162175	0.062685
18	2.22486	0.060966
19	2.285826	0.059382
20	2.345208	0.057915
21	2.403123	0.056552

Lenslet Position	Nearest j	Local Grating d	$Δ x (λ = 550 nm)$	$Δ x (λ = 780 nm)$
0	0	0.524404424	0.015732141	0.744616174
0.4	1	0.217215425	0.03798085	0.30811496
0.8	2	0.166675258	0.049497718	0.236403887
1.2	5	0.111919318	0.073714706	0.158728911
1.6	9	0.085099123	0.096947795	0.120687414
2	15	0.066608095	0.123863042	0.094461042
2.4	21	0.056551807	0.145890832	0.080198098

Abstract

References

Cited By

Figures (6)

Tables (2)

Equations (6)

Metrics

Login or Create Account