11. Supplemental Material
Supplemental Material
Previous Module | 1 of 1 | Next Module |
Optica Publishing Group Resources
Editor Article: Why Peer Review Matters
Optica Publishing Group Journal Descriptions
Optica Publishing Group Journal Review Criteria
Optica Publishing Group Ethical Guidelines for Publication
Optica Publishing Group Conflicts of Interest Policy
Optica resources on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Webinar: What ARE Unintended Biases? A Primer for Understanding Bias in Everyday Life.
Author Guidelines for Supplementary Materials in Optica Publishing Group Journals
Optica Account Profile Landing Page
Optica Publishing Group Reviewer Recognition and Rewards Program
Optica Publishing Group's Peer Review Quick Reference Guide
External Resources
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
CSE (Council of Science Editors) Reviewer Roles and Responsibilities Guidelines
References
NSF. Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences Perspectives on Robust and Reliable Science. May, 2015. (Report of the Subcommittee on Replicability in Science Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences).
Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K, "Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide," EJIFCC. 2014;25(3):227-43. Oct 24, 2014.
Joseph N. Mait, "In Praise of Reviewers," Appl. Opt. 52, ED5-ED6 (2013)