Abstract

Our analysis based on calculations carried out with different methods but with the data taken from Optica 3, 351 (2016) [CrossRef]   led to the conclusion that the results obtained in Optica 3, 351 (2016) [CrossRef]   are questionable in several respects.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. F. Bouchard, J. Harris, H. Mand, R. W. Boyd, and E. Karimi, Optica 3, 351 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  2. Z. Horváth, J. Vinkó, Z. Bor, and D. Von der Linde, Appl. Phys. B 63, 481 (1996).
    [Crossref]
  3. N. D. Bareza and N. Hermosa, Sci. Rep. 6, 26842 (2016).
    [Crossref]
  4. P. Piksarv, H. Valtna-Lukner, A. Valdman, M. Lõhmus, R. Matt, and P. Saari, Opt. Express 20, 17220 (2012).
    [Crossref]
  5. C. J. R. Sheppard, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18, 2594 (2001).
    [Crossref]
  6. S. Feng and H. G. Winful, Phys. Rev. E 61, 862 (2000).
    [Crossref]
  7. P. Saari, Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 58, 729 (2003).
  8. P. Saari, Opt. Express 16, 10303 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  9. A. Valdmann, P. Piksarv, H. Valtna-Lukner, and P. Saari, Opt. Lett. 39, 1877 (2014).
    [Crossref]
  10. M. A. Porras, Phys. Rev. E 65, 026606 (2002).

2016 (2)

2014 (1)

2012 (1)

2008 (1)

2003 (1)

P. Saari, Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 58, 729 (2003).

2002 (1)

M. A. Porras, Phys. Rev. E 65, 026606 (2002).

2001 (1)

2000 (1)

S. Feng and H. G. Winful, Phys. Rev. E 61, 862 (2000).
[Crossref]

1996 (1)

Z. Horváth, J. Vinkó, Z. Bor, and D. Von der Linde, Appl. Phys. B 63, 481 (1996).
[Crossref]

Bareza, N. D.

N. D. Bareza and N. Hermosa, Sci. Rep. 6, 26842 (2016).
[Crossref]

Bor, Z.

Z. Horváth, J. Vinkó, Z. Bor, and D. Von der Linde, Appl. Phys. B 63, 481 (1996).
[Crossref]

Bouchard, F.

Boyd, R. W.

Feng, S.

S. Feng and H. G. Winful, Phys. Rev. E 61, 862 (2000).
[Crossref]

Harris, J.

Hermosa, N.

N. D. Bareza and N. Hermosa, Sci. Rep. 6, 26842 (2016).
[Crossref]

Horváth, Z.

Z. Horváth, J. Vinkó, Z. Bor, and D. Von der Linde, Appl. Phys. B 63, 481 (1996).
[Crossref]

Karimi, E.

Lõhmus, M.

Mand, H.

Matt, R.

Piksarv, P.

Porras, M. A.

M. A. Porras, Phys. Rev. E 65, 026606 (2002).

Saari, P.

Sheppard, C. J. R.

Valdman, A.

Valdmann, A.

Valtna-Lukner, H.

Vinkó, J.

Z. Horváth, J. Vinkó, Z. Bor, and D. Von der Linde, Appl. Phys. B 63, 481 (1996).
[Crossref]

Von der Linde, D.

Z. Horváth, J. Vinkó, Z. Bor, and D. Von der Linde, Appl. Phys. B 63, 481 (1996).
[Crossref]

Winful, H. G.

S. Feng and H. G. Winful, Phys. Rev. E 61, 862 (2000).
[Crossref]

Appl. Phys. B (1)

Z. Horváth, J. Vinkó, Z. Bor, and D. Von der Linde, Appl. Phys. B 63, 481 (1996).
[Crossref]

Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi (1)

P. Saari, Atti della Fondazione Giorgio Ronchi 58, 729 (2003).

J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (1)

Opt. Express (2)

Opt. Lett. (1)

Optica (1)

Phys. Rev. E (2)

M. A. Porras, Phys. Rev. E 65, 026606 (2002).

S. Feng and H. G. Winful, Phys. Rev. E 61, 862 (2000).
[Crossref]

Sci. Rep. (1)

N. D. Bareza and N. Hermosa, Sci. Rep. 6, 26842 (2016).
[Crossref]

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Group velocity at the radial position corresponding to the LG beam (with l = 5 , p = 0 ) intensity maximum as a function of the propagation distance. The curve has been calculated numerically with the same beam parameters as in Fig. 1(b) of Ref. [1] (pulse carrier wavelength 795 nm, beam waist 2.5 mm in the plane of a thin lens of focal length 400 mm), but the curve substantially differs from the corresponding one in Fig. 1(b) of Ref. [1]. At the same time, it coincides—as it should—with the curve plotted from our analytical expression obtained under the very well-fulfilled assumption considered in the text.

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

Φ LG ( r , z , ϕ , ω ) = ω c z + ω r 2 2 c R + l ϕ ( 2 p + | l | + 1 ) ζ ,

Metrics