Abstract

Er3+-doped transparent tellurite glass ceramics (GCs) containing PbTe3O7 nanocrystals were successfully prepared. The formation of PbTe3O7 nanocrystals was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). It can be deduced that Er3+ ions prefer to concentrate in the PbTe3O7 nanocrystals rather than in glass matrix. Intense 2.7 μm emission was achieved from Er3+-doped GCs upon excitation with a 980 nm LD. Besides, the present tellurite GC possesses large stimulated emission cross section (0.80 × 10−20 cm2) and a low pumping threshold around 2.7 μm indicating that the obtained GC might be an attractive candidate for mid-infrared laser or amplifier.

© 2016 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

In the past several decades, much attention has been paid on the development of mid-infrared (~3 μm) laser owing to its extensive applications such as medical surgery, remote sensing, light detection and ranging (LIDAR), and so forth [1–3]. Developing new materials for mid-infrared lasers operating in this wavelength region is becoming extremely urgent. It is known that two important factors, the active ions and the host materials, must be considered in developing more efficient optical devices based on rare-earth ions. Among various rare-earth ions, Ho3+, Dy3+, Er3+ can provide ~3 μm emission corresponding to 5I65I7, 6H13/26H15/2, 4I11/24I13/2 transition, respectively. Compared to Ho3+ or Dy3+, Er3+ is an ideal luminescent candidate, since Ho3+ and Dy3+ ions both lack an efficient, commonly commercial and high power excitation source, whereas the absorption bands of Er3+ ions match well with the commercially available and low-cost 808 nm or 980 nm laser diode (LD) [4–7]. The host materials for 2.7 μm emission which are expected to possess a minimal absorption coefficient in the typical H2O absorption band around 3 μm, low nonradiative decay rates as well as high radiative emission rates have been primarily focused on glasses [8–10] and single-crystals [11–13]. However, both materials have their own weaknesses. On one hand, glass exhibits weak crystal field, which results in high probability of nonradiative transition and weak emission of rare-earth ions. On the other hand, although with excellent luminescence performance, single-crystals are very difficult to prepare quality and long single crystal fibers. Glass ceramic (GC), combining the strong crystal field of nanocrystals and excellent fiber-drawing ability of glass matrix, is considered as a promising medium for Er3+-doped fiber to produce intense 2.7 μm emission. Recently, several efforts have been made on the synthesis and mid-infrared optical properties of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride GCs [14–16]. However, to our best knowledge, no any study about the 2.7 μm emission in Er3+-doped tellurite GCs is reported.

TeO2-based glasses are very interesting hosts due to their important properties that confer to these materials a large applicability in telecommunications, photonics, gas sensors, and so forth [17, 18]. It is known that tellurite glasses possess low phonon energy (~700 cm-1), large refractive index (~2.0), high transmittance in near to middle infrared regions, high solubility for rare earth ions and good chemical durability and thermal stability, etc. [19-22]. The low phonon energy decreases the multi-phonon relaxation and non-radiative decay rate, especially for the mid-infrared emission. The large refractive index enhances both the absorption and emission cross-section, and improves the refractive index match between nanocrystals and glass matrix. The good chemical durability and thermal stability result in good environmental adaptation. Although tellurite glasses possess so many excellent properties, there is no any publication about the mid-infrared emission of tellurite GCs. Therefore, we try to prepare and study the optical properties of tellurite GCs. According to previous research, TeO2, as a conditional glass former, requires the addition of other metal oxides to form stable glasses. In this view, PbO is an interesting component in glasses due to its dual characters: it functions as a network modifier at low concentrations when Pb-O is ionic, and it aids in glass network formation as a function of its increasing concentration owing to the formation of PbO4 structural units when Pb-O is covalent. It also results in a high capacity of vitrification and contributes to the further increase in the refractive index of modified tellurite glasses [23, 24].

Concerning all the reasons mentioned above, herein we choose TeO2–PbO–Er2O3 system as the precursor glass to prepare Er3+-doped tellurite GCs containing PbTe3O7 nanocrystals. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) characterizations of the GCs were used as combined techniques to understand the crystallization in this glass. Thereafter, we obtained intense 2.7 μm emission and discussed in detail the influence of the Er doping concentration and heat-treated temperature on the intensity of 2.7 μm emission. In addition, the absorption and emission cross-sections were calculated by using McCumber formula and Fuchtbauer-Ladenburg equation, respectively, and the gain cross section was obtained from absorption and emission cross-sections to survey the feasibility of the present tellurite GC as candidate for a new type of rare-earth-doped laser host material.

2. Experimental

Tellurite glasses with the composition of (75-x) TeO2–25 PbO–x Er2O3 (x = 1, 3, 5,) in mol% were prepared by the conventional melt-quenching method. The starting materials are anhydrous powders of TeO2 and Er2O3 with 5N purity, and PbO was introduced with 3N purity. Batches of 20 g were melted in covered corundum crucibles at 900°C for 30 min in an electrically heated furnace. Then melts were cast on a preheated copper plate, and the obtained glasses were cut to the size of 10 mm × 10 mm and heat-treated at 340°C-380°C for 8 h to achieve GCs. For further optical measurements, the samples were optically polished with a thickness of 1.5 mm.

XRD analysis was performed on a X’Pert PRO X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) radiation to identify the crystalline phase and estimate the nanocrystal grain size. High-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM, 2100F, JEOL, Japan) equipped with energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) system to analyze the microstructure and the elements distribution of GC samples. The absorption spectra were measured in the range of 500-3200 nm using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 900/UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer. The emission spectra in the range of 2500-2850 nm were recorded by a computer controlled Triax 320 type spectrofluorimeter (Jobin-Yvon Corp.) with a lock-in amplifier upon excitation of a 980 nm LD. All the measurements were carried out at room temperature.

3. Results and discussions

The XRD characterizations of the as-prepared glasses and GCs are shown in Fig. 1. Apparently, the XRD spectra recorded with as-prepared samples show no peaks of crystallization, exhibiting a typical amorphous structure. After a heat-treated process above 360°C for 8 h, strong diffraction peaks appear, which are assigned to the cubic phase PbTe3O7 (JCPDF: 37-1392). With the increase of heat-treated temperature, the diffraction peaks become more evident and sharper, which indicates crystalline size increases and grows gradually. When the heat-treated temperature is elevated to 380°C, another crystalline phase α-TeO2 occurs at 3% and 5% Er3+-doped GCs. However, compared with Fig. 1(a), when the amount of Er3+ reaches 3% and 5%, the diffraction peaks are much higher than that of 1% Er3+-doped tellurite glass matrix, even though the samples were heat-treated under the same temperature schedule. This phenomenon can also be explained by Fig. 1(d), which indicates the addition of Er3+ is beneficial to the PbTe3O7 nanocrystals growth in the glass matrix. Therefore, we can deduce that PbTe3O7 nanocrystals are probably nucleated on the surface of Er3+ ions as nucleating agent, which will be further confirmed by the following HRTEM and EDS results.

 

Fig. 1 (a)-(c) XRD patterns of 1%, 3%, 5% Er3+-doped as-prepared glasses and resulting GCs obtained by heat treatment at 340°C-380°C for 8 h. (d) XRD patterns of 1%, 3%, 5% Er3+-doped GCs heat-treated at 370°C for 8 h. The main crystalline phase is PbTe3O7, and the stark ‘*’ represents the TeO2 phase.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

From the peak width of XRD pattern, the crystalline size of PbTe3O7 crystals in the GCs can be estimated by using Scherrer’s equation:

D=Kλβcosθ
where D is the grain size of nanocrystals, K is a dimensionless shape factor, λ is the wavelength of X-ray, θ is the angle of diffraction peak, β is the full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak. The mean size of PbTe3O7 crystals lies in the range of about 8-30 nm for samples with different Er3+ doping level and heat-treated temperature. And the size of nanocrystals decreases when the Er3+ concentration increases under the same heat-treated temperature, reflecting the tendency to create more nuclei and thus more crystallites as the doping concentration rises. A larger number of nucleating agents being present, each of them will absorb fewer Te, Pb, and O elements, which will result in the smaller size and higher number density of PbTe3O7 nanocrystals. To conclude, a higher Er3+-doped concentration as nucleating agent is beneficial to the crystallization and corresponds to a smaller size of crystallite.

TEM permits the direct imaging of nanocrystals and provides information about their shape, size and size distribution. Figure 2(a) shows the TEM image of 5% Er3+-doped GC heat-treated at 360°C for 8h. It can be seen that the particles are quasi-spherical with an average size of ~14 nm, which is consistent with our calculated result based on the XRD data. The annular pattern appearing on the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) image, shown in Fig. 2(b), is another view of the crystallites in the glass. In Fig. 2(b), outward from the core, the diffraction rings can be indexed to the (111), (200), (220) and (311) plane diffraction of PbTe3O7 nanocrystal, respectively. The HRTEM image, as shown in Fig. 2(c), shows the resolved lattice fringes with a constant spacing of 0.33 nm, ascribing to the (111) plane of PbTe3O7 nanocrystal. To detect the distribution of Er3+ ions in the GCs, the EDS spectra taken from the nanocrystals-rich region and glass matrix are shown in Fig. 2(d). Te, O, Pb, and Er peaks are detected in the nanocrystals-rich region, while very weak Er signal are found in the glass matrix. These results indicate that Er3+ ions preferentially enter into the precipitated PbTe3O7 nanocrystals after crystallization. In addition, Er3+ ions also probably act as the nucleation centers of PbTe3O7 nanocrystals and enrich in the nanocrystals. The two-dimensional mapping distribution of Te, O, Pb, and Er image, illustrated in Fig. 2(e)-2(h), shows that the distribution region of Te, O, Pb, and Er are almost overlapping, which further confirms that Er3+ ions enrich in the precipitated PbTe3O7 nanocrystals.

 

Fig. 2 (a) TEM micrograph, (b) the corresponding SAED pattern, and (c) HRTEM image, (d) EDS spectra of 5% Er3+-doped GC sample heat-treated at 360°C for 8 h. (e)-(h) the two-dimensional mapping distribution images of Te, O, Pb, Er elements, respectively. The circle 1 and circle 2 in figure (a) indicate the nanocrystals-rich region and glass matrix, separately.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The absorption spectra of 3% Er3+-doped tellurite glass and GC heat-treated at 370°C in the range from 500 to 3200 nm are shown in Fig. 3(a). Five absorption bands at 520 nm, 652 nm, 800 nm, 975 nm and 1532 nm are found and attributed to the transitions of Er3+ ions from the ground state 4I15/2 to the excited states 2H11/2, 4F9/2, 4I9/2, 4I11/2 and 4I13/2 respectively. The baseline of the absorption curve becomes precipitous toward to the short wavelength region when the temperature reaches 370°C. It can be ascribed to the transmittance loss causing by the Rayleigh scatting effect, which is resulted from the growth of PbTe3O7 crystallite. Figure 3(b-d) show the absorption spectra of the glass doped with different amounts of Er3+ heat-treated at 360°C, 370°C, and 380°C, respectively. From the figures it can be easily found that the absorption intensifies with the increase of Er3+-doped concentration by virtue of the incorporation of more Er3+ ions into the PbTe3O7 nanocrystals. The inset of Fig. 3(a) shows the transmittance spectra of 3% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass. The maximum transmittance around 3 μm due to the stretching vibrations of -OH group is ~70%. Further reduction of -OH contamination can be accomplished via purification during glass melting.

 

Fig. 3 . (a) Absorption spectra of 3% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass and GC heat-treated at 370°C for 8 h. (b)-(d) Absorption spectra of Er3+-doped GCs heat-treated at 360°C, 370°C, and 380°C for 8 h with the Er3+ concentration of 1%, 3%, and 5%. The inset in figure (a) shows the transmittance spectra of 3% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Based on the absorption spectra, the Judd–Ofelt intensity parameters Ωλ (λ = 2, 4, 6) can be determined and their values indicate the variation of the Er3+ environment from glass to GCs. The calculated Judd–Ofelt intensity parameters are presented in Table 1 . According to Judd-Ofelt theory, Ω2 is sensitive to the environmental configuration symmetry of rare earth ions, and it decreases with the host changing from glass to GCs. The gradual decrease of Ω2 value with the increase of heat-treated temperature indicates Er3+ ions are successfully incorporated into PbTe3O7 nanocrystals. On the other hand, the value of Ω6, which is proportional to the rigidity of the host, increases with the increase of heat-treated temperature manifesting the mechanical properties of samples are improved gradually [25].

Tables Icon

Table 1. J–O intensity parameters of Er3+ in 3% Er3+-doped samples

To investigate the mid-infrared 2.7 μm emission characteristics of the Er3+-doped tellurite glasses and GCs, the emission spectra of the samples under a 980 nm LD excitation are shown in Fig. 4. Figure 4(b) shows the 2.7 μm emission spectra of 3% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass and GCs heat-treated at different temperature for 8 h. Obvious emission band centered at 2.7 μm corresponding to Er3+: 4I11/24I13/2 transition can be observed. For all samples, the locations of the emission peak are fixed, but the intensities of 2.7 μm emission peak vary to great extent. Weak 2.7 μm emission is found in the as-prepared glass. However, with the increase of heat-treated temperature, intense 2.7 μm emission of Er3+ ions can be observed in the GCs, indicating the enhancement of 2.7 μm emission originated mainly from the Er3+ ions in PbTe3O7 nanocrystals. It is well known that the intensity of 2.7 μm emission is sensitive to the crystal field effect which depends on the crystallinity of their matrix. According to the XRD pattern, the higher the heat-treated temperature is, the better the crystallinity of host matrix is, inducing the enhancement the crystal field effect. Due to the intensification of crystal field effect, the 2.7 μm emission of Er3+ in the PbTe3O7 nanocrystals will be stronger than that in the as-prepared glass. As a result, the 2.7 μm emission intensity of the GCs increased significantly with the increasing crystallization temperature.

 

Fig. 4 2.7 μm mid-infrared emission spectra of (a) 1% Er3+, (b) 3% Er3+, and (c) 5% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass and GCs heat-treated at different temperature for 8 h pumped by a 980 nm LD.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Figures 4(a) and 4(c) show the 2.7 μm emission spectra of 1% and 5% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass and GCs heat-treated at different temperature for 8 h, respectively. It is found that with the Er3+ concentration increasing from 1 to 5 mol %, the 2.7 μm emission intensity increases when the temperature is below 350°C. It could be ascribed to the addition of Er3+ will increase both the luminescence activators and the number density of PbTe3O7 nanocrystals. However, when the temperature reaches above 370°C, the 2.7 μm emission intensity of 3% Er3+-doped GC is much stronger than that of 5% Er3+-doped GC, which is probably due to the concentration quenching effect. According to the previous results, the Er3+ ions preferentially enter into the precipitated PbTe3O7 nanocrystals after crystallization at higher temperature leading to a much higher concentration of Er3+ ions in PbTe3O7 nanocrystals higher than 5 mol%, and thus inducing the concentration quenching effect. In this factor, the probability of energy migration among Er3+ ions increases with the increase of Er3+ concentration resulting in their higher accessibility to the OH- quenching center. Therefore, the 2.7 μm emission intensity decreases. Based on the above results, it can be concluded that tellurite glass doped with 3% Er3+ and heat-treated above 370°C is the optimal condition to produce an intensive 2.7 μm emission in Er3+-doped GCs.

Fluorescence lifetime is an important parameter to estimate the emission properties of the excited level. The lifetimes of Er3+: 4I11/2 level (980 nm) and 4I13/2 level (1530 nm) excited by 808 and 980 nm LD shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b) exhibit as a function of the heat-treated temperature. With the increase of heat treatment temperature, the lifetime of 4I11/2 and 4I13/2 level increases from 0.20 to 1.08 ms and from 1.04 to 3.89 ms, respectively. These results indicate that more Er3+ ions have entered into PbTe3O7 nanocrystals and the nonraditive relaxation probability decreased by increasing the heat treatment temperature.

 

Fig. 5 (a) and (b) Fluorescence decay curves of Er3+: 4I11/2 and Er3+: 4I13/2 level pumped by 808 and 980 nm pulsed LD, respectively, in 3% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass and GCs heat-treated at 340°C-380°C for 8 h; (c) and (d) Er3+-doped concentrations and heat treatment temperature v.s. the lifetime of Er3+: 4I11/2 and Er3+: 4I13/2 level, respectively.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Figures 5(c) and 5(d) show the contrast of lifetime at 4I11/2 and 4I13/2 level produced by Er3+-doped glasses with different heat treatment temperature and Er3+-doped concentrations. It is observed that with the increase of Er3+-doped concentration from 1 to 5 mol %, the lifetimes of 4I13/2 levels decreases. As we know, shorter lifetimes of 4I13/2 level are beneficial to the population inversion between upper 4I11/2 level and lower 4I13/2 level and can improve 2.7 μm emission. Hence, it is expected that 2.7 μm emission can be enhanced. However, when the temperature reaches above 360°C, the lifetimes of 4I11/2 levels in 5% Er3+-doped GCs are shorter than that of 3% Er3+-doped GCs and the 2.7 μm emission intensity of 5% Er3+-doped GCs is much weaker than that of 3% Er3+-doped GCs, which is probably attributed to the concentration quenching effect.

It is widely acknowledged that both absorption cross section and emission cross section are very important factors to obtain efficient laser output. The larger their values are, the more efficiently laser generate. On the basis of discussion above, it can be concluded that tellurite glass doped with 3% Er3+ and heat-treated above 370°C possesses optimal luminescence properties. Herein, by selecting the GC sample doped with 3% Er3+ and heat-treated at 380°C, the absorption and emission cross sections were calculated to further estimate its possibility as mid-infrared laser gain material. The emission cross section (σem) can be calculated from the emission spectra by Fuchtbauer-Ladenburg equation [26]

σem(λ)=λ5AradI(λ)8πcn2λI(λ)dλ
where λ is the wavelength, Arad (42.1 s-1) is the spontaneous transition probability, I(λ) is the intensity of emission spectra, and n and c are the refractive index and light speed in vacuum respectively.

The absorption cross section (σabs) was calculated from the emission cross section by using McCumber formula equation [27]

σem(λ)=σabs(λ)(Zl/Zu)exp[(εhv)/KT]
where σabs(λ) is the absorption cross section, ɛ is the net free energy demanded to excite one Er3+ from the 4I13/2 to 4I11/2 state at the temperature of T, Zl and ZU are the partition functions for the upper and lower multiplets, respectively, h is Planck’s constant, and K is the Boltzmann constant. Combining Eq. (2) and (3), the absorption (σabs) and emission cross sections (σem) at 2.7 μm have been calculated and displayed in Fig. 6(a). It can be obtained that the peak absorption and emission cross sections of the present sample are 0.78 × 10-20 cm2 and 0.80 × 10-20 cm2, respectively. Higher emission cross section is extremely useful for better laser actions. It is found that the obtained σem for present sample is higher than those of ZBLAN (0.54 × 10-20 cm2) [28], chalcohalide (0.66 × 10-20 cm2) [29] glass and YAG crystal (0.45 × 10-20 cm2) [30]. The above results indicated that the present GC is an attractive candidate for 2.7 μm laser or amplifier.

 

Fig. 6 (a) Absorption and stimulated emission cross sections, and (b) gain cross sections at 2.7 μm in 3% Er3+-doped GC heat-treated at 380°C for 8 h.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Besides, the gain cross section (G) was calculated derived from (σabs) and (σem) to evaluate the mid-infrared gain properties. The room temperature gain cross section can be simply evaluated by [31]

G(λ,P)=Pσem(λ)(1P)σabs(λ)
where P is the population inversion given by the ratio between the population of Er3+: 4I11/2 level and the total Er3+ concentration. Figure 6(b) displays the gain cross sections for 2.7 μm mid-infrared transition of Er3+, while P value varies from 0 to 1 with an increasing step of 0.1. We observe that the gain becomes positive when P is more than 0.5, which implies that a low pumping threshold can be achieved for the Er3+: 4I11/24I13/2 laser operation.

4. Conclusion

In this work, Er3+-doped transparent tellurite GCs containing PbTe3O7 nanocrystals have been prepared. The XRD and TEM results confirmed that PbTe3O7 nanocrystals were precipitated in the glass matrix with a significant number of Er3+ ions incorporated after a proper heat-treatment. Owing to the weak absorption band around 3 μm and efficient crystal field, an intense 2.7 μm emission of Er3+: 4I11/24I13/2 transition was observed in the transparent GCs compared to that of as-prepared glasses and the optimal condition for 2.7 μm emission is 3% Er3+-doped tellurite glass heat-treated above 370°C. Furthermore, the prepared tellurite GC possesses high stimulated emission cross section (0.80 × 10-20 cm2) and a low pumping threshold, which endows its potential applications in mid-infrared laser or amplifier.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61475047, 51302086); Guangdong Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (2014A030306045); Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou (2014J2200083); West Light Foundation from Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) of China, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2015PT021).

References and links

1. A. Zajac, M. Skorczakowski, J. Swiderski, and P. Nyga, “Electrooptically Q-switched mid-infrared Er:YAG laser for medical applications,” Opt. Express 12(21), 5125–5130 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. S. D. Jackson, T. A. King, and M. Pollnau, “Diode-pumped 1.7-W erbium 3-µm fiber laser,” Opt. Lett. 24(16), 1133–1135 (1999). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996). [CrossRef]  

4. M. Eichhorn, “Quasi-three-level solid-state lasers in the near and mid infrared based on trivalent rare earth ions,” Appl. Phys. B 93(2-3), 269–316 (2008). [CrossRef]  

5. F. Huang, X. Liu, L. Hu, and D. Chen, “Spectroscopic properties and energy transfer parameters of Er3+-doped fluorozirconate and oxyfluoroaluminate glasses,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5053 (2014). [PubMed]  

6. S. Tokita, M. Murakami, S. Shimizu, M. Hashida, and S. Sakabe, “12 W Q-switched Er:ZBLAN fiber laser at 2.8 μm,” Opt. Lett. 36(15), 2812–2814 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. E. Arbabzadah, S. Chard, H. Amrania, C. Phillips, and M. Damzen, “Comparison of a diode pumped Er:YSGG and Er:YAG laser in the bounce geometry at the 3 μm transition,” Opt. Express 19(27), 25860–25865 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014). [CrossRef]  

9. Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014). [CrossRef]  

10. Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013). [CrossRef]  

11. G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012). [CrossRef]  

12. G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014). [CrossRef]  

14. G. Wu, S. Fan, Y. Zhang, G. Chai, Z. Ma, M. Peng, J. Qiu, and G. Dong, “2.7 μm emission in Er3+:CaF2 nanocrystals embedded oxyfluoride glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 38(16), 3071–3074 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006). [CrossRef]  

16. M. Mortier, P. Goldner, C. Chateau, and M. Genotelle, “Erbium doped glass-ceramics: concentration effect on crystal structure and energy transfer between active ions,” J. Alloys Compd. 323–324, 245–249 (2001). [CrossRef]  

17. C. Duverger, M. Bouazaoui, and S. Turrell, “Raman spectroscopic investigations of the effect of the doping metal on the structure of binary tellurium-oxide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 220(2-3), 169–177 (1997). [CrossRef]  

18. K. F. Li, G. Zhang, L. L. Hu, M. Wang, and D. P. Chen, “~2.1 μm Tm3+-Ho3+ co-doped tungsten tellurite single mode fiber laser,” Proc. Of SPIE. 8257, 0A (2012).

19. R. Jose and Y. Ohishi, “Higher Nonlinear Indices, Raman Gain Coefficients, and Bandwidths in the TeO2–ZnO–Nb2O5–MoO3 Quaternary Glass System,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(21), 211104 (2007). [CrossRef]  

20. I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, and C. Barthou, “Judd-Ofelt analysis and improvement of thermal and optical properties of tellurite glasses by adding P2O5,” J. Lumin. 130(12), 2394–2401 (2010). [CrossRef]  

21. K. Li, G. Zhang, and L. Hu, “Watt-level ~2 μm laser output in Tm3+-doped tungsten tellurite glass double-cladding fiber,” Opt. Lett. 35(24), 4136–4138 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. J. S. Wang, E. M. Vogel, and E. Snitzer, “Determination of thermal diffusion constant [J],” Opt. Mater. 3, 187 (1994). [CrossRef]  

23. H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992). [CrossRef]  

24. V. Ravi Kumar and N. Veeraiah, “Infrared spectral investigations on ZnF2-PbO-TeO2 glasses,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16(22), 1816–1818 (1997). [CrossRef]  

25. F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015). [CrossRef]  

26. T. Schweizer, D. W. Hewak, B. N. Samson, and D. N. Payne, “Spectroscopic data of the 1.8-, 2.9-, and 4.3-microm transitions in dysprosium-doped gallium lanthanum sulfide glass,” Opt. Lett. 21(19), 1594–1596 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. D. E. McCumber, “Einstein Relations Connecting Broadband Emission and Absorption Spectra,” Phys. Rev. 136(4A), A954–A957 (1964). [CrossRef]  

28. B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009). [CrossRef]  

29. H. Lin, D. Chen, Y. Yu, A. Yang, and Y. Wang, “Enhanced mid-infrared emissions of Er3+ at 2.7 μm via Nd3+ sensitization in chalcohalide glass,” Opt. Lett. 36(10), 1815–1817 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. J. Koetke and G. Huber, “Infrared excited-state absorption and stimulated-emission cross sections of Er3+-doped crystals,” Appl. Phys. B 61(2), 151–158 (1995). [CrossRef]  

31. X. Zou and T. Izumitani, “Spectroscopic properties and mechanisms of excited state absorption and energy transfer upconversion for Er3+-doped glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162(1-2), 68–80 (1993). [CrossRef]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. A. Zajac, M. Skorczakowski, J. Swiderski, and P. Nyga, “Electrooptically Q-switched mid-infrared Er:YAG laser for medical applications,” Opt. Express 12(21), 5125–5130 (2004).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. S. D. Jackson, T. A. King, and M. Pollnau, “Diode-pumped 1.7-W erbium 3-µm fiber laser,” Opt. Lett. 24(16), 1133–1135 (1999).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
    [Crossref]
  4. M. Eichhorn, “Quasi-three-level solid-state lasers in the near and mid infrared based on trivalent rare earth ions,” Appl. Phys. B 93(2-3), 269–316 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  5. F. Huang, X. Liu, L. Hu, and D. Chen, “Spectroscopic properties and energy transfer parameters of Er3+-doped fluorozirconate and oxyfluoroaluminate glasses,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5053 (2014).
    [PubMed]
  6. S. Tokita, M. Murakami, S. Shimizu, M. Hashida, and S. Sakabe, “12 W Q-switched Er:ZBLAN fiber laser at 2.8 μm,” Opt. Lett. 36(15), 2812–2814 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. E. Arbabzadah, S. Chard, H. Amrania, C. Phillips, and M. Damzen, “Comparison of a diode pumped Er:YSGG and Er:YAG laser in the bounce geometry at the 3 μm transition,” Opt. Express 19(27), 25860–25865 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
    [Crossref]
  9. Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014).
    [Crossref]
  10. Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013).
    [Crossref]
  11. G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012).
    [Crossref]
  12. G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
    [Crossref]
  14. G. Wu, S. Fan, Y. Zhang, G. Chai, Z. Ma, M. Peng, J. Qiu, and G. Dong, “2.7 μm emission in Er3+:CaF2 nanocrystals embedded oxyfluoride glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 38(16), 3071–3074 (2013).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  16. M. Mortier, P. Goldner, C. Chateau, and M. Genotelle, “Erbium doped glass-ceramics: concentration effect on crystal structure and energy transfer between active ions,” J. Alloys Compd. 323–324, 245–249 (2001).
    [Crossref]
  17. C. Duverger, M. Bouazaoui, and S. Turrell, “Raman spectroscopic investigations of the effect of the doping metal on the structure of binary tellurium-oxide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 220(2-3), 169–177 (1997).
    [Crossref]
  18. K. F. Li, G. Zhang, L. L. Hu, M. Wang, and D. P. Chen, “~2.1 μm Tm3+-Ho3+ co-doped tungsten tellurite single mode fiber laser,” Proc. Of SPIE. 8257, 0A (2012).
  19. R. Jose and Y. Ohishi, “Higher Nonlinear Indices, Raman Gain Coefficients, and Bandwidths in the TeO2–ZnO–Nb2O5–MoO3 Quaternary Glass System,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(21), 211104 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  20. I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, and C. Barthou, “Judd-Ofelt analysis and improvement of thermal and optical properties of tellurite glasses by adding P2O5,” J. Lumin. 130(12), 2394–2401 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  21. K. Li, G. Zhang, and L. Hu, “Watt-level ~2 μm laser output in Tm3+-doped tungsten tellurite glass double-cladding fiber,” Opt. Lett. 35(24), 4136–4138 (2010).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. J. S. Wang, E. M. Vogel, and E. Snitzer, “Determination of thermal diffusion constant [J],” Opt. Mater. 3, 187 (1994).
    [Crossref]
  23. H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992).
    [Crossref]
  24. V. Ravi Kumar and N. Veeraiah, “Infrared spectral investigations on ZnF2-PbO-TeO2 glasses,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16(22), 1816–1818 (1997).
    [Crossref]
  25. F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
    [Crossref]
  26. T. Schweizer, D. W. Hewak, B. N. Samson, and D. N. Payne, “Spectroscopic data of the 1.8-, 2.9-, and 4.3-microm transitions in dysprosium-doped gallium lanthanum sulfide glass,” Opt. Lett. 21(19), 1594–1596 (1996).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. D. E. McCumber, “Einstein Relations Connecting Broadband Emission and Absorption Spectra,” Phys. Rev. 136(4A), A954–A957 (1964).
    [Crossref]
  28. B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
    [Crossref]
  29. H. Lin, D. Chen, Y. Yu, A. Yang, and Y. Wang, “Enhanced mid-infrared emissions of Er3+ at 2.7 μm via Nd3+ sensitization in chalcohalide glass,” Opt. Lett. 36(10), 1815–1817 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  30. J. Koetke and G. Huber, “Infrared excited-state absorption and stimulated-emission cross sections of Er3+-doped crystals,” Appl. Phys. B 61(2), 151–158 (1995).
    [Crossref]
  31. X. Zou and T. Izumitani, “Spectroscopic properties and mechanisms of excited state absorption and energy transfer upconversion for Er3+-doped glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162(1-2), 68–80 (1993).
    [Crossref]

2015 (1)

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

2014 (4)

F. Huang, X. Liu, L. Hu, and D. Chen, “Spectroscopic properties and energy transfer parameters of Er3+-doped fluorozirconate and oxyfluoroaluminate glasses,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5053 (2014).
[PubMed]

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014).
[Crossref]

F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
[Crossref]

2013 (3)

G. Wu, S. Fan, Y. Zhang, G. Chai, Z. Ma, M. Peng, J. Qiu, and G. Dong, “2.7 μm emission in Er3+:CaF2 nanocrystals embedded oxyfluoride glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 38(16), 3071–3074 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013).
[Crossref]

G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2012 (1)

G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012).
[Crossref]

2011 (3)

2010 (2)

I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, and C. Barthou, “Judd-Ofelt analysis and improvement of thermal and optical properties of tellurite glasses by adding P2O5,” J. Lumin. 130(12), 2394–2401 (2010).
[Crossref]

K. Li, G. Zhang, and L. Hu, “Watt-level ~2 μm laser output in Tm3+-doped tungsten tellurite glass double-cladding fiber,” Opt. Lett. 35(24), 4136–4138 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

2009 (1)

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

2008 (1)

M. Eichhorn, “Quasi-three-level solid-state lasers in the near and mid infrared based on trivalent rare earth ions,” Appl. Phys. B 93(2-3), 269–316 (2008).
[Crossref]

2007 (1)

R. Jose and Y. Ohishi, “Higher Nonlinear Indices, Raman Gain Coefficients, and Bandwidths in the TeO2–ZnO–Nb2O5–MoO3 Quaternary Glass System,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(21), 211104 (2007).
[Crossref]

2006 (1)

V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006).
[Crossref]

2004 (1)

2001 (1)

M. Mortier, P. Goldner, C. Chateau, and M. Genotelle, “Erbium doped glass-ceramics: concentration effect on crystal structure and energy transfer between active ions,” J. Alloys Compd. 323–324, 245–249 (2001).
[Crossref]

1999 (1)

1997 (2)

C. Duverger, M. Bouazaoui, and S. Turrell, “Raman spectroscopic investigations of the effect of the doping metal on the structure of binary tellurium-oxide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 220(2-3), 169–177 (1997).
[Crossref]

V. Ravi Kumar and N. Veeraiah, “Infrared spectral investigations on ZnF2-PbO-TeO2 glasses,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16(22), 1816–1818 (1997).
[Crossref]

1996 (2)

T. Schweizer, D. W. Hewak, B. N. Samson, and D. N. Payne, “Spectroscopic data of the 1.8-, 2.9-, and 4.3-microm transitions in dysprosium-doped gallium lanthanum sulfide glass,” Opt. Lett. 21(19), 1594–1596 (1996).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
[Crossref]

1995 (1)

J. Koetke and G. Huber, “Infrared excited-state absorption and stimulated-emission cross sections of Er3+-doped crystals,” Appl. Phys. B 61(2), 151–158 (1995).
[Crossref]

1994 (1)

J. S. Wang, E. M. Vogel, and E. Snitzer, “Determination of thermal diffusion constant [J],” Opt. Mater. 3, 187 (1994).
[Crossref]

1993 (1)

X. Zou and T. Izumitani, “Spectroscopic properties and mechanisms of excited state absorption and energy transfer upconversion for Er3+-doped glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162(1-2), 68–80 (1993).
[Crossref]

1992 (1)

H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992).
[Crossref]

1964 (1)

D. E. McCumber, “Einstein Relations Connecting Broadband Emission and Absorption Spectra,” Phys. Rev. 136(4A), A954–A957 (1964).
[Crossref]

Amrania, H.

Arbabzadah, E.

Barthou, C.

I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, and C. Barthou, “Judd-Ofelt analysis and improvement of thermal and optical properties of tellurite glasses by adding P2O5,” J. Lumin. 130(12), 2394–2401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Bi, Z.

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

Bouazaoui, M.

C. Duverger, M. Bouazaoui, and S. Turrell, “Raman spectroscopic investigations of the effect of the doping metal on the structure of binary tellurium-oxide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 220(2-3), 169–177 (1997).
[Crossref]

Chai, G.

G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

G. Wu, S. Fan, Y. Zhang, G. Chai, Z. Ma, M. Peng, J. Qiu, and G. Dong, “2.7 μm emission in Er3+:CaF2 nanocrystals embedded oxyfluoride glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 38(16), 3071–3074 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Chai, G. Q.

G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012).
[Crossref]

Chard, S.

Chateau, C.

M. Mortier, P. Goldner, C. Chateau, and M. Genotelle, “Erbium doped glass-ceramics: concentration effect on crystal structure and energy transfer between active ions,” J. Alloys Compd. 323–324, 245–249 (2001).
[Crossref]

Chen, B.

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

Chen, B. J.

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

Chen, D.

F. Huang, X. Liu, L. Hu, and D. Chen, “Spectroscopic properties and energy transfer parameters of Er3+-doped fluorozirconate and oxyfluoroaluminate glasses,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5053 (2014).
[PubMed]

H. Lin, D. Chen, Y. Yu, A. Yang, and Y. Wang, “Enhanced mid-infrared emissions of Er3+ at 2.7 μm via Nd3+ sensitization in chalcohalide glass,” Opt. Lett. 36(10), 1815–1817 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Chen, D. P.

F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
[Crossref]

Chen, J.

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

Cheng, L. H.

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

Damzen, M.

Dong, G.

G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

G. Wu, S. Fan, Y. Zhang, G. Chai, Z. Ma, M. Peng, J. Qiu, and G. Dong, “2.7 μm emission in Er3+:CaF2 nanocrystals embedded oxyfluoride glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 38(16), 3071–3074 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Dong, G. P.

G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012).
[Crossref]

Duverger, C.

C. Duverger, M. Bouazaoui, and S. Turrell, “Raman spectroscopic investigations of the effect of the doping metal on the structure of binary tellurium-oxide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 220(2-3), 169–177 (1997).
[Crossref]

Eichhorn, M.

M. Eichhorn, “Quasi-three-level solid-state lasers in the near and mid infrared based on trivalent rare earth ions,” Appl. Phys. B 93(2-3), 269–316 (2008).
[Crossref]

Elhouichet, H.

I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, and C. Barthou, “Judd-Ofelt analysis and improvement of thermal and optical properties of tellurite glasses by adding P2O5,” J. Lumin. 130(12), 2394–2401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Fan, S.

Ferid, M.

I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, and C. Barthou, “Judd-Ofelt analysis and improvement of thermal and optical properties of tellurite glasses by adding P2O5,” J. Lumin. 130(12), 2394–2401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Frenz, M.

M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
[Crossref]

Furniss, D.

V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006).
[Crossref]

Genotelle, M.

M. Mortier, P. Goldner, C. Chateau, and M. Genotelle, “Erbium doped glass-ceramics: concentration effect on crystal structure and energy transfer between active ions,” J. Alloys Compd. 323–324, 245–249 (2001).
[Crossref]

Goldner, P.

M. Mortier, P. Goldner, C. Chateau, and M. Genotelle, “Erbium doped glass-ceramics: concentration effect on crystal structure and energy transfer between active ions,” J. Alloys Compd. 323–324, 245–249 (2001).
[Crossref]

Guo, Y.

Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014).
[Crossref]

Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013).
[Crossref]

Hashida, M.

He, J.

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Hewak, D. W.

Hu, L.

Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014).
[Crossref]

F. Huang, X. Liu, L. Hu, and D. Chen, “Spectroscopic properties and energy transfer parameters of Er3+-doped fluorozirconate and oxyfluoroaluminate glasses,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5053 (2014).
[PubMed]

Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013).
[Crossref]

K. Li, G. Zhang, and L. Hu, “Watt-level ~2 μm laser output in Tm3+-doped tungsten tellurite glass double-cladding fiber,” Opt. Lett. 35(24), 4136–4138 (2010).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Hu, L. L.

F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
[Crossref]

Huang, A.

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

Huang, F.

Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014).
[Crossref]

F. Huang, X. Liu, L. Hu, and D. Chen, “Spectroscopic properties and energy transfer parameters of Er3+-doped fluorozirconate and oxyfluoroaluminate glasses,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5053 (2014).
[PubMed]

Huang, F. F.

F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
[Crossref]

Huber, G.

J. Koetke and G. Huber, “Infrared excited-state absorption and stimulated-emission cross sections of Er3+-doped crystals,” Appl. Phys. B 61(2), 151–158 (1995).
[Crossref]

Izumitani, T.

X. Zou and T. Izumitani, “Spectroscopic properties and mechanisms of excited state absorption and energy transfer upconversion for Er3+-doped glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162(1-2), 68–80 (1993).
[Crossref]

Jackson, S. D.

Jansen, E. D.

M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
[Crossref]

Jlassi, I.

I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, and C. Barthou, “Judd-Ofelt analysis and improvement of thermal and optical properties of tellurite glasses by adding P2O5,” J. Lumin. 130(12), 2394–2401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Jose, R.

R. Jose and Y. Ohishi, “Higher Nonlinear Indices, Raman Gain Coefficients, and Bandwidths in the TeO2–ZnO–Nb2O5–MoO3 Quaternary Glass System,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(21), 211104 (2007).
[Crossref]

Kamiya, K.

H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992).
[Crossref]

Kanbara, H.

H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992).
[Crossref]

King, T. A.

Koetke, J.

J. Koetke and G. Huber, “Infrared excited-state absorption and stimulated-emission cross sections of Er3+-doped crystals,” Appl. Phys. B 61(2), 151–158 (1995).
[Crossref]

Konz, F.

M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
[Crossref]

Kubodera, K.

H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992).
[Crossref]

Li, K.

Li, L.

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Li, X.

F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
[Crossref]

Lin, A.

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Lin, H.

Liu, X.

F. Huang, X. Liu, L. Hu, and D. Chen, “Spectroscopic properties and energy transfer parameters of Er3+-doped fluorozirconate and oxyfluoroaluminate glasses,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5053 (2014).
[PubMed]

Liu, X. Q.

F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
[Crossref]

Ma, Y.

Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014).
[Crossref]

Ma, Z.

McCumber, D. E.

D. E. McCumber, “Einstein Relations Connecting Broadband Emission and Absorption Spectra,” Phys. Rev. 136(4A), A954–A957 (1964).
[Crossref]

Mendez-Ramos, J.

V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006).
[Crossref]

Mortier, M.

M. Mortier, P. Goldner, C. Chateau, and M. Genotelle, “Erbium doped glass-ceramics: concentration effect on crystal structure and energy transfer between active ions,” J. Alloys Compd. 323–324, 245–249 (2001).
[Crossref]

Murakami, M.

Nasu, H.

H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992).
[Crossref]

Nyga, P.

Ohishi, Y.

R. Jose and Y. Ohishi, “Higher Nonlinear Indices, Raman Gain Coefficients, and Bandwidths in the TeO2–ZnO–Nb2O5–MoO3 Quaternary Glass System,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(21), 211104 (2007).
[Crossref]

Payne, D. N.

Peng, M.

Phillips, C.

Pollnau, M.

Pratisto, H.

M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
[Crossref]

Qiu, J.

G. Wu, S. Fan, Y. Zhang, G. Chai, Z. Ma, M. Peng, J. Qiu, and G. Dong, “2.7 μm emission in Er3+:CaF2 nanocrystals embedded oxyfluoride glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 38(16), 3071–3074 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Qiu, J. R.

G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012).
[Crossref]

Ravi Kumar, V.

V. Ravi Kumar and N. Veeraiah, “Infrared spectral investigations on ZnF2-PbO-TeO2 glasses,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16(22), 1816–1818 (1997).
[Crossref]

Rodriguez, V. D.

V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006).
[Crossref]

Sakabe, S.

Samson, B. N.

Schweizer, T.

Seddon, A. B.

V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006).
[Crossref]

Shi, T.

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Shimizu, S.

Skorczakowski, M.

Snitzer, E.

J. S. Wang, E. M. Vogel, and E. Snitzer, “Determination of thermal diffusion constant [J],” Opt. Mater. 3, 187 (1994).
[Crossref]

Sun, J. S.

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

Swiderski, J.

Tian, Y.

Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013).
[Crossref]

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

Tikhomirov, V. K.

V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006).
[Crossref]

Tokita, S.

Turrell, S.

C. Duverger, M. Bouazaoui, and S. Turrell, “Raman spectroscopic investigations of the effect of the doping metal on the structure of binary tellurium-oxide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 220(2-3), 169–177 (1997).
[Crossref]

Uchigaki, T.

H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992).
[Crossref]

Veeraiah, N.

V. Ravi Kumar and N. Veeraiah, “Infrared spectral investigations on ZnF2-PbO-TeO2 glasses,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16(22), 1816–1818 (1997).
[Crossref]

Vogel, E. M.

J. S. Wang, E. M. Vogel, and E. Snitzer, “Determination of thermal diffusion constant [J],” Opt. Mater. 3, 187 (1994).
[Crossref]

Wang, B.

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

Wang, J. S.

J. S. Wang, E. M. Vogel, and E. Snitzer, “Determination of thermal diffusion constant [J],” Opt. Mater. 3, 187 (1994).
[Crossref]

Wang, Y.

Weber, H. P.

M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
[Crossref]

Welch, A. J.

M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
[Crossref]

Wu, G.

Xiao, Z.

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

Xusheng, X. J. S.

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Yang, A.

Yang, Z.

G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Yang, Z. M.

G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012).
[Crossref]

Yu, Y.

Zajac, A.

Zhan, H.

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Zhang, A.

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Zhang, F.

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

Zhang, G.

Zhang, J.

Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014).
[Crossref]

Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013).
[Crossref]

Zhang, J. J.

F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
[Crossref]

Zhang, L.

Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013).
[Crossref]

Zhang, Q.

G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Zhang, Q. Y.

G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012).
[Crossref]

Zhang, X. Q.

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

Zhang, Y.

Zhong, H. Y.

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

Zhou, Z.

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

Zhu, Y.

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

Zou, X.

X. Zou and T. Izumitani, “Spectroscopic properties and mechanisms of excited state absorption and energy transfer upconversion for Er3+-doped glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162(1-2), 68–80 (1993).
[Crossref]

Appl. Phys. B (2)

M. Eichhorn, “Quasi-three-level solid-state lasers in the near and mid infrared based on trivalent rare earth ions,” Appl. Phys. B 93(2-3), 269–316 (2008).
[Crossref]

J. Koetke and G. Huber, “Infrared excited-state absorption and stimulated-emission cross sections of Er3+-doped crystals,” Appl. Phys. B 61(2), 151–158 (1995).
[Crossref]

Appl. Phys. Lett. (1)

R. Jose and Y. Ohishi, “Higher Nonlinear Indices, Raman Gain Coefficients, and Bandwidths in the TeO2–ZnO–Nb2O5–MoO3 Quaternary Glass System,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(21), 211104 (2007).
[Crossref]

IEEE J. Quantum Electron. (1)

M. Frenz, H. Pratisto, F. Konz, E. D. Jansen, A. J. Welch, and H. P. Weber, “Comparison of the effects of absorption coefficient and pulse duration of 2.12 μm and 2.79 μm radiation on laser ablation of tissue,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32(12), 2025–2036 (1996).
[Crossref]

J. Alloys Compd. (3)

M. Mortier, P. Goldner, C. Chateau, and M. Genotelle, “Erbium doped glass-ceramics: concentration effect on crystal structure and energy transfer between active ions,” J. Alloys Compd. 323–324, 245–249 (2001).
[Crossref]

H. Zhan, A. Zhang, J. He, Z. Zhou, L. Li, T. Shi, X. J. S. Xusheng, and A. Lin, “Enhanced 2.7 μm emission of Er/Pr-codoped water-free fluorotellurite glasses,” J. Alloys Compd. 582, 742–746 (2014).
[Crossref]

F. Zhang, Z. Bi, J. Chen, A. Huang, Y. Zhu, B. Chen, and Z. Xiao, “Spectroscopic investigation of Er3+ in fluorotellurite glasses for 2.7 μm luminescence,” J. Alloys Compd. 649, 1191–1196 (2015).
[Crossref]

J. Lumin. (2)

I. Jlassi, H. Elhouichet, M. Ferid, and C. Barthou, “Judd-Ofelt analysis and improvement of thermal and optical properties of tellurite glasses by adding P2O5,” J. Lumin. 130(12), 2394–2401 (2010).
[Crossref]

Y. Ma, Y. Guo, F. Huang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Spectroscopic properties in Er3+ doped zinc- and tungsten-modified tellurite glasses for 2.7 μm laser materials,” J. Lumin. 147(2), 372–377 (2014).
[Crossref]

J. Mater. Sci. Lett. (1)

V. Ravi Kumar and N. Veeraiah, “Infrared spectral investigations on ZnF2-PbO-TeO2 glasses,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 16(22), 1816–1818 (1997).
[Crossref]

J. Non-Cryst. Solids (3)

X. Zou and T. Izumitani, “Spectroscopic properties and mechanisms of excited state absorption and energy transfer upconversion for Er3+-doped glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162(1-2), 68–80 (1993).
[Crossref]

Y. Guo, Y. Tian, L. Zhang, L. Hu, and J. Zhang, “Erbium doped heavy metal oxide glasses for mid-infrared laser materials,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 377(10), 119–123 (2013).
[Crossref]

C. Duverger, M. Bouazaoui, and S. Turrell, “Raman spectroscopic investigations of the effect of the doping metal on the structure of binary tellurium-oxide glasses,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 220(2-3), 169–177 (1997).
[Crossref]

J. Phys. Chem. C (1)

G. Q. Chai, G. P. Dong, J. R. Qiu, Q. Y. Zhang, and Z. M. Yang, “2.7 μm Emission from Transparent Er3+, Tm3+ Codoped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Y3Al5O12) Nanocrystals–Tellurate Glass Composites by Novel Comelting Technology,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(37), 19941–19950 (2012).
[Crossref]

Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (1)

H. Nasu, T. Uchigaki, K. Kamiya, H. Kanbara, and K. Kubodera, “Nonresonant-Type Third-order Nonlinearity of (PbO, Nb2O5)-TiO2-TeO2 Glass Measured by Third-Harmonic Generation,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31(1), 3899–3900 (1992).
[Crossref]

Opt. Express (2)

Opt. Lett. (6)

Opt. Mater. (4)

B. Wang, L. H. Cheng, H. Y. Zhong, J. S. Sun, Y. Tian, X. Q. Zhang, and B. J. Chen, “Excited state absorption cross sections of 4 I 13/2 of Er 3+ in ZBLAN,” Opt. Mater. 31(11), 1658–1662 (2009).
[Crossref]

J. S. Wang, E. M. Vogel, and E. Snitzer, “Determination of thermal diffusion constant [J],” Opt. Mater. 3, 187 (1994).
[Crossref]

V. K. Tikhomirov, J. Mendez-Ramos, V. D. Rodriguez, D. Furniss, and A. B. Seddon, “Laser and gain parameters at 2.7 μm of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride transparent glass-ceramics,” Opt. Mater. 28(10), 1143–1146 (2006).
[Crossref]

F. F. Huang, X. Li, X. Q. Liu, J. J. Zhang, L. L. Hu, and D. P. Chen, “Sensitizing effect of Ho3+ on the Er3+: 2.7 μm-emission in fluoride glass,” Opt. Mater. 36(5), 921–925 (2014).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. (1)

D. E. McCumber, “Einstein Relations Connecting Broadband Emission and Absorption Spectra,” Phys. Rev. 136(4A), A954–A957 (1964).
[Crossref]

Sci. Rep. (2)

F. Huang, X. Liu, L. Hu, and D. Chen, “Spectroscopic properties and energy transfer parameters of Er3+-doped fluorozirconate and oxyfluoroaluminate glasses,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5053 (2014).
[PubMed]

G. Chai, G. Dong, J. Qiu, Q. Zhang, and Z. Yang, “Phase Transformation and Intense 2.7 μm Emission from Er3+ doped YF3/YOF Submicron-Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1598 (2013).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Other (1)

K. F. Li, G. Zhang, L. L. Hu, M. Wang, and D. P. Chen, “~2.1 μm Tm3+-Ho3+ co-doped tungsten tellurite single mode fiber laser,” Proc. Of SPIE. 8257, 0A (2012).

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a)-(c) XRD patterns of 1%, 3%, 5% Er3+-doped as-prepared glasses and resulting GCs obtained by heat treatment at 340°C-380°C for 8 h. (d) XRD patterns of 1%, 3%, 5% Er3+-doped GCs heat-treated at 370°C for 8 h. The main crystalline phase is PbTe3O7, and the stark ‘*’ represents the TeO2 phase.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) TEM micrograph, (b) the corresponding SAED pattern, and (c) HRTEM image, (d) EDS spectra of 5% Er3+-doped GC sample heat-treated at 360°C for 8 h. (e)-(h) the two-dimensional mapping distribution images of Te, O, Pb, Er elements, respectively. The circle 1 and circle 2 in figure (a) indicate the nanocrystals-rich region and glass matrix, separately.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 . (a) Absorption spectra of 3% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass and GC heat-treated at 370°C for 8 h. (b)-(d) Absorption spectra of Er3+-doped GCs heat-treated at 360°C, 370°C, and 380°C for 8 h with the Er3+ concentration of 1%, 3%, and 5%. The inset in figure (a) shows the transmittance spectra of 3% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 2.7 μm mid-infrared emission spectra of (a) 1% Er3+, (b) 3% Er3+, and (c) 5% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass and GCs heat-treated at different temperature for 8 h pumped by a 980 nm LD.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 (a) and (b) Fluorescence decay curves of Er3+: 4I11/2 and Er3+: 4I13/2 level pumped by 808 and 980 nm pulsed LD, respectively, in 3% Er3+-doped as-prepared glass and GCs heat-treated at 340°C-380°C for 8 h; (c) and (d) Er3+-doped concentrations and heat treatment temperature v.s. the lifetime of Er3+: 4I11/2 and Er3+: 4I13/2 level, respectively.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 (a) Absorption and stimulated emission cross sections, and (b) gain cross sections at 2.7 μm in 3% Er3+-doped GC heat-treated at 380°C for 8 h.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 J–O intensity parameters of Er3+ in 3% Er3+-doped samples

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

D = K λ β cos θ
σ em ( λ ) = λ 5 A r a d I ( λ ) 8 π c n 2 λ I ( λ ) d λ
σ em ( λ ) = σ a b s ( λ ) ( Z l / Z u ) exp [ ( ε h v ) / K T ]
G ( λ , P ) = P σ e m ( λ ) ( 1 P ) σ a b s ( λ )

Metrics