Abstract

In Fig. 4(c) of a previous Letter [Opt. Lett. 38, 3969 (2013)], wavelengths of the angle of incidence were incorrectly plotted. The error is rectified here.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

In Fig. 4(c) in our previous Letter [1], while we should have plotted Rp and Rs versus angle of incidence at the wavelength of 350 nm, we plotted Rs at the wavelength of 600 nm and Rp at 325 nm, which creates a mismatch at zero angle of incidence between Rp and Rs. The corrected plot is given in Fig. 1.

 

Fig. 1 Simulated and experimental reflectance spectra for Sample A for 7.2° angle of incidence, taken from Fig. 4 in [1].

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Reference

1. A. A. Khosroabadi, P. Gangopadhyay, B. Cocilovo, L. Makai, P. Basa, B. Duong, J. Thomas, and R. A. Norwood, Opt. Lett. 38, 3969 (2013). [CrossRef]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. A. A. Khosroabadi, P. Gangopadhyay, B. Cocilovo, L. Makai, P. Basa, B. Duong, J. Thomas, and R. A. Norwood, Opt. Lett. 38, 3969 (2013).
    [CrossRef]

2013 (1)

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Simulated and experimental reflectance spectra for Sample A for 7.2° angle of incidence, taken from Fig. 4 in [1].

Metrics