Abstract

The frequency given in the caption of Fig. 3 of Bravo et al. [Opt. Lett. 38, 1542 (2013)] was wrong. We provide here a corrected frequency value.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

In a previous Letter [1], a wrong frequency value was given in the caption of Fig. 3. The corrected frequency, 500 MHz, is given in bold in Fig. 1. This correction does not affect any of the conclusions of [1].

 

Fig. 1. (a) Time domain laser behavior in A and C when 500 MHz square signal modulates the system. (b) Frequency response of the proposed random cavity in comparison with a linear cavity.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Reference

1. M. Bravo, M. Fernandez-Vallejo, and M. Lopez-Amo, Opt. Lett. 38, 1542 (2013). [CrossRef]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. M. Bravo, M. Fernandez-Vallejo, and M. Lopez-Amo, Opt. Lett. 38, 1542 (2013).
    [CrossRef]

2013

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

(a) Time domain laser behavior in A and C when 500 MHz square signal modulates the system. (b) Frequency response of the proposed random cavity in comparison with a linear cavity.

Metrics