It is shown that, even using the mathematical treatment proposed by the comment [Opt. Lett. 35, 265 (2010) ], the results of our paper will be revised only in quantity. The qualitative features, i.e., negative (imaginary conductivity) of AlInN, are unchanged. Otherwise, the method used by Schneider, which produces positive based only on value, is proved to be incorrect.
© 2010 Optical Society of AmericaFull Article | PDF Article