Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Reply to comment on “Degree of paraxiality for monochromatic light beams”

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

The theory of the degree of paraxiality is correct. Very likely, the Comment [Opt. Lett. 33, 3004 (2008) ] on our original Letter [Opt. Lett. 33, 1360 (2008) ] originated from an imprecision we made in the plot included in the paper. Such imprecision induced the Comment’s author to raise further objections that, as proved in the present Reply, are totally incorrect.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article

Corrections

Omar El Gawhary and Sergio Severini, "Reply to comment on “Degree of paraxiality for monochromatic light beams”: erratum," Opt. Lett. 34, 343-343 (2009)
https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-34-3-343

More Like This
Comment on “Degree of paraxiality for monochromatic light beams”

Pablo Vaveliuk
Opt. Lett. 33(24) 3004-3005 (2008)

Reply to comment on “Degree of paraxiality for monochromatic light beams”: erratum

Omar El Gawhary and Sergio Severini
Opt. Lett. 34(3) 343-343 (2009)

Degree of paraxiality for monochromatic light beams

Omar El Gawhary and Sergio Severini
Opt. Lett. 33(12) 1360-1362 (2008)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (1)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved