Abstract

It is shown that, even using the mathematical treatment proposed by the comment [Opt. Lett.35, 265 (2010)], the results of our paper will be revised only in quantity. The qualitative features, i.e., negative Im[σ] (imaginary conductivity) of AlInN, are unchanged. Otherwise, the method used by Schneider, which produces positive Im[σ] based only on |Efilm(ω)/Eref(ω)| value, is proved to be incorrect.

© 2010 Optical Society of America

PDF Article

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Metrics

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription