Abstract

We report and correct a few typographical and scaling errors in our manuscript

© 2013 OSA

1. Introduction

In the first paragraph of section 2 of our manuscript [1], ε 0 should be replaced by εh which was correctly used throughout the procedure. In Eq. (1), k is the wave number in the host medium. As a result C 1, C 2, and C 3 should be multiplied by εh, and L 1 should be divided by εh. The procedure and subsequently the equivalent circuit configuration remain unchanged. From Eq. (12), ωCPR does not change. n, the order of the filter, in Eq. (14) should be replaced by i, with no effect on the design procedure. Considering the equation for L′ in the last paragraph of section 2, equations (16) and (17) should be divided by εh. Thus, in Table 1 all dimensions should be divided by εh. The recalculated Fig. (8) for F = 0.376 and a 1,2 = 9.5nm and a 3 = 19nm shows that the bandwidth is narrowed but still the same behavior as predicted in Fig. (7) is seen. The angle dependance is the same as described previously in [1].

 

Fig. 1 Recalculated results for Fig. 8.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

References and links

1. C. Saeidi and D. van der Weide, “Nanoparticle array based optical frequency selective surfaces: theory and design,” Opt. Express 21, 16170–16180 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. C. Saeidi and D. van der Weide, “Nanoparticle array based optical frequency selective surfaces: theory and design,” Opt. Express 21, 16170–16180 (2013).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]

2013 (1)

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Recalculated results for Fig. 8.

Metrics