We demonstrate stable and tunable light emission in ultraviolet to near infrared regime by using annealed SiOx sample. By adjusting the ratio of Si and O of SiOx, different wavelengths such as ultraviolet, visible and near infrared photoluminescence can be tuned. From the results of transmission electron microscope, various sizes (1~4 nm) of the embedded Si nanoparticles were formed. Nanoparticles with smaller sizes were indeed formed for UV-blue emitting samples and the origin of light emission may be misattributed to the quantum confinement effects. However, we found the efficient and stable light emission in UV-blue regime, with lifetime on the order of nanoseconds, is dominantly from the defects.
© 2013 Optical Society of America
Light emission from silicon has attracted a lot of attentions in the scientific community because it has promising potential to be integrated with Si-based electronic device and to form Si-based optoelectronics. However, bulk silicon is indirect bandgap semiconductor, and the efficiency of light emission is weak. To solve this intrinsic problem, porous silicon has been demonstrated to emit visible light in the 1990s [1–7], but light emission was not stable due to the problems of aging, oxidation, and surface passivation in porous silicon [4, 8–11]. Later, silicon nanoparticles (Si NPs) embedded in SiO2 or sub-stoichiometric oxide have emerged as alternates to porous silicon owing to their stable light emission, good repeatability, and well-controlled particle size . Both red and near-infrared (NIR) light emissions have been demonstrated in Si/SiO2 superlattice [13–17], Si NPs in SiOx [18–21], and Si NPs in ZnO . Blue and green light emissions have also been achieved from Si NPs [19, 23, 24]. However, to our knowledge, there is no report to demonstrate such a broad tunability of photoluminescence (PL) from ultraviolet (UV) to NIR regime.
In this work, by controlling the condition of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD), different ratios of O to Si were achieved, resulting in tunable wavelength of photoluminescence after thermal annealing. We characterized the samples with emission from UV to NIR regime, but particularly focused on the UV-blue emission since most previous studies had already investigated the visible-NIR regime [18–21]. The experimental results indicated that the origin of light in UV-blue emitting sample is from defects at the interface of Si and SiOx matrix although nanoparticles with size smaller than 2 nm were found. This observation is not trivial because the size-dependence of silicon nanoparticles relating to PL can be easily misattributed the origin of light emission to quantum confinement effects . It should also be noted that the UV-blue emitting samples with short lifetime in our work is different from the widely studied porous silicon by wet-etching techniques [3, 4, 8–10] in 1990s. Because stable and tunable light can be obtained from annealed SiOx in contrast to unstable porous-silicon, it can be utilized for application of optoelectronic devices [25, 26]. Our investigation has shown the great potential to extend annealed SiOx materials for UV-related optoelectronic devices.
2. Experimental methods
The Si-rich SiOx film was grown on p-type (100)-oriented Si substrate by using the PECVD system. By controlling the N2O/SiH4 fluence ratio, different O/Si compositions were achieved. The samples were annealed in a quartz furnace with flowing N2 gas at 1100°C. Growth conditions and the physical properties of the samples are listed in Table 1. O/Si composition ratios were characterized by XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy).
Cross-sectional transmission electron microscope (TEM) specimens were prepared with tripod polishing and ion milling using the Gatan PIPS system operated at 3 kV. The TEM experiments were carried out using a field-emission-gun TEM (FEI, Tecnai F20) operated at 200 kV equipped with Gatan image filter (GIF, Tridiem 865). The real-space spectral-imaging (SI) in energy-filtered TEM with a tunable energy-selection slit, was conducted on the same microscope . For time-integrated PL and time-resolved PL (TRPL) in the UV-blue region, the excitation light source was from the fourth harmonic generation (266 nm or 4.67 eV) of a 40 MHz, 1064 nm femtosecond fiber laser (Fianium, Ltd.). For blue-visible PL lifetime measurement on the time scale of 10 ns to 1 μs, a 0.5 MHz, 405 nm picosecond diode laser (PicoQuant GmbH) was used as the excitation light source. The TRPL were measured using time-correlated single photon technique. The PL excitation (PLE) spectroscopy was performed with a commercial spectrofluorometer (FluoLog, Horiba, Ltd.).
3. Results and discussion
Real-space TEM SI was first performed to confirm the presence of Si NPs embedded in SiOx with different O/Si composition ratios. Figure 1(a) shows a typical SI with the energy-selection slit positioned at the energy loss region of 16 ~18 eV, which monitors the plasmon peak of bulk Si at ~16.7 eV [28, 29]. Figure 1(b) shows the corresponding electron-energy loss spectra extracted respectively from position 1 (Si NPs) and position 2 (SiOx) marked in Fig. 1(a). The result reveals that the bright spots shown in Fig. 1(a) have the same spectral feature as Si bulk plasmon, indicating those areas contain Si NPs. In contrast, the gray areas correspond to amorphous SiOx. Furthermore, the TEM image shows a wide size distribution, 1.0~2.5 nm in diameter, of Si NPs in Sample A. With increasing annealing time (Sample B), the particle size distribution of Si NPs became narrower (~1.8 nm ± 0.2 nm in diameter). Compared with Samples A and B, the Si NP size distribution in Sample C is larger (2.2~3.0 nm in diameter) due to the aggregation of more excess Si. The histograms of Si NP size distributions are shown in Fig. 1(c)-1(e) for Samples A-C. Overall, the mean diameter of Si NPs decreases when the O/Si composition ratio increases .
Figure 2 shows the PL spectra of all the samples. The two peaks at ~340 nm and ~410 nm were observed both in Samples A and B. For Samples C and D, the PL shows a broad feature with peaks at ~600 nm and ~770 nm, respectively. When the excess Si decreases (or x increases in SiOx), the peak of PL spectra shifts from red (Sample D) and yellow (Sample C), to UV-blue (Samples A and B). The light emission of the SiOx samples with various annealing time was also investigated. It was found that the PL spectra of Samples C and D showed red-shift when the sample annealing time increased. These results agree with previous reports that the main origin for visible light from annealed SiOx is from quantum confinement (QC) effects . The blue-shift phenomenon in PL spectra was attributed to the shrinking of Si NP size which leads to a larger bandgap. Longer time of annealing will also result in larger Si NP due to aggregation of excess Si. For UV-blue emitting samples in our work, the Si nanoparticles were found even smaller from our TEM images, which were generally thought as evidence of QC effects. However, in contrast to visible-light-emitting samples, the PL spectra showed no significant peak shift but decreasing intensity when the sample annealing time was increased for Samples A and B.
The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of individual Si NPs in Samples A and C are presented in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), respectively. Figures 3(c) and 3(d) show their corresponding fast Fourier transform (FFT) patterns, which are equivalent to the experimental electron diffraction patterns of the selected local regions indicated by the dash circles in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b). For Sample C the lattice fringe can be resolved in Fig. 3(b), and the corresponding FFT pattern in Fig. 3(d) reveals the spot-like pattern, indicating the Si NPs are crystalline. In contrast, Sample A HRTEM investigation [Figs. 3(a) and 3(c)] reveal a featureless image and a diffuse ring pattern, indicating the Si NPs are amorphous. This evidence clearly exhibits the tendency of poor Si NP crystallinity when the O/Si composition ratio is intentionally tuned to higher value for embedding SiOx with smaller Si NPs.
We further investigated samples A and C with PLE spectroscopy. Strong resonant features located at ~275 nm are resolved when one monitored the light emission at 340 nm [Fig. 4(a)] and 410 nm [Fig. 4(b)]. This resonant feature is related to defect luminescence and was also observed for Sample B. It is worthy to note that UV-blue emission was observed in porous silicon  and amorphous Si:H:O films , while similar emission bands were also found in SiO2 [11, 30]. Specifically, it was reported recently that –SiO3 group has a resonant feature in the range from 260 nm to 280 nm, with the emission at ~370 nm in porous silicon . Our PLE results strongly suggest that the PL of UV-blue emitting samples (A and B) should be associated with molecule-like luminescent defects in Si-SiOx complexes.
Figure 4(c) shows the PLE spectrum of Sample C by monitoring the main emission wavelength at 625nm. The spectrum is similar to the absorption spectrum of bulk silicon, but a weak resonant feature at 275 nm can be identified. This weak resonant feature implies the existence of fewer UV-blue luminescence defects in Sample C, but this should not be the dominant mechanism of light emission. Previous reports  showed that shorter wavelength light emission corresponded to smaller Si NP size in visible-NIR regime following the prediction of QC effects . In addition, we also observed red-shift effects in light emission when the annealing time of Sample C is longer. This evidence also supports the QC effects because longer annealing time results in aggregation of Si and larger Si NPs. In contrast, we did not see shift of spectra for Sample A and B with different annealing time. Apparently the dominant mechanism of visible-NIR emitting samples is different from that of UV-blue emitting samples. It is thus more likely that the visible-NIR light emission of Sample C is dominantly originating from the QC effect of the crystalline Si NPs. But we do not rule out another possibility such as other types of luminescent defects in Si-SiOx complexes [15, 16, 20].
The lifetimes of UV emission from Sample A were measured as shown in Fig. 5. Similar result was also obtained for Sample B (not shown here). In order to quantitatively analyze the lifetimes, we chose multiple-exponential function to fit each TRPL curve in a commercial TRPL fitting software (Fluofit, PicoQuant). In this fitting function, τi and Ai denote the lifetime and amplitude of each exponential decay component, and A0 is the background level. The intensity-weighted averaged PL lifetime was then determined by . For emission wavelengths in the range from 275 nm to 345 nm, we noticed that some of the TRPL curves showed a higher apparent background, resulting from the long-lived PL contribution of earlier laser pulse cycles. To determine the PL lifetime accurately, we had to carefully correct this uncompleted PL decay effect  by using the background level of the 275 nm TRPL curve as a fixed parameter A0 in the above curve-fitting process. Figure 5(b) shows the obtained averaged PL lifetime of Sample A and B as a function of the emission wavelength, including other published results [4, 9, 12, 33] for comparison. The dashed line for eye-guiding which was obtained by power-law fitting : , where is the photon energy in eV. Note that most previous studies focused on the light emission in the NIR-visible regime (1.4 ~2.1 eV), with reported PL lifetime on the order of microseconds [4, 9, 12, 33]. Here, we have systematically measured the PL lifetime in the UV-blue regime for Sample A and B.
The lifetimes of PL from Samples A in visible regime were obtained to be on the order of several tens of nanoseconds, which are at least one order of magnitude lower than that of Sample C and previous reports [4, 9, 12, 33]. Theoretically, the QC effects only relate the light emission wavelength to the particle sizes. The broad spectral profile of light emission is attributed to the size distribution of Si NPs, and the PL lifetimes of different Si NP samples at the same emission wavelength are expected to be the same or similar. The huge difference in PL lifetimes in visible regime for Sample A and Sample C also supports our argument that light emission of Sample A is from defects instead of QC effects.
The lifetimes of PL from Samples A and B in UV regime were also obtained to be on the order of several nanoseconds. Overall, the lifetimes of UV-blue emitting samples decrease monotonically with increasing photon energy of PL. The absorption of light for photoexcitation of carriers could be either through defect absorption band or band transition in the Si NPs. After the carriers are excited with high photon energy, they relax to defect-related states on the order of picosecond timescale  and PL transition occurs through defect luminescent centers. Shorter lifetime is thus expected for higher PL photon energy . It should be noted that in Fig. 5(b), Sample C and previous reports [4, 9, 12, 33], which attribute mechanism of light emission to QC effects also have the similar trend of lifetime with photon energy. The lifetime also decreases monotonically with increasing photon energy of PL. According to the QC model, smaller Si NPs have faster PL lifetimes because the spatial confinement enhances the electron-hole wave function overlap and the momentum scattering probability (so-called the breakdown of momentum-conservation rule) to assist the radiative transition .
Note that the UV emission lifetime is on the order of few nanoseconds and its UV emission efficiency is in fact comparable to those found in many direct band gap semiconductors such as GaN, GaAs and CdSe with nanosecond lifetimes. This makes Si-based UV photonic devices possible based on annealed SiOx. It is worthy to mention that PL of porous silicon, also with the nanosecond UV-blue emission from native oxide, is not stable and may not be suitable for application . It should also be emphasized that defect-related UV-blue emission from annealed SiOx is not trivial. Historically, QC effects were possible origin of UV-blue emission from oxide-free porous silicon containing smaller Si nanoparticles [4, 9]. In our UV-blue annealed SiOx samples, Si NPs with size < 2 nm were indeed observed and have stable light emission because the embedded Si NPs are not exposed to air. The blue-shift in PL spectra with smaller Si NPs may also mislead to the conclusion of QC effects. Here, we have clearly demonstrated that the origin of UV-blue emission in this work is from defects although smaller Si NPs were formed in comparison with visible-NIR emitting samples (such as C and D).
We have reported that tunable photoluminescence between UV and NIR regime can be achieved by annealed SiOx by controlling the ratios of O to Si in the condition of plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). When the O/Si composition ratio was increased to 1.5 or higher, smaller Si NPs (<2 nm) could form in the thermally annealed SiOx. But we have concluded that the origin of UV-blue emitting samples is related to defects. These smaller Si NPs were found to be amorphous and turned into Si-SiOx complexes instead. We have obtained the lifetimes of different PL wavelengths of UV-blue emitting samples. The lifetimes of visible light are on the order of several tens of nanoseconds and those of UV light are on the order of several nanoseconds. The nanosecond lifetimes of UV-blue emitting samples make it comparable with light efficiency of direct bandgap materials. This reveals great potential of annealed SiOx for Si-based photonic devices from NIR-visible to UV regime.
The authors Y.-M. Chang and K.-H. Lin are grateful to acknowledge the financial support of National Science Council of Taiwan under Grant Nos.: NSC99-2112-M-002-008-MY3 and NSC100-2112-M-001-028-MY3, respectively.
References and links
1. A. G. Cullis, L. T. Canham, and P. D. J. Calcott, “The structural and luminescence properties of porous silicon,” J. Appl. Phys. 82(3), 909–965 (1997). [CrossRef]
2. L. T. Canham, “Silicon quantum wire array fabrication by electrochemical and chemical dissolution of wafers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 57(10), 1046–1048 (1990). [CrossRef]
4. H. Mizuno, H. Koyama, and N. Koshida, “Oxide-free blue photoluminescence from photochemically etched porous silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(25), 3779–3781 (1996). [CrossRef]
5. J. C. Vial, A. Bsiesy, F. Gaspard, R. Herino, M. Ligeon, F. Muller, R. Romestain, and R. M. Macfarlane, “Mechanisms of visible-light emission from electrooxidized porous silicon,” Phys. Rev. B 45(24), 14171–14176 (1992). [CrossRef]
6. Y. Kanemitsu, T. Ogawa, K. Shiraishi, and K. Takeda, “Visible photoluminescence from oxidized Si nanometer-sized spheres: exciton confinement on a spherical shell,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 48(7), 4883–4886 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. A. J. Kontkiewicz, A. M. Kontkiewicz, J. Siejka, S. Sen, G. Nowak, A. M. Hoff, P. Sakthivel, K. Ahmed, P. Mukherjee, S. Witanachchi, and J. Lagowski, “Evidence that blue luminescence of oxidized porous silicon originates from SiO2,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 65(11), 1436–1438 (1994). [CrossRef]
9. M. V. Wolkin, J. Jorne, P. M. Fauchet, G. Allan, and C. Delerue, “Electronic states and luminescence in porous silicon quantum dots: The role of oxygen,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 82(1), 197–200 (1999). [CrossRef]
10. D. I. Kovalev, I. D. Yaroshetzkii, T. Muschik, V. Petrovakoch, and F. Koch, “Fast and slow visible luminescence bands of oxidized porous Si,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(2), 214–216 (1994). [CrossRef]
11. G. G. Qin, J. Lin, J. Q. Duan, and G. Q. Yao, “Comparative study of ultraviolet emission with peak wavelengths around 350 nm from oxidized porous silicon and that from SiO2 powder,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(12), 1689–1691 (1996). [CrossRef]
12. A. Sa'ar, “Photoluminescence from silicon nanostructures: The mutual role of quantum confinement and surface chemistry,” J. Nanophotonics 3(1), 032501 (2009). [CrossRef]
13. M. Zacharias, J. Heitmann, R. Scholz, U. Kahler, M. Schmidt, and J. Blasing, “Size-controlled highly luminescent silicon nanocrystals: a SiO/SiO2 superlattice approach,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 80(4), 661–663 (2002). [CrossRef]
15. B. Averboukh, R. Huber, K. W. Cheah, Y. R. Shen, G. G. Qin, Z. C. Ma, and W. H. Zong, “Luminescence studies of a Si/SiO2 superlattice,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(7), 3564–3568 (2002). [CrossRef]
16. S. Godefroo, M. Hayne, M. Jivanescu, A. Stesmans, M. Zacharias, O. I. Lebedev, G. Van Tendeloo, and V. V. Moshchalkov, “Classification and control of the origin of photoluminescence from Si nanocrystals,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 3(3), 174–178 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. X. J. Hao, A. P. Podhorodecki, Y. S. Shen, G. Zatryb, J. Misiewicz, and M. A. Green, “Effects of Si-rich oxide layer stoichiometry on the structural and optical properties of Si QD/SiO2 multilayer films,” Nanotechnology 20(48), 485703 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. X. M. Wen, L. Van Dao, P. Hannaford, E. C. Cho, Y. H. Cho, and M. A. Green, “Excitation dependence of photoluminescence in silicon quantum dots,” New J. Phys. 9(9), 337 (2007). [CrossRef]
19. B. H. Lai, C. H. Cheng, Y. H. Pai, and G. R. Lin, “Plasma power controlled deposition of SiOx with manipulated Si quantum dot size for photoluminescent wavelength tailoring,” Opt. Express 18(5), 4449–4456 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. L. Khriachtchev, T. Nikitin, R. Velagapudi, J. Lahtinen, and S. Novikov, “Light-emission mechanism of thermally annealed silicon-rich silicon oxide revisited: What is the role of silicon nanocrystals?” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(4), 043115 (2009). [CrossRef]
21. M. S. Carroll, L. Brewer, J. C. Verley, J. Banks, J. J. Sheng, W. Pan, and R. Dunn, “Silicon nanocrystal growth in the long diffusion length regime using high density plasma chemical vapour deposited silicon rich oxides,” Nanotechnology 18(31), 315707 (2007). [CrossRef]
22. K. Y. Kuo, S. W. Hsu, P. R. Huang, W. L. Chuang, C. C. Liu, and P. T. Lee, “Optical properties and sub-bandgap formation of nano-crystalline Si quantum dots embedded ZnO thin film,” Opt. Express 20(10), 10470–10475 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. C. H. Chang, Y. H. Pai, J. H. He, and G. R. Lin, “Wavelength-tunable blue photoluminescence of < 2 nm Si nanocrystal synthesized by ultra-low-flow-density PECVD,” Acta Mater. 58(4), 1270–1275 (2010). [CrossRef]
24. V. Svrcek, D. Mariotti, and M. Kondo, “Ambient-stable blue luminescent silicon nanocrystals prepared by nanosecond-pulsed laser ablation in water,” Opt. Express 17(2), 520–527 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. C. H. Cheng, Y. C. Lien, C. L. Wu, and G. R. Lin, “Mutlicolor electroluminescent Si quantum dots embedded in SiOx thin film MOSLED with 2.4% external quantum efficiency,” Opt. Express 21(1), 391–403 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. G. R. Lin, C. W. Lian, C. L. Wu, and Y. H. Lin, “Gain analysis of optically-pumped Si nanocrystal waveguide amplifiers on silicon substrate,” Opt. Express 18(9), 9213–9219 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. R. F. Egerton, Electron energy-loss spectroscopy in the electron microscope. (Plenum Press, 1996).
28. F. Iacona, C. Bongiorno, C. Spinella, S. Boninelli, and F. Priolo, “Formation and evolution of luminescent Si nanoclusters produced by thermal annealing of SiOx films,” J. Appl. Phys. 95(7), 3723–3732 (2004). [CrossRef]
29. S. Schamm, C. Bonafos, H. Coffin, N. Cherkashin, M. Carrada, G. Ben Assayag, A. Claverie, M. Tencé, and C. Colliex, “Imaging Si nanoparticles embedded in SiO2 layers by (S)TEM-EELS,” Ultramicroscopy 108(4), 346–357 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. S. Tong, X. N. Liu, T. Gao, and X. M. Bao, “Intense violet-blue photoluminescence in as-deposited amorphous Si:H:O films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(5), 698–700 (1997). [CrossRef]
31. X. Yang, X. L. Wu, S. H. Li, H. Li, T. Qiu, Y. M. Yang, P. K. Chu, and G. G. Siu, “Origin of the 370-nm luminescence in Si oxide nanostructures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86(20), 201906 (2005). [CrossRef]
32. P. R. Barber, S. M. Ameer-Beg, J. Gilbey, R. J. Edens, I. Ezike, and B. Vojnovic, in Multiphoton Microscopy in the Biomedical Sciences V, edited by A. Periasamy and P. T. C. So 5700, 171 (2005).
33. M. Schmidt, J. Heimann, R. Scholz, V. Y. Timoshenko, M. G. Lisachenko, and M. Zacharias, in Advanced Luminescent Materials and Quantum Confinement II, edited by M. Cahay, J. P. Leburton, D. J. Lockwood et al. (Electrochemical Society, Pennington, 2002), p.83.
34. R. Guerra and S. Ossicini, “High luminescence in small Si/SiO2 nanocrystals: A theoretical study,” Phys. Rev. B 81(24), 245307 (2010). [CrossRef]
35. K. Žídek, F. Trojánek, P. Malý, L. Ondič, I. Pelant, K. Dohnalová, L. Šiller, R. Little, and B. R. Horrocks, “Femtosecond luminescence spectroscopy of core states in silicon nanocrystals,” Opt. Express 18(24), 25241–25249 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]