Abstract

We demonstrate the generation of non-diffracting heralded single photons, i.e. which are characterized by a single-photon transverse intensity distribution which remains essentially unchanged over a significant propagation distance. For this purpose we have relied on the process of spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC) for the generation of signal and idler photon pairs, where our SPDC crystal is pumped by a Bessel-Gauss (BG) beam. Our experiment shows that the well-understood non-diffracting behavior of a BG beam may be directly mapped to the signal-mode, single photons heralded by the detection of a single idler photon. In our experiment, the heralded single photon is thus arranged to be non-diffracting without the need for projecting its single-photon transverse amplitude, post-generation, in any manner.

© 2012 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Diffraction is ubiquitous in any branch of physics that involves waves, including optics, acoustics, and quantum mechanics. For many applications, diffraction is a limitation and several techniques have been proposed for its control. Non-diffracting beam (NDB) is the common term used in classical optics to refer to a solution of the wave equation that propagates along a given axis preserving its transverse intensity pattern. The best known NDB is the Bessel beam introduced by Durnin et al. in 1987 [1]. Bessel beams were followed by the discovery of other nondiffracting solutions including Mathieu beams, parabolic beams, X-waves, and Airy beams [2]. Ideal NDBs have an infinite extent and energy, and thus they are not physically realizable. In view of this, high-quality apodized versions of ideal NDB’s have been experimentally generated using annular masks, axicons, laser cavities, holograms and light modulators [3].

In the process of spontaneous parametric downconversion (SPDC) [4], individual photons from a pump beam which illuminates a second-order nonlinear crystal may be annihilated with a small probability, each annihilation event leading to the emission of a signal and idler photon pair. The detection of the idler photon of a given pair may “herald” the existence of a single photon in the signal mode; this is then known as a heralded single photon source. SPDC is remarkable in that the photon pair properties can be widely engineered to fit particular needs [5]. For a sufficiently short crystal, the two-photon state depends solely on the pump, with the resulting spectral (spatial) entanglement highly dependent on the pump spectral [6] (transverse k-vector [7]) amplitude; these degrees of freedom are in fact linked, e.g. the spatial pump properties may influence the photon-pair spectral properties [8]. Past works which exploit SPDC together with transversely structured beams, of which NDB’s are a sub-category, include the generation of entangled states in modes, e.g. Gauss-Laguerre, with orbital angular momentum [9]. In many of these experiments, the signal and idler fields are projected onto specific transverse k-vector amplitudes using phase holograms or other optical elements. In this paper we exploit the fact that for a sufficiently-short crystal, the spatial pump beam properties can be directly mapped to the two-photon state [10, 11], and in particular to the heralded single-photon; this is accomplished without the need for projecting, post-generation, the heralded single photon into particular k-vector distributions [12]. Specifically, in our work we directly map the non-diffracting behavior of a Bessel-Gauss (BG) pump beam to the single-photon amplitude of the heralded signal photons. Thus, we take the well understood non-diffracting properties of BG beams into the quantum optics realm.

The ability to control the transverse spatial intensity pattern at the single photon level, while also achieving non-diffracting behavior, is notable. Applications could be found in the area of free-space quantum communications, where the ability of an NDB to maintain its form despite the presence of obstacles [13] and/or despite propagation through a turbulent medium [14, 15]. would be particularly useful. Applications could likewise be found in the controlled interaction of single photons with atoms and/or ions in the linear arrangement of an ion trap or an optical lattice.

2. Theory

Our main objective in this paper is the generation of non-diffracting single-photon wavepackets. For this purpose, we take advantage of the well-developed field of classical NDB’s.

We rely on the process of SPDC to generate signal and idler photon pairs in a bulk second-order crystal pumped by a BG beam of frequency ωp. We detect an idler photon on the Fourier plane defined by an ff optical system following the crystal, which heralds a conjugate signal-photon wavepacket. Under ideal conditions the quantum state of the signal photons, conditioned by the detection of an idler photon of frequency ω̃i and transverse wavevector k̃i, may be written as follows

|Ψs=dksSp(ks+k˜i)|ωpω˜i,ks,
in terms of the angular amplitude Sp(k) of the pump, and where |ω, k〉 is a single-photon Fock state of frequency ω and transverse wavevector k.

Here, ideal conditions refers first to the use of a sufficiently short crystal and second to the use of a conditioning idler-mode detector with sufficiently small transverse dimensions. Indeed, in general the single-photon amplitude in Eq. (1) should be multiplied by a sinc function factor, determined by crystal properties such as crystal length and Poynting vector walk-off; for a sufficiently short crystal, the width of this factor is much larger than that of the function |Sp(ks+k˜i)|, so that the former may be disregarded [16]. If the idler detector has a non-zero transverse extent, the signal-mode single-photon state becomes a statistical mixture of states of the form in Eq. (1) integrated over all k˜i values within the angular acceptance of the idler detector. Equation (1) already contains the main physical mechanism which we exploit in this paper: the signal-mode, single-photon amplitude corresponds to the angular amplitude of the pump mode, except displaced in transverse momentum space. Thus, our experiment (to be described in detail below) has been designed so that, ideally, the detection of a single idler photon heralds a single signal-mode photon with a transverse amplitude which corresponds to a direct mapping of the pump transverse amplitude.

Note that for a plane-wave pump, with |Sp(k)|2 = δ(k), the above mechanism implies that the signal-mode conditional angular spectrum is likewise a delta function δ(ks+k˜i). In this paper our pump beam has a non-zero transverse-momentum width. In particular, it has a BG transverse amplitude which is mapped to the conditionally-prepared single photons. Because BG beams exhibit a non-diffracting character, this behavior will likewise be presented by the signal-mode single photons conditioned by the detection of an idler photon.

A BG beam is a conical coherent superposition of Gaussian beams, each with a radius at the beamwaist parameter w0, and with a cone opening half-angle arcsin(kt/kp), where kt is transverse wavenumber and kp is the pump wavenumber. For a BG pump, the function Sp(k) may then be written as

Sp(k)=Aexp(w024|k|2)I0(ktw02|k|2),
where A is a normalization constant and I0(.) is a zeroth order modified Bessel function of the first kind. When viewed in the transverse position ρ domain, the transverse amplitude as a function of the propagation distance z becomes
Ap(ρ)=A1μexp{1μ(ikt2z2kp+|ρ|2w02)}J0(kt|ρ|μ),
in terms of μ = 1 + iz/zr with zr=kpw02/2 the Rayleigh range of the pump, the zeroth-order Bessel function J0(.) and a normalization constant A′. A measure of the propagation distance over which the single-photon transverse intensity pattern remains unchanged is given by zmax = w0ks/kt, where ks is the signal wavenumber.

3. Experiment

We have prepared a BG beam to be used as pump in a second-order nonlinear crystal, which generates photon pairs through the SPDC process. Figure 1 shows our experimental setup. A beam from a diode laser, centered at 406nm with 72mW power is sent through a telescope (T1) with magnification ×13.3 to obtain an approximately Gaussian beam with an approximate radius at the beamwaist of 7.5mm. This magnified beam is transmitted through an axicon (A), i.e. a conical lens, with a 2° apex angle, which maps the incoming beam into a high-quality BG beam. As a final preparation step, this beam is magnified ×5 with a telescope (T2) consisting of appropriately separated lenses with focal lengths 10cm and 50cm.

 

Fig. 1 Experimental setup for the generation of non-diffracting single photons.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Figure 2(a) shows a measurement of the transverse intensity distribution of the BG pump, obtained with a CCD camera, at a distance of 25cm following the second lens of telescope T2 (see Fig. 1); as discussed below, this corresponds to the plane where the nonlinear crystal is placed. This measurement shows the distinct characteristics of a BG beam, i.e. a central spot surrounded by a set of concentric rings, as predicted by |Ap(ρ)|2 in Eq. (3). The slight departure from azimuthal symmetry is probably due to fabrication imperfections in the axicon. Figure 2(b) shows the corresponding transverse momentum distribution, obtained through an optical ff system prior to the CCD camera. This figure shows the expected annular shape of the BG pump angular spectrum as predicted by the function |Sp(k)|2 in Eq. (2). Note that the radius of this annulus, in k space directly yields the parameter kt of Eq. (2), in our case with a value of kt = 0.046 ± .001μm−1. Note also that the w0 parameter in Eq. (2) may be obtained from the width of the annulus δk according to the relationship w0 = 4/δk; in our case we obtain a value of w0 = 1.85 ± 0.60mm.

 

Fig. 2 BG pump properties: a) Measured transverse intensity, b) measured angular spectrum, and c) measured transverse intensity vs coordinate y, measured under propagation along coordinate z.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

In order to visualize the propagation properties of the BG pump beam, Fig. 2(c) shows a plot of the measured transverse pump intensity distribution along the y direction, measured with a CCD camera, as a function of the propagation distance z. It may be appreciated that this distribution remains essentially unchanged in a distance of over 200cm, making it clear that our pump beam has non-diffracting properties.

The SPDC crystal, β-barium borate (BBO) with thickness 1mm, is placed a distance of 25cm from the second lens of telescope T2. Pump photons are eliminated using appropriate filters (F). An ff optical system is used in order to yield a Fourier plane on which we can probe the signal and idler transverse momentum distributions. Specifically, a lens (focal length f1 = 10cm and 1-inch diameter; L1) which is placed at a distance of 10cm from the crystal, defines a Fourier plane (FP1) at a distance of 10cm from the lens. Spatially-resolved photon counting on this plane yields the angular spectrum of the SPDC photon pairs. For this purpose, we have used the fiber tip of a large-diameter fiber (200μm) which can be displaced laterally along the x and y directions with the help of a computer-controlled motor (50nm resolution and 1.5cm travel range). The fiber used leads to a Si avalanche photodiode (APD), with its output connected to standard pulse-counting equipment to obtain number of detection events per second data; Fig. 3(a) shows the resulting measured SPDC angular spectrum.

 

Fig. 3 a) Measured angular spectrum of SPDC photon pairs. b) Measured conditional angular spectrum of signal-mode heralded single photons. c) measured transverse intensity of signal-mode heralded single photons.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Note that the annular SPDC angular spectrum is asymmetric in a manner similar to that observed for a focused Gaussian pump beam (e.g. see Ref. [17]). The distinct properties resulting from a BG beam pump are, however, more evident when we analyze spatially-resolved coincidence counts. For this purpose, we use spatially-resolved coincidence photon counting implemented with two independent fiber tips, each laterally displaceable with a computer-controlled motor and each leading to an APD.

Figure 3(b) shows the measured conditional angular spectrum of the signal photon, i.e. conditioned to the detection of an idler photon with a fixed transverse momentum value. Specifically, the idler fiber tip is placed at the disk indicated in Fig. 3(a), corresponding to kiy=0 and with a kix value which maximizes the counts, while we have scanned the signal-mode fiber tip, also with a 200μm diameter, around the diametrically-opposed point, within the square indicated in Fig. 3(a). The plot in Fig. 3(b) corresponds to the number of signal-idler measured coincidence counts as a function of the position (transverse momentum) of the signal-mode fiber tip. This plot shows, as expected from Eq. (1), an annular structure which ideally would be identical to the pump angular spectrum, plotted in Fig. 2(a). The much larger width of the signal-mode angular spectrum annulus, compared to that of the pump (leading to w0 ≈ 260μm vs 1850μm for the pump), is a consequence of the considerable idler-mode fiber tip width of 200μm; the observed annulus is given by the incoherent addition of the contributions for each ki within the angular acceptance of the idler detector. In addition, the width of the observed annulus is enlarged due to the convolution of the actual annulus with the angular aperture of the (signal-mode) scanning fiber tip. Note that the kt value that could be inferred from the radius of the the most intense region of the annulus in Fig. 3(b) corresponds well to that inferred from the pump angular spectrum (kt = 0.046 ± 0.001μm−1).

Besides the conditional angular spectrum of the signal photon, shown in Fig. 3(b), we are interested in measuring the transverse single-photon intensity in position space. For this purpose, we have placed a second ff optical system following FP1. Specifically, we have placed a lens (focal length f2 = 30cm and 2-inch diameter; L2) at a distance of 30cm from FP1, so as to define a second Fourier plane (FP2) a distance of 30cm from the lens (see Fig. 1); the larger lens diameter is intended to minimize signal-mode k-vector clipping by the lens aperture. For this measurement, we retain the fixed conditioning idler detector on FP1 and we place the signal-mode fiber tip with a 50μm diameter, rather than 200μm as for FP1, and scan its transverse position while monitoring signal-idler coincidence counts. The resulting data, i.e coincidence counts between idler photons collected on FP1 and signal photons collected on FP2 as a function of the position of the signal-mode fiber tip; see Fig. 3(c), constitutes a measurement of the heralded singal-mode intensity as a function of transverse position rather than momentum.

Note that the non-diffracting propagation distance zmax is proportional to w0 which is in turn inversely proportional to the annulus width δk. Thus, the increased width of the signal-photon conditional angular spectrum of Fig. 3(b) (relative to that of the pump angular spectrum), controlled by the angular acceptance width of the idler detector, has the effect of reducing zmax with respect to its ideal value obtained for an idealized point-like idler detector. While a smaller-diameter fiber leading to the idler detector would enhance zmax, this unfortunately leads to a prohibitive reduction of coincidence counts.

In order to study the propagation properties of our BG signal photon we have displaced the plane on which the signal-mode fiber tip is scanned, from its initial position corresponding to the plane FP2 (regarded as z = 0), and have collected signal-idler coincidence data for each propagation plane. In Fig. 4(a) we show the resulting signal-idler coincidences as a function of the y coordinate, for ten propagation planes, along z, covering a propagation distance of 40cm. It can be appreciated that the width of the signal-mode transverse intensity remains essentially unchanged over a propagation distance surpassing 25cm, with the maximum number of coincidence counts exhibiting a gradual decline. This behavior can be directly contrasted with the corresponding behavior for single-channel counts, i.e. signal-mode detection events unconditioned by the detection of an idler photon. Figure 4(b) shows single-channel counts, as a function of z and y, in direct correspondence with Fig. 4(a). It may be appreciated that unlike for the coincidence counts, the single-channel counts profile broadens and declines in height dramatically with propagation distance. In a related paper, Ref. [18] reports near-field, specifically intra-crystal, signal-idler correlations which can have a variety of shapes, including a structure that resembles that of a Bessel beam for a specific value of the phase mismatch and for an unstructured pump.

 

Fig. 4 a) Measured heralded single-photon intensity, as a function of y, under propagation along z. b) Similar to a) except showing single-channel signal counts. c) Maximum counts Rc for each curve in a). d) Maximum counts Rs for each curve in b).

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

The above behavior for the coincidence-counts transverse profile, under propagation along z, constitutes clear evidence of non-diffracting behavior at the single-photon level, for the heralded signal mode. Note that this behavior is in line with the value for zmax = 40.6cm, obtained for our BG single photons through the expression zmax = (f2/f1)2w0ks/kt. Figure 4(c) shows the maximum number of coincidence counts, as a function of z, showing a gradual decline with propagation. Likewise, Fig. 4(d) shows the corresponding behavior for the single-channel signal counts, showing a much more drastic decline with propagation. It is interesting to note that these behaviors imply that the ratio of coincidences to single-channel counts increases by one order of magnitude over the propagation distance considered.

4. Conclusions

We have presented an experiment in which an SPDC nonlinear crystal is pumped by a Bessel-Gauss beam. Our measurement of the signal-mode conditional angular spectrum shows that it corresponds, as limited by the angular acceptance of the idler detector, to the angular spectrum of the pump. We have presented experimental data which shows that the width of the signal-mode, single-photon transverse intensity remains essentially unchanged over a distance exceeding 25cm while, in contrast, the unconditioned signal-mode counts exhibit a drastic broadening within a few cm of propagation. In this paper we have thus shown that the non-diffracting behavior of the pump is directly mapped to the heralded signal-mode single photons.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by CONACYT, Mexico, and by DGAPA, UNAM.

References and links

1. J. Durnin, J.J. Micely Jr, and J. H. Eberly, “Diffraction-free beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. J. Turunen and A. Friberg, “Propagation-invariant optical fields,” Progress in Optics 54, 2–81 (2009).

3. J. C. Gutierrez-Vega and M. A. Bandres, “Helmholtz–Gauss waves,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 289–298 (2005).

4. D.C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, “Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84–87 (1970). [CrossRef]  

5. see for example: J.P. Torres, K. Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Engineering nonlinear optic sources of photonic entanglement,” Prog. in Opt. 56227–331 (2011) [CrossRef]  

6. A.B. U’Ren, K Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Photon engineering for quantum information processing,” Quant. Inf. and Comp. J. 3480–502 (2003)

7. S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. H. Souto Ribero, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion.” Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010). [CrossRef]  

8. A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007) [CrossRef]  

9. see for example: G. Molina-Terriza, J.P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nature Physics 3305–310 (2007) [CrossRef]  

10. C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Pádua, “Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123–3126 (1998). [CrossRef]  

11. G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005). [CrossRef]  

12. J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE 5531(2004)

13. Z. Bouchal, J. Wagner, and M. Chlup, “Self-reconstruction of a distorted nondiffracting beam,” Opt. Comm. 151, 207–211 (1998). [CrossRef]  

14. G. Gbur and O. Korotkova, “Angular spectrum representation for the propagation of arbitrary coherent and partially coherent beams through atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 745–752 (2007) [CrossRef]  

15. R.J. Noriega-Manez and J.C. Gutirrez-Vega, “Rytov theory for Helmholtz-Gauss beams in turbulent atmosphere,” Opt. Express 15, 16328–16341 (2007) [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. R. Ramirez-Alarcon, H. Cruz-Ramirez, and A.B. U’Ren, “Crystal length effects on the angular spectrum of spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pairs,” submitted

17. R. S. Bennink, Y. Liu, D. D. Earl, and W. P. Grice, “Spatial distinguishability of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 023802 (2006). [CrossRef]  

18. H. Di Lorenzo Pires, C.H. Monken, and M.P. van Exter, “Near-field correlations in the two-photon field,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 022307 (2009). [CrossRef]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. J. Durnin, J.J. Micely, and J. H. Eberly, “Diffraction-free beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. J. Turunen and A. Friberg, “Propagation-invariant optical fields,” Progress in Optics 54, 2–81 (2009).
  3. J. C. Gutierrez-Vega and M. A. Bandres, “Helmholtz–Gauss waves,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 289–298 (2005).
  4. D.C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, “Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84–87 (1970).
    [Crossref]
  5. see for example: J.P. Torres, K. Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Engineering nonlinear optic sources of photonic entanglement,” Prog. in Opt. 56227–331 (2011)
    [Crossref]
  6. A.B. U’Ren, K Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Photon engineering for quantum information processing,” Quant. Inf. and Comp. J. 3480–502 (2003)
  7. S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. H. Souto Ribero, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion.” Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010).
    [Crossref]
  8. A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007)
    [Crossref]
  9. see for example: G. Molina-Terriza, J.P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nature Physics 3305–310 (2007)
    [Crossref]
  10. C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Pádua, “Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123–3126 (1998).
    [Crossref]
  11. G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
    [Crossref]
  12. J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE5531(2004)
  13. Z. Bouchal, J. Wagner, and M. Chlup, “Self-reconstruction of a distorted nondiffracting beam,” Opt. Comm. 151, 207–211 (1998).
    [Crossref]
  14. G. Gbur and O. Korotkova, “Angular spectrum representation for the propagation of arbitrary coherent and partially coherent beams through atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 745–752 (2007)
    [Crossref]
  15. R.J. Noriega-Manez and J.C. Gutirrez-Vega, “Rytov theory for Helmholtz-Gauss beams in turbulent atmosphere,” Opt. Express 15, 16328–16341 (2007)
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. R. Ramirez-Alarcon, H. Cruz-Ramirez, and A.B. U’Ren, “Crystal length effects on the angular spectrum of spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pairs,” submitted
  17. R. S. Bennink, Y. Liu, D. D. Earl, and W. P. Grice, “Spatial distinguishability of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 023802 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  18. H. Di Lorenzo Pires, C.H. Monken, and M.P. van Exter, “Near-field correlations in the two-photon field,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 022307 (2009).
    [Crossref]

2011 (1)

see for example: J.P. Torres, K. Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Engineering nonlinear optic sources of photonic entanglement,” Prog. in Opt. 56227–331 (2011)
[Crossref]

2010 (1)

S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. H. Souto Ribero, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion.” Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010).
[Crossref]

2009 (2)

J. Turunen and A. Friberg, “Propagation-invariant optical fields,” Progress in Optics 54, 2–81 (2009).

H. Di Lorenzo Pires, C.H. Monken, and M.P. van Exter, “Near-field correlations in the two-photon field,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 022307 (2009).
[Crossref]

2007 (4)

G. Gbur and O. Korotkova, “Angular spectrum representation for the propagation of arbitrary coherent and partially coherent beams through atmospheric turbulence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 745–752 (2007)
[Crossref]

R.J. Noriega-Manez and J.C. Gutirrez-Vega, “Rytov theory for Helmholtz-Gauss beams in turbulent atmosphere,” Opt. Express 15, 16328–16341 (2007)
[Crossref] [PubMed]

A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007)
[Crossref]

see for example: G. Molina-Terriza, J.P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nature Physics 3305–310 (2007)
[Crossref]

2006 (1)

R. S. Bennink, Y. Liu, D. D. Earl, and W. P. Grice, “Spatial distinguishability of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 023802 (2006).
[Crossref]

2005 (2)

G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
[Crossref]

J. C. Gutierrez-Vega and M. A. Bandres, “Helmholtz–Gauss waves,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22, 289–298 (2005).

2004 (1)

J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE5531(2004)

2003 (1)

A.B. U’Ren, K Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Photon engineering for quantum information processing,” Quant. Inf. and Comp. J. 3480–502 (2003)

1998 (2)

C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Pádua, “Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123–3126 (1998).
[Crossref]

Z. Bouchal, J. Wagner, and M. Chlup, “Self-reconstruction of a distorted nondiffracting beam,” Opt. Comm. 151, 207–211 (1998).
[Crossref]

1987 (1)

J. Durnin, J.J. Micely, and J. H. Eberly, “Diffraction-free beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

1970 (1)

D.C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, “Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84–87 (1970).
[Crossref]

Banaszek, K

A.B. U’Ren, K Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Photon engineering for quantum information processing,” Quant. Inf. and Comp. J. 3480–502 (2003)

Banaszek, K.

see for example: J.P. Torres, K. Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Engineering nonlinear optic sources of photonic entanglement,” Prog. in Opt. 56227–331 (2011)
[Crossref]

Bandres, M. A.

Bennink, R. S.

R. S. Bennink, Y. Liu, D. D. Earl, and W. P. Grice, “Spatial distinguishability of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 023802 (2006).
[Crossref]

Bouchal, Z.

Z. Bouchal, J. Wagner, and M. Chlup, “Self-reconstruction of a distorted nondiffracting beam,” Opt. Comm. 151, 207–211 (1998).
[Crossref]

Burnham, D.C.

D.C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, “Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84–87 (1970).
[Crossref]

Cer, A.

A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007)
[Crossref]

Chlup, M.

Z. Bouchal, J. Wagner, and M. Chlup, “Self-reconstruction of a distorted nondiffracting beam,” Opt. Comm. 151, 207–211 (1998).
[Crossref]

Cruz-Ramirez, H.

R. Ramirez-Alarcon, H. Cruz-Ramirez, and A.B. U’Ren, “Crystal length effects on the angular spectrum of spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pairs,” submitted

Deyanova, Y.

G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
[Crossref]

Di Lorenzo Pires, H.

H. Di Lorenzo Pires, C.H. Monken, and M.P. van Exter, “Near-field correlations in the two-photon field,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 022307 (2009).
[Crossref]

Durnin, J.

J. Durnin, J.J. Micely, and J. H. Eberly, “Diffraction-free beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Earl, D. D.

R. S. Bennink, Y. Liu, D. D. Earl, and W. P. Grice, “Spatial distinguishability of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 023802 (2006).
[Crossref]

Eberly, J. H.

J. Durnin, J.J. Micely, and J. H. Eberly, “Diffraction-free beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Friberg, A.

J. Turunen and A. Friberg, “Propagation-invariant optical fields,” Progress in Optics 54, 2–81 (2009).

Gbur, G.

Grice, W. P.

R. S. Bennink, Y. Liu, D. D. Earl, and W. P. Grice, “Spatial distinguishability of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 023802 (2006).
[Crossref]

Gutierrez-Vega, J. C.

Gutirrez-Vega, J.C.

Hendrych, M.

G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
[Crossref]

Korotkova, O.

Lekki, J.

J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE5531(2004)

Liu, Y.

R. S. Bennink, Y. Liu, D. D. Earl, and W. P. Grice, “Spatial distinguishability of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 023802 (2006).
[Crossref]

Micely, J.J.

J. Durnin, J.J. Micely, and J. H. Eberly, “Diffraction-free beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Minardi, S.

G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
[Crossref]

Molina-Terriza, G.

A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007)
[Crossref]

see for example: G. Molina-Terriza, J.P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nature Physics 3305–310 (2007)
[Crossref]

G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
[Crossref]

Monken, C. H.

S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. H. Souto Ribero, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion.” Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010).
[Crossref]

C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Pádua, “Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123–3126 (1998).
[Crossref]

Monken, C.H.

H. Di Lorenzo Pires, C.H. Monken, and M.P. van Exter, “Near-field correlations in the two-photon field,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 022307 (2009).
[Crossref]

Nguyen, Q.V.

J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE5531(2004)

Noriega-Manez, R.J.

Osorio, C. I.

G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
[Crossref]

Pádua, S.

S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. H. Souto Ribero, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion.” Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010).
[Crossref]

C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Pádua, “Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123–3126 (1998).
[Crossref]

Ramirez-Alarcon, R.

R. Ramirez-Alarcon, H. Cruz-Ramirez, and A.B. U’Ren, “Crystal length effects on the angular spectrum of spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pairs,” submitted

Seibert, M.

J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE5531(2004)

Shi, X.

A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007)
[Crossref]

Souto Ribeiro, P. H.

C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Pádua, “Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123–3126 (1998).
[Crossref]

Souto Ribero, P. H.

S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. H. Souto Ribero, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion.” Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010).
[Crossref]

Torner, L.

see for example: G. Molina-Terriza, J.P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nature Physics 3305–310 (2007)
[Crossref]

Torres, J. P.

A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007)
[Crossref]

Torres, J.P.

see for example: J.P. Torres, K. Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Engineering nonlinear optic sources of photonic entanglement,” Prog. in Opt. 56227–331 (2011)
[Crossref]

see for example: G. Molina-Terriza, J.P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nature Physics 3305–310 (2007)
[Crossref]

G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
[Crossref]

Turunen, J.

J. Turunen and A. Friberg, “Propagation-invariant optical fields,” Progress in Optics 54, 2–81 (2009).

U’Ren, A.B.

A.B. U’Ren, K Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Photon engineering for quantum information processing,” Quant. Inf. and Comp. J. 3480–502 (2003)

R. Ramirez-Alarcon, H. Cruz-Ramirez, and A.B. U’Ren, “Crystal length effects on the angular spectrum of spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pairs,” submitted

Valencia, A.

A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007)
[Crossref]

van Exter, M.P.

H. Di Lorenzo Pires, C.H. Monken, and M.P. van Exter, “Near-field correlations in the two-photon field,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 022307 (2009).
[Crossref]

Wagner, J.

Z. Bouchal, J. Wagner, and M. Chlup, “Self-reconstruction of a distorted nondiffracting beam,” Opt. Comm. 151, 207–211 (1998).
[Crossref]

Walborn, S. P.

S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. H. Souto Ribero, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion.” Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010).
[Crossref]

Walmsley, I.A.

see for example: J.P. Torres, K. Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Engineering nonlinear optic sources of photonic entanglement,” Prog. in Opt. 56227–331 (2011)
[Crossref]

A.B. U’Ren, K Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Photon engineering for quantum information processing,” Quant. Inf. and Comp. J. 3480–502 (2003)

Weiland, K.

J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE5531(2004)

Weinberg, D. L.

D.C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, “Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84–87 (1970).
[Crossref]

Williams, J.

J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE5531(2004)

J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (2)

Nature Physics (1)

see for example: G. Molina-Terriza, J.P. Torres, and L. Torner, “Twisted photons,” Nature Physics 3305–310 (2007)
[Crossref]

Opt. Comm. (1)

Z. Bouchal, J. Wagner, and M. Chlup, “Self-reconstruction of a distorted nondiffracting beam,” Opt. Comm. 151, 207–211 (1998).
[Crossref]

Opt. Express (1)

Phys. Rep. (1)

S. P. Walborn, C. H. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. H. Souto Ribero, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion.” Phys. Rep. 495, 87–139 (2010).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. A (4)

R. S. Bennink, Y. Liu, D. D. Earl, and W. P. Grice, “Spatial distinguishability of photons produced by spontaneous parametric down-conversion with a focused pump,” Phys. Rev. A 74, 023802 (2006).
[Crossref]

H. Di Lorenzo Pires, C.H. Monken, and M.P. van Exter, “Near-field correlations in the two-photon field,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 022307 (2009).
[Crossref]

C. H. Monken, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, and S. Pádua, “Transfer of angular spectrum and image formation in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 3123–3126 (1998).
[Crossref]

G. Molina-Terriza, S. Minardi, Y. Deyanova, C. I. Osorio, M. Hendrych, and J.P. Torres, “Control of the shape of the spatial mode function of photons generated in noncollinear spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 72, 065802 (2005).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. Lett. (3)

A. Valencia, A. Cer, X. Shi, G. Molina-Terriza, and J. P. Torres, “Shaping the waveform of entangled photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 243601 (2007)
[Crossref]

J. Durnin, J.J. Micely, and J. H. Eberly, “Diffraction-free beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1499–1501 (1987).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

D.C. Burnham and D. L. Weinberg, “Observation of simultaneity in parametric production of optical photon pairs,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 84–87 (1970).
[Crossref]

Proc SPIE (1)

J. Lekki, Q.V. Nguyen, M. Seibert, K. Weiland, and J. Williams, “Single-photon non-diffracting Bessel beams,” Proc SPIE5531(2004)

Prog. in Opt. (1)

see for example: J.P. Torres, K. Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Engineering nonlinear optic sources of photonic entanglement,” Prog. in Opt. 56227–331 (2011)
[Crossref]

Progress in Optics (1)

J. Turunen and A. Friberg, “Propagation-invariant optical fields,” Progress in Optics 54, 2–81 (2009).

Quant. Inf. and Comp. J. (1)

A.B. U’Ren, K Banaszek, and I.A. Walmsley, “Photon engineering for quantum information processing,” Quant. Inf. and Comp. J. 3480–502 (2003)

Other (1)

R. Ramirez-Alarcon, H. Cruz-Ramirez, and A.B. U’Ren, “Crystal length effects on the angular spectrum of spontaneous parametric downconversion photon pairs,” submitted

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Experimental setup for the generation of non-diffracting single photons.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 BG pump properties: a) Measured transverse intensity, b) measured angular spectrum, and c) measured transverse intensity vs coordinate y, measured under propagation along coordinate z.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 a) Measured angular spectrum of SPDC photon pairs. b) Measured conditional angular spectrum of signal-mode heralded single photons. c) measured transverse intensity of signal-mode heralded single photons.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 a) Measured heralded single-photon intensity, as a function of y, under propagation along z. b) Similar to a) except showing single-channel signal counts. c) Maximum counts Rc for each curve in a). d) Maximum counts Rs for each curve in b).

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

| Ψ s = d k s S p ( k s + k ˜ i ) | ω p ω ˜ i , k s ,
S p ( k ) = A exp ( w 0 2 4 | k | 2 ) I 0 ( k t w 0 2 | k | 2 ) ,
A p ( ρ ) = A 1 μ exp { 1 μ ( i k t 2 z 2 k p + | ρ | 2 w 0 2 ) } J 0 ( k t | ρ | μ ) ,

Metrics