## Abstract

We find self-accelerating beams in highly nonlocal nonlinear optical media, and show that their propagation dynamics is strongly affected by boundary conditions. Specifically for the thermal optical nonlinearity, the boundary conditions have a strong impact on the beam trajectory: they can increase the acceleration during propagation, or even cause beam bending in a direction opposite to the initial trajectory. Under strong self-focusing, the accelerating beam decomposes into a localized self-trapped beam propagating on an oscillatory trajectory and a second beam which accelerates in a different direction. We augment this study by investigating the effects caused by a finite aperture and by a nonlinear range of a finite extent.

© 2011 OSA

## 1. Introduction

The past few years have witnessed considerable research on self-accelerating beams and optical pulses. This concept was pioneered by Berry and Balazs in 1979 [1], who found a special solution for the Schrödinger equation, where a wave-packet describing a free particle is self-accelerating. In 2007, this idea was introduced into optics, and used to demonstrate experimentally self-bending beams which have the functional shape of an Airy function [2,3]. Since then, this phenomenon has drawn much interest, with applications ranging from trapping of particles along curved paths [4] and self-bending plasma channels [5] to ultrafast self-accelerating pulses [6] and Airy light bullets accelerating in both transverse dimensions and in time [7]. Until recently, nonlinearities have been perceived as an obstacle for supporting self-accelerating wavepackets: attempts to launch an Airy beam into Kerr media revealed that the beam shape varies - no longer propagating as accelerating shape-invariant entity [7–9], due to “nonlinearly induced distortions” [7]. However, recently our group has shown [10] that it is possible to generate self-accelerating nonlinearly-self-trapped beams in various types of nonlinear media, ranging from Kerr (where this idea was pioneered in 1989 [11]) and saturable Kerr-like media to quadratic nonlinearities. Related studies followed soon thereafter [12,13]. In principle, the formulation in [10] applies to all nonlinear media with a local response, hence it is likely that self-accelerating beams will be found in any local optical nonlinearities including in systems where two polarizations are coupled (e.g., the Manakov system). However, many soliton-supporting nonlinear systems display a highly nonlocal response, for example thermal glasses [14,15], liquid crystals [16,17], charge carriers in semiconductor amplifiers [18] and more. This raises the intriguing question: can self-accelerating solitons exist in nonlocal nonlinear media? This question becomes even more interesting in long-range nonlocal nonlinear media, where the response is strongly affected by boundary conditions, such that even highly localized soliton beams can be controlled from afar [15,19,20]. This issue is especially interesting for accelerating beams, because all accelerating wavepackets found thus far, in linear and nonlinear media, albeit being localized functions, they all have an infinite oscillating tail. Consequently, we expect accelerating beams in nonlocal nonlinear media to be strongly affected by boundary conditions, even from very far away.

In this paper, we do just that: we present self-accelerating beams in nonlocal nonlinear optical media, focusing specifically on the highly nonlocal thermal optical nonlinearity. We show that the non-accelerating thermal boundary conditions have a strong impact on the beam trajectory: they can increase the acceleration during propagation, or even cause beam bending in a direction opposite to the initial trajectory. Under strong self-focusing, the accelerating beam decomposes into a localized self-trapped beam, and a second beam which accelerates in a different direction.

## 2. Accelerating self-trapped (propagation-invariant) solutions

The thermal nonlinear optical effect is caused due to absorption of light by the medium, which raises the local temperature. In such a medium, the temperature modifies the refractive index, according to $\Delta n=\beta \Delta T,\beta =dn/dt$ [15], where $\beta $ describes the temperature dependence of the refractive index, $\Delta T$ is the change in the temperature and $\Delta n$ is the change in the refractive index. The temperature obeys the heat equation, which under steady-state conditions, yields an equation for the change in the refractive index [15]:

$\kappa $is the thermal conductivity, $\alpha $ is the linear absorption coefficient of the material, and $\psi $ is the slowly-varying amplitude of the electromagnetic field. The sign of $\beta $ determines if the medium is of the self-focusing or self-defocusing type. In many relevant materials (e.g., lead glass), $\alpha $ is very small, such that absorption can be safely neglected for fairly large propagation distances, while the thermal nonlinearity is still very strong [15]. For simplicity, we henceforth analyze one-dimensional beams propagating in this nonlinear medium. The evolution of the slowly-varying envelope $\psi \left(x,z\right)$ of such beams is described by the nonlinear paraxial equation:where $z$ is the optical axis, $x$ is the transverse direction, $k=2\pi {n}_{0}/\lambda $ is the wavenumber, $\lambda $ is the vacuum wavelength, ${n}_{0}$ is the background refractive index of the medium, and $\Delta n$ satisfies Eq. (1). As shown in [19], when the refractive index change $\Delta n$ is not too large (~0.01 and smaller), the evolution is slow and adiabatic, such that the z-derivatives in Eq. (1) can be safely neglected. To find self-accelerating beams in such a medium, we use the same method used in [10] to find accelerating beams in media with local nonlinear response. We seek self-trapped self-accelerating solutions that satisfy $\left|\psi \left(x,0\right)\right|=\left|\psi \left(x-f\left(z\right),z\right)\right|$, meaning that the beam is propagating along the curve $x=f\left(z\right)$, while maintaining its exact intensity structure. Such a solution is a self-trapped solution in the accelerating frame of reference. We change variables $\widehat{x}=x-f\left(z\right)$, transforming Eq. (2) to the accelerating frame, which yieldsWe seek propagation-invariant solutions for Eq. (3), namely, $\widehat{\psi}\left(\widehat{x},z\right)=u\left(\widehat{x}\right){e}^{iT\left(\widehat{x},z\right)}$, where $u$ is a real function. After setting to zero the coefficients of terms that diverge if $u\left(\widehat{x}\right)$ goes through zero, we obtain

The Green function of Eq. (5), for trivial boundary conditions, is $G\left(\tilde{x},\tilde{x}\text{'}\right)=-const\cdot \left|\tilde{x}-\tilde{x}\text{'}\right|$. Using this we rewrite Eq. (6):

To approximate the integral, we assume that the self-trapped solution has at least one decaying tail. Therefore, for some ${x}_{0}$, (with ${x}_{0}>0$, without loss of generality) every $\tilde{x}>{x}_{0}$ satisfies ${\left|u\left(\tilde{x}\right)\right|}^{2}\to 0$. We approximate the integral term for $\tilde{x}>{x}_{0}$:

where $P={\displaystyle {\int}_{-L}^{L}{\left|\tilde{u}\left(x\text{'}\right)\right|}^{2}dx\text{'}}$ and ${X}_{CM}={\displaystyle {\int}_{-L}^{L}x\text{'}{\left|\tilde{u}\left(x\text{'}\right)\right|}^{2}dx\text{'}}$. This approximation is valid for any solution having at least one decaying tail. Under the condition $cP<<1$, which physically implies a weak nonlinearity, Eq. (7) is similar to the Airy equation $\tilde{u}\text{'}\text{'}-\tilde{x}\tilde{u}=0$, whose solutions are the Airy functions. This suggests that, for every such small $cP$, the refractive index change $\Delta \tilde{n}\left(x\right)$ is approximately linear in $\tilde{x}$ for any $\tilde{x}>{x}_{0}$. Hence, we expect the solution on the side of the decaying tail of $\tilde{u}$ to be similar to the Airy function, which is the eigen-function of a potential structured as a linear gradient.

We solve Eq. (5) and Eq. (6) numerically in the interval $\left[-a,a\right]$, and find the eigen-functions (the propagation-invariant solutions in the accelerated frame). As sketched in Fig. 1 , the boundary conditions for $\Delta \tilde{n}$ are $\Delta \tilde{n}\left(\tilde{x}=-a\right)=\Delta \tilde{n}\left(\tilde{x}=a\right)=0$ (arising from $T(\tilde{x}=\pm a)={T}_{0}$, ${T}_{0}$ being the temperature everywhere in the absence of light). The boundary conditions for the field amplitude, $\tilde{u}\left(\tilde{x}=-a\right)$ and $\tilde{u}\left(\tilde{x}=a\right)$, can be any non-zero finite value. We choose this value to be such that does not make $\tilde{u}$ diverge. A typical solution is shown in Fig. 1.

Notice that the change in the refractive index, $\Delta \tilde{n}$, is approximately linear near the main lobe, as we expected. This implies that, near the main lobe, the solution is similar to the Airy function. As $\tilde{x}\to -a$, the self-trapped solution differs from the Airy function, mainly due to the boundary conditions.

## 3. Propagation dynamics of accelerating self-trapped beams

Having found the self-accelerating self-trapped solutions, we study their propagation dynamics. It is important to emphasize that these propagation-invariant beams were found under boundary conditions $\Delta \tilde{n}\left(\tilde{x}=-a\right)=\Delta \tilde{n}\left(\tilde{x}=a\right)=0$, which are z-independent in the accelerating frame. However, physically, this will almost never be the case in experiments: to do that one would have to pre-select a given trajectory, and subsequently cut the nonlinear sample specifically for that trajectory. Rather, experimentally one would typically use a rectangular sample with z-independent boundary conditions in the non-accelerating lab frame. In what follows, we study the impact of such non-accelerating boundary conditions on the accelerating beam that was chosen such that it is self-trapped (propagation-invariant) under accelerating boundary conditions. This setting conforms to typical experiments with self-trapped beams in nonlocal nonlinear media [15,19,20,22]. From previous work with boundary force effects on solitons in such media [19], we expect the propagation dynamics of the accelerating beams to be strongly affected by boundary conditions, even from far away from the beam. As we show below, by controlling the power of the beam we change the strength of the nonlinearity, and through that the impact of the boundary conditions on the propagation dynamics. The simulations are carried out using the techniques described in [15,19,20,22]. In all cases, the initial condition (the launch beam) is the self-consistent solution of the type shown in Fig. 1 (truncated only by the boundaries of the sample), which would exhibit self-accelerating self-trapped propagation in the same system, under accelerating boundary conditions. Typical simulation results are depicted in Fig. 2 . The physical parameters used for the examples shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 are the optical wavelength $\lambda =0.75\mu m$ in vacuum, the background refractive index ${n}_{0}=1.5$, $\left|c\right|=2\cdot {10}^{-5}$, where the sign of $c$ determines whether the nonlinearity is of the self-focusing or the self-defocusing type.

We tested the stability of the self-accelerating solution numerically under random noise in a magnitude of 10% of the amplitude of the main lobe. We find that the accelerating beams are virtually unaffected by the noise, for both the focusing and defocusing cases. This is in fact excepted from highly nonlocal nonlinearities, which always tend to suppress localized perturbations in the beam and/or the index change.

The results depicted in Fig. 2 show that varying the power of the beam changes the beam trajectory. Notice that the beam is no longer propagation-invariant in the accelerating frame of reference. The reason for this is the thermal boundary conditions. Namely, the boundary conditions are symmetric at $z=0$, however, as the beam is propagating, it undergoes spatial acceleration (beam bending), which inherently makes the boundaries to become non-symmetric with respect to the beam. As we know from [19], asymmetric boundary conditions exert forces on the beam, which affect the beam trajectory. The complex dynamics shown in Fig. 2 arises from this interplay between interference effects predesigned to support a particular accelerating trajectory and boundary forces exerted on the beam, in highly nonlocal nonlinear media. Clearly, these forces have a major impact on the beam trajectory, leading to accelerating trajectories that are very different from the parabolic trajectories found for the Airy beams propagating in linear media. For the self-focusing case, the acceleration decreases as the beam power is increased, and for strong self-focusing the trajectory becomes non-parabolic. This is a clear manifestation of the underlying nonlocal nonlinearity, because in nonlinearities where $\Delta n$ has a local response, all trajectories are parabolic. Furthermore, all accelerating beams supported by linear interference effects must have convex trajectories [21], in a sharp contrast to the “wiggly beam” of Fig. 2c, which exhibits a non-convex trajectory. Also, notice that under strong self-focusing the lobes of the accelerating beam become narrower as the beam is propagating. For the self-defocusing case (Fig. 2d), the acceleration increases as the beam power is increased, and for a strong defocusing nonlinearity all the lobes of the beam expand. Thus, controlling the power of the optical beam allows us to change the trajectory (spatial acceleration) of the beam, by virtue of boundary force effects arising from the long-range nonlocal nature of the thermal nonlinearity.

Another very interesting phenomenon occurs in the self-focusing case. For very strong nonlinearity, the original beam decomposes into two beams, as depicted in Fig. 3c: The original Airy-like beam that continues propagating on a different trajectory, until it loses all its power as a result of the finite aperture of the beam, and a second, new, localized beam that has taken its power from the original beam. Notice that this second beam lacks any oscillating tails characteristic of the Airy-like wavepackets, which accelerate due to their structure. Indeed, this second beam is self-trapped by virtue of the self-focusing nonlinearity: it is a spatial soliton [23]. For strong self-focusing, the nonlinear term in Eq. (6) becomes dominant, causing focusing of the beam that overcomes the tendency of the beam to accelerate. This new self-trapped beam first moves on an oscillatory trajectory while radiating power during propagation. Later on, after that beam has gained enough power, the trajectory oscillations decrease, and the beam stabilizes around a constant power, becoming a spatial soliton propagating at an approximately straight line trajectory in the z direction. Such oscillatory propagation dynamics of solitons in this highly nonlocal nonlinear medium is familiar from earlier work [19]: it appears when the soliton is launched off-center, such that the boundaries exert asymmetric forces on the beam. What we have shown here is a fascinating nonlinear phenomenon in which a localized soliton is created from a wide beam with very long tails, that are affected by far away boundary conditions through a highly nonlocal nonlinearity.

## 4. Accelerating self-trapped beams carrying finite power

The self-accelerating beams discussed thus far in this article carry infinite power (truncated only by the boundaries of the sample). Physically, however, all beams must carry finite power. Accordingly, accelerating beams carrying finite power were analyzed theoretically in both the linear domain [2,3] and in local nonlinearities [10]. In this section, we study the propagation dynamic of accelerating beams carrying finite power in highly nonlocal nonlinear media. Specifically, we are interested to elucidate the influence of the width of the aperture (which is what makes the beam finite) on the propagation dynamic of the beam. We study numerically the propagation dynamic of such finite-power beams under self-focusing and self-defocusing, for varying power levels. It is important however to distinguish between the linear diffractive evolution associated with launching finite beams (namely, that the acceleration occurs only for a finite distance determined by the aperture [2,3,10]), and the effects caused by the nonlocal response of the nonlinearity. Consequently, we simulate finite beams whose initial width (aperture) is considerably narrower than the width of the nonlinear sample (2*a* in Fig. 1).

We find that, under self-focusing conditions, such self-accelerating finite beam exhibits all the phenomena described above with infinite beams, including the observation that, as the power of the beam is increased the acceleration decreases, and the intriguing effects occurring under strong self-focusing (Fig. 3). Likewise, under self-defocusing, as the beam power is increased the acceleration increases, similar to what happens with infinite beams.

The effects associated with the highly nonlocal nature of the nonlinearity do give rise to one important effect caused by the aperture: changing the aperture changes the distance of the beam from the boundaries. Hence, when the aperture is wider the boundary forces are more dominant and have a more significant influence on the acceleration of the beam. A typical example of the propagation dynamic of such a finite self-accelerating beam is displayed in Fig. 4 : a beam of wavelength $\lambda =0.75\mu m$, going through an aperture of $1.8mm$, which allows 55 lobes with width varying from $50\mu m$ (main lobe) to $10\mu m$ (narrowest lobe). All the physical parameters of the beam and of the sample are exactly as for the beam in Fig. 2a. The beam enters a sample of $7.5mm$ width, the background refractive index is ${n}_{0}=1.5$, and $\left|c\right|=2\cdot {10}^{-5}$. The power is the same as of the beam in Fig. 2a. However, for this finite beam the same power gives rise to a change in the refractive index which at its peak is as large as $5.4\cdot {10}^{-3}$, one order of magnitude higher than that of the infinite beam. The reasoning is simple: the same power is now distributed over the finite aperture, which is narrower than the sample width, hence the higher nonlinear effects. Consequently, the main nonlinear effect caused by the finite width of an accelerating launch beam is that all the nonlinear effects are “scaled up”: they occur at power levels lower than those required to exhibit the same effects with infinite beams.

## 5. Accelerating self-trapped beams in nonlinear media with a finite range of nonlocality

In the previous sections we dealt with a highly nonlocal nonlinearity, in which the nonlocal response has an infinite range. Here we consider accelerating beams propagating in a medium with nonlinearity having a finite range of nonlocality. Specifically, we are interested in the influence of the range of the nonlocality on the propagation of the beam. Such finite-range nonlocal nonlinearities occur in a variety of physical systems, such as liquid crystals [16,17], semiconductor amplifiers [18] and photorefractives [24–26]. In many cases, the equation describing the change in the refractive index under nonlocal nonlinearity with a finite range can be written as [27]:

## 6. Conclusion

We have found self-accelerating self-trapped beams supported by the highly nonlocal thermal nonlinearity. We demonstrated the complex dynamic of an accelerating beam propagating under non-accelerating boundary conditions that exert forces on the beam. We showed that changing the nonlinearity strength allows control over the trajectories of the beam, to the extent that it gives rise even to trajectories that are completely different from those of the linear self-accelerating Airy beam. Moreover, we found a new surprising phenomenon created by the presence of high focusing nonlinearity: a very broad (“infinite”) launch beam decomposes into two beams, one of which becoming a localized spatial soliton, whose trajectory oscillates around a straight line, while the other beam is shedding power and eventually dies out. This picturesque phenomenon brings about a variety of intriguing questions: can the interaction between nonlinear accelerating beams produce spatial solitons? What would be their trajectories? Can they be pre-designed? We leave these ideas for future research.

## Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Ido Kaminer for introducing his method for finding the self-accelerating nonlinear beams, and for his helpful support. This project was support by the Binational USA – Israel Science Foundation, the Israel Science Foundation, and by an Advanced Grant from the European Research Council.

## References and links

**1. **M. V. Berry and N. L. Balazs, “Nonspreading wave packets,” Am. J. Phys. **47**(3), 264–267 (1979). [CrossRef]

**2. **G. A. Siviloglou and D. N. Christodoulides, “Accelerating finite energy Airy beams,” Opt. Lett. **32**(8), 979–981 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**3. **G. A. Siviloglou, J. Broky, A. Dogariu, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Observation of accelerating Airy beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **99**(21), 213901 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**4. **J. Baumgartl, M. Mazilu, and K. Dholakia, “Optical mediated particle clearing using Airy wavepackets,” Nat. Photonics **2**(11), 675–678 (2008). [CrossRef]

**5. **P. Polynkin, M. Kolesik, J. V. Moloney, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Curved plasma channel generation using ultraintense Airy beams,” Science **324**(5924), 229–232 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**6. **A. Chong, W. H. Renninger, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, “Airy-Bessel wave packets as versatile linear light bullets,” Nat. Photonics **4**(2), 103–106 (2010). [CrossRef]

**7. **D. Abdollahpour, S. Suntsov, D. G. Papazoglou, and S. Tzortzakis, “Spatiotemporal airy light bullets in the linear and nonlinear regimes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **105**(25), 253901 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**8. **Y. Hu, S. Huang, P. Zhang, C. Lou, J. Xu, and Z. Chen, “Persistence and breakdown of Airy beams driven by an initial nonlinearity,” Opt. Lett. **35**(23), 3952–3954 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**9. **R.-P. Chen, C.-F. Yin, X.-X. Chu, and H. Wang, “Effect of Kerr nonlinearity on an Airy beam,” Phys. Rev. A **82**, 043832 (2010).

**10. **I. Kaminer, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Self-accelerating self-trapped optical beams,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **106**(21), 213903 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**11. **J. A. Giannini and R. I. Joseph, “The role of the second Painleve transcendent in nonlinear optics,” Phys. Lett. A **141**(8-9), 417–419 (1989). [CrossRef]

**12. **Y. Fattal, A. Rudnick, and D. M. Marom, “Soliton shedding from Airy pulses in Kerr media,” Opt. Express **19**(18), 17298–17307 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**13. **A. Lotti, D. Faccio, A. Couairon, D. G. Papazoglou, P. Panagiotopoulos, D. Abdollahpour, and S. Tzortzakis, “Stationary nonlinear Airy beams,” Phys. Rev. A **84**(2), 021807 (2011). [CrossRef]

**14. **F. W. Dabby and J. R. Whinnery, “Thermal self-focusing of laser beams in lead glasses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. **13**(8), 284–286 (1968). [CrossRef]

**15. **C. Rotschild, O. Cohen, O. Manela, M. Segev, and T. Carmon, “Solitons in nonlinear media with an infinite range of nonlocality: first observation of coherent elliptic solitons and of vortex-ring solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **95**(21), 213904 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**16. **E. Braun, L. P. Faucheux, and A. Libchaber, “Strong self-focusing in nematic liquid crystals,” Phys. Rev. A **48**(1), 611–622 (1993). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**17. **C. Conti, M. Peccianti, and G. Assanto, “Route to nonlocality and observation of accessible solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **91**(7), 073901 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**18. **E. A. Ultanir, D. Michaelis, F. Lederer, and G. I. Stegeman, “Stable spatial solitons in semiconductor optical amplifiers,” Opt. Lett. **28**(4), 251–253 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**19. **B. Alfassi, C. Rotschild, O. Manela, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Boundary force effects exerted on solitons in highly nonlinear media,” Opt. Lett. **32**(2), 154–156 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**20. **C. Rotschild, B. Alfassi, O. Cohen, and M. Segev, “Long-range interactions between optical solitons,” Nat. Phys. **2**(11), 769–774 (2006). [CrossRef]

**21. **E. Greenfield, M. Segev, W. Walasik, and O. Raz, “Accelerating light beams along arbitrary convex trajectories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **106**(21), 213902 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**22. **B. Alfassi, C. Rotschild, O. Manela, M. Segev, and D. N. Christodoulides, “Nonlocal surface-wave solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **98**(21), 213901 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**23. **G. I. Stegeman and M. Segev, “Optical spatial solitons and their interactions: universality and diversity,” Science **286**(5444), 1518–1523 (1999). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**24. **M. Segev, B. Crosignani, A. Yariv, and B. Fischer, “Spatial solitons in photorefractive media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **68**(7), 923–926 (1992). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**25. **M. Segev, G. C. Valley, B. Crosignani, P. DiPorto, and A. Yariv, “Steady-state spatial screening solitons in photorefractive materials with external applied field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **73**(24), 3211–3214 (1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**26. **W. Królikowski, M. Saffman, B. Luther-Davies, and C. Denz, “Anomalous interaction of spatial solitons in photorefractive media,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **80**(15), 3240–3243 (1998). [CrossRef]

**27. **J. Wyller, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, and J. J. Rasmussen, “Generic features of modulational instability in nonlocal Kerr media,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. **66**(6), 066615 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]