We show a large enhancement of two-photon absorption processes in nanocrystal quantum dots and of light upconversion efficiency from the IR to the near-IR spectral regime, using a hybrid optical device in which near-IR emitting InAs quantum dots were embedded on top a metallic nanoslit array. The resonant enhancement of these nonlinear optical processes is due to the strong local electromagnetic field enhancements inside the nanoslit array structure at the extraordinary transmission resonances. A maximal two-photon absorption enhancement of more than 20 was inferred. Different high field regions were identified for different polarizations, which can be used for designing and optimizing efficient nonlinear processes in such hybrid structures. Combining nanocrystal quantum dots with subwavelength metallic nanostructures is therefore a promising way for a range of possible nonlinear optical devices.
© 2011 Optical Society of America
Nanocrystal Quantum Dots (NQDs) are becoming increasingly important as the active building blocks for a host of photonic applications. This is due to their unique properties, such as their well engineered optical emission and absorption wavelengths, their high quantum yield and their tiny dimensions. These properties, together with the ability to selectively integrate them on various platforms down to the nanoscale by changing their chemical functionality, make them a suitable active medium for many nano-optical devices. Indeed, NQDs are currently being used or tested for applications ranging from biological labeling in vivo of cells [1–4], photodetectors , solar cells [6, 7], to lasing devices [8–10] as well as for single photon sources [11, 12].
For improving and expanding the range of possible optical functionalities of NQDs in optical devices, control and manipulation schemes of their optical properties are necessary. Indeed, a demonstration of control of quantum dots linear emission and absorption has been demonstrated in various works [13–16]. Some of the most interesting possible applications of NQDs in optical devices involve exploiting their optical nonlinear properties [17–20]. For efficient nonlinear optical processes involving NQDs, an enhancement of their nonlinear response is essential. In this regard, several works have demonstrated enhancement of two-photon absorption (TPA) processes of quantum dots using local field enhancements in dielectric photonic crystals [21, 22]. Such ability to combine NQDs on the ensemble level as well as on the single particle level into photonic structures, and utilize it for manipulating the light - quantum dot interactions, opens up ways to construct various types of active optical devices, both linear and nonlinear, in subwavelengths dimensions and with new or enhanced properties.
Another emerging set of optical structures for manipulation of light are subwavelength metallic structures [23,24]. More specifically, metallic nanoslit array (NSA) structures are composed of metal transmission gratings with very narrow slits. Such structures have been predicted  and later shown  to exhibit a phenomenon known as extraordinary transmission (EOT) , in which, under certain resonant wavelength regimes, light can be transmitted in an almost perfect way through these gratings. This almost perfect transmission occurs even when the slits are much smaller than the impinging light wavelength. An intuitive and clear explanation of the exact mechanism behind this effect was, and still is in some way, a matter of an ongoing scientific exploration, but it is now well established that these resonances correspond to standing surface waves on the NSA . Initially, only resonances for incoming light in TM polarization were suggested and measured in relation to the EOT effect, but later, EOT was suggested  and measured  in NSA structures for incoming light with TE polarization as well. For an EOT to occur in TE, a thin layer of dielectric material has to be present on top of the metallic grating (see a schematic diagram of such a structure in Fig. 1a).
Recently, we have developed a unified analytical model to explain in an intuitive way the underlying mechanism behind EOT in such structures, for both the TM and TE polarization on the same footing . The emerging picture from this model is that in order for an EOT resonance to occur, the Bragg waves, that are the confined eigenmodes of the periodic NSA, must fulfill a standing wave condition between the effective edges of the structure. Whenever such a condition is fulfilled, a standing waveguide mode which can also be viewed as a Fabri-Perot - like mode arises in the structure, leading to strong local electromagnetic field enhancements at the anti-nodes of this standing wave [24, 30]. Local field enhancements were recently used to show a transmission bistability for a nonlinear polymer on top of an array of nanosized holes . This picture is true for both TM and TE polarization with the difference being in the boundaries of the standing wave , and therefore in the location of the EM field enhancements as will be discussed late on in this paper.
TPA is a third order nonlinear effect (χ(3)) which is an intensity dependent process. Therefore, it is expected that enhancing the electromagnetic (EM) field intensities at the vicinity of the nonlinear material will increase the TPA efficiency. Indeed, increasing the efficiency of two-photon absorption in Erbium doped glass using an NSA structure in TM polarization has recently been reported . In this work we show an enhancement of TPA and of light upconversion in NQDs embedded in a metallic subwavelength nanoslit array. We show that the highly confined EM waves in both TE and TM polarizations in such metallic structures enhances TPA efficiency in NQDs and therefore the light upconversion process by a factor of ∼ 20. We also show that the TPA enhancement measurement is a good probe of the local field enhancements in such metallic nanostructures, and suggest that understanding and exploiting the different geometry of the EOT resonances in TE and TM can lead to new functionalities of devices based on NQDs.
2. Experimental setup
To demonstrate the enhancement of a TPA process in NQDs using resonant local field enhancements in metallic NSAs, we fabricated metallic NSA structures covered by a NQD-in-polymer matrix. The NSA resonances were designed to occur at wavelengths which are at half the wavelength of the higher excitonic transitions of the NQDs (see Fig. 1c). By exciting the structure with laser pulses at these resonant wavelengths (∼ 1500nm), the strong local field enhancements of the structure enhanced the TPA process in the NQDs, leading to a population of the NQD excited states. These excited states then decay radiatively from the first excitonic transition wavelength (∼ 950nm), leading to light upconversion from the structure . This procedure is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1c.
Our samples consist of NIR emitting NQDs in a transparent polymer, embedded in an Aluminum based NSA, as is schematically shown in Fig. 1a. The NQDs investigated in this work are InAs/CdSe core/shell type I , dispersed in a polymer matrix of perfluorocyclobutane (PFCB) . A typical emission spectrum of the NQDs is shown in Fig. 1b, peaking around ∼950nm, corresponding to the emission wavelength of the first excitonic transition, inhomogeneously broadened by the small size distribution of the NQDs. The polymer has a refractive index of n ≃ 1.51. The NQD/polymer mixture was spin-coated on the NSA forming a H ≃ 1.8μm thick layer (Fig. 1a).
The NSA consists of an Aluminum grating on a glass substrate, as depicted in Fig. 1a with a height of h = 0.25μm. Two different grating periods and slit widths were used, depending on the incoming excitation polarization with respect to the grating (either TE or TM polarizations). For the experiments with an excitation having TM (TE) polarization, the grating had a period of d = 0.8μm (d = 1μm) and a slit width of a = 0.35μm (a = 0. 45μm) respectively. These parameters where chosen so that the structure resonances (in both TE and TM) would match the excitation wavelengths required for the TPA process as described above.
The excitation was done using a tunable Optical Parametric Oscillator (OPO) pumped by a mode-locked 80Mhz Ti:Sapphire laser, producing sub-100fs pulses in the near infra-red (NIR) spectral range (1400 – 1600nm). The pulse was either TM or TE polarized with respect to the NSA structure. The pulse was slightly focused on the sample, and the resulting upconverted fluorescence was collected and analyzed by a spectrometer with a Pixis CCD camera (Fig. 1a). This fluorescence intensity was normalized to the fluorescence intensity from an identical reference sample but without the NSA.
In order to analyze our experimental results, We first define the total absorption cross-section of the NQDs as:36]:
Equation (2) shows that IUC ∝ I2. We also define the enhancement factor of the incoming light inside the NSA structure for various excitation wavelengths λ as γ(λ). Therefore, the intensity inside the structure is enhanced as I → γI. As a result, the measured upconverted fluorescence IUC from the NSA structure, normalized to the fluorescence from the reference without the NSA, is equal to γ2.
From Eq. (2), we expect a quadratic behavior of IUC as we increase the peak power of the excitation laser. This is experimentally confirmed in Fig. 2 where the total fluorescence of the NQDs in a reference sample exhibits such quadratic behavior.
Figure 3a shows an example of an enhancement of IUC in our NSA structures (in TM polarization). It is clear that the induced fluorescence is enhanced due to the enhanced TPA. The square of the experimental enhancement intensity factor ( ) is extracted by integrating the full spectra to get the total induced fluorescence and normalizing it to the emission from the reference sample. In addition, we verified that γ is power independent as expected, which is presented in Fig. 3b.
Next, we measured the dependence of on the excitation wavelength. This dependence is presented by the green dots in Fig. 4a for the TM excitation and in Fig. 4b for TE excitation. It is evident that in both TE and TM, the nonlinear enhancement is strongly wavelength dependent and exhibits a resonant behavior. In order to understand the nature of this resonant behavior, we have measured the transmission spectra of the NSA structure in both polarizations. The corresponding transmission measurements in TM and TE are presented by the blue lines in Fig. 4a and b respectively. Both transmission spectra show clear EOT resonances. These peaks in transmission are the result of the standing EM resonances of the confined Bragg modes of the structure (see Ref.  for a general analytical model that identifies and explains the origin of the EOT resonances in such structures). These Fabri-Perot like confined resonances are accompanied by a strong enhancement of the EM intensity inside the structure. This is verified by a numerical calculation of the optical response of our structures, based on a dynamical diffraction formalism . Figure 5a,c presents a comparison of the measured transmission spectra to the calculated one for both TE and TM respectively. A good agreement is found between the calculation and the measurement, and the various peaks are identified as various orders of the standing wave resonances (the differences in the absolute magnitude of the transmission between the calculation and the experiment are probably due to the inhomegenity of the grating). In particular, we have calculated the EM intensity distributions in the structure around the first EOT resonance for both polarizations. The red circles in Fig. 4 point to the spectral position of the maximal calculated field enhancement for the TE and TM polarizations. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that there is a good correspondence between the spectral location of the peak in γ2 and the maximal field enhancement in both polarization. This is a strong indication that the mechanism behind the TPA enhancement is the local field enhancements at the EOT resonances. The calculated spatial distribution of the field intensities at those EOT resonances are plotted in Fig. 5b, 5d for TE and TM respectively, normalized to the EM field intensities without the NSA structure. It can be seen that indeed strong local field enhancements are obtained in our structures, reaching a maximal value of ∼ 90 for TE and ∼ 13 for TM.
To compare the theoretical calculations to our experimental results, we first need to obtain the expected nonlinear enhancement factor from the near field calculations. For that, we assumed that the NQD are evenly dispersed in the polymer layer on the metallic grating. With this assumption, the spatially averaged value of the TPA enhancement factor (γcalc) should be given by:
Figure 6 shows the dependence of γcalc on the excitation wavelength. The largest enhancement for TE is at 1466nm with a maximal value of ∼ 21 and a typical width of 3nm. For the TM polarization the enhancement is broader, peaking at 1505nm. The reason for this difference in the maximal value of γcalc between the two polarizations can be explained as follows: the field enhancements are larger for the TE polarization than for the TM polarization due to a better mode confinement. Also, while in TM the maximal enhancement is restricted only to the slit volume, the volume of the high field enhancements in TE polarization is larger and resides mostly in the thicker polymer layer. This leads to a better overlap of the enhanced EM fields with the NQDs. Next, we have to take into account the finite spectral width of the laser pulse (∼ 20nm), which excites the inhomogeneously broadened spectrum of the NQDs inside the resonant structure. This means that different NQDs having a TPA resonance at different wavelengths covered by the laser pulse spectrum experience different laser powers as well as different local field enhancements. To take this effect into account we calculate the expected averaged TPA enhancement by:Eq. ( 3).
Figure 7a, 7b shows a comparison of the experimentally measured enhancement factor, γexp to the calculated one, γavg, for TE and TM polarizations respectively. A very good agreement between the calculated values and the experimental values is obtained, confirming both the interpretation of the origin of the observed enhancement as well as validating the numerically calculated field intensities and the NQDs TPA enhancements in the NSA structure.
We have shown enhancement of two-photon absorption processes in nanocrystal quantum dots and of light upconversion from the IR to the NIR spectral regime using a hybrid optical device in which NIR emitting InAs quantum dots were embedded on top a metallic nanoslit array. Our measurements and calculations show that the underlying mechanism behind the resonant enhancement of this nonlinear optical process is the strong local field enhancements inside the NSA structure which in turn result from the standing EM waves at the EOT resonances. A maximal TPA enhancement of more than 20 was inferred. We also identified, using our numerical model, the ”hot spots” in the structure where maximal field enhancement is achieved: in TE polarization, the maximal field of the first EOT resonance occurs mainly at the dielectric waveguide layer on top of the metal grating, while for the first EOT resonance in TM, the maximal field occurs mostly inside the slit and very close to the metal-dielectric interface. This can be used as a guide for designing and optimizing efficient nonlinear devices based on such NSA structures. For example, one can fill the slits and the top dielectric layer with different nonlinear media (such as two different types of NQDs), and control which one will be activated using different polarizations. We note that the maximal enhancement can be much improved by a better design, e.g., using less lossy metal in the IR spectral regime, and optimizing the metal thickness and the slit width. Our conclusion is that subwavelength metallic nanostructures are promising for a range of possible nonlinear optical devices based on nanocrystal quantum dots.
This research was partially supported by the FP7 Marry Curie IRG program and the BIKURA program of the Israel Science Foundation.
References and links
1. D. R. Larson, W. R. Zipfel, R. M. Williams, S. W. Clark, M. P. Bruchez, F. W. Wise, and W. W. Webb, “Water-soluble quantum dots for multiphoton fluorescence imaging in vivo,” Science 300, 1434–1436 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. X. Michalet, F. F. Pinaud, L. A. Bentolila, J. M. Tsay, S. Doose, J. J. Li, G. Sundaresan, A. M. Wu, S. S. Gambhir, and S. Weiss, “Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics,” Science 307, 538–544 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. S. C. Lee, S. Krishna, and S. R. J. Brueck, “Quantum dot infrared photodetector enhanced by surface plasma wave excitation,” Opt. Express 17, 23160–23168 (2009). [CrossRef]
6. A. J. Nozik, “Quantum dot solar cells,” Physica E 14, 115 – 120 (2002). [CrossRef]
7. G. Conibeer, M. Green, E. Cho, D. Knig, Y. Cho, T. Fangsuwannarak, G. Scardera, E. Pink, Y. Huang, T. Puzzer, S. Huang, D. Song, C. Flynn, S. Park, X. Hao, and D. Mansfield, “Silicon quantum dot nanostructures for tandem photovoltaic cells,” Thin Solid Films 516, 6748 – 6756 (2008). [CrossRef]
8. V. I. Klimov, A. A. Mikhailovsky, S. Xu, A. Malko, J. A. Hollingsworth, C. A. Leatherdale, H.-J. Eisler, and M. G. Bawendi, “Optical gain and stimulated emission in nanocrystal quantum dots,” Science 290, 314–317 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. S. Hideaki, N. Kenich, O. Ichiro, S. Shigeo, and S. Yoshimasa, “Room-temperature lasing operation of a quantum-dot vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3140–3142 (1996). [CrossRef]
10. D. L. Huffaker, G. Park, Z. Zou, O. B. Shchekin, and D. G. Deppe, “1.3 μm room-temperature GaAs-based quantum-dot laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2564–2566 (1998). [CrossRef]
11. P. Michler, A. Imamoglu, M. D. Mason, P. J. Carson, G. F. Strouse, and S. K. Buratto, “Quantum correlation among photons from a single quantum dot at room temperature.” Nature 406, 968 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. W. Lu, Y. L. Ji, G. B. Chen, N. Y. Tang, X. S. Chen, S. C. Shen, Q. X. Zhao, and M. Willander, “Enhancement of room-temperature photoluminescence in InAs quantum dots,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 4300–4302 (2003). [CrossRef]
14. C. B. Poitras, M. Lipson, H. Du, M. A. Hahn, and T. D. Krauss, “Photoluminescence enhancement of colloidal quantum dots embedded in a monolithic microcavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4032–4034 (2003). [CrossRef]
15. O. Kulakovich, N. Strekal, A. Yaroshevich, S. Maskevich, S. Gaponenko, I. Nabiev, U. Woggon, and M. Artemyev, “Enhanced luminescence of CdSe quantum dots on gold colloids,” Nano Lett. 2, 1449–1452 (2002). [CrossRef]
16. H. Aouani, S. Itzhakov, D. Gachet, E. Devaux, T. W. Ebbesen, H. Rigneault, D. Oron, and J. Wenger, “Colloidal quantum dots as probes of excitation field enhancement in photonic antennas,” ACS Nano 4, 4571–4578 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. S. C. Pu, M. J. Yang, C. C. Hsu, C. W. Lai, C. C. Hsieh, S. H. Lin, Y. M. Cheng, and P. T. Chou, “The empirical correlation between size and two-photon absorption cross section of CdSe and CdTe quantum dots,” Small 2, 1308–1313 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. L. A. Padilha, J. Fu, D. J. Hagan, E. W. Van Stryland, C. L. Cesar, L. C. Barbosa, C. H. B. Cruz, D. Buso, and A. Martucci, “Frequency degenerate and nondegenerate two-photon absorption spectra of semiconductor quantum dots,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 075325 (2007). [CrossRef]
19. Y. Yingli and W. Wei, “Two-photon absorption of quantum dots in the regime of very strong confinement: size and wavelength dependence,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 26, 1897–1904 (2009). [CrossRef]
20. I. Dancus, V. I. Vlad, A. Petris, N. Gaponik, V. Lesnyak, and A. Eychmüller, “Saturated near-resonant refractive optical nonlinearity in CdTe quantum dots,” Opt. Lett. 35, 1079–1081, (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. X. Xingsheng, Y. Toshiki, U. Rieko, and O. Akira, “Two-photon excited fluorescence from CdSe quantum dots on SiN photonic crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 221113 (2009). [CrossRef]
22. Z. Lin and J. Vučković, “Enhanced two-photon processes in single quantum dots inside photonic crystal nanocavities,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 035301 (2010). [CrossRef]
23. J. A. Porto, F. J. García-Vidal, and J. B. Pendry, “Transmission resonances on metallic gratings with very narrow slits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2845–2848 (1999). [CrossRef]
24. F. J. Garcia-Vidal, L. Martin-Moreno, T. W. Ebbesen, and L. Kuipers, “Light passing through subwavelength apertures,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 729–787 (2010). [CrossRef]
25. A. Barbara, P. Quémerais, E. Bustarret, and T. Lopez-Rios, “Optical transmission through subwavelength metallic gratings,” Phys. Rev. B 66, 161403 (2002). [CrossRef]
26. T. W. Ebbesen, H. J. Lezec, H. F. Ghaemi, T. Thio, and P. A. Wolff, “Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays,” Nature 391, 667–669 (1998). [CrossRef]
27. E. Moreno, L. Martín-Moreno, and F. J. García-Vidal, “Extraordinary optical transmission without plasmons: the s-polarization case,” J. Opt. A 8, S94 (2006). [CrossRef]
28. M. Guillaumée, M. Y. Nikitin, M. J. K. Klein, L. A. Dunbar, V. Spassov, R. Eckert, L. Martín-Moreno, F. J. García-Vidal, and R. P. Stanley, “Observation of enhanced transmission for s-polarized light through a subwavelength slit,” Opt. Express 18, 9722–9727 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. I. Schwarz, N. Livneh, and R. Rapaport, “A unified analytical model for extraordinary transmission in subwavelength metallic gratings,” arXiv:1011.3713v1 (2010).
30. J. T. Shen and P. M. Platzman, “Properties of a one-dimensional metallophotonic crystal,” Phys. Rev. B 70, 035101 (2004). [CrossRef]
32. E. Verhagen, L. Kuipers, and A. Polman, “Field enhancement in metallic subwavelength aperture arrays probed by erbium upconversion luminescence,” Opt. Express 17, 14586–14598 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. U. Woggon, Optical properties of semiconductor quantum dots. Springer tracts in modern physics (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997).
34. Y. Cao and U. Banin, “Growth and properties of semiconductor core/shell nanocrystals with InAs cores,” J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 122, 9692–9702 (2000). [CrossRef]
35. G. Chen, R. Rapaport, D. T. Fuchs, L. Lucas, A. J. Lovinger, S. Vilan, A. Aharoni, and U. Banin, “Optical gain from InAs nanocrystal quantum dots in a polymer matrix,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 251108 (2005). [CrossRef]
36. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics Second Ed. (Academic Press, 2003).
37. M. M. J. Treacy, “Dynamical diffraction explanation of the anomalous transmission of light through metallic gratings,” Phys. Rev. B 66, 195105 (2002).