## Abstract

We investigate the nonlinearity of ultra-low loss Si_{3}N_{4}-core and SiO_{2}-cladding rectangular waveguides. The nonlinearity is modeled using Maxwell’s wave equation with a small amount of refractive index perturbation. Effective *n _{2}* is used to describe the third-order nonlinearity, which is linearly proportional to the optical intensity. The effective

*n*measured using continuous-wave self-phase modulation shows agreement with the theoretical calculation. The waveguide with 2.8-μm wide and 80-nm thick Si

_{2}_{3}N

_{4}core has low loss and high power handling capability, with an effective

*n*of about $9\times {10}^{-16}$cm

_{2}^{2}/W.

© 2010 OSA

## 1. Introduction

Ultra-low loss waveguides are required for many applications, such as integrated optical delay lines, optical buffers, and high-Q resonators, which play important roles for planar lightwave circuits (PLC). As the waveguide loss decreases and thus allows longer propagation lengths, the nonlinear effect will accumulate and show up even with relatively low input optical power and eventually affect the performance of the PLC. This is especially important for devices that need highly accurate phase control. Therefore, it is essential to know the nonlinear coefficient of waveguides to predict the performance.

In this paper, we focus on the application of on-chip optical delay lines, where low-nonlinearity material is required for optical waveguide design. Silica-based material is a good candidate because of its lower nonlinearity and optical loss compared to silicon [1,2]. We have demonstrated ultra-low loss of 3 dB/m in Si_{3}N_{4}-core and SiO_{2}-cladding rectangular waveguides with 2-mm bend radius [3]. Here, we investigate the third-order nonlinearity of the waveguides, and the resulting power handling capability. When the optical mode is mostly confined in the core of the waveguides, the core contributes most of the nonlinearity. However, if the optical mode is distributed in the core and cladding region, an effective *n _{2}* is used to consider the nonlinearity from both cladding and core. Ref [4]. has derived the formula of effective

*n*for low-index contrast waveguide (

_{2}*n*), such as optical fibers. However, the formula is not applicable for high-index-contrast waveguides, such as silicon or silicon nitride waveguides. Therefore, we derive the effective

_{core}≈n_{clad}≈n_{eff}*n*by solving Maxwell’s wave equation with introduced index perturbation due to the nonlinearity. This method is also compared to ref [5], which uses vectorial mode solver and nonlinear propagating equations to obtain effective nonlinearity. Finally, a general nonlinear waveguide can be modeled using an effective

_{2}*n*, and thus the nonlinear effect can be engineered through proper waveguide design.

_{2}## 2. Effective *n*_{2} coefficient

_{2}

The response of materials becomes nonlinear at high intensities. The third-order nonlinearity, which comes mostly from the dielectric Kerr effect, is linearly proportional to optical intensity. The resulting refractive index change of waveguides can be expressed by

*n*is the effective nonlinear refractive index coefficient,

_{2,eff}*I*is average optical intensity of the effective core area,

_{eff}*P*is total optical power, and

_{tot}*I(x,y)*is the intensity distribution. The effective core area,

*A*, is used to indicate how well the optical mode is confined in the core and the corresponding effective mode size. The schematic of the waveguide is shown in Fig. 1(a) . In a large-core waveguide, most of the optical power is confined in the core, and thus the nonlinearity of the core dominates. As a result, the effective

_{eff}*n*of the waveguide is close to

_{2}*n*of the core. In nano-core Si

_{2}_{3}N

_{4}waveguides, the optical power is weakly confined in the core (Fig. 1(b)); therefore, it is necessary to consider the nonlinearity from both the Si

_{3}N

_{4}core and the SiO

_{2}cladding, and thus the effective

*n*falls between the nonlinear refractive index coefficients of the core and the cladding.

_{2}In order to obtain the effective *n _{2}* of waveguides, we solve Maxwell’s wave equation with introduced power-dependent refractive index change of the waveguide due to the nonlinearity. Since the refractive index change is relatively small, we use a perturbation method [6] to introduce the small amount of index change. The refractive index distribution for the waveguide is written as

*n*is the linear material refractive index. For quasi-TE modes in a rectangular waveguide, the wave equation is expressed aswhere

_{0}*k*is the free-space wavevector and

*β*is the propagation constant. The magnetic field

*H*and eigenvalue

_{y}*β*of the above equation are expressed in the first-order perturbation form as Substituting Eq. (3), (5), and (6) into (4) and simplifying the equation using Green’s theorem, we obtain

^{2}*n*is the effective linear index of the waveguide, and

_{0,eff}*I*is average optical intensity of the effective core area defined by

_{eff}*n*is then obtained as follows.

_{2}*n*is then expressed in a simple way as

_{2}We compare this analytic perturbation method with the conventional scalar method [4] and the fully vectorial numerical method [5] via the nonlinear parameter $\gamma =\frac{2\pi}{\lambda}\frac{{n}_{2,eff}}{{A}_{eff}}$. The analytic perturbation method and conventional scalar method are implemented by using the Marcatili’s method [6] to solve the electrical and magnetic field distributions while the numerical method is incorporated into MATLAB with vertorial finite-difference algorithm [7]. The nonlinearity of the waveguides with various Si_{3}N_{4} core thicknesses is calculated using these three methods and shown in Fig. 2
. When the core thickness is reduced and sufficiently small, the calculated results become similar because the optical mode is weakly guided. The waveguide nonlinearity measured by self-phase modulation (SPM), which will be described in Section 3, is also included for comparison.

## 3. Measurement of waveguide nonlinearity

Channel waveguides with Si_{3}N_{4} core and SiO_{2} cladding are fabricated with LioniX BV’s TriPleX^{TM} LPCVD technology. The Si_{3}N_{4} cores are 2.8-μm wide and 80-nm to 100-nm thick with 8-μm-thick upper and lower SiO_{2} cladding. The whole waveguides are built on silicon substrates. In order to characterize the nonlinear effect of the channel waveguides, we measure the nonlinear phase shift induced by the continuous-wave (CW) SPM [1,8,9] for different launched optical powers in the waveguide. The measurement setup is illustrated in Fig. 3
. Two distributed feedback (DFB) lasers with wavelengths separated by about 0.4 nm are coupled to a 3-dB coupler to generate a beat signal of 50 GHz. The power of the lasers is set the same by a variable optical attenuator, and the lasers are adjusted to be copolarized by the polarization controllers on both arms. The beat signal is then amplified by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) with 33-dBm maximum output power to generate sufficient optical intensity for observing the nonlinear effect. The power is coupled into and out of the waveguide through lensed fibers. The optical spectrum due to SPM is analyzed by an optical spectrum analyzer while the power is measured by a power meter.

A measured SPM spectrum for TE-polarized light through a 6-m long spiral waveguide is shown in Fig. 4 . With 29-dBm beat signals launched into the waveguide, the nonlinear effect is observed through the spectrum. The nonlinear phase shift is extracted from the relative intensity of the fundamental wavelength and the first-order sideband. The relation between the nonlinear phase shift and the intensity is given as [1]

*I*and

_{0}*I*are the intensities of the fundamental wavelength and the first-order sideband,

_{1}*J*is the Bessel function of the

_{n}*nth*order, and

*φ*is the nonlinear phase shift due to SPM. The phase shift only depends on the intensity ratio between the fundamental wavelength and the first-order sideband. It is independent of the laser linewidth and the wavelength separation of the two lasers if the chromatic dispersion is negligible. To neglect the chromatic dispersion, the wavelength separation and the waveguide length must be small enough [1,9]. We also experimentally confirmed the influence of dispersion is negligible by tuning the wavelength separation of the lasers.

_{SPM}The relation between the nonlinear phase shift and input optical power for three test chips with different waveguide core thicknesses (80 nm, 90 nm, and 100 nm) is shown in Fig. 5 . It should be mentioned that the nonlinearity from the EDFA was measured and subtracted when characterizing the waveguide nonlinearity. The waveguide with thicker core exhibits larger nonlinear phase shift because of its smaller effective core area and thus stronger intensity.

Once the nonlinear phase shift is known, the nonlinear coefficient *γ* and effective *n _{2}* are derived from the slope of the fitted straight lines in Fig. 5, and plotted in Fig. 2 and Fig. 6
using the following formula [8].

*P*is the waveguide input power and

_{in}*L*is the effective length defined aswhere

_{eff}*L*is the actual length of the waveguide and

*α*is the waveguide loss. The squares in Fig. 2 and Fig. 6 are measurement data points from six test chips with three different Si

_{3}N

_{4}core thicknesses while the solid lines represent the calculated nonlinearity as described in Section 2. The nonlinear refractive index coefficients

*n*for Si

_{2}_{3}N

_{4}and SiO

_{2}are $3.5\times {10}^{-15}$cm

^{2}/W and $2\times {10}^{-16}$cm

^{2}/W, respectively, for calculation [1,10]. When the core thickness is reduced, the optical mode of the waveguide is squeezed out and more optical power overlaps with the SiO

_{2}cladding. Therefore, the effective

*n*is closer to

_{2}*n*of SiO

_{2}_{2}with reduced core thickness. The measured

*γ*and effective

*n*are a little less than the theoretical prediction because a thin silicon oxynitride layer may occur at the interface of Si

_{2}_{3}N

_{4}and SiO

_{2}because of nitrogen diffusion during the thermal annealing step of waveguide fabrication [11]. This influence is more obvious especially for a very thin Si

_{3}N

_{4}layer. It should also be mentioned that all the waveguide nonlinearity is measured with TE-polarized optical input because the waveguide is designed to support fundamental TE mode only. The loss of TM mode is much larger than that of TE mode; therefore, it is not possible to characterize the waveguide nonlinearity with TM-polarized optical input.

For the application of optical delay lines, low nonlinearity is required to have small power-dependent optical phase variation over a length of waveguide. Given a specific phase variation tolerance, we can estimate the maximum handling power for a waveguide. For our 80-nm-thick Si_{3}N_{4} waveguides, the maximum affordable propagation power over 20-m long waveguides (100-ns delay) can be as large as 120 mW with phase variation less than π/20. It is feasible to propagate even higher power by reducing Si_{3}N_{4}-core thickness in order to lower the nonlinearity of waveguides, as indicated in Fig. 6.

## 4. Conclusions

We have demonstrated ultra-low loss Si_{3}N_{4}-core and SiO_{2}-cladding rectangular waveguides that are capable of handling high propagating power because of their low nonlinearity. The nonlinearity of the waveguide is described using effective *n _{2}*, which is derived by solving Maxwell’s wave equation with introduced power-dependent refractive index perturbation. The effective

*n*of the waveguides with different core thicknesses is measured using CW SPM and shows agreement with the theoretical calculation of waveguide nonlinearity. The waveguide with 80-nm-thick core is characterized, and has effective

_{2}*n*of about $9\times {10}^{-16}$cm

_{2}^{2}/W, which can handle 120-mW optical power over a length of 20 meters with negligible power-dependent phase variation.

## Acknowledgements

The authors thank Scott Rodgers, Daoxin Dai, Zhi Wang, and Paolo Pintus for helpful discussions. This work is supported by DARPA MTO under iPhoD contract No: HR0011-09-C-0123.

## References and links

**1. **A. Boskovic, S. V. Chernikov, J. R. Taylor, L. Gruner-Nielsen, and O. A. Levring, “Direct continuous-wave measurement of n_2 in various types of telecommunication fiber at 155 µm,” Opt. Lett. **21**(24), 1966–1968 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**2. **Q. Lin, O. J. Painter, and G. P. Agrawal, “Nonlinear optical phenomena in silicon waveguides: modeling and applications,” Opt. Express **15**(25), 16604–16644 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**3. **J. F. Bauters, M. J. R. Heck, D. John, M.-C. Tien, A. Leinse, R. G. Heideman, D. J. Blumenthal, and J. Bowers, “Ultra-low loss silica-based waveguides with millimeter bend radius,” in *ECOC*(Torino, Italy, 2010).

**4. **R. S. Grant, “Effective non-linear coefficients of optical waveguides,” Opt. Quantum Electron. **28**(9), 1161–1173 (1996). [CrossRef]

**5. **C. Koos, L. Jacome, C. Poulton, J. Leuthold, and W. Freude, “Nonlinear silicon-on-insulator waveguides for all-optical signal processing,” Opt. Express **15**(10), 5976–5990 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**6. **K. Okamoto, *Fundamentals of optical waveguides* (Academic Press, 2006).

**7. **A. B. Fallahkhair, K. S. Li, and T. E. Murphy, “Vector finite difference modesolver for anisotropic dielectric waveguides,” J. Lightwave Technol. **26**(11), 1423–1431 (2008). [CrossRef]

**8. **S. V. Chernikov and J. R. Taylor, “Measurement of normalization factor of n(_{2}) for random polarization in optical fibers,” Opt. Lett. **21**(19), 1559–1561 (1996). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**9. **A. Lamminpaa, T. Niemi, E. Ikonen, P. Marttila, and H. Ludvigsen, ““Effects of dispersion on nonlinearity measurement of optical fibers,” Opt. Fiber Technol,” Mater. Devices Syst. **11**, 278–285 (2005).

**10. **K. Ikeda, R. E. Saperstein, N. Alic, and Y. Fainman, “Thermal and Kerr nonlinear properties of plasma-deposited silicon nitride/ silicon dioxide waveguides,” Opt. Express **16**(17), 12987–12994 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**11. **H. Schmidt, M. Gupta, and M. Bruns, “Nitrogen diffusion in amorphous silicon nitride isotope multilayers probed by neutron reflectometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **96**(5), 055901 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]