We present a novel mid-IR source based on optical parametric chirped pulse amplification (OPCPA) generating 96 fs pulses (9.0 cycles) at 3.2 μm with an energy of 1.2 μJ, at a repetition rate of 100 kHz. The amplified spectrum supports a minimum Fourier transform limited pulse duration of 45 fs, or 4.2 cycles. Our use of OPCPA allows the direct amplification of few-cycle pulses at this mid-IR wavelength, and is inherently scalable to higher energies. The seed source for the system is based on difference frequency generation (DFG) between two outputs of the same fibre laser: this source is expected to be intrinsically CEP stable.
© 2009 Optical Society of America
Ultrashort pulsed light sources in the mid-IR are sought for numerous different fields ranging from fundamental strong field physics to medical and industrial applications. Strong field physics demands high repetition rate few-cycle pulses with stable carrier envelope phase (CEP). Generating such pulses in the mid-IR should result in shorter attosecond pulses [1, 2, 3], and allow improved discrimination between tunneling and multi-photon processes . The broad bandwidths of such pulses are beneficial to spectroscopy since they cover many vibrational transitions in important molecules, and the intrinsic potential CEP stability adds a wide range of applications  such as breath monitoring for medical purposes ; the identification of bio-marker molecules ; monitoring the concentration of green house gases  or explosive detection via LIBS . Here we present such a completely new, scalable and potentially CEP stable source based on OPCPA, generating 9 cycle pulses at 3.2μm with 1.2 μJ energy at a repetition rate of 100 kHz.
Laser technology has advanced in recent years, enabling the production of near-IR pulse durations corresponding to only a few cycles of the laser field, at moderately high repetition rates and with stabilised CEP. These sources are nearly exclusively based on chirped pulse amplification (CPA) in Ti:Sapphire with subsequent broadening via gas-filled hollow fibres  or filamentation  and compression with chirped mirrors. State of the art pulse durations at centre wavelengths in the visible to near-IR currently lie in the few-cycle range at repetition rates up to a few kHz , but there exist significant motivations for the development of much less complex to operate new sources, particularly emitting at different wavelengths such as in the mid-IR (above 3 μm). A few-cycle mid-IR source has recently been demonstrated via four wave mixing in a filament , but this is based on a Ti:Sa CPA system, inheriting many of the associated disadvantages, and may not be scalable to high energies.
1.1. Mid-IR wavelengths
Mid-IR wavelengths are interesting, e.g. from an atomic physics application point of view, since they allow for a much clearer investigation of tunneling processes, whereas near-IR pulses operate in a mix of multi-photon and tunneling regimes. Attosecond pulses with carrier frequencies corresponding to extreme ultraviolet wavelengths can be produced from short-pulse laser systems, using high order harmonic generation (HHG) as coherent up-shifting mechanism from the near-IR drive laser [14, 15]. Here, changing drive laser wavelengths to the mid-IR is expected to yield shorter attosecond pulses due to a square of wavelength dependence of the shortest wavelength reachable via HHG [4, 16]. Recent experiments have confirmed this scaling of the harmonic cutoff with drive wavelength, while showing that predicted losses in harmonic yield  can be compensated by taking advantage of more favourable HHG phasematching at longer wavelengths . Based on their results we expect that changing the wavelength of a typical NIR few-cycle source to 3μm should allow generation of harmonic spectra extending to a photon energy well above 1 keV.
1.2. High repetition rates
Higher repetition rates help to improve signal to noise ratio for most experiments, but they are also essential for some in strong field physics; for instance, particle coincidence experiments with reaction microscopes (COLTRIMS)  permit the investigation of atomic and molecular processes with unprecedented scrutiny, but are limited mainly by the stability of current lasers due to the low cross sections of the processes under investigation; the measurement time is, in practice, nearly always longer than the time over which the best lasers can deliver constant performance. Using a 100kHz repetition rate, experiments taking six days with a 1kHz system can be completed in 90 min, greatly reducing the demands on the laser system stability.
1.3. CEP stability
Maintaining CEP stability is a key difficulty for most few-cycle laser sources, with current state of the art feedback stabilised systems capable of CEP locked operation for several hours, though locked durations of tens of minutes to a few hours are more common. Total CEP stability of the laser source is essential for many experiments, e.g. the measurement of double ionization , which demands a few-cycle laser source to be phase-stable with negligible amplitude instabilities and drift over about 12 hours with a 1kHz repetition rate; an unrealistic requirement from current electronically CEP stabilised systems.
To date, various techniques allow the conversion of few-cycle near-IR sources to longer wavelengths, however these sources are based on Ti:Sa CPA, and inherit the associated problems of long term stability and operational complexity. DFG between different components of the same pulse followed by parametric amplification can create phase stable pulses with millijoule energies and few-cycle durations , but this is limited to near-IR and visible wavelengths. Parametric amplification of a white-light continuum can also provide short pulses in the visible-2μm range , but as of yet has not been demonstrated to provide pulses in the mid-IR. The combination of Ti:Sa CPA and a laser diode in a frequency mixing scheme can produce short pulses in the mid-IR , but without CEP stability or easy scalability, with low efficiency and again requiring a complex CPA system as a front-end.
2. OPCPA layout
With the above-mentioned limitations in mind, we have designed a completely different mid-IR (3.2μm) source with the goal for long-term stability and compactness based on optical parametric chirped pulse amplification (OPCPA) [23, 24]. The use of OPCPA as the amplification technique allows broadband amplification at arbitrary wavelengths , and does not use any gain storage as in a traditional laser system, thereby freeing the repetition rate of the laser from problems associated with thermal deposition in the amplifiers. Figure 1 shows the layout of this source, which incorporates the stability and ?hands-off? operability of a fibre front-end, stability of a diode-based pump laser, and the use of an intrinsically optically self-CEP-stable seed . The source generates 96fs pulses at 3.2μm (9.0 cycles) with an amplified spectrum supporting a Fourier transform limited pulse duration of 45fs, or 4.2 cycles. Currently we measure compressed pulse energies of 1.2μJ, at a repetition rate of 100 kHz, however our use of OPCPA ensures this is inherently scalable to higher energies , with multi-Joule near-IR OPCPA sources already demonstrated .
The seed source for the system is based on difference frequency generation (DFG) between two outputs of the same fibre laser [29, 30]: this source is expected to be intrinsically carrier-envelope phase stable  since the fibre arms have been measured to show excellent relative timing stability, equivalent to a CEP jitter of 90 mrad over 1 s [31, 32]. The transfer of carrier-envelope phase ϕ in a three-wave mixing interaction such as DFG can be described by ϕp - ϕs = ϕi - π/2 , where the subscripts p,s,i refer to the pump, signal and idler waves, listed in order of decreasing frequency. CEP fluctuations arise mainly in the oscillator, so that pump and signal waves produced from the same oscillator will have a constant phase difference ϕp - ϕs = const, creating an idler with fixed phase for use as our seed source. The phase stability of DFG generated pulses has been experimentally confirmed e.g. in Ref. .
OPCPA is also in principle perfectly CEP preserving, though in practice small phase matching errors between pump, signal and idler waves lead to some coupling between the pump intensity and CEP of the amplified pulse . However, the additional phase noise induced is below the stabilised value for many conventionally amplified few-cycle systems, and so OPCPA amplification can be used to produce effectively CEP-stable, energetic pulses from a CEP-stable seed.
3. Mid-IR seeder
The mid-IR seed beam is generated by single path DFG between a broadband beam centred at 1.07μm and abeam at 1.58 μm (1.07 μm -1.58 μm → 3.31 μm), both of which are produced by a commercially available fibre laser (TopticaFFS) (Fig. 1). The fibre laser operates at 100MHz repetition rate and has two simultaneous outputs originating from a single oscillator, one providing 75 fs pulses at 1.58 μm with 160 mW average power while the second arm propagates identical pulses through a highly nonlinear fibre to generate a supercontinuum, from which a 1.0–1.15 μm spectral band is selected and compressed, yielding 65 fs pulses with an average power of 12.6 mW.
To create the difference frequency, the 1.07 μm and 1.58 μmpulses from the fibre laser were combined in a 2 mm long, periodically poled, MgO-doped Lithium Niobate (PPLN) crystal with a poling period of 31 μm. The crystals are heated to 80° C to avoid water absorption and minimise photorefractive damage. The two beams were collinearly focused onto the crystal, achieving respectively an intensity of 0.3 GW/cm2 and 3 GW/cm2. The resulting 3.2 μm DFG pulses are slightly down-chirped and have an average power of 1.6 mW at 100 MHz, corresponding to a quantum efficiency of more than 40% for the conversion process.
The spectrum of the DFG pulse was measured using a Fourier-transform IR spectrometer (FTIR) and is shown in Fig. 2. The spectrum spans from 2.9–3.8 μm at the 1/e 2 level, and corresponds to a transform-limited pulse duration of 33 fs or 3 cycles. The DFG output beam is collimated by a Calcium Fluoride (CaF2) lens, after which the residual 1 μm and 1.55 μm beams are rejected by the use of dielectric filters on CaF2 substrates. The down-chirped DFG output is then further negatively stretched via propagation through an uncoated 10 cm long Sapphire rod, producing a 6 ps stretched pulse with which we seed the OPCPA amplifier chain.
We amplify the stretched mid-IR seed beam, which is the idler wave, in two collinear geometry OPCPA amplifiers. The stability and beam quality of the pump laser in any OPCPA system is of crucial importance, and here we use a commercially available Nd:YVO4 mode-locked laser (Lumera), delivering 10 W at 100 kHz with a pulse duration of 8.7 ps, and an extremely good spatial profile with an M2 of 1.1. The fibre laser oscillator is electronically synchronised to the second harmonic of the 50 MHz oscillator of the Lumera laser, using a commercial synchronisation system (Toptica FFS-Sync-PLL). The RMS timing jitter between the two laser pulse trains is typically sub-350fs. Note that since the pump pulse duration is ~2 ps longer than the seed pulse duration, a temporal jitter of less than 5% of the pump pulse duration is negligible and excellent temporal overlap is ensured.
In the first parametric amplification stage the mid-IR seed is focused into a PPLN crystal identical to the DFG crystal. The pump beam power was set to 2.6 W via a series of waveplates and polarisers, generating a focused intensity of 60 GW/cm2 at the crystal, producing a gain of 4×103. The amplified mid-IR beam is recollimated and dielectric filters are used to reject the pump beam and any unwanted frequencies before propagation to the second OPCPA stage.
The second OPCPA stage again uses a 2 mm long PPLN crystal at the focus of the pump and seed beams, with identical characteristics to the DFG stage. The seed and pump beams are focused to intensities of 83MW/cm2 and 61GW/cm2 respectively. As in the first stage the beam is recollimated and passed through dielectric filters. The measured pulse energy after the two amplifier stages is 2.5μJ at a repetition rate of 100kHz. The amplified OPA1 spectrum is shown in Fig. 2, and it spans from 2.9–3.3μm, at the 1/e 2 level, corresponding to a transform-limited pulse duration of 45fs, or 4.2 cycles at 3.2μm. The loss of bandwidth on the long wavelength side of the spectrum is due to the phase-matching in the amplification process and affects only slightly the transform-limited pulse duration. The modulation seen on the spectrum has been identified as originating from etalon effects in the fibre laser which create double pulsing, and is not an artifact of the OPCPA process. Work is in progress to modify the cavity in order to suppress this effect.
To compress the down-chirped amplified pulse we used a Martinez type 4-f grating sequence with two 200 line/mm gold coated gratings designed for 3μm. The total efficiency of the compressor is 48%, and our measured compressed energy is 1.2μJ, with most losses due to the uncoated lenses in the setup.
The pulse duration is measured using second harmonic generation frequency resolved optical gating (SHG-FROG) together with the FTIR spectrometer giving a resolution of up to 0.5cm-1. The two replica pulses in the FROG are created using a pellicle beam splitter to minimise dispersion, and are focused non-collinearly into a 0.2 mm thick AgGaS2 crystal whose acceptance bandwidth is over 1.8μm at a central wavelength of 3.2μm. To remove the time-reversal ambiguity in the FROG we directed the optimally compressed pulse through an 8 mm thick Silicon plate. Comparing the change in the FROG retrieved phase with the known phase introduced by the silicon allowed us to determine the correct direction for the time axis.
With our simple compressor, we have measured pulses as short as 96 fs, corresponding to 9.0 cycles at 3.2μm, and within a factor of two of the 45 fs, 4.2 cycle transform limited pulse duration (Fig. 4). Note that we have highlighted the very small-scale features in the FROG trace (Fig. 3) over-proportionally through a square-root of the intensity colour scaling. As mentioned before, these features are known to arise from the fiber seeder and we have taken great care to record our FROG trace with high enough spectral resolution and over a very large time window, without which these subtleties are easily missed; see e.g. . Recording such ultrahigh resolution trace is not trivial in the mid-IR but the excellent agreement in the measured and reconstructed FROG traces demonstrate the high fidelity of our measurement and the fringes are of no big consequence for the temporal profile as can be seen from Fig. 4.
We also measured a knife-edge spatial profile of the compressed pulse 1.5 m after exiting the compressor (Fig. 4 inset), showing an excellent beam quality, with close to a Gaussian profile.
The energy achieved is sufficient for spectroscopy  as well as for some strong field physics experiments, since focusing to a few times the diffraction limit already yields intensities in excess of 1013W/cm2, and the total energy by no means represents the achievable limit from our system. As shot noise in experiments typically scales inversely with repetition rate, our 100kHz system can produce data with higher signal to noise ratio than would be expected from comparable energies at kHz repetition rates. We expect our OPCPA design to be scalable in repetition rate and pulse energy with the limitation being the pump laser. Sources with average powers of up to 200 W are however already available and we can expect near linear scaling of the OPCPA output with the available pump laser pulse energy.
One issue that can limit energy scaling in OPCPA systems is parametric superfluorescence, although the level of fluorescence seen varies between systems [25, 35]. One successful approach to limit superfluorescence is the use of a high energy seed pulse , which however is inappropriate in our case since we have deliberately chosen to use a fibre laser to take advantage of its high stability at the expense of seed energy. In our system we maximise the pump-seed volume overlap in each OPA, choose closely matched pump and seed durations, and limit the OPA gain to less than 104 to help reduce the problem of unwanted superfluorescence, while the inclusion of dielectric spectral filtering between each OPA stage should further suppress fluorescence at unwanted frequencies.
To conclude, we have devised a completely new source of ultrashort laser pulses (9.0 cycles) in the mid-IR (3.2 μm) with a repetition rate of 100 kHz. This novel design is compact, solid-state, solely based on OPCPA, and incorporates a fibre seeder as well as solid-state pump laser, thereby ensuring maximum reliability and hands-off operation. The pulse energy, measured after compression, is 1.2 μJ and already sufficient for spectroscopy or even some strong field experiments. As shot noise in experiments typically scales inversely with repetition rate, our 100kHz system can produce data with higher signal to noise ratio than would be expected from comparable energies at kHz repetition rates. The energy can easily be improved by replacing our metal optics (6% loss per reflection) with highly reflective all dielectric optics, or by upgrading our pump laser pulse energy.
We acknowledge partial support from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science through its Consolider Program Science (SAUUL - CSD 2007-00013), “Participation in ELI” (CAC-2007-37), as well as through “Plan Nacional” (FIS2008-06368-C02-01). This work is also part of a Collaborative Research Program between ICFO and the Ontario Centres of Excellence, Canada, and funding from ICFO and OCE is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank Toptica Photonics AG and Lumera Laser GmbH for their support and we are grateful to Prof. Leitenstorfer and Dr. Hubert from Konstanz University for helpful discussions.
References and links
1. P. Agostini and L. F. DiMauro, “The physics of attosecond light pulses” Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 813–855 (2004). [CrossRef]
2. P. B. Corkum and F. Krausz, “Attosecond science” Nat. Phys. 3, 381–387 (2007). [CrossRef]
3. T. Popmintchev, M. Chen, O. Cohen, M. E. Grisham, J. J. Rocca, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, “Extended phase matching of high harmonics driven by mid-infrared light” Opt. Lett. 33, 2128–2130 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. B. Sheehy, J. Martin, L. F. Dimauro, P. Agostini, K. J. Schafer, M. Gaarde, and K. C. Kulander, “High harmonic generation at long wavelengths” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5270 (1999). [CrossRef]
5. M. J. Thorpe and J. Ye, “Cavity-enhanced direct frequency comb spectroscopy” Appl. Phys. B 91, 397–414 (2008). [CrossRef]
7. K. Namjou, C. Roller, T. Reich, J. Jeffers, G. McMillen, P. McCann, and M. Camp, “Determination of exhaled nitric oxide distributions in a diverse sample population using tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy” Appl. Phys. B 85, 427 (2006). [CrossRef]
8. F. Tittel, D. Richter, and A. Fried, “Mid-infrared laser applications in spectroscopy” SOLID-STATE MID-INFRARED LASER SOURCES 89, 445–510 (2003). [CrossRef]
9. D. Mirell, O. Chalus, K. Peterson, and J. C. Diels, “Remote sensing of explosive using infrared and ultraviolet filaments” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25, (2008). [CrossRef]
10. M. Nisoli, S. Stagira, S. De Silvestri, O. Svelto, S. Sartania, Z. Cheng, G. Tempea, C. Spielmann, and F. Krausz, “Toward a terawatt-scale sub-10-fs laser technology” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 4, 414–420 (1998). [CrossRef]
11. C. Hauri, W. Kornelis, F. Helbing, A. Heinrich, A. Couairon, A. Mysyrowicz, J. Biegert, and U. Keller, “Generation of intense, carrier-envelope phase-locked few-cycle laser pulses through filamentation” Appl. Phys. B 79, 673–677 (2004). [CrossRef]
12. M. Kling and F. Krausz, “Attoscience: An attosecond stopwatch” Nat. Phys. 4, 515–516 (2008). [CrossRef]
14. A. Mcpherson, G. Gibson, H. Jara, U. Johann, T. S. Luk, I. Mcintyre, K. Boyer, and C. K. Rhodes, “Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum-ultraviolet radiation in the rare gases” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 595 (1987). [CrossRef]
15. M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, “Multiple-harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases” J. Phys. B 21, L31–L35 (1988). [CrossRef]
17. J. Tate, T. Auguste, H. G. Muller, P. Salieres, P. Agostini, and L. F. DiMauro, “Scaling of wave-packet dynamics in an intense midinfrared field” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 013901 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. R. Moshammer, M. Unverzagt, W. Schmitt, J. Ullrich, and H. Schmidt-Bocking, “A 4p recoil-ion electron momentum analyzer: a high-resolution “microscope” for the investigation of the dynamics of atomic, molecular and nuclear reactions” Nuc. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. Sec. B 108, 425–445 (1996). [CrossRef]
19. T. Weber, K. Khayyat, R. Dorner, V. Mergel, O. Jagutzki, L. Schmidt, F. Afaneh, A. Gonzalez, C. Cocke, A. Landers, and H. Schmidt-bocking, “Kinematically complete investigation of momentum transfer for single ionization in fast proton-helium collisions” J. Phys. B 33, 3331–3344 (2000). [CrossRef]
20. C. Vozzi, G. Cirmi, C. Manzoni, E. Benedetti, F. Calegari, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, O. Svelto, S. De Silvestri, M. Nisoli, and G. Cerullo, “High-energy, few-optical-cycle pulses at 1.5 μm with passive carrier-envelope phase stabilization” Opt. Express 14, 10109–10116 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. G. Cirmi, C. Manzoni, D. Brida, S. De Silvestri, and G. Cerullo, “Carrier-envelope phase stable, few-optical-cycle pulses tunable from visible to near IR” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25, B62–B69 (2008). [CrossRef]
22. F. Rotermund, V. Petrov, F. Noack, M. Wittmann, and G. Korn, “Laser-diode-seeded operation of a femtosecond optical parametric amplifier with MgO:LiNbO3 and generation of 5-cycle pulses near 3 μm” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 1539–1545 (1999). [CrossRef]
23. A. Dubietis, G. Jonusauskas, and A. Piskarskas, “Powerful Femtosecond Pulse Generation By Chirped And Stretched Pulse Parametric Amplification In Bbo Crystal” Opt. Commun. 88, 437–440 (1992). [CrossRef]
24. I. N. Ross, P. Matousek, M. Towrie, A. J. Langley, and J. L. Collier, “The prospects for ultrashort pulse duration and ultrahigh intensity using optical parametric chirped pulse amplifiers” Opt. Commun. 144, 125–133 (1997). [CrossRef]
25. T. Fuji, N. Ishii, C. Y. Teisset, X. Gu, T. Metzger, A. Baltuska, N. Forget, D. Kaplan, A. Galvanauskas, and F. Krausz, “Parametric amplification of few-cycle carrier-envelope phase-stable pulses at 2.1 μm” Opt. Lett. 31, 1103–1105 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. A. Baltuska, T. Fuji, and T. Kobayashi, “Controlling the carrier-envelope phase of ultrashort light pulses with optical parametric amplifiers” Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 133901 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. I. N. Ross, P. Matousek, G. H. C. New, and K. Osvay, “Analysis and optimization of optical parametric chirped pulse amplification” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 19, 2945–2956 (2002). [CrossRef]
28. O. V. Chekhlov, J. L. Collier, I. N. Ross, P. K. Bates, M. Notley, C. Hernandez-Gomez, W. Shaikh, C. N. Dan-son, D. Neely, P. Matousek, and S. Hancock, “35 J broadband femtosecond optical parametric chirped pulse amplification system” Opt. Lett. 31, 3665–3667 (2006). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. C. Erny, K. Moutzouris, J. Biegert, D. Kühlke, F. Adler, A. Leitensdorfer, and U. Keller, “Mid-infrared difference-frequency generation of ultrashort pulses tunable between 3.2 and 4.8 μm from a compact fiber source” Opt. Lett. 32, 1138 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. C. Erny, C. Heese, M. Haag, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, “High-repetition-rate optical parametric chirped-pulse amplifier producing 1-μJ, sub-100-fs pulses in the mid-infrared” Opt. Express 17, 1340–1345 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
31. F. Adler, A. Sell, F. Sotier, R. Huber, and A. Leitenstorfer, “Attosecond relative timing jitter and 13 fs tunable pulses from a two-branch Er : fiber laser” Opt. Lett. 32, 3504–3506 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. P. Kubina, P. Adel, F. Adler, G. Grosche, T. W. Hansch, R. Holzwarth, A. Leitenstorfer, B. Lipphardt, and H. Schnatz, “Long term comparison of two fiber based frequency comb systems” Opt. Express 13, 904–909 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. C. Vozzi, C. Manzoni, F. Calegari, E. Benedetti, G. Sansone, G. Cerullo, M. Nisoli, S. De Silvestri, and S. Stagira, “Characterization of a high-energy self-phase-stabilized near-infrared parametric source” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 25 B112–B117 (2008). [CrossRef]
34. A. Renault, D. Z. Kandula, S. Witte, A. L. Wolf, R. T. Zinkstok, W. Hogervorst, and K. S. E. Eikema, “Phase stability of terawatt-class ultrabroadband parametric amplification” Opt. Lett. 32, 2363–2365 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. S. Witte, R. T. Zinkstok, W. Hogervorst, and K. S. E. Eikema, “Generation of few-cycle terawatt light pulses using optical parametric chirped pulse amplification” Opt. Express 13, 4903–4908 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]