We report on a simple and accurate method for determination of thermo-optical and spectroscopic parameters (thermal diffusivity, temperature coefficient of the optical path length change, pump and fluorescence quantum efficiencies, thermal loading, thermal lens focal length, etc) of relevance in the thermal lensing of end-pumped neodymium lasers operating at 1.06- and 1.3- µm channels. The comparison between thermal lensing observed in presence and absence of laser oscillation has been used to elucidate and evaluate the contribution of quantum efficiency and excited sate absorption processes to the thermal loading of Nd:YAG lasers.
© 2008 Optical Society of America
Pump and laser induced Thermal Lens (TL) is a crucial effect in laser materials, especially when operating in an end-pumping configuration (due to the much localized heat deposition achieved in this case). In most of the situations TL is an undesirable effect that leads to deterioration in the laser output power and/or in the spatial quality of the laser beam. On the other hand, in some configurations, such as microchip designs, TL is required for stable laser oscillation. In any case, and independently of the geometrical configuration of the laser cavity used, a precise knowledge of the thermo-optical and spectroscopic properties of the system, determining the generated heat in the active volume and the induced TL, is very important to laser design [1,2]. Some properties, particularly the TL dioptric power (DTL=f TL -1) and thermal loading, change when the system is under laser action [3,4]. Furthermore, in some cases the presence of excited state absorption (ESA) and/or Auger upconversion at laser wavelength could lead to the appearance of additional heating sources different to those associated to pump radiation [5,6]. Thus, it is very important for an accurate determination of these properties, the realization of the measurements with the system in real conditions of functionality, i.e., in the presence of laser oscillation.
The quantitative determination of the effective focal length due to thermal effects in end-pumped lasers is difficult compared to lamp-pumped due to the small size involved and also due to the higher sensitivity required. Several different approaches have been used including those based on interferometry, analysis of the output beam parameters, transverse mode beat frequency, and degeneration in the resonator length [7–10]. Nevertheless, most of these methods are inaccurate and some important features are not well understood. For instance, it is recognized that the end-face curvature of the sample should contribute to TL due to the hotter center of the sample compared to its edge (the surface bulging effect) [11,12]. However, this effect is not well quantitatively known and most papers consider only the temperature coefficient of the refractive index (dn/dT) to estimate DTL [8,13]. Moreover, how crystal defects affect the pumping and fluorescence efficiencies and, consequently, the heat generation is still uncertain. Although these subjects have been extensively studied, they have proven to be quite difficult with many conflicting results in the literature .
The dual-beam mode-mismatched TL spectrometry (MMTLS) was developed to improve the sensitivity of TL measurements . It is a simple, accurate, and very sensitive method for the determination of TL induced phase-shifts (up to ~λ/108) and thermo-optical properties. It has been successfully applied to laser materials for accurate determination of thermal diffusivity, temperature coefficient of the optical path change (ds/dT), fluorescence quantum efficiency (η), and Auger upconversion parameter . In this work, the MMTLS was applied to an intracavity experiment, a diode end-pumped Nd:YAG laser oscillating at 1.064 and 1.34 µm. Most of previous papers [4,6–9] used TL only to measure DTL while the fractional thermal loading (the rate of heat generated to absorbed energy) and quantum efficiency were determined by other photothermal methods or estimated from lifetime measurements and Judd-Ofelt calculations [3,6]. In this paper, we demonstrated that the analysis of laser and TL data (without and with laser oscillation at 1.064 and 1.34 µm) allows a precise determination of several important laser and spectroscopic parameters: DTL, the pump efficiency (at 808nm), the fractional thermal loading (φ), and the effect of ESA on φ at 1.34 µm.
2. Theoretical background and experiment
In the MMTLS experiment, a probe laser beam crosses the pumped volume of the sample and consequently a change in its on-axis intensity takes place, which in the far-field is given by :
Where m=(wp/wex)2, V=Z1/Zc (when Z c≪Z 2), Z c is the confocal distance of the probe beam, Z1 is the distance between the probe beam waist and the sample, Z2 is the distance between the sample and the photodiode, wp and wex are the probe and excitation beams radii at the sample position, respectively, I(0)=I(t) when the transient time t or θ is zero, tc is the characteristic TL signal time, which is related to the thermal diffusivity by D=wex2/4tc, and this one to the thermal conductivity by K=ρcD, where ρ is the density and c the specific heat. θ is approximately the phase difference of the probe beam at r=0 and r=√2wex induced by TL, which is given by [11,12,14,15]:
where λp is the probe beam wavelength, Pabs is the absorbed pump power, and φ is the fraction of absorbed energy converted into heat (also called fractional thermal loading). Since the fluorescence quantum efficiency of higher-lying levels than the metastable state (4F3/2) is negligible, Nd:YAG can be considered as presenting only one emitting state. In this case, φ is given by [3,6,11,14]:
where ηp≈1 is the pump quantum efficiency (the fraction of absorbed pumping photons contributing to inversion), ηf is the fluorescence quantum efficiency, ηl is the laser extraction efficiency (the fraction of excited ions that are extracted by stimulated emission), λl is the laser wavelength. In the case of diode pumped Nd:YAG crystals the excitation wavelength (λex) and the average emission wavelength (〈λem〉) are 808 and 1050 nm, respectively. In expression (3) σSE is the stimulated emission cross-section and σESA is the ESA cross-section at the laser action wavelength. Self-absorption of the fluorescence was not taken into account in Eq. (3) because absorption at the emission wavelengths of Nd:YAG are negligible. From the knowledge of the TL-induced phase shift (θ), it is possible to obtain the dioptric power [13,14]:
in which C=(πw 2 ex K)-1 ds/dT is a constant that depends on thermo-optical properties of the sample. The parameter θ is obtained from the fit of TL transient signal, as detailed elsewhere [11,12,14,15]. According to Eq. (4), the product Cφ can be achieved from the plot of DTL (calculated from θ) versus Pabs.
The experimental setup used in this work is shown in Fig. 1. It is similar to that used in previous works concerning MMTLS with the only difference that in this case the crystal under study was placed in a laser cavity. The laser cavity was composed of an input mirror with 10 cm radius of curvature and a flat output coupler. Both mirrors were highly-transmitting (HT) at the pump wavelength and highly-reflecting (HR) at the laser wavelength. The pump source was a fiber coupled LIMO laser diode operating at 808 nm, with TM00 mode, and quality factor M2=3.5. The fiber has 100 µm diameter, a numeric aperture of 0.22, and a bandwidth of 1 nm. Before focusing, the laser radiation was collimated by an OFCR adjustable fiber collimator. The probe beam was a He-Ne laser operating at 632.8 nm. The detection system consisted of a Si detector, a digital oscilloscope, and a computer. The pump and probe beams were nearly counter-propagating in a small angle (<1.5°), in order to deviate the probe beam to photodiode detector positioned in the far field. It was already demonstrated that this small angle does not affect the TL signal [12,14]. To maximize the signal, the probe beam was aligned to pass through the center of TL induced by the excitation beam. The investigated sample was a Nd:YAG commercial crystal (Castech Inc.) with a nominal Nd3+ concentration of 1.0 at.% and size of 1.5×2.5×3.0 mm3 with the optical path along the shortest thickness (the absorption coefficient at 808.6nm is ~9.5 cm-1).
3. Results and discussion
Figure 2 shows typical TL transients obtained from the Nd:YAG samples with (at 1.064 µm) and without laser action for P abs=0.44 and 0.40 W, respectively. The smaller amplitude of the TL signal with laser oscillation is an indication of reduced heat generation. From the fitting with Eq. (1), it was obtained θ no-lasing=(194.5±0.2)×10-3 rad, θ lasing=-(162.8±0.2)×10-3 rad, and for the two transients t c=(160±6) µs. From this t c and w ex=55 µm, D=(47±2)×10-3 cm2/s was obtained, in agreement with the expected value for Nd:YAG crystal [1,2,14,16].
The measured laser curve and DTL versus Pabs without and with laser operation at 1.064 µm is shown in Fig. 3 (a). The data are very well fit by straight lines with a clear distinction between before and after laser threshold. This indicates that an abrupt transition from ηl=0 (no lasing condition) to ηl≈1 (under lasing operation) takes place [Eqs. (3) and (4)]. The correspondents Cφ parameters obtained from the linear fit of Fig. 3 (a) data were Cφ no lasing=(32.2±0.4)m-1/W and Cφ 1.06 lasing=(25.3±0.7)m-1/W. So, 1.064µm laser action reduces the thermal load by ~21% as predicted by Brown . In order to interpret these results, several spectroscopic features of Nd:YAG have to be considered. A nonunitary ηp would account for nonunitary transfer efficiency from pump to metastable level or dead sites . In some Nd:YAG crystals, a broad absorption band can be noticed in the visible indicating color centers or some defects [3,14,20]. However, in the near infrared range (730–900 nm) an overall coincidence is observed between the absorption, excitation, and photothermal spectra, which present only the characteristic of Nd3+ line sharps . Then, ηp≈1 can be assumed for excitation at 808nm. By a simple inspection of the energy level diagram of the Nd:YAG system, ESA at 1.064 µm should be negligible. Therefore, we can assume σESA/σSE≈0 in Eq. (3). This assumption is not only supported by previous spectroscopic works [17,18], but also by the absence of any additional visible luminescence (upconversion) originated from higher energy levels in laser-on conditions. Comparing the values with and without laser action by means of the following equation:
the fluorescence quantum efficiency ηf=(0.90±0.03) was obtained. Using this ηf value in Cφ no lasing=(32.2±0.4)m-1/W [Eq. (3) with ηl=0], C=(105±5)m-1/W was calculated. Since C=(πw 2 ex K)-1 ds/dT, with K=13 W/mK and wex=55 µm, we have found ds/dT=(13.0±0.7)×10-6 K-1. These ηf and ds/dT values are in good agreement with those previously determined for 0.75 at.% doped Nd:YAG crystal using multiwavelength TL spectroscopy, ηf=(0.95±0.02) and ds/dT=(13.7±0.9)×10-6 K-1 .
Most papers on TL in end-pumped solid-state lasers analyze their results considering in Eq. (4) only dn/dT instead of ds/dT, as modeled by Innocenzi et al . However, Neuenschwander et al  observed a TL focal length 30% smaller (or larger DTL) than that predicted using dn/dT and attributed this difference to the surface bending (bulging), stress, and strain induced refractive index change. All these effects can be taken into account replacing dn/dT by an effective ds/dT [12,14] (note that DTL ∝ ds/dT by Eq. (4)). An approximated simple analytical expression is available for two geometries: disk (L≪Dd) and rod (L≫Dd), where L and Dd represent the cylinder length and diameter, respectively. In the case of Nd:YAG, ds/dT is larger than dn/dT by a factor of 1.3 and 2.2 for rod and disk geometry, respectively [1,14]. Neuenschwander et al.  obtained a factor 1.3 as expected for rod geometry (in their experiment L≈4Dd). We obtained a factor 1.8 (lower than 2.2) probably because our sample is not thin enough, L≈Dd/2.
The discussion about ηf will be made after the analysis of the data obtained for 1.34 µm laser action shown in Fig. 3 (b). At variance with the case of laser action at 1.064 µm (Fig. 3 (a)), the thermal loading is increased in the presence of laser oscillation. In fact, Cφ 1.34 lasing=(52±2)m-1W, which is twice larger than that with laser operation at 1.064 µm and 62% larger than without laser action. A similar increase of thermal load (~2×) was observed in Nd doped YAG and vanadate crystals [6,19], when compared 1.064 and 1.34 µm laser oscillation. There are several reasons for the higher thermal loading observed for 1.34 µm laser operation. Firstly, the higher quantum defect due to the longer laser wavelength. Secondly, we have observed a strong green luminescence originated from the active volume when laser oscillation is achieved (see Fig. 4 (a)). This 1.34 µm laser induced visible fluorescence has been attributed to ESA of laser radiation resulting in a population of the 4G7/2 state (Auger upconversion is less possible, given the doping levels of the studied sample [4,5,18]). Consequently the assumption σESA/σSE≈0, made for the case of 1.064 µm laser operation, is not longer valid for analysis of the 1.34 µm laser oscillation data. The effect of σESA is equivalent to increase the quantum defect since λl is multiplied by the factor (1+σESA/σSE). Substituting the experimental data of φ 1.34 lasing/φ 1.06 lasing in Eq. (3), the value σESA/σSE=0.19±0.02 is obtained in good agreement with σESA/σSE≈0.14 (at ~1.34 µm, σESA≈8×10-21 cm2 and σSE≈5.8×10-20 cm2) estimated from ESA data, which are not very accurate (ESA experiment presents serious problems of calibration) [17,18]. Then, using σESA/σSE=0.19±0.02 and the data of φ 1.34 lasing/φ no lasing we obtained ηf=0.90±0.04, corroborating the ηf value previously calculated from φ 1.064 lasing/φ no lasing. Alternatively, we could use φ 1.34 lasing/φ no lasing data assuming σESA/σSE≈0.14 (from ESA data) to obtain ηf=0.92, in agreement with the previous value. According to this procedure, Fig. 4 (b) simulates the effect of σESA/σSE on ηf, calculated from φ 1.34 µm lasing and φ no lasing data using Eq. (3). The effect of ηp was also investigated and indicates that decreasing the value of ηp and/or ηf, implies in σESA/σSE much higher than 0.2, which is in contradiction with ESA data at 1.34 µm. For instance, using ηp=0.90 with φ 1.064 lasing/φ no lasing data we obtain ηf=0.86 and σESA/σSE=0.57. Thus, we concluded that our data corroborate the assumption of unitary ηp for excitation at 808nm and ηf=0.90 (φ no lasing=0.30). Our results are also consistent with φ no lasing=0.27 and ηf=0.95 obtained by TL in a 0.75 at.% doped Nd:YAG crystal . Both results are in agreement with the calculated ηcal=τexp/τrad. From Judd-Ofelt analysis it is expected τrad≈259µs in excellent agreement with lifetime measurements of diluted crystal (τexp≈260µs), since multiphonon decay should have negligible effect. Due to cross relaxation ion-ion interaction τexp decrease with Nd3+ concentration and for ≈1 at.% doped Nd:YAG crystals it is expected ηcal≈0.9 [2,20]. However, it should be noticed that ηp might depend on crystal preparation procedures since nonunitary pump efficiency is usually attributed to defects or impurities [3,14,20].
In summary, we have applied the MMTLS to analyze the pump and laser induced thermal lensing of Nd:YAG crystals operating at 1.064 and 1.34 µm laser channels. This method is characterized by its simplicity, sensitivity, and accuracy, providing information about TL and other physical properties. We obtained fractional thermal loadings of ≈ 0.30, 0.24, and 0.49 for the cases of no lasing, laser oscillation at 1.06, and laser oscillation at 1.34 µm, respectively. We conclude that for excitation at 808 nm, the pumping efficiency is close to unity and the fluorescence quantum efficiency is ≈ 0.90. We have found that ESA plays no role for 1.064 µm laser oscillation but for 1.34 µm laser it increases the fractional thermal loading by ≈23%. Besides, the TL results evidenced the importance of the end-face curvature or bulging effect (ds/dT≈1.8×dn/dT) in the TL created in Nd:YAG lasers. It is worth noting that, all these parameters were obtained with the system in real laser action, differently from previous TL experiments [5, 11, 14]. All experimental data (with and without laser action) could be described by a simple theoretical model that depends critically on the abovementioned spectroscopic and thermo-optical parameters. In addition, with the present approach additional parameter such as pump quantum efficiency, effect of ESA on the laser emission, etc were obtained.
The authors are thankful to Brazilian agencies CNPq, FAPESP, CAPES, and FAPEAL, and Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (project CCCG07-UAM/MAT-1861) and Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (MAT2007-64686) for the financial support of this work.
References and links
1. W. Koechner, Solid-State Laser engineering (Springer - Verlag, New York, 1988).
2. A. A. Kaminskii, Laser Crystals, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1990).
3. T. Y. Fan, “Heat-Generation in Nd:YAG and Yb:YAG,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29, 1457–1459 (1993). [CrossRef]
4. J. L. Blows, T. Omatsu, J. Dawes, H. Pask, and M. Tateda, “Heat generation in Nd:YVO4 with and without laser action,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 10, 1727–1729 (1998). [CrossRef]
5. C. Jacinto, S. L. Oliveira, T. Catunda, A. A. Andrade, J. D. Myers, and M. J. Myers, “Upconversion effect on fluorescence quantum efficiency and heat generation in Nd3+-doped materials”, Opt. Express13, 2040–2046 (2005); http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-6-2040 [CrossRef]
6. M. Okida, M. Itoh, T. Yatagi, H. Ogilvy, J. Piper, and T. Omatsu, “Heat generation in Nd doped vanadate crystals with 1.34 µm laser action,” Opt. Express 13, 4909–4915 (2005); http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-13-13-4909. [CrossRef]
7. B. Neuenschwander, R. Weber, and H. P. Weber, “Determination of the thermal lens in solid-state lasers with stable cavities,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 31, 1082–1087 (1995). [CrossRef]
8. B. Ozygus and Q. C. Zhang, “Thermal lens determination of end-pumped solid-state lasers using primary degeneration modes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2590–2592 (1997). [CrossRef]
10. S. Fan, X. Zhang, Q. Wang, S. Li, S. Ding, and F. Su, “More precise determination of thermal lens focal length for end-pumped solid-state lasers,” Opt. Commun. 266, 620–626 (2006). [CrossRef]
11. C. Jacinto, D. N. Messias, A. A. Andrade, S. M. Lima, M. L. Baesso, and T. Catunda, “Thermal lens and Z-scan measurements: Thermal and optical properties of laser glasses - A review”, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352, 3582–3597 (2006). [CrossRef]
12. M. L. Baesso, J. Shen, and R. D. Snook, “Mode-mismatched thermal lens determination of temperature coefficient of optical path length in soda lime glass at different wavelengths”, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 3732–3737 (1994). [CrossRef]
13. M. E. Innocenzi, H. T. Yura, C. L. Fincher, and R. A. Fields, “Thermal modeling of continuous-wave end-pumped solid-state lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1831–1833 (1990). [CrossRef]
14. C. Jacinto, A. A. Andrade, T. Catunda, S. M. Lima, and M. L. Baesso, “Thermal lens spectroscopy of Nd:YAG,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 034104 (2005). [CrossRef]
15. J. Shen, R. D. Lowe, and R. D. Snook, “A model for cw laser induce mode-mismatched dual-beam thermal lens spectrometry”, Chem. Phys. 165, 385–396 (1992). [CrossRef]
16. D. C. Brown, “Heat, fluorescence, and stimulated-emission power densities and fractions in Nd:YAG,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 34, 560–572 (1998). [CrossRef]
17. S. Kück, L. Fornasiero, E. Mix, and G. Huber, “Excited state absorption and stimulated emission of Nd3+. in crystals. Part I: Y3Al5O12, YAlO3, and Y2O3,” Appl. Phys. B-Lasers and Optics 67, 151–156 (1998). [CrossRef]
18. Y. Guyot, H. Manaa, J. Y. Rivoire, R. Moncorge, N. Garnier, E. Descroix, M. Bon, and P. Laporte, “Excited-state-absorption and up-conversion studies of Nd3+-doped single crystals Y3Al5O12, YLiF4, and LaMgAl11O19,” Phys. Rev. B 51, 784–799 (1995). [CrossRef]
19. N. Pavel, V. Lupei, J. Saikawa, T. Taira, and H. Kan, “Neodymium concentration dependence of 0.94-, 1.06- and 1.34- µm laser emission and of heating effects under 809- and 885- nm diode laser pumping of Nd:YAG,” Appl. Phys. B-Lasers and Optics 82, 599–605 (2006). [CrossRef]
20. R. C. Powell, Physics of Solid-State Laser Materials (Springer, New York, 1998). [CrossRef]