We investigated the possibility to trigger real-scale lightning using ionized filaments generated by ultrashort laser pulses in the atmosphere. Under conditions of high electric field during two thunderstorms, we observed a statistically significant number of electric events synchronized with the laser pulses, at the location of the filaments. This observation suggests that corona discharges may have been triggered by filaments.
© 2008 Optical Society of America
Lightning has always been considered as fascinating but hazardous. Extensive work has been dedicated to the quantitative understanding of this natural phenomenon, with only limited success. In particular, its randomness makes in situ measurements difficult, raising the need to trigger lightning strikes at predetermined times and locations where instruments are available. Small rockets pulling thin wires into the high-field regions below thunderclouds can achieve such triggering [1, 2]. But the number or available rockets is limited, and several seconds elapse between the launch of a rocket and the triggered lightning strike.
To overcome these drawbacks, the use of lasers has been considered since the 1970’s although without success.  The hot and dense plasma produced by such lasers absorbs the trail of the laser pulse and prevents the formation of the long plasma channels required to guide lightning strikes. Even by focusing four laser beams at the top of a lightning tower and using a solid target to produce a dense plasma, Uchida et al.  observed only two lightning strikes when the lasers were shot. Moreover, these events cannot be unambiguously attributed to an effect of the laser because the laser pulses were triggered only upon detection of naturally initiated descending leaders.
The advent of high-power, ultrashort (~100 fs) lasers renewed the perspective of laser-controlled lightning. Such systems generate efficient multiphoton/tunnel ionization of the air even at moderate energy (typically a few mJ per pulse), while they are too short to induce cascading ionization. The balance between Kerr self-focusing and defocusing by this plasma results in self-guided filaments [5–10]. More powerful lasers generate multiple filaments, which start and end randomly within a filamentation bundle of length up to hundreds of meters [11, 12]. They form channels of cold and underdense plasma with an electron density Ne≈1015 cm-3 , several orders of magnitude above the required free electron density for lightning initiation in the atmosphere (Ninit≈5×1011 cm-3 ). We have recently shown that such conducting filaments can be generated away from the laser source , propagate in clouds or turbulent atmospheres [16–18], and trigger and guide high-voltage discharges even in artificial rain [9, 10].
In this paper, we report in-situ investigations of the effect of laser filaments on electric activity in a thunderstorm. The observation of a statistically significant number of radiofrequency (RF) pulses associated with electric events in clouds, collocated and synchronized with the filaments, suggests that the laser has induced electric activity in the thunderclouds.
2. Experimental methods
We investigated the effect of femtosecond plasma channels of moderate energy on thunderclouds during a field campaign at the Langmuir Laboratory (New Mexico, USA, See Fig. 1), which provides a fully equipped facility with high lightning occurrence.
The Teramobile femtosecond-terawatt laser  was fired from the ridge of South Baldy Peak, 3209 m above sea level, at coordinates N33.98° and W107.2°. The laser was triggered at a repetition rate f=10 Hz (i.e. every T=100 ms) by an internal clock, independently from the thunderstorm activity. It emitted a collimated (unfocused) beam, leaning southwards 70° above horizontal. The laser beam diameter was 3 cm, and the energy per pulse was 270 mJ at a center wavelength of 800 nm. The laser pulses, of 150 fs initial duration, were negatively chirped to 600 fs. Based on previous experiments with the same laser system  as well as control measurements performed at the campaign location  we determined that the above-described laser setup generates multiple filamentation with significant ionization over a typical length of 100 m, a few hundreds of meters above ground.
We investigated two thunderstorms (labelled T1 and T2, respectively) on September 24 (20:50 to 22:40 UTC) and September 25 (21:34 to 23:20 UTC), 2004. We focused the analysis on times when the electric field would have been sufficient to trigger lightning using rockets, i.e. exceeded 10 kV/m . To account for the faster decrease of the electric field at ground level than a few meters above , we considered the maximum value of the electric field, measured at ground level by a field mill, over a running 20 s time interval rather than its instantaneous value. During T1, the high-electric field criterion was achieved during 135 s, corresponding to 1350 laser pulses, in several time frames between 21:23 and 21:28. During T2, the relevant times lasted for 115 s (1150 laser pulses) in 3 periods: 21:48–21:52, around 23:07, and 23:14–23:15.
We analyzed the raw data from five Lightning Mapping Array (LMA)  receivers located within 1 km distance from the laser (See Fig. 1). Such receivers detect radiofrequency (RF) pulses at 63 MHz, generated by the electric activity in the atmosphere, with a time accuracy of 40 ns. For each node of a 100×100 m grid within a 2×2 km area around the laser, we shifted the clock of each receiver in order to account for its distance to the considered location. Each electric event in the atmosphere is then characterized by a set of RF pulses detected simultaneously (within ±167 ns, i.e. 100 m horizontal resolution) by all of the 5 receivers. This data analysis technique allows to consider sets of RF sources with a delay mismatch corresponding to distances up to 100 m. Therefore, it is well suited to detect possible RF sources spreading over many tens of meters, as could be the case for events distributed along a filament, i.e. over a length up to 100 m. The delay mismatch between the times of arrival of the signals on the different receivers was evaluated for each event detected during T1.
Because the laser is fired independently from the electric activity in the clouds, temporal correlations of the electric events detected by the LMA with the laser operation can provide indications for an effect of the laser. At each location, we sought electric events temporally separated by entire multiples of T=1/f within an uncertainty of t=2 ms. This 2 ms time delay has been chosen as a safe value to account for both the drift of the laser master clock over the duration of the thunderstorms, as well as possible delays between a laser pulse and an electric event it could trigger. In particular, typical discharge propagation speeds of 105–106 m/s  correspond to sub-ms to ms-range delays for the typical 100 m scale of the filaments.
Electric activity in clouds is a random process, so that a temporal correlation between the electric activity in the thunderclouds and the laser pulses may be obtained by chance. We therefore estimated, at each location within the investigated area, the probability αsync that the observed number of synchronized events may have been obtained by chance among random events, rather than being due to an effect of the laser. This estimation yields the corresponding confidence level 1-αsync, where αsync can be understood as the risk of error when concluding that the observed pulses are related with the laser pulses.
Alternatively, we periodically blocked the laser beam for t OFF=3 to 10 s and recorded the ratio of the number of events while the laser was emitted and blocked, respectively. Comparing this ratio with the one that could be expected in the case of random pulses yields the confidence level 1-αexcess for this second observable.
The α values have been calculated as follows. Observing, at a given location, n selected events among N is likely to be due to an effect of the laser only if the corresponding single-sided confidence level 1-α (where α is the a priori probability that at least n events are selected among N random ones) is high. If the a priori probability for an individual random event to be selected is p, then:
where β denotes the incomplete beta function. When observing n ON events during the time t ON with the laser firing, and nOFF events in the time t OFF without laser, the selection probability is p=tON/(tON+tOFF), so that 1-αexcess=1-β(nON,nOFF+1,tON/(tON+tOFF)). Similarly, if n events among N are separated by entire multiples of T within t=2 ms, the confidence level of the corresponding single-sided statistical test is the probability of detecting by chance n or more synchronized events among N random events: , where Rk=R 1·(1-R k-1), R 0=1 and R 1=β(n,N-n+1,t/T).Here, the summation accounts for the fact that the absolute time of the train of laser pulses is unknown, so that any time delay should be considered.
3. Results and discussion
Fig. 1 displays the result of the statistical analysis of thunderstorm T1. At the location of the laser filaments (arrow head), 43% (3 out of 7, Fig. 1(a)) of the pulses are synchronized with the laser repetition rate. This rate may appear pretty low, especially when considering that higher rates are observed at several other locations of the map. However, performing the statistical test described above at each location draws a fully different picture (Fig. 1(b)). The confidence level shows high statistical significance (1-αsync=0.987) only at the location of the laser filaments, suggesting that the laser did indeed induce the observed electric events. This statistical significance is achieved in spite of the limited number of events, especially if we compare with the 1350 laser pulses launched into the atmosphere during the considered 135 s time frame. This significance stems from the fact that the time jitter allowed between synchronized pulses is much shorter than the time between two consecutive laser pulses (2 ms vs 100 ms). Similar results are obtained for Thunderstorm T2 (3 synchronized pulses out of 10 in 115 s, 1-αsync=0.958). In the latter case the effect is slightly shifted northwards due to a drift in the plasma filaments along the laser beam and the uncertainties in the triangulation algorithm. No effect was observed when the electric field was low or negative. Therefore, our results suggest that a small fraction (0.24% of the laser pulses, i.e. ~1 event/minute) of the plasma filaments have initiated electric events in a strong positive (upward pointing) electric field.
Moreover, more electric events are observed when the laser is fired than when it is blocked (Fig. 2). During T1, 7 pulses are detected at the laser location during a total t ON=135 s, and none during t OFF=72 s when the laser is blocked, corresponding to a significant effect within a confidence level 1-αexcess=0.95. Again, similar results (10 pulses in t ON=115 s vs none in t OFF=84 s, 1-αexcess=0.998) are observed for T2.
The laser filaments do not extend to the ground, so that they can be compared with a rocket-pulled wire not connected to the ground. While the potential upward positive leader can be invisible to the LMA [24, 25], the associated negative downward leader propagating from the bottom of the wire (resp. filament) and dart leaders that later propagate from the cloud down to the initial positive leader channel, shall emit detectable pulses. However, the delay mismatch between the RF pulses detected on the different LMA detectors for some events correspond to some tens of meters. Such mismatches suggest spatially spread events, such as corona discharges at the tips of individual filaments within the bundle of multiple filamentation.
The very limited effect of the plasma channel left behind by the filaments, which did not trigger full lightning strike, is due to their limited lifetime of ~1 µs [26, 27], corresponding to an effective length on the meter-scale for a leader propagating at a speed of a few 106 m/s . Since wires of a few tens of meters are sufficient for rocket triggering of lightning, the plasma lifetime has to be enhanced up to several tens of µs. This could be achieved by a subsequent nanosecond, multi-Joule laser pulse [14, 28]. Recetly, we have even shown in the laboratory that a frequency-doubled YAG pulse of moderate energy (200 mJ) is sufficient to improve the ability of femtosecond filaments to trigger high-voltage discharges on the meter-scale . Sequences of ultrashort pulses at 800 nm have also been proposed to improve the plasma lifetime [30, 31]. The definition of the optimal pulse sequence is still an open question, relying on throughout modeling of the temporal evolution of the plasma channel created by the laser in an electric field.  Other available parameters include the pulse energy and beam profile. While the latter is difficult to control over long distances in the highly perturbed propagation conditions encountered in thunderstorms, an increased pulse energy could yield more filaments over longer distances , thus possibly improving the effect of the laser on the electric field.
To implement and optimize such improved laser schemes in a field campaign, an observable is required to assess for the influence of each investigated parameter. In that purpose, a sensitive detection system with adequate spatial and temporal resolution, as was provided by the LMA, is a key element for such field experiments. The effect of the laser, as faint as it may be, can then be monitored as a function of each experimental parameter in order to drive the experimental work and optimize the laser effect. In that regard, our results constitute a step towards laser-controlled lightning.
As a conclusion, we have investigated the influence of ultrashort laser filaments on thunderclouds. Our results suggest that plasma filaments generated in the atmosphere by ultrashort laser pulses can trigger electric events in thunderclouds under high positive electric field, although the efficiency achieved in our experiment is low. This result constitutes a step towards laser-controlled lightning. The triggering of actual lightning strikes requires further development, in particular to enhance the plasma lifetime and density within the filament e.g. using sequences of laser pulses. Also, improving the laser repetition rate will enhance the time rate of triggered events. A factor of 10 could be achieved if using the TW-lasers with repetition rates of 100 Hz or more that are becoming available.
This work has been performed in the framework of the Teramobile collaboration (www.teramobile.org), funded jointly by the CNRS, DFG, French and German ministries of Foreign affairs, Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR, grant # NT05-1_43175), Fonds national suisse de la recherche scientifique (FNS, grants #200021-111688/1 and 200021-116198/1), and the Swiss Secrétariat d’État à l’Éducation et à la Recherche (COST P18 action C06.0114). The authors also acknowledge AFOSR and AFRL/DE for their financial support to the experimental campaign. K. S. acknowledges financial support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. We would like to warmly thank the team of the Langmuir Laboratory at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, and especially Graydon Aulich, Gary Coppler, James Dinallo, Harald Edens, Steven Hunyady, Sandy Kieft, Dan Klinglesmith, William Rison, Ron Thomas, and William Winn for their constant support and fruitful discussions all along the campaign and data analysis. Constructive discussions with L.A.(Vern) Schlie at AFRL/DE, as well as the efficient administrative support by Anne Gourlan at Lasim were also highly appreciated.
References and links
1. R. Fieux, C. Gary, and P. Hubert, “Artificially Triggered Lightning above Land,” Nature 257, 212–214 (1975). [CrossRef]
2. V. A. Rakov, M. A. Uman, and K. J. Rambo, “A review of ten years of triggered-lightning experiments at Camp Blanding, Florida,” Atmos. Res. 76, 503–517 (2005). [CrossRef]
3. M. Miki, Y. Aihara, and T. Shindo, “Development of long gap discharges guided by a pulsed CO2 laser,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phus 26, 1244–1252 (1993). [CrossRef]
4. S. Uchida, Y. Shimada, H. Yasuda, S. Motokoshi, C. Yamanaka, T. Yamanaka, Z. Kawasaki, and K. Tsubakimoto, “Laser-triggered lightning in field experiments,” J. Opt. Technol. 66, 199–202 (1999). [CrossRef]
6. S. L. Chin, S. A. Hosseini, W. Liu, Q. Luo, F. Theberge, N. Akozbek, A. Becker, V. P. Kandidov, O. G. Kosareva, and H. Schroeder, “The propagation of powerful femtosecond laser pulses in optical media: physics, applications, and new challenges,” Can. J. Phys. 83, 863–905 (2005). [CrossRef]
7. L. Bergé, S. Skupin, R. Nuter, J. Kasparian, and J.-P. Wolf, “Ultrashort filaments of light in weakly-ionized, optically-transparent media,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 70, 1633–1713 (2007). [CrossRef]
8. A. Couairon and A. Mysyrowicz, “Femtosecond filamentation in transparent media,” Phys. Rep. 441, 47–189 (2007). [CrossRef]
10. J. Kasparian, M. Rodriguez, G. Méjean, J. Yu, E. Salmon, H. Wille, R. Bourayou, S. Frey, Y.-B. André, A. Mysyrowicz, R. Sauerbrey, J.-P. Wolf, and L. Wöste, “White-Light Filaments for Atmospheric Analysis,” Science 301, 61–64 (2003). [CrossRef]
12. S. Skupin, L. Bergé, U. Peschel, F. Lederer, G. Méjean, J. Yu, J. Kasparian, E. Salmon, J. P. Wolf, M. Rodriguez, L. Wöste, R. Bourayou, and R. Sauerbrey, “Filamentation of femtosecond light pulses in the air: Turbulent cells versus long-range clusters,” Phys. Rev. E 70, 046602 (2004). [CrossRef]
13. J. Kasparian, R. Sauerbrey, and S. L. Chin, “The critical laser intensity of self-guided light filaments in air,” Appl. Phys. B 71, 877–879 (2000). [CrossRef]
14. X. M. Zhao, J.-C. Diels, C. Y. Wang, and J. M. Elizondo, “Femtosecond ultraviolet laser pulse induced lightning discharges in gases,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 31, 599–612 (1995). [CrossRef]
15. M. Rodriguez, R. Bourayou, G. Méjean, J. Kasparian, J. Yu, E. Salmon, A. Scholz, B. Stecklum, J. Eislöffel, U. Laux, A. P. Hatzes, R. Sauerbrey, L. Wöste, and J.-P. Wolf, “Kilometer-range non-linear propagation of femtosecond laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. E 69, 036607 (2004). [CrossRef]
16. G. Méjean, J. Kasparian, J. Yu, E. Salmon, S. Frey, J.-P. Wolf, S. Skupin, A. Vinçotte, R. Nuter, S. Champeaux, and L. Bergé, “Multifilamentation transmission through fog,” Phys. Rev. E 72, 026611 (2005). [CrossRef]
17. G. Méchain, G. Méjean, R. Ackermann, P. Rohwetter, Y.-B. André, J. Kasparian, B. Prade, K. Stelmaszczyk, J. Yu, E. Salmon, W. Winn, L. A. V. Schlie, A. Mysyrowicz, R. Sauerbrey, L. Wöste, and J.-P. Wolf, “Propagation of fs-TW laser filaments in adverse atmospheric conditions,” Appl. Phys. B 80, 785–789 (2005). [CrossRef]
18. R. Salamé, N. Lascoux, E. Salmon, J. Kasparian, and J. P. Wolf, “Propagation of laser filaments through an extended turbulent region,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 171106 (2007). [CrossRef]
19. H. Wille, M. Rodriguez, J. Kasparian, D. Mondelain, J. Yu, A. Mysyrowicz, R. Sauerbrey, J.-P. Wolf, and L. Wöste, “Teramobile: a mobile femtosecond-terawatt laser and detection system,” Eur. Phys. J. - Appl. Phys. 20, 183–190 (2002). [CrossRef]
20. P. Hubert, P. Laroche, A. Eybertberard, and L. Barret, “Triggered Lightning in New-Mexico,” J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres 89, 2511–2521 (1984). [CrossRef]
21. R. B. Standler and W. P. Winn, “Effects of Coronae on Electric-Fields beneath Thunderstorms,” Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 105, 285–302 (1979). [CrossRef]
22. W. Rison, R. J. Thomas, P. R. Krehbiel, T. Hamlin, and J. Harlin, “A GPS-based three-dimensional lightning mapping system: Initial observations in central New Mexico,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3573–3576 (1999). [CrossRef]
23. M. Rodriguez, R. Sauerbrey, H. Wille, L. Wöste, T. Fujii, Y.-B. André, A. Mysyrowicz, L. Klingbeil, K. Rethmeier, W. Kalkner, J. Kasparian, E. Salmon, J. Yu, and J.-P. Wolf, “Megavolt discharges triggered and guided with laser filaments,” Opt. Lett. 27, 772–774 (2002). [CrossRef]
24. M. Stanley, P. R. Krehbiel, D. Davis, C. B. Moore, J. Mathis, W. P. Winn, W. Rison, M. Brook, V. Idone, and J. Payne, EOS, Transactions. AGU75, 104 (1994).
25. P. R. Krehbiel, X. M. Shao, M. Stanley, G. Gray, S. McCrary, R. Scott, J. Lopez, C. R. Rhodes, and D. Holden, “Interferometer observations of natural and triggered lightning at Langmuir Laboratory,” EOS, Transactions. AGU 75, 99 (1994).
26. B. La Fontaine, F. Vidal, D. Comtois, C.-Y. Chien, A. Deparois, T. W. Johnston, J.-C. Kieffer, H. P. Mercure, H. Pépin, and F. A. M. Rizk, “The influence of electron density on the formation of streamers in electrical discharges triggered with ultrashort laser pulses,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 27, 688–700 (1999). [CrossRef]
27. S. Tzortzakis, B. Prade, M. Franco, and A. Mysyrowicz, “Time evolution of the plasma channel at the trail of a self-guided IR femtosecond laser pulse in air,” Opt. Commun. 181, 123–127 (2000). [CrossRef]
28. P. Rambo, J. Schwarz, and J.-C. Diels, “High-voltage electrical discharges induced by an ultrashort-pulse UV laser system,” J. of Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 3, 146–158 (2001). [CrossRef]
29. G. Méjean, R. Ackermann, J. Kasparian, E. Salmon, J. Yu, J.-P. Wolf, K. Rethmeier, W. Kalkner, P. Rohwetter, K. Stelmaszczyk, and L. Wöste, “Improved laser triggering and guiding of megavolt discharges with dual fs-ns pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 021101 (2006). [CrossRef]
30. H. Yang, J. Zhang, Y. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Li, Z. Chen, H. Teng, Z. Wei, and Z. Sheng, “Characteristics of self-guided laser plasma channels generated by femtosecond laser pulses in air,” Phys. Rev. E 66, 016406 (2002). [CrossRef]
31. Z. Hao, J. Zhang, Y. T. Li, X. Lu, X. H. Yuan, Z. Y. Zheng, Z. H. Wang, W. J. Ling, and Z. Y. Wei, “Prolongation of the fluorescence lifetime of plasma channels in air induced by femtosecond laser pulses,” Appl. Phys. B 80, 627–630 (2005). [CrossRef]
32. T. B. Petrova, H. D. Ladouceur, and A. P. Baronavski, “Numerical modeling of the electrical breakdown and discharge properties of laser-generated plasma channels,” Phys. Rev. E 76, 066405 (2007). [CrossRef]
33. P. Béjot, L. Bonacina, J. Extermann, M. Moret, J. P. Wolf, R. Ackermann, N. Lascoux, R. Salamé, E. Salmon, J. Kasparian, L. Bergé, S. Champeaux, C. Guet, N. Blanchot, O. Bonville, A. Boscheron, P. Canal, M. Castaldi, O. Hartmann, C. Lepage, L. Marmande, E. Mazataud, G. Mennerat, L. Patissou, V. Prevot, D. Raffestin, and J. Ribolzi, “32 Terawatt Atmospheric White-Light Laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 151106 (2007). [CrossRef]