## Abstract

Recently important efforts have been dedicated to the realization of a new kind of photonic crystals, known as photonic quasicrystals, in which the lack of the translational symmetry is compensated by rotational symmetries not achievable by the conventional periodic crystals. Here we show a novel approach to their fabrication based on the use of a programmable Spatial Light Modulator encoding Computer-Generated Holograms. Using this single beam technique we fabricated Penrose-tiled structures possessing rotational symmetry up to 23-fold, and a two-dimensional Thue-Morse structure, which is an aperiodic structure not achievable by multiple beam holography.

©2008 Optical Society of America

## 1. Introduction

Quasicrystals are structures exhibiting long-range aperiodic order and rotational symmetry [1–3]. Mesoscale quasicrystals may possess photonic bandgaps (PBG) [4–6] that are more isotropic than in conventional photonic and, hence, the PBG becomes more spherical leading to interesting properties of light transmission [7], wave guiding and localization [8], increasing the flexibility of these materials for many photonic applications. To construct two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) quasicrystals is a very difficult task, however, because conventional methods used in the micro-chip fabrication (such as semiconductor lithography, multi-photon adsorption, template-based techniques, etc.) and also special methods developed for making photonic crystals (such as self-assembling of colloidal micro-spheres or micro-fabrication) are inadequate. Previously used to realize periodic photonic crystals [9,10], holographic lithography was recently proposed and used to realize quasicrystals too at the mesoscale in polymer resins [11–13], Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals (H-PDLC) [14], and holographic plates [15]. The holographic lithography is based on the interference pattern of many coherent light beams, that are usually obtained by splitting a single laser beam by suitable grating [11,13], prism [15] or dielectric beam splitters [16], in a single or multiple exposure process [12]. Realizing a quasicrystal structure, exhibiting N-fold symmetry like a 2D Penrose-tiled [14] structure, usually requires to control the amplitude and phase of N interfering laser beams, leading to several difficulties, which can limit this technique. Moreover, quasi-periodic structures may be envisaged that cannot be realized even in principle by multiple-beam interference. The Thue-Morse structure is an example of aperiodic pattern [17–20], defined by recursive sequences, that cannot be obtained by interference of coherent beams. One-dimensional Thue-Morse gratings are known to exhibit PGB with interesting omnidirectional reflectance [21–23]. 2D Thue-Morse gratings are defined mathematically by recursive procedure (see equation (3) below). Very recently, theoretical studies have shown the presence of PBG in a two-dimensional Thue-Morse structure [24]. But experimental realization of photonic structures exhibiting two-dimensional Thue-Morse arrangement has not been reported in the literature until now.

In this communication, we report the fabrication of several 2D Penrose and Thue-Morse
quasicrystals in the mesoscale range, using a novel single-beam technique based on
the spatial modulation of the optical beam by means of Spatial Light Modulator (SLM)
and Computer-Generated Hologram (CGH). The realization of these structures clearly
demonstrates the potential of the CGH-SLM technique. In fact, we were able to
produce, with single-beam optical setup, 2D Penrose patterns of rotational symmetry
as high as 23-fold, never reached before. Moreover, this technique allows to obtain,
with no realignment of the optics nor mechanical motions, any design of
quasiperiodic and aperiodic patterns that cannot be realized using
*N*-beam interference, whatever large may be *N*, as
for instance the 2D Thue-Morse pattern.

Holographic Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystals (H-PDLCs) are materials that provide good mechanical and optical properties and can be switched by applying moderate external electric fields [16]. Our Penrose and Thue-Morse gratings were realized by induced photo-polymerization of liquid crystal-polymer composite. Nevertheless, the technique we employed is not limited to this kind of photosensitive materials.

## 2. Holographic patterning and fabrication

Computer-generated holography is a very attractive technique that permits to create
almost any two-dimensional, and even three-dimensional, spatial distribution of the
intensity of the optical beam, by controlling the phase profile of the laser beam
impinging on a Diffractive Optical Element (DOE) [25], which is designed as a CGH. Usually, the DOE is previously
fabricated and works as a static element to project in the Fourier plane an array of
intensity spots [26]. In our work, we used a different approach implementing the
DOE with a programmable liquid crystal SLM which can encode the CGH directly in its
LC-display. This permitted us to exploit at best the potential of the CGH technique.
While in the standard multi-beam holography is quite difficult to work with a large
number of beams [27], with the CGH-SLM it is possible to get almost any design
of the writing pattern encoding the desired spatial distribution in a single beam.
Another drawback of the multiple-beam approach is the great difficulty in
maintaining phase coherence of the interfering beams between subsequent exposures.
Our CGH-SLM technique completely alleviates this issue, providing high
reproducibility of the resulting structures. No complex optical setup is needed and
mechanical noise problems are drastically reduced. Finally, real-time switching from
one pattern to the other is easily accomplished without changing the optical
alignment. The only limitations come out from the pixel resolution of the SLM and
from the refresh rate of the computer graphic card. In our experiments we used a
liquid crystal spatial light modulator HoloEye LC-R 3000. An intensity image of 256
grey levels with a maximum resolution of 1200×1920 pixels is addressed to
the SLM via computer and corresponds to the optical phase profile added to the
incident beam. The LC-display acts as a DOE modulating the irradiance spatial
distribution in a given region of space, usually the focal plane of a lens. In a
previous preliminary work, we realized 2D Penrose gratings by using an iterative
algorithm to create the desired irradiance pattern in the Fourier plane of the CGH [28]. In the present work, we used a different approach for the
beam shaping. Instead of computing the CGH suitable to work in the Fourier plane [25,29] we encoded the desired intensity pattern directly in a
phase-only CGH [30]. The desired irradiance profile is computed and then
addressed to the SLM to create the phase hologram. Two relay lenses are then used to
form the reduced image of the irradiance profile on the photosensitive sample. The
lateral magnification of the imaging system determines the scale length of the
pattern to be written. This method of “direct imaging” permits
to obtain higher spatial resolution in writing the pattern. The irradiance profiles
*I*(**r**) associated to the Penrose structures were
calculated simulating a multi-beam interference according to [11,15]

where *A _{m}*,

**k**

_{m},

*φ*, are the amplitudes, the wave vectors and the initial phases of the interfering beams, respectively. The number

_{m}*N*of the interfering beams yields the order of the rotational symmetry of the quasicrystal pattern [27]. By adjusting the parameters in equation (1), different interference patterns can be obtained. The wave vectors of the interfering beams are given by [15]

where the **k**
_{m}, *m*=(1, …, *N*), are oriented at
angle *θ* with respect to the longitudinal
*z*-direction, and are equally distributed along the transverse
(*x*, *y*)-plane; *n* is the
average refractive index of the photosensitive mixture, and
*λ* is the common wavelength of the beams. In our
simulations *θ* ranges from 30° to
65°. We simulated (and realized) quasi-periodic patterns with 8-, 9-,
10-, 12-, 17-, 23-fold rotational symmetry.

In the one-dimensional case, a binary Thue-Morse sequence is constructed using the
following rule: given an arbitrary sequence of two symbols, *A*=0 and
*B*=1, say, a new sequence is formed by replacing each occurrence
of *A* with the pair (*A*, *B*) and any
occurrence of *B* with the pair (*B*,
*A*) [17]. The one-dimensional quasi-periodic Thue-Morse grating is
formed starting from the single element *A*. The one-dimensional
Thue-Morse grating is generalized to the two-dimensional case by the recursive rule
defined by

where **I**
_{n,n} is a 2^{n}×2^{n} matrix in which each element is equal to one, and the initial matrix, for
*n*=1, is **M**
_{1}=(0). It is easily verified,
in fact, that any row and any column of the
2^{(n+1)}×2^{(n+1)}
symmetric matrix **M**
_{n+1} is a
Thue-Morse sequence of order *n*+1 generated from the
first element of the row or column itself. The initial condition of the recurrence,
defined by the starting matrix (a single element is a particular case), determines
the symmetry and the properties of the 2D-Thue-Morse pattern affecting the optical
properties of the resulting dielectric structure. In fact, given a binary square
matrix of arbitrary size as the initial condition of Eq. (3), the resulting matrix of the iteration is a Thue-Morse
2D-pattern in which the unit cell corresponds to the matrix given in the initial
condition. We expect that changing the unit cell from a scalar to an arbitrary
square matrix would imply a modification of the Thue-Morse superstructure and,
hence, of the photonic band gap properties of the quasicrystal. Typically ten or
more iterations of Eq. (3) are needed in order to achieve the matrix size saturating
the resolution of our SLM.

A homogenous mixture of photopolymer, liquid crystal, and photo-initiator is exposed to the required irradiance profile at the conjugate plane of the hologram. Photo-polymerization of the monomer occurs in the bright region of the writing pattern, initiating a diffusion process where the LC-molecules diffuse into the dark regions of the pattern. The intensity modulation is finally recorded as a refractive index modulation due to the phase separation of LC-rich regions and polymer-rich regions, and due to the refractive index mismatch between the polymer an the liquid crystal. The modulation of the dielectric function gives rise to a photonic crystal with a quasi-periodic and/or aperiodic arrangement of the structure. We used the frequency doubled continuous wave Coherent Verdi at λ=532 nm for the optical curing of our samples during the holographic process. This was a single step process with time exposures between a few seconds and several minutes depending on the power of the single laser beam incident on the sample after the spatial modulation. The laser power ranged typically from 1 to 20 mW at the position of the sample. Our quasicrystal structures were obtained by curing, at room temperature, a pre-polymer/LC photosensitive mixture in the image plane of the CGH, where the desired reduced irradiance profile is reconstructed by means of two relay lenses with focal lengths ranging between 63 and 500 mm depending of the wanted lateral magnification. The spatial light modulator LC-R 3000 (for visible light) had a pixel pitch of 9.5 µm and we adopted a lateral magnification of 0.1–0.2 in this work.

We used a starting solution of the monomer dipentaerythrol-hydroxyl-penta-acrylate
DPHPA (60.0% w/w), the cross-linking stabilizer monomer N-vinylpyrrolidinone (9.2%
w/w), the liquid crystal BLO38 by Merck (30.0% w/w), and a mixture of the
photoinitiator Rose Bengal (0.3% w/w) and the co-initiator N-phenylglycine (0.5%
w/w) [28,31,32]. The polymer has a refractive index
*n _{p}*=1.530, whereas the LC BL038 has an ordinary
refractive index

*n*=1.527 and an extraordinary refractive index

_{o}*n*=1.799. The average refractive index of the mixture is estimated to be

_{e}*n*~1.57. The thickness of the sample cell varied from about 5 to 30 µm, whereas the cured area had a linear dimension ranging from ~4 to 20 mm. The diffraction patterns in Figs. 1 and 2 were obtained with a He-Ne laser at λ=633 nm in the back focal plane of a lens with a focal length of 300 mm. The non-diffracted beam was cut by a screen. The observed diffraction patterns are in a very good agreement with the calculated (FT) ones, as shown in Figs. 1 and 2.

In Figs. 1(a)–1(b) and 2(a)–2(f) three insets are shown. Each figure, in
fact, consists of: the calculated Irradiance Profile (IP) sent to our SLM and then
imaged at the sample position; the calculated 2D Fourier Transform (FT) of this
irradiance pattern; and the experimental Diffraction Pattern (DP) produced by the
written structure. Examples of quasiperiodic structures achievable varying the
initial phases of the interfering beams in the numerical calculation of the
irradiance profile are presented in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b) for a structure with 8-fold rotational symmetry. In Fig. 1(a) all the beams possess the same initial phase, say,
phase set 1; in Fig. 1(b), instead, the initial phases of the eight beams are
*φ _{2}*=

*φ*=

_{4}*φ*=

_{6}*φ*=π/2+

_{8}*φ*, say, phase set 2, where

*φ*represents the phase of the remaining beams [15]. Figures from 2(a) to 2(e) refer to 2D Penrose-tiled structures having 9-, 10-, 12-, 17-, 23-fold symmetries in this order; Fig. 2(f) shows a 2D Thue-Morse quasicrystal. The similarity between the positions and cone angle of the spots in the calculated Fourier transform FT and the observed diffraction pattern DP demonstrates the good quality of the quasicrystals written with our holographic technique. These structures are two-dimensional phase gratings in which the modulation profile of the average refractive index is not easily accessible with the scanning electron microscopy. Nevertheless, the observed optical diffraction patterns doubtless substantiate the presence of the index profile. The diffraction spots in first and higher orders show the expected

*N*-fold symmetry and have

*N*points for even symmetry and 2

*N*points for odd symmetry (Figs. 1 and 2). The magnitudes of the basic reciprocal vectors in the diffraction patterns are related to sensible lengths of the crystal structures, such as a tile side [16,33]. In this way we estimated the size

*d*of the self-similarity cell (the “unit cell”) to be in the range between 4.8 and 8.6 µm, increasing with the order of the symmetry, as reported in Figs. 1 and 2 (IP insets). It is worth noticing that, even if the typical length of the obtained structures was in the range 5–10 µm, the typical separation between equal dielectric regions in the fine structure of the self-similarity cell was in the range of ~1–2 µm. In fact, we were able to realize 1D Bragg grating and 2D periodic square lattice with a pitch of ~1µm. The scale length of the realized structures depends on the lateral magnification of the relay lenses, which also affects the extension of the writing area, as long as the spatial resolution is far from the diffraction limit. The ultimate limit in the achievable resolution depends on the SLM pixel size and on the wavelength of the writing light. Using UV light and state-of-the-art SLM pixel size [34], the limit in the spatial resolution could be improved by a factor of 3–4. Since now however, the scalability of the optical properties permits to use our quasiperiodic structures to study their interesting yet unknown optical behavior.

## 3. Conclusion and discussion

In conclusion, we used Computer-Generated Holograms to drive a liquid crystal Spatial Light Modulator that permits to write arbitrary structures with simple and reliable optical setup. The writing light intensity pattern can be modified at will by real time change of the CGH sent to the programmable SLM. Accurate control of arbitrary pattern designs can be achieved without mechanical motion and optical realignment. Furthermore, highly reproducible patterns can be obtained over an area of hundreds of square millimeters with micrometric resolution and without drawbacks due to the long term stability of the holographic process. We were able to obtain with a single beam technique quasiperiodic Penrose-tiled structures with unprecedented rotational symmetry up to 17- and 23-fold and two-dimensional Thue-Morse structures too. To realize a 23-fold quasicrystal with the usual multi-beam holographic lithography, 23 interfering laser beams would have been necessary. Furthermore, now it is open the possibility of a full characterization of quite interesting aperiodic structures, like two-dimensional Thue-Morse, which have been studied until now only theoretically [24]. In fact, this kind of pattern could not be realized by multiple beam holography even in principle. The quality of our structures was demonstrated by the good agreement between the observed and calculated optical diffraction pattern. Our structures were written into polymeric liquid crystal films, so to permit switching by external fields [16]. The PBG is not expected for the small index contrast (~0.2) we can achieve, even though small index contrast have produced absolute PBGs in 12-fold symmetric photonic quasicrystals [4]. We are working in order to obtain 2D quasicrystals with improved features not only in terms of spatial resolution along the line mentioned above but also in terms of better optical contrast by choosing a different material, so to match the demands for practical applications. In fact, our holographic technique could be applied, in principle, to any photosensitive material (e.g. with a larger index contrast), or to produce patterned masks and templates for use in lithography of hard materials [9–16,27]. We expect that the SLM based CGH technique may have a large impact on the production of complex photonic structures.

## Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by INTAS under the project no. 05-1000008-7902 and by the NATO grant CBP.NUKR.CLG.981968.

## References and links

**1. **D. Levine and P. J. Steinhartdt, “Quasicrystals: a new class of
ordered structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **53**, 2477–2480
(1984). [CrossRef]

**2. **P. J. Steinhartdt and S. Ostlund, (eds.) *The Physics of Quasicrystals*
(Word Scientific, River Edge, NJ,
1987).

**3. **Z. M. Stadnik, (eds.) *Physical Properties of Quasicrystals*
(Springer, New York,
1999). [CrossRef]

**4. **M. E. Zoorob, M. D. B. Charlton, G. J. Parker, J. J. Baumberg, and M. C. Netti, “Complete photonic bandgaps in
12-fold symmetric quasicrystals,” Nature **404**, 740–743
(2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**5. **Y. S. Chan, C. T. Chan, and Z. Y. Liu, “Photonic band gaps in
two-dimensional photonic quasicrystals,”
Phys. Rev. Lett. **80**, 956–959
(1998). [CrossRef]

**6. **X. Zhang, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, “Absolute photonic band gaps in
12-fold symmetric photonic quasicrystals,”
Phys. Rev. B **63**, 081105/1–4
(2001). [CrossRef]

**7. **S. S. M. Cheng, L. Li, C. T. Chan, and Z. Q. Zhang, “Defect and transmission properties
of two-dimensional quasiperiodic photonic band-gap
systems,” Phys. Rev. B **59**, 4091–4099
(1999). [CrossRef]

**8. **C. Jin, B. Cheng, B. Man, Z. Li, D. Zhang, S. Ban, and B. Sun, “Band gap and wave guiding effect in
a quasiperiodic photonic crystal,” Appl.
Phys. Lett. **75**, 1848–1850
(1999). [CrossRef]

**9. **M. Campbell, D. N. Sharp, M. T. Harrison, R. G. Denning, and A. J. Turberfield, “Fabrication of photonic crystals for
the visible spectrum by holographic lithography,”
Nature **404**, 53–56
(2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**10. **V. Berger, O. Gauthier-Lafaye, and E. Costard, “Fabrication of a 2D photonic band
gap by a holographic method,” Electron.
Lett. **33**, 425–426
(1997). [CrossRef]

**11. **X. Wang, C. Y. Ng, W. Y. Tam, C. T. Chan, and P. Sheng, “Large-area two-dimensional mesoscale
quasicrystals,” Adv. Mater. **15**, 1526–1528
(2003). [CrossRef]

**12. **R. C. Gauthier and A. Ivanov, “Production of quasicrystal template
patterns using a dual beam multiple exposure
technique,” Opt. Express **12**, 990–1003
(2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**13. **X. Wang, J. Xu, J. C. W. Lee, Y. K. Pang, W. Y. Tam, C. T. Chan, and P. Sheng, “Realization of optical periodic
quasicrystals using holographic lithography,”
Appl. Phys. Lett. **88**, 051901/1–3
(2006). [CrossRef]

**14. **S. P. Gorkhali, J. Qi, and G. P. Crawford, “Electrically switchable mesoscale
Penrose quasicrystal structure,” Appl.
Phys. Lett. **86**, 011110/1–3
(2005). [CrossRef]

**15. **Y. Yang, S. Zhang, and G. P. Wang, “Fabrication of two-dimensional
metallodielectric quasicrystals by single-beam
holography,” Appl. Phyis. Lett. **88**, 251104/1–3
(2006). [CrossRef]

**16. **S. P. Gorkhali, J. Qi, and G. P. Crawford, “Switchable quasicrystal structures
with five-, seven-, and ninefold symmetries,”
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B **23**, 149–158
(2006). [CrossRef]

**17. **E. Macià, “The role of aperiodic order in
science and technology,” Rep. Prog. Phys. **69**, 397–441
(2006). [CrossRef]

**18. **F. Axel and H. Terauchi, “High-resolution X-ray-diffraction
spectra of Thue-Morse GaAs-AlAs heterostructures: towards a novel
description of disorder,” Phys. Rev.
Lett. **66**, 2223–2226
(1991). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**19. **F. Axel and H. Terauchi, “Axel and Terauchi
reply,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **73**, 1308–1308
(1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**20. **M. Kolar, “High-resolution X-ray-diffraction
spectra of Thue-Morse GaAs-AlAs
heterostructures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. **73**, 1307–1307
(1994). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**21. **L. Dal Negro, M. Stolfi, Y. Yi, J. Michel, X. Duan, L. C. Kimerling, J. LeBlanc, and J. Haavisto, “Photon band gap properties and
omnidirectional reflectance in Si/SiO2 Thue-Morse
quasicrystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. **84**, 5186–5188
(2004). [CrossRef]

**22. **H. Y. Lee and G. Y. Nam, “Realization of ultrawide
omnidirectional photonic band gap in multiple one-dimensional photonic
crystals,” J. Appl. Phys. **100**, 083501/1–5
(2006). [CrossRef]

**23. **H. Lei, J. Chen, G. Nouet, S. Feng, Q. Gong, and X. Jiang, “Photonic band gap structures in the
Thue-Morse lattice,” Phys. Rev B **75**, 205109/1–10
(2007). [CrossRef]

**24. **L. Moretti and V. Mocella, “Two-dimensional photonic aperiodic
crystals based on Thue-Morse sequence,”
Opt. Express **15**, 15314–15323
(2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**25. **V. A. Soifer, (eds.) *Methods for Computer Design of Diffractive
Optical Elements* (John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New York, 2002).

**26. **G. Lee, S. H. Song, C. -H. Oh, and P. -S. Kim, “Arbitrary structuring of
two-dimensional photonic crystals by use of phase-only Fourier
gratings,” Opt. Lett. **29**, 2539–2541
(2004). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**27. **W. Mao, G. Liang, H. Zou, R. Zhang, H. Wang, and Z. Zeng, “Design and fabrication of
two-dimensional holographic photonic quasi crystals with high-order
symmetries,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B **23**, 2046–2050
(2006). [CrossRef]

**28. **G. Zito, B. Piccirillo, E. Santamato, A. Marino, V. Tkachenko, and G. Abbate, “Computer-generated holographic
gratings in soft matter,” Mol. Cryst.
Liq. Cryst. **465**, 371–378
(2007). [CrossRef]

**29. **J. W. Goodman, (eds.) *Introduction to Fourier Optics*
(McGraw-Hill, New York,
1996).

**30. **J. A. Davis, D. M. Cottrell, J. Campos, M. J. Yzuel, and I. Moreno, “Encoding amplitude information onto
phase-only filters,” Appl. Opt. **38**, 5004–5013
(1999). [CrossRef]

**31. **R. L. Sutherland, L. V. Natarajan, V. P. Tondiglia, and T. J. Bunning, “Bragg gratings in an acrylate
polymer consisting of periodic polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal
planes,” Chem. Mater. **5**, 1533–1538
(1993). [CrossRef]

**32. **F. Vita, A. Marino, V. Tkachenko, G. Abbate, D. E. Lucchetta, L. Criante, and F. Simoni, “Visible and near-infrared
characterization and modeling of nanosized holographic-polymer-dispersed
liquid crystal gratings,” Phys. Rev. E **72**, 011702/1–8
(2005). [CrossRef]

**33. **M. A. Kaliteevski, S. Brand, R. A. Abram, T. F. Krauss, P. Millar, and R. M. De La Rue, “Diffraction and transmission of
light in low-refractive index Penrose-tiled photonic
quasicrystals,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter **13**, 10459–10470
(2001). [CrossRef]

**34. **B. Apter, Y. David, I. Baal-Zedaka, and U. Efron, “Experimental study and computer
simulation of ultra-small-pixel liquid crystal
device,” presented at the Eleventh Meeting on
Optical Engineering and Science, Tel Aviv, Israel,
26–27 March 2007.