Abstract

We observe -9.01±0.14 dB of squeezing and +15.12±0.14 dB of antisqueezing with a local oscillator phase locked in homodyne measurement. Suzuki et al. have pointed out two main factors in [Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 061116 (2006)], which degrade the observed squeezing level:phase fluctuation in homodyne measurement and intracavity losses of an optical parametric oscillator for squeezing. We have improved the phase stability of homodyne measurement and have reduced the intracavity losses. We measure pump power dependences of the squeezing and antisqueezing levels, which show good agreement with theoretical calculations taking account of the phase fluctuation.

©2007 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Squeezed states can be important resources for quantum information processing with continuous variables [2]. For example, quadrature squeezed vacuum states are used to realize quantum teleportation [3], which is one of the most important protocols in quantum information processing. The squeezing level limits the fidelity of teleportation [3, 4]. Hence it is important to improve the squeezing level to achieve higher fidelity.

A quadrature squeezed vacuum state of continuous-wave (cw) light is often generated by utilizing a subthreshold optical parametric oscillator (OPO), and a periodically poled KTiOPO4 (PPKTP) crystal is being used as a nonlinear optical medium in the OPO [5, 1, 6, 7]. -7.2±0.2 dB of squeezing at 860 nm has been reported by Suzuki et al. [1] using a PPKTP crystal. As is indicated in this reference, one needs to suppress fluctuation of relative phase between squeezed light and a local oscillator (LO) beam in homodyne measurement and to reduce intracavity losses of the OPO in order to observe higher level of squeezing. Therefore we have focused on suppression of the phase fluctuation and reduction of the intracavity losses to improve the observed squeezing level.

2. Experiment

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (Color online) Schematic of experimental setup. SHG: second harmonic generator, KN: KNbO3 crystal, OPO: optical parametric oscillator, PPKTP: periodically poled KTiOPO4 crystal, PD: photo detector, MCC: mode cleaning cavity, LO: local oscillator, HD: balanced homodyne detector, ⊖: subtraction circuit, ⊗: mixing circuit (multiplier), FG: function generator, ATT: electrical attenuator, Servo: servo amplifier circuit for feedback system, PZTs: piezoelectric transducers, and SA: spectrum analyzer.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Figure 1 shows a schematic of our experimental setup. A quadrature squeezed vacuum state is generated from a subthreshold OPO which is pumped by a second harmonic light generated with doubling of an output of a cw Ti:Sapphire laser (Coherent, MBR110) at 860 nm. A cavity of the OPO has a bow-tie-type ring configuration consisting of two spherical mirrors (radius of curvature of 50 mm) and two flat mirrors. One of the two flat mirrors is an output coupler and the transmittance is T = 0.123. The round trip length is about 500 mm. A 10-mm-long PPKTP crystal (Raicol Crystals) is placed between the two spherical mirrors. The PPKTP crystal is specially antireflecting-coated to reduce the intracavity losses as much as possible. The beam waist size inside the crystal is about 20 μm.

Squeezed light from the OPO is measured by a balanced homodyne detector and the output electric signal is analyzed by a spectrum analyzer (Agilent, E4402B). The homodyne detector consists of two Si photodiodes (Hamamatsu, S3590-06 with antirefrection coating) and a subtraction circuit. We need to lock the relative phase between the squeezed light and the LO beam in order to measure the squeezed or antisqueezed quadrature at the homodyne detection. To realized this phase locking, we use a phase-modulated weak coherent beam, which is called a “probe” beam, and the phase modulation is applied to it by a function generator (FG) and a piezoelectric transducer (PZT2). At first, we lock a relative phase between the pump beam and the probe beam by monitoring the intensity of the transmitted probe beam from the OPO with a photo detector (PD) to make the probe beam intensity minimum or maximum by controlling the PZT1, i.e., the parametric gain is locked at the most de-amplified phase or the most amplified phase. Then, we lock a relative phase between the LO beam and the probe beam by using the output signal of the homodyne detector to get an error signal for controlling the PZT3. As a result of these two phase locking, the relative phase between the LO beam and the squeezed light is locked so that we can measure the squeezed or antisqueezed quadrature.

The relative phase is fluctuating even if it is locked. Because of the finite phase fluctuation, the antisqueezed quadrature contaminates the observed squeezing level. It is essentially required to suppress the phase fluctuation, in order to observe high level of squeezing. Taking account of the phase fluctuation with an rms of θ˜ , the observed squeezing level R and antisqueezing level R′+ are calculated as follows [8, 9, 10, 5]:

R±R±cos2θ˜+Rsin2θ˜,
R±=1±ηξ2ζρ4x(1x)2+4Ω2,

where R ± is generated squeezing/antisqueezing levels without taking account of the phase fluctuation, η is quantum efficiency of the photodiode, ξ is homodyne visibility, ζ is propagation efficiency, ρ = T/(T +L) is escape efficiency of the cavity, T is transmittance of the output coupler, L is the intracavity losses, x=P/Pth is normalized pump power, P is pump power, Pth is an oscillation threshold of the OPO, Ω = f/γ is normalized frequency, f is measurement frequency by a spectrum analyzer, γ= c(T + L)/l is the OPO cavity decay rate, and l is round trip length of the cavity.

3. Improvement

One of the main factors we need to improve is the phase fluctuation. In the reference [1], the phase fluctuation θ˜ was 3.9°, which limits the observed squeezing level to -8.66 dB even in an ideal, lossless condition. We have improved our feedback system, especially the following two points in order to reduce the phase fluctuation: resonant frequency of the feedback system, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the error signals.

To make the resonant frequency of the feedback system higher, we have replaced PZTs from single-layer ones to stack ones (Thorlabs, AE0203D04). Generally speaking, a stack PZT has larger capacitance than a single-layer one so that it seems that the feedback system has lower resonant frequency with a stack PZT. But resonance of the feedback system in fact occurs at an eigen frequency of a complex consisting of a PZT, a mirror, and a mount, and the eigen frequency of the system is lower than the frequency derived from only an effect of the capacitance. In our case, the resonant frequency was about 2 kHz with single-layer PZTs, and with the present setup the resonance occurs at 14 kHz at PZT1 for parametric gain locking and at 22 kHz at PZT3 for LO phase locking, respectively. Note that the difference between these two resonant frequencies would be caused by individualities of the PZTs. As a result of the higher resonant frequencies, we can apply larger feedback gain to low frequency domain to stabilize the phase locking.

To increase SNR of the error signals, we have optimized modulation frequency, modulation depth, and probe beam power. The modulation frequency should be sufficiently high not to be affected by original laser noise around 89 kHz and 177 kHz. Thus we have set it 295 kHz because the laser noise can be considered at the shot noise level and the PZT2 resonates at this frequency. The modulation depth and the probe beam power should be large enough to obtain clear error signals, but they can affect homodyne measurement harmfully. We have optimized them and checked that the shot noise level was not affected by the modulation at the measurement frequency.

Thanks to these improvements, the phase fluctuation is suppressed to 1.5°, with which the highest squeezing level is supposed to be -12.81 dB in an ideal, lossless condition of the present experimental setup.

Another main factor which degrades the observed squeezing level is the intracavity losses. In the reference [1], intracavity losses were L = 0.0063 which stayed constant independently of the pump beam power, that is, blue light induced infrared absorption (BLIIRA) [11, 12] or other pump light induced losses were not observed. To reduce the intracavity losses as much as possible, we use a specially antireflecting-coated PPKTP crystal. With the crystal, the intracavity losses are reduced to L = 0.0020 without a pump beam and L = 0.0038 with a pump beam at the power of 100 mW Therefore the escape efficiency ρ = T/(T+L) is improved from 0.95 to 0.97 under 100 mW pumping. Note that small pump light induced losses are observed with the new crystal, and the induced losses increase as the pump beam power increases. Moreover, if we make the wavelength of the output beam of the Ti:Sa laser slightly shorter (Δλ ≈-1 nm), the intracavity losses become to grow gradually in time (the intracavity losses increased to more than 0.0073 at 2000 seconds after 100 mW pump beam was injected). This phenomenon depends strongly on the wavelength so that we have chosen better wavelength without the effect.

4. Results and discussions

Figure 2 shows the observed noise levels at the pump power of 100 mW. All traces are measured by a spectrum analyzer with the following conditions: measurement frequency is 1 MHz in a zero span mode, resolution bandwidth is 30 kHz, and video bandwidth is 300 Hz. The trace (i) is the shot noise level, (ii) a noise level with the LO phase locked at the squeezed quadrature, (iii) locked at the antisqueezed quadrature, and (iv) a noise level with the LO phase scanned. These traces except for (iv) are averaged for 20 times. The observed squeezing level is −9.01±0.14 dB and the antisqueezing level is +15.12±0.14 dB.

In this measurement, the intracavity losses are L = 0.0038 with 100 mW pump beam, the parametric gain (amplification factor) G = 18.7, propagation efficiency ζ = 0.99, the phase fluctuation θ˜ = 1.5°, the homodyne visibility ξ = 0.988, photodiodes quantum efficiency ξ =0.998, and the detector circuit noise level is −21.7 dB compared to the shot noise level at the LO power of 5.5 mW. Subtracting the detector circuit noise, the squeezing/antisqueezing levels R± are −9.22±0.15/+15.15±0.14 dB, respectively. Considering Eq. (1), the generated squeezing/antisqueezing levels R ± are estimated as −10.12±0.18/+15.15±0.14 dB, respectively. Here, the total losses can be estimated as 0.0709±0.0045 via Eq. (2), while by using measurement values the total losses 1−ρζξ2η) =0.0645, which agree well with the estimation.

We repeat the above measurement for several pump powers. The observed squeezing and antisqueezing levels are shown in Fig. 3. In the figure, theoretical values are derived from Eq. (1) using the measured values in the experiment. Black squares are calculated by the measured intracavity losses for each pump powers, and traces (solid and dotted) are calculated by using the following equation:

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (Color online) Observed noise levels at the pump power of 100 mW. (i) Shot noise level. (ii) LO phase is locked at the squeezed quadrature. (iii) LO phase is locked at the antisqueezed quadrature. (iv) LO phase is scanned. These levels are normalized to make the shot noise level 0 dB. Measurement frequency: 1 MHz, resolution bandwidth: 30 kHz, and video bandwidth: 300 Hz. Traces (i), (ii), and (iii) are averaged for 20 times. The observed squeezing/antisqueezing levels are −9.01±0.14/+15.12±0.14 dB, respectively.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

L(x)=0.00249+0.00222x.

This equation is derived by fitting the measured intracavity losses for several pump powers. The solid curves are calculated with θ˜ = 1.5°, and the dotted with 3.9° [1]. The horizontal axis represents normalized pump power x=P/Pth, which is more convenient than pump power P because the subthreshold condition is satisfied within the range of 0 ≤ P < P th, corresponding to 0 ≤ x < 1. The measurements are performed at the pump power of 10, 20, 50, 65, 90, 100, 120, 130, and 150 mW. To calculate the normalized pump powers from these “raw” pump powers, we derive oscillation threshold P th of the OPO by the following relations [ 10]:

G(P)=1(1x(P))2,
x(P)=PPth.

By using these equations, the oscillation threshold is estimated as P th = 180±2 mW using the measured parametric gains G(P) for several pump powers P.

The theoretically calculated values show good agreement with the experimental results, which suggests that Eq. (1) is a proper model of degradation of squeezing caused by phase fluctuation. One can see that the observed squeezing level degrades above x ≈ 0.82 since the large antisqueezed quadrature contaminates the observed (squeezed) quadrature due to the finite phase fluctuation so that there exists optimal normalized pump power x opt to observe the highest squeezing level. Of course the optimal power x opt increases as the phase fluctuation θ˜ is suppressed. Thus it is obvious that suppression of the phase fluctuation is extremely effective to observe high level of squeezing.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (Color online) Pump power dependences of the squeezing and antisqueezing levels. Normalized pump power is calculated by P/Pth where P is the pump power and P th = 180 mW is the oscillation threshold of the OPO. Blue (red) circles indicate the observed squeezing (antisqueezing) levels. Black squares and solid/dotted curves indicate theoretically calculated values. Each square plot is calculated by using the measured intra-cavity losses at each pump power while the curves are calculated by using Eq. (3) in the condition of the phase fluctuation θ˜ = 1.5° (solid) and 3.9° (dotted).

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (Color online) Theoretically predicted squeezing level R_(θ˜ , L, x opt(θ˜ ,L)). Solid curve satisfies Eq. (3), which represents the relation between x and L in the present experimental condition. Our current position (θ˜ , L) = (1.5°, 0.0038) is shown by *.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Figure 4 shows the theoretically predicted squeezing level R(θ˜ , L, x opt) taking account of the phase fluctuation and also detector’s circuit noise. In the calculation, experimentally obtained values are used except for the phase fluctuation θ˜ , the intracavity losses L, and the normalized pump power x. The axis of x is reduced by choosing the optimal value x opt(θ˜ ,L) mentioned above. A solid curve satisfies Eq. (3), which represents the relation between x and L in the present experimental condition. We can advance along the curve only by improving the phase stability in homodyne measurement. We are now at (θ˜ ,L) = (1.5°, 0.0038), represented by *, and have already exceeded the -9 dB line in the figure With much more stable system (θ˜ ≈ 0°), it would be possible to observe a squeezing level over -10 dB. This figure can indicate the future prospects of the squeezing level, having two parameters θ˜ and L, which are the main factors degrading the observed squeezing level.

5. Conclusion

Thanks to suppression of the phase fluctuation and reduction of the intracavity losses, we succeed in observing -9.01±0.14 dB of squeezing and +15.12±0.14 dB of antisqueezing with the LO phase locked. Theoretical calculation shows good agreement with the experimental results for several pump powers and we observe the degradation of squeezing level with sufficiently large pump powers as predicted by the model of the phase fluctuation. It is extremely important to obtain a more stable system, in order to achieve higher level of squeezing.

Acknowledgments

One of the authors (Y.T.) profoundly thank Dr. Shigenari Suzuki. This work was partly supported by the MEXT of Japan.

References and links

1. S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, and A. Furusawa,“7 dB quadrature squeezing at 860 nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,061116 (2006). [CrossRef]  

2. S. L. Braunstein and Peter van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77,513–577 (2005). [CrossRef]  

3. A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and P. van Loock , “Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. A 64,022321 (2001). [CrossRef]  

5. T. Aoki, G. Takahashi, and A. Furusawa, “Squeezing at 946nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Opt. Express 14,6930–6935 (2006). http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-15-6930 [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. T. Tanimura, D. Akamatsu, Y. Yokoi, A. Furusawa, and M. Kozuma, “Generation of a squeezed vacuum resonant on a rubidium D1 line with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Opt. Lett. 31,2344–2346 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007). [CrossRef]  

8. E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, “Atomic Spectroscopy with Squeezed Light for Sensitivity Beyond the Vacuum-State Limit,” Appl. Phys. B 55,279–290 (1992). [CrossRef]  

9. P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999). [CrossRef]  

10. T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003). [CrossRef]  

11. S. Wang, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Dynamics of green light-induced infrared absorption in KTiOPO4 and periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Appl. Phys. 96,2023–2028 (2004). [CrossRef]  

12. H. Mabuchi, E. S. Polzik, and H. J. Kimble, “Blue-light-induced infrared absorption in KNbO3,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11,2023–2029 (1994). [CrossRef]  

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, and A. Furusawa,“7 dB quadrature squeezing at 860 nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,061116 (2006).
    [Crossref]
  2. S. L. Braunstein and Peter van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77,513–577 (2005).
    [Crossref]
  3. A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and P. van Loock , “Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. A 64,022321 (2001).
    [Crossref]
  5. T. Aoki, G. Takahashi, and A. Furusawa, “Squeezing at 946nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Opt. Express 14,6930–6935 (2006). http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-15-6930
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. T. Tanimura, D. Akamatsu, Y. Yokoi, A. Furusawa, and M. Kozuma, “Generation of a squeezed vacuum resonant on a rubidium D1 line with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Opt. Lett. 31,2344–2346 (2006).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
    [Crossref]
  8. E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, “Atomic Spectroscopy with Squeezed Light for Sensitivity Beyond the Vacuum-State Limit,” Appl. Phys. B 55,279–290 (1992).
    [Crossref]
  9. P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
    [Crossref]
  10. T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003).
    [Crossref]
  11. S. Wang, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Dynamics of green light-induced infrared absorption in KTiOPO4 and periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Appl. Phys. 96,2023–2028 (2004).
    [Crossref]
  12. H. Mabuchi, E. S. Polzik, and H. J. Kimble, “Blue-light-induced infrared absorption in KNbO3,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11,2023–2029 (1994).
    [Crossref]

2007 (1)

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

2006 (3)

2005 (1)

S. L. Braunstein and Peter van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77,513–577 (2005).
[Crossref]

2004 (1)

S. Wang, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Dynamics of green light-induced infrared absorption in KTiOPO4 and periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Appl. Phys. 96,2023–2028 (2004).
[Crossref]

2003 (1)

T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003).
[Crossref]

2001 (1)

S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and P. van Loock , “Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. A 64,022321 (2001).
[Crossref]

1999 (1)

P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
[Crossref]

1998 (1)

A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

1994 (1)

1992 (1)

E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, “Atomic Spectroscopy with Squeezed Light for Sensitivity Beyond the Vacuum-State Limit,” Appl. Phys. B 55,279–290 (1992).
[Crossref]

Akamatsu, D.

Aoki, T.

Bachor, H. A.

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
[Crossref]

Braunstein, S. L.

S. L. Braunstein and Peter van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77,513–577 (2005).
[Crossref]

S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and P. van Loock , “Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. A 64,022321 (2001).
[Crossref]

A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Buchler, B. C.

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
[Crossref]

Carri, J.

E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, “Atomic Spectroscopy with Squeezed Light for Sensitivity Beyond the Vacuum-State Limit,” Appl. Phys. B 55,279–290 (1992).
[Crossref]

Chou, C. W.

T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003).
[Crossref]

Fuchs, C. A.

S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and P. van Loock , “Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. A 64,022321 (2001).
[Crossref]

A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Furusawa, A.

S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, and A. Furusawa,“7 dB quadrature squeezing at 860 nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,061116 (2006).
[Crossref]

T. Aoki, G. Takahashi, and A. Furusawa, “Squeezing at 946nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Opt. Express 14,6930–6935 (2006). http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-14-15-6930
[Crossref] [PubMed]

T. Tanimura, D. Akamatsu, Y. Yokoi, A. Furusawa, and M. Kozuma, “Generation of a squeezed vacuum resonant on a rubidium D1 line with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Opt. Lett. 31,2344–2346 (2006).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Gao, J.

P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
[Crossref]

Glöckl, O.

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

Goh, K. W.

T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003).
[Crossref]

Harb, C. C.

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

Hétet, G.

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

Kannari, F.

S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, and A. Furusawa,“7 dB quadrature squeezing at 860 nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,061116 (2006).
[Crossref]

Kimble, H. J.

T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003).
[Crossref]

S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and P. van Loock , “Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. A 64,022321 (2001).
[Crossref]

A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

H. Mabuchi, E. S. Polzik, and H. J. Kimble, “Blue-light-induced infrared absorption in KNbO3,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11,2023–2029 (1994).
[Crossref]

E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, “Atomic Spectroscopy with Squeezed Light for Sensitivity Beyond the Vacuum-State Limit,” Appl. Phys. B 55,279–290 (1992).
[Crossref]

Kozuma, M.

Lam, P. K.

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
[Crossref]

Laurell, F.

S. Wang, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Dynamics of green light-induced infrared absorption in KTiOPO4 and periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Appl. Phys. 96,2023–2028 (2004).
[Crossref]

Lodahl, P.

T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003).
[Crossref]

Loock, Peter van

S. L. Braunstein and Peter van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77,513–577 (2005).
[Crossref]

Mabuchi, H.

McClelland, D. E.

P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
[Crossref]

Pasiskevicius, V.

S. Wang, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Dynamics of green light-induced infrared absorption in KTiOPO4 and periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Appl. Phys. 96,2023–2028 (2004).
[Crossref]

Pilypas, K. A.

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

Polzik, E. S.

A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

H. Mabuchi, E. S. Polzik, and H. J. Kimble, “Blue-light-induced infrared absorption in KNbO3,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11,2023–2029 (1994).
[Crossref]

E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, “Atomic Spectroscopy with Squeezed Light for Sensitivity Beyond the Vacuum-State Limit,” Appl. Phys. B 55,279–290 (1992).
[Crossref]

Ralph, T. C.

P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
[Crossref]

Sasaki, M.

S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, and A. Furusawa,“7 dB quadrature squeezing at 860 nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,061116 (2006).
[Crossref]

Sørensen, J. L.

A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Suzuki, S.

S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, and A. Furusawa,“7 dB quadrature squeezing at 860 nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,061116 (2006).
[Crossref]

Takahashi, G.

Tanimura, T.

van Loock, P.

S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and P. van Loock , “Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. A 64,022321 (2001).
[Crossref]

Wang, S.

S. Wang, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Dynamics of green light-induced infrared absorption in KTiOPO4 and periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Appl. Phys. 96,2023–2028 (2004).
[Crossref]

Yokoi, Y.

Yonezawa, H.

S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, and A. Furusawa,“7 dB quadrature squeezing at 860 nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,061116 (2006).
[Crossref]

Zhang, T. C.

T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003).
[Crossref]

Appl. Phys. B (1)

E. S. Polzik, J. Carri, and H. J. Kimble, “Atomic Spectroscopy with Squeezed Light for Sensitivity Beyond the Vacuum-State Limit,” Appl. Phys. B 55,279–290 (1992).
[Crossref]

Appl. Phys. Lett. (1)

S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, and A. Furusawa,“7 dB quadrature squeezing at 860 nm with periodically poled KTiOPO4,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 89,061116 (2006).
[Crossref]

J. Appl. Phys. (1)

S. Wang, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Dynamics of green light-induced infrared absorption in KTiOPO4 and periodically poled KTiOPO4,” J. Appl. Phys. 96,2023–2028 (2004).
[Crossref]

J. Opt. B (1)

P. K. Lam, T. C. Ralph, B. C. Buchler, D. E. McClelland, H. A. Bachor, and J. Gao, “Optimization and transfer of vacuum squeezing from an optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. B 1,469–474 (1999).
[Crossref]

J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (1)

J. Phys. B (1)

G. Hétet, O. Glöckl, K. A. Pilypas, C. C. Harb, B. C. Buchler, H. A. Bachor, and P. K. Lam, “Squeezed light for bandwidth-limited atom optics experiments at the rubidium D1 line,” J. Phys. B 40221–226 (2007).
[Crossref]

Opt. Express (1)

Opt. Lett. (1)

Phys. Rev. A (2)

S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and P. van Loock , “Quantum versus classical domains for teleportation with continuous variables,” Phys. Rev. A 64,022321 (2001).
[Crossref]

T. C. Zhang, K. W. Goh, C. W. Chou, P. Lodahl, and H. J. Kimble, “Quantum teleportation of light beams,” Phys. Rev. A 67,033802 (2003).
[Crossref]

Rev. Mod. Phys. (1)

S. L. Braunstein and Peter van Loock, “Quantum information with continuous variables,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 77,513–577 (2005).
[Crossref]

Science (1)

A. Furusawa, J. L. Sørensen, S. L. Braunstein, C. A. Fuchs, H. J. Kimble, and E. S. Polzik, “Unconditional Quantum Teleportation,” Science 282,706–709 (1998).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (Color online) Schematic of experimental setup. SHG: second harmonic generator, KN: KNbO3 crystal, OPO: optical parametric oscillator, PPKTP: periodically poled KTiOPO4 crystal, PD: photo detector, MCC: mode cleaning cavity, LO: local oscillator, HD: balanced homodyne detector, ⊖: subtraction circuit, ⊗: mixing circuit (multiplier), FG: function generator, ATT: electrical attenuator, Servo: servo amplifier circuit for feedback system, PZTs: piezoelectric transducers, and SA: spectrum analyzer.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (Color online) Observed noise levels at the pump power of 100 mW. (i) Shot noise level. (ii) LO phase is locked at the squeezed quadrature. (iii) LO phase is locked at the antisqueezed quadrature. (iv) LO phase is scanned. These levels are normalized to make the shot noise level 0 dB. Measurement frequency: 1 MHz, resolution bandwidth: 30 kHz, and video bandwidth: 300 Hz. Traces (i), (ii), and (iii) are averaged for 20 times. The observed squeezing/antisqueezing levels are −9.01±0.14/+15.12±0.14 dB, respectively.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (Color online) Pump power dependences of the squeezing and antisqueezing levels. Normalized pump power is calculated by P / P th where P is the pump power and P th = 180 mW is the oscillation threshold of the OPO. Blue (red) circles indicate the observed squeezing (antisqueezing) levels. Black squares and solid/dotted curves indicate theoretically calculated values. Each square plot is calculated by using the measured intra-cavity losses at each pump power while the curves are calculated by using Eq. (3) in the condition of the phase fluctuation θ ˜ = 1.5° (solid) and 3.9° (dotted).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (Color online) Theoretically predicted squeezing level R_( θ ˜ , L, x opt( θ ˜ ,L)). Solid curve satisfies Eq. (3), which represents the relation between x and L in the present experimental condition. Our current position ( θ ˜ , L) = (1.5°, 0.0038) is shown by *.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

R ± R ± cos 2 θ ˜ + R sin 2 θ ˜ ,
R ± = 1 ± η ξ 2 ζρ 4 x ( 1 x ) 2 + 4 Ω 2 ,
L ( x ) = 0.00249 + 0.00222 x .
G ( P ) = 1 ( 1 x ( P ) ) 2 ,
x ( P ) = P P th .

Metrics