The experimental observation of photorefractive self focusing in Sn 2 P 2 S 6 : Te bulk crystals at 1.06 μm wavelength is presented. Steady state self focusing is reached as fast as 15 ms for an input peak intensity equal to 160 W/cm2. Self focusing is maximum for input peak intensities around 15 W/cm2 and is decreasing for intensities below and above this value.
© 2007 Optical Society of America
Self-trapped beams in photorefractive crystals can generate their own waveguide . Such light guides are especially interesting if they can be generated at near infrared wavelengths and if they can be reconfigured rapidly, which leads to interesting perspectives for applications such as optical routing, steering or switching. At present, much of the interest in near infrared (IR) self focusing and spatial solitons lies on semiconductor materials, because of the small band gap and fast response time [2, 3].
However, the low electro-optic nonlinearity of these crystals (with electro-optic coefficients inferior to 10 pm/V for crystals such as InP, CdTe or GaAs) limit a bit the range of possible applications. Here we present results of near infrared self focusing in a wide band-gap semiconductor with large electro-optic nonlinearity.
The material under investigation is Sn 2 P 2 S 6 (SPS - tin thiohypodiphosphate) with interesting non linear optical properties which makes it suitable for photorefractive (PR) applications: it has a wide optical transparency range (from 0.53μm to 8μm) and a large electro-optic (EO) coefficient that reaches 174 pm/V at room temperature . As a semiconductor type ferroelectric material, SPS combines the large linear electro-optic coefficient characteristic of ferroelectrics and the fast formation of space-charge gratings more typical of semiconductors . Two wave mixing (TWM) experiments have evidenced high gains in near IR: up to 15 cm-1 with external applied fields  and 4 cm-1 without field [6, 7]. The dominating photoconductivity proved to be of the p type . Near infrared optical phase conjugation have shown that SPS response time is more than two order of magnitude faster than that of most conventional photorefractive materials at light intensities of 20 W/cm2 .
Photorefraction in the near IR range (1.06 μm) has been first demonstrated for nominally pure SPS crystals using pre-exposure with incoherent light . Although a high gain has been obtained, the experiments have shown a strong dependence of the gain on the preexposure time; this disadvantage has been eliminated by doping SPS with tellurium (Te), which, while improving its stability and sensitivity in near IR, also eliminates the electron-hole competition observed in some undoped samples.
While SPS has been widely investigated in wave mixing and phase conjugation configurations up to near infrared wavelengths, to our knowledge no reports about its near IR behavior in a single beam configuration exists. Because of its proven rapid change of refractive index and low absorption at telecom wavelengths, this crystal may become a viable candidate for telecom applications involving reconfigurable optical circuitry such as optical routing.
In this work, we start by investigating the self-focusing behavior at the near IR wavelength of 1.06 μm. We choose Te doped samples with nominal content of 1% because this doping leads to the best IR response in samples that can be grown in a reproducible way . We show that strong self-focusing occurs for moderate applied electric fields and input intensities and investigate its behavior as a function of these parameters. The maximum degree of self-focusing is obtained for an input intensity of 15 W/cm2 and is less important above and below this level. The steady state is reached as fast as 15 ms for a peak input intensity of 160 W/cm2.
2. Experimental setup and crystal parameters
Crystal dimensions are 6 × 6 × 11 mm3 on X × Y × Z axis, the convention for the axis presentation being the one described in . SPS: Te refractive index at 1.06 μm is approximately 2.8 and the X axis is nearly parallel to the direction of the spontaneous polarization axis as presented in . The measured absorption coefficient for the polarization used in the experiments is a = 0.09 cm-1. No background illumination was used.
A 1.06 μm beam polarized along the X axis of the crystal was focused to a waist of 25 μm on the crystal entrance face and propagates along the Z direction. Electrodes were deposited on the crystal faces perpendiculars to the X axis. For the steady state measurements, the output face was observed using a microscope objective and a CCD camera; for measurements in the transient regime the output face was imaged on a 50 μm diameter hole and then recovered and focused with a lens on a photodiode. During the transient regime experiments, the applied field was kept on while the beam was modulated with an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) having a 0.5 μs rise time.
The beam power ranged from 10 μW to 1.8 mW, thus yielding a peak intensity ranging from approximately 1 W/cm2 to 180 W/cm2. The crystal temperature was maintained at 20°C during the experiments using a Peltier cell. An electric field of 300, 700 and 1000 V/cm respectively was applied in the X direction of the crystal which allows to take advantage of the largest EO coefficient r 111 of SPS.
3. Steady state results
Figure 1 shows a typical result evidencing the self focusing behavior taking place for applied fields ranging from 300 V/cm to 1000 V/cm.
As it can be seen in Fig. 1(a), self focusing is strongly dependent on the value of applied electric field and occurs mostly in the direction parallel to the external applied field, while in the vertical direction it is much smaller. Also from beam profiles shown in 1(b) it can be seen that no significant bending occurs in our sample. Furthermore, if we rotate the light polarization by 90 degrees, we use the lower r 221 EO coefficient and observe a less important self focusing. For a 1000 V/cm applied field and an input peak intensity of 60 W/cm2 a horizontal polarized beam focuses to a 19 μm radius at the output face of the crystal (the radius is 60 μm when there is no applied field), while a vertical polarized beam has a 41 μm radius in the same conditions. “Radius” (as used in this work) is the beam half width (in horizontal direction in Fig. 1(a)) at a value of intensity equal to 1/e2 from its peak intensity. For our crystal parameters (length and refractive index) the condition for which the input width is equal to the output width is realized for a ratio of 0.4 between output beam radius with and without applied field. Figure 2 shows that this condition is reached (for the direction parallel to the applied field) for an electric field of 1000 V/cm and an intensity of 2 W/cm2 yet we cannot speak of a 2D spatial soliton because the input beam is circular whereas the output beam is elliptical owing to highly different self focusing ratio for horizontal and vertical directions .
The maximum self focusing (minimum beam radius) is obtained for a peak intensity of the order of 10-20 W/cm2 (Fig. 2) corresponding to an input power of 100-200 μW.
Below and above this level self focusing is steadily decreasing. This kind of behavior has been already experimentally observed and theoretically modelled in the framework of a single carrier model of photorefrractivity [9, 10, 11] and in the case of materials with bipolar conduction .
The intensity value for which steady-state self focusing leads to a minimum radius is usually connected to the dark conductivity of the materials through the “dark intensity“ Id. For this intensity the photoconductivity equals the dark conductivity.
We have performed standard current-voltage measurements in our samples to determine the dark conductivity σd and the photoconductivity σph. At the wavelength and polarization used in our experiments σph equals σd for an intensity I = Id ≈ 0.75 W/cm2. The minimum diameter from Fig. 2 is attained at I ≈ 10-20 W/cm2, which corresponds to a ratio I/Id ≃ 13 - 26. This value is larger by more than a factor of two with respect to the one predicted by a semi-analytic 2+1 model  in the case where a beam is a soliton, which is not satisfied in our case.
4. Transient regime results
In order to characterize the temporal evolution of the self focusing process the output face of the crystal is imaged on a pinhole having a 50 μm diameter. At this position, the beam output radius in the absence of applied field owing to diffraction is 60 μm, thus part of beam intensity is blocked by the pinhole; when there is an applied electric field the beam is self focused and the output radius is decreased resulting in more light passing through the pinhole. The emerging intensity from the pinhole is measured with a photodiode, which permits to characterize the evolution of the beam radius in real time because there is no significant bending. We have calculated the ratio between intensities passing through the pinhole for different beam sizes under the following assumptions: the self focusing occurs only in the direction parallel to the applied field and the beam maintains its Gaussian profile. We have found that, for the self focusing ratios measured in our case, the intensity recorded by the photodiode is inversely proportional to the beam radius.
For all the measurements, we have chosen to keep the field turned on and to modulate instead the laser beam with a 1Hz repetition rate, meaning that the beam was turned on for half a second and then turned off for another half a second. There was no significant difference between the results given by different pulses; the pulse repetition rate was sufficiently low to permit full relaxation of the refractive index channel. Using an AOM we were able to modulate the beam within less than 0.5μs from zero to full power. Figure 3 shows a typical result; the AOM modulation is taken as time origin in our measurements. It can be seen that the recorded radius starts from an initial value (Wi in Fig. 3), decreases with time until reaches a local minimum (Wp) and then increases to a steady state (Ws) which, although larger than the local minimum, is still smaller than the initial value of the radius. This kind of behavior has been theoretically predicted [10, 13] and experimentally observed [14, 15] in other materials.
Using Wp and Ws as defined on Fig. 3 we have performed systematic observations of transient self focusing for different values of incident intensity and applied electric field. Here we are defining the self focusing ratio R 2 at a given time as the ratio between the measured radius at that time when the electric field is on and the value of the radius when there is no applied field.
As it can be seen in Fig. 3 for a 40W/cm 2 intensity the minimum radius is reached in 5 ms and the steady state in about 50 ms. For 160 W/cm2 these values are decreased to 2 ms, respectively 15 ms . The inset in Fig. 3 shows the evolution of the time t 1 needed to reach the minimum radius as a function of peak intensity. The decrease is close to linear, but suggests a slightly sub-linear dependence of t 1 on the inverse intensity. The maximum self focusing (defined as Wp/Wi) and steady state self focusing (Ws/Wi) are shown in Fig. 4 as a function of the incident intensity.
By comparing figures 2 (obtained with the CCD camera) and 4 (obtained with the pinhole-photodiode system) one can see that results obtained with both measurements methods are in agreement: stationary self focusing is maximum for intensities around 15 W/cm2. Also from Fig. 4 it can be seen that the transient self focusing maximum is increasing with intensity. Unlike for the steady state, the transient beam radius does not show an increase when the input intensity is increased above 20 W/cm2. This transient behavior has been already predicted and observed in other materials .
Transient and steady-state photorefractive self focusing has been experimentally demonstrated in the near IR for the first time in the highly electro-optic and moderately absorbing Sn 2 P 2 S 6 : Te crystal. The output beam diameter has been characterized as a function of applied field and input intensity; its evolution versus intensity has been found to be consistent with available theories. It has been shown that the steady state is reached in less than 15 ms for an input power of 1.6 mW corresponding to a peak intensity of 160 W/cm2. The obtained results demonstrate the interest of SPS for the self-focusing of light and the realization of rapidly reconfigurable light-induced wave guides using infrared light for applied voltages much lower than those needed in the case of standard semiconductors.
The authors thank the region Lorraine for their financial support.
References and links
1. S. Lan, M. F. Shih, and M. Segev, “Self-trapping of one-dimensional and two-dimensional optical beams and induced waveguides in photorefractive KNbO3,” Opt. Lett. 22(19), 1467 (1997). [CrossRef]
2. M. Chauvet, S. Hawkins, G. Salamo, M. Segev, D. Bliss, and G. Bryant , “Self-trapping of planar optical beams by use of the photorefractive effect in InP:Fe,” Opt. Lett. 21(17), 1333 (1996). [CrossRef]
3. T. Schwartz, Y. Ganor, T. Carmon, R. Uzdin, S. Shwartz, M. Segev, and U. El-Hanany, “Photorefractive solitons and light-induced resonance control in semiconductor CdZn:Te,” Opt. Lett. 27(14), 1229 (2002). [CrossRef]
4. A. A. Grabar, M. Jazbinsek, A. Shumelyuk, Yu. M. Vysochanskii, G. Montemezzani, and P. G툓nter , chapter Photorefractive effect in Sn2P2S6 in Photorefractive Materials and Their Applications, vol. 2, J. P. Huignard and P. G툓nter, eds., pp. 327–362 (Springer, New York,2007).
5. A. Shumelyuk, S. Odoulov, D. Kip, and E. Krätzig, “Electric-field enhancement of beam coupling in SPS,”Appl. Phys. B 72, 707–710 (2001). [CrossRef]
6. T. Bach, M. Jazbinsek, P. G툓nter, A. A. Grabar, I. M. Stoika, and Yu. M. Vysochanskii, “Self Pumped Optical Phase Conjugation at 1.06 mm in Te-doped Sn2P2S6,” Opt. Express 13, 9890 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. A. Shumelyuk, S. Odoulov, O. Oleynik, G. Brost, and A. Grabar, “Spectral sensitivity of nominally undoped photorefractive Sn2P2S6,” Appl. Phys. B 88, 79–82 (2007). [CrossRef]
8. T. Bach, M. Jazbinsek, G. Montemezzani, P. G툓nter, A. A. Grabar, and Yu. M. Vysochanskii, “Tailoring of infrared photorefractive properties of Sn2P2S6 crystals by Te and Sb doping,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 1535 (2007). [CrossRef]
9. A. Zozulya, D. Anderson, A. Mamaev, and M. Saffman, “Solitary attractors and low-order filamentation in anisotropic self-focusing media,” Phys. Rev. A 57, 522 (1998). [CrossRef]
10. N. Fressengeas, J. Maufoy, and G. Kugel, “Temporal behavior of bidimensional photorefractive bright spatial solitons,” Phys. Rev. E. 54, 6866–6875 (1996). [CrossRef]
11. G. C. Valley, M. Segev, B. Crosignani, A. Yariv, M. M. Fejer, and M. C. Bashaw, “Dark and bright photovoltaic spatial solitons,” Phys. Rev. A 50, 4457 (1994). [CrossRef]
12. N. Fressengeas, N. Khelfaoui, C. Dan, D. Wolfersberger, G. Montemezzani, H. Leblond, and M. Chauvet, “Roles of resonance and dark irradiance for infrared photorefractive self-focusing and solitons in bi-polar InP:Fe,” Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. A; available for consultation at arXiv:0705.3521v2.
15. N. Fressengeas, D. Wolfersberger, J. Maufoy, and G. Kugel, “Experimental study of the self-focusing process temporal behavior in photorefractive Bi12TiO20,” App. Phys. 85, 2062 (1999). [CrossRef]