## Abstract

We investigate the bleaching of two-photon absorption by single-photon excitation using femtosecond transient absorption measurements on the prototypical polyfluorene (F8), and thus introduce single-photon pumping and two-photon probing spectroscopy for the determination of absorption cross-sections in an organic semiconductor. Single-photon excitation at 3.1 eV rearranges the population distributions on the singlet excited state (*1B*_{u}
) and on the ground state (*1A*_{g}
), and probe pulses at 1.55 eV will thus be absorbed both by the singlet excited state through a single-photon process and by the partially depopulated ground state for two-photon transition from *1A*_{g}
to *mA*_{g}
. As a result, the two-photon absorption will be partially bleached, introducing a modulation to the total transient absorption. Probe intensity dependence of the transient absorption enables simultaneous determination of the two-photon absorption (*mA*_{g}
←*1A*_{g}
) and exciton absorption (*kA*_{g}
←*1B*_{u}
) cross-sections at 1.55 eV.

© 2005 Optical Society of America

## 1. Introduction

Blue-emitting polyfluorenes exhibit strong two-photon absorption (*TPA*) properties in the near infrared (*NIR*). Determination of the two-photon and single-photon absorption (*SPA*) cross-sections on both the ground state and the excited states is very useful for better understanding the material-related transition mechanisms and for optimizing the corresponding semiconductor device properties. Stimulated emission depletion spectroscopy [1], two-photon microstructure writing [2] and imaging [3] with high resolutions, and two-photon detection devices [4,5] are potential applications of *TPA* materials. Two-photon-excitation time-resolved spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study the organic and inorganic semiconductors.

A number of methods have been demonstrated to measure the two-photon absorption cross-sections of organic molecules.[6–11] Measurement of the intensity dependence of the transmission is the most commonly used technique to resolve the *TPA* cross-section at a specific wavelength [6]. Using spatially dispersed white-light supercontinuum as the light source and measuring the *TPA* spectrum, the absorption cross-section can be measured over a broad band with the influence from nondegenerate *TPA* excluded [7]. The fluorescence method [8] can be considered as a background-free technique, where the *TPA* cross-section is measured by comparing the single- and two-photon excited fluorescence. A pump-probe scheme was demonstrated to measure the nondegenerate *TPA* cross-sections of organic molecules.[9]

In most cases, influences from the solvent, excited state absorption, and nonlinear optical effects during propagation through the sample need to be eliminated to improve the accuracy of the measurements. Furthermore, the absorption cross-section of the excited state is generally difficult to measure directly. However, if the absorption cross-sections are measured on the basis of mutually correlated transition schemes, the background-free absorption characteristics of multiple channels can be evaluated simultaneously.

In this work, we describe simultaneous determination of the ground state two-photon absorption and excited state single-photon absorption cross-sections at 1.55 eV in the prototypical member of polyfluorene: poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene-co-benzothiadiazole) (F8), making use of the correlation between the single- and two-photon processes, i.e. the single-photon pumping and two-photon probing spectroscopy. In the transient absorption (*TA*) measurements, the femtosecond pulses at 3.1 eV were used as the pump and those at 1.55 eV as the probe. The probe was delayed about 4 *ps* from the pump in the absorption cross-section measurements and had a relatively high intensity varying from 199 μJ/cm^{2} to 1.99 mJ/cm^{2} in order to obtain sufficiently strong *TPA*. The probe-intensity dependence of the *TA* enables simultaneous determination of the ground state *TPA* and the singlet exciton absorption cross-sections at the probe frequency.

## 2. Theory

#### 2.1 Basic principles

The scheme of transitions with single-photon pumping and two-photon probing spectroscopy is depicted in Fig. 1. Single-photon excitation at 2 *ω* produced population on the odd-parity state of *1B*_{u}
and depopulation on the ground state (*1A*_{g}
) with an absorption coefficient *α*
_{1} The time-delayed probe pulse at stakes part in two absorption processes: two-photon absorption from the ground state to the even-parity state of *mA*_{g}
with an absorption coefficient of *β*
_{2} and single-photon absorption from the lowest singlet exciton state of *1B*_{u}
to higher-lying state of *kA*_{g}
with an absorption coefficient of *β*_{1}
The population densities on *1A*_{g}
, *1B*_{u}
, and *mA*_{g}
states are *N*_{1}
, *N*_{2}
, and *N*_{3}
, respectively. Because of the depopulation of the ground state by the preceding pump and the long lifetime (a few hundred picoseconds [12][13]) of the singlet excited state of *1B*_{u}
, the two-photon absorption of the probe will be reduced or partially bleached. In principle, the reduction of the *TPA* would appear as a positive signal in the *TA*. However, because the absorption by the excited state is far larger than the bleaching effect of the *TPA*, this modulation will display as a reduction in the *TA* amplitude.

Because the two-photon absorption increases with increasing pulse intensity, the bleaching effect becomes more pronounced with increasing probe intensity. Consequently, higher probe intensities give rise to smaller amplitude of *TA* signals. In this way, we can evaluate quantitatively the absorption properties of both the ground state and the excited state using the probe-intensity dependence of the *TA* at the two-photon frequency.

#### 2.2 Single-photon excitation

The rate equation describing the population on the *1B*_{u}
state due to the single-photon excitation is given by:

where *τ*
_{2} is the lifetime of *1B*_{u}
, *N*
_{1}=*N*
_{0}- *N*
_{2} is the population on the ground state with *N*
_{0} equal the density of states on the ground state before excitation, *P*_{1}
is the single-photon pumping rate defined as${P}_{1}\left(t\right)=\frac{{\sigma}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}{I}_{2\omega}\left(t\right)}{2\mathit{\u0127}\mathit{\omega}}$ is the intensity of the pump pulses, and ${\mathrm{\sigma}}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ is the ground state absorption cross-section at 2*ω*. For simplicity, we assume a rectangular pulse shape so that *I*
_{2ω}(t)≈*I*
_{2ω} and *P*_{1}
(t) is a constant of ${P}_{1}=\frac{{\sigma}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}{I}_{2\omega}}{2\mathit{\u0127}\mathit{\omega}}$for 0<*t*<*τ*_{p}
where *τ*_{p}
is the pulse length. Therefore, an analytical solution to equation (1) can be obtained as:

and *N*_{1}
=*N*
_{0}-*N*_{2}
.

In the measurements (Section 3) we used the solution sample of F8 that has a thickness of 1 *mm*, therefore, we have to take into account the pump depletion during propagation in the sample. Therefore, *I*
_{2ω} actually decays with propagating along the *z*-axis that is perpendicular to the sample surface, which can be described approximately as *I*
_{2ω}(*z*) = *I*
_{2ω0} exp(- ${\sigma}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$
*N*
_{1}
*z*). For extremely dilute solutions, this depletion should be small.

#### 2.3 Two-photon probing

In single-photon pumping and two-photon probing spectroscopy, the probe arrives with a sufficiently large delay (*t*
_{0}) after the pump so that there is no temporal overlap between them. Thus, the possibly complicated interaction between them is avoided. On the other hand, this delay should be small enough with respect to the lifetime of the excited state so that the decay of the *1B*_{u}
excitons is negligibly small. In the section4, we have performed the measurement at a time-delay of 4 ps (*t*
_{0}≈*4 ps*) using a pulse length of about 250 *fs*. In this way, the probe pulses will be absorbed by the ground-state molecules through two-photon excitation and by the *1B*_{u}
excitons with a presumably constant density. The corresponding rate equations can be written as:

Where ${P}_{2}=\frac{{\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}{I}_{\omega}^{2}}{2\mathit{\u0127}\mathit{\omega}}$ is the two-photon excitation rate and ${P}_{3}=\frac{{\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}{I}_{\omega}}{\mathit{\u0127}\mathit{\omega}}$ evaluates the absorption rate of the probe pulses by *1B*_{u}
excitons. *I*_{ω}
is the intensity of the probe pulses at the two-photon frequency *ω*. ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$ and ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ are the two-photon absorption and excited state absorption cross-sections, respectively. The rate equations in (3)–(5) apply to both cases when the pump is switched on and switched off. However, the initial conditions (arrival of the probe pulse at *t*
_{0}) are different. When the pump is switched on:

${N}_{2}\left(t\right)={N}_{0}\frac{{P}_{1}{\tau}_{2}}{1+{P}_{1}{\tau}_{2}}\left[1-{e}^{-\left(\frac{1}{{\tau}_{2}}+{P}_{1}\right){\tau}_{P}}\right]\xb7{e}^{\frac{-\left({t}_{0}-{\tau}_{P}\right)}{{\tau}_{2}}}$ and *N*
_{1}|_{t=t0} = *N*
_{0} - *N*
_{2}|_{t=t0}and when the pump is switched off: *N*
_{2}|_{t=t0}=0 and *N*
_{1}|_{t=t0} =*N*
_{0}.

Obviously, the excited state absorption on *1B*_{u}
at the probe has been included in both cases. Using extremely dilute solution sample (0.1 mg/ml) in the experimental work, we intend to avoid charge generation and charge absorption processes. Considering quick relaxation from *mA*_{g}
to *1B*_{u}
(~100 fs)[14][15], we did not take into account further excitations from *mA*_{g}
to higher-lying excited states. Additionally, we did not include the possible transitions to the triplet states in the above model.

#### 2.4 Relating TA to the absorption cross-sections

The propagation equation describing the absorption mechanisms of the probe pulses at *ω* with an intensity of *I*_{ω}
reads:

The transient absorption measurement is an evaluation of:

where ${I}_{\omega}^{\mathit{\text{on}}}$ and ${I}_{\omega}^{\mathit{\text{off}}}$ are the transmitted pulse intensities of the probe with the pump switched on and switched off, respectively, and both can be obtained by solving (6) in combination with the rate equations.

Because *β*
_{1} is related to the exciton absorption cross-section ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ at *ω* through *β*
_{1} = ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$
*N*
_{2}, *β*
_{2} is related to the ground state two-photon absorption cross-section ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$ through *β*
_{2} = ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$
*N*
_{1}, and the population densities *N*
_{1} and *N*
_{2} are both dependent on ${\sigma}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ and *I*
_{2ω}, a series of measurements of *ΔT*/*T* at different probe intensities *I*_{ω}
will give a simultaneously determination of ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ and ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$.

Actually, the three absorption cross-sections of ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$, ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$, and ${\sigma}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ can be determined
simultaneously using *TA* dynamics data measured at different probe intensities. However, we found that the solution to the equations would then become sensitive to the accuracy of the *TA* measurements. As a result, noise in the *TA* data introduced relatively large errors in the calculation. Considering this sensitivity and the fact that the ground state single-photon
absorption cross-section ${\sigma}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ is relatively easy to measure, we used the measured value of ${\sigma}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ as a given parameter to determine ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$ and ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$, ensuring the reliability of this method.
Furthermore, moderately lower pump intensities can improve the accuracy, avoiding the saturation of the excitation.

## 3. Experimental method

In the experiment, we first measured ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ using the common absorption-spectrum method with a HP UV/VIS absorption spectrometer. The sample was a F8/*p*-Xylene solution with a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml and a thickness of 1 *mm*. Figure 2 demonstrates the absorption spectrum of the solution with the chemical structure of F8 shown in the inset. The peak absorption of F8 is around 3.2 eV, implying strong two-photon absorption around 1.6 eV. In our experiment, the pump pulse is centered around 400 nm (3.1 eV) and the probe around 800 nm (1.55eV). The absorption is approximately 0.96 OD at 3.1 eV for our dilute solution sample. To eliminate the background, we used 1-*mm*-thick *p*-Xylene solvent as the blank. ${\sigma}_{2\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ was measured to be 1.38×10^{-16} cm^{2} at 400 nm (3.1 eV), where we have used the repeat unit of the F8 molecule chain as the chromophore. In the transient absorption measurement, the pump and the probe powers were measured using a 3sigma single-channel Laser Power/Energy meter, and their beam sizes at the sample were measured using the knife-edge method. The pump pulses at 3.1 eV were produced by doubling the ~100-fs fundamental pulses from a Ti:sapphire amplifier operating at 1 kHz. A small fraction of the fundamental pulses at 1.55 eV was used as the probe. *ΔT*/*T* was measured as a function of the delay between the pump and the probe pulses at different intensities of both the pump and probe pulses. To rule out the possibility of the influence from the nonlinearity of the detection system, we fixed both the reference and the signal levels before the monochromator using continuously adjustable attenuators with large dynamic ranges.

## 4. Measurement results and discussion

#### 4.1 Probe intensity dependence

Figure 3 shows a group of measurements of the *TA* dynamics with a pump intensity of about 96 μJ/cm^{2}, while the probe intensity varied from 600 μJ/cm^{2} (open triangles), 990 μJ/cm^{2} (open squares), to 1.99 mJ/cm^{2} (open circles). To show the decay dynamics of the *1B*_{u}
state, *TA* measurements with relatively large delay ranges (-5 ~ 110 ps) are presented in Fig. 3. We attribute the reduction of the transient absorption amplitude with increasing the probe intensity to the bleaching of *TPA*. Using the *ΔT*/*T* values in Fig. 3 at a 4-*ps* delay (marked by the dash-dotted vertical line) from the pump pulses and the measured pump and probe intensities, we calculated ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$ and ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ using the theory in section 2. In determining the measurement of *TA* at a given delay, we used an average value of four adjacent data (a delay window of 400 fs) centered around the specified data point. For a 4-*ps* delay, we can assume
no decay of the population on *1B*_{u}
. The correct values of ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$ and ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ should satisfy the three *TA* data at a 4-*ps* delay simultaneously. A *TPA* cross-section of 4.2×10^{-21} cm^{4}/GW was obtained for ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$ and a value of 3.3×10^{-19} cm^{2} was calculated for the excited state absorption cross-section ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$. Here we have also used the repeat unit of the F8 molecule chain as the chromophore. These absorption cross-sections are large when compared with other organic molecules [11] and their values vary within a range of about ±15% when using different groups of *TA* measurements with the probe intensity ranging from 199 μJ/cm^{2} to 1.99 mJ/cm^{2}. The decay rate of the *TA* dynamics was found almost independent of the probe intensity in the long-term range, implying that the decay dynamics is mainly dependent on the long-lived *1B*_{u}
population excited by the single-photon pumping at 3.1 eV. This can be confirmed by comparing with the *TA* dynamics at 2 eV, which is shown by the filled circles in Fig. 3 and
has been normalized to the dynamics at 1.55 eV with a probe intensity of 1.99 mJ/cm^{2} (open circles).

#### 4.2 Pump intensity dependence

Figure 4(a) and (b) demonstrate the pump intensity dependence of the *TA* dynamics measurements for probe fluences of 1.99 mJ/cm^{2} and 199 μJ/cm^{2}, respectively, where the pump fluence varied from 22 μJ/cm^{2} to 176 μJ/cm^{2}. Figure 4(c) shows the measured *ΔT*/*T* at a 4-*ps* delay as a function of the pump fluence for a probe fluence of 1.99 mJ/cm^{2} (filled circles) and 199 μJ/cm^{2} (open circles), respectively, and the solid curves are the corresponding simulation results. The calculated values of ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(2\right)}$ and ${\sigma}_{\omega}^{\left(1\right)}$ given in section 4.1 have been used in both simulations. Basically, the simulations fit well to the measurement data, implying a physically reasonable model and reliable evaluations of the absorption cross-sections. At a pump fluence of 176 μJ/cm^{2}, larger discrepancy can be observed between the measurement and the simulation. The reason is that the intense pump has begun to saturate the excitation [16], so that the TA data tended to become independent of the pump intensity.

The absolute value of *ΔT*/*T* increases faster at a lower probe intensity of 199 μJ/cm^{2} than at a higher probe intensity of 1.99 mJ/cm^{2} with increasing the pump intensity, as can be seen by the different slopes of the two curves in Fig. 4(c). The mechanism can be understood by considering that the *TPA* is proportional to the square of the probe intensity. That means, the bleaching effect depends nonlinearly on the probe intensity.

Figure 5 gives the contour lines of the absolute value of the calculated *ΔT*/*T* as a function of both the pump and the probe fluences, showing that the absolute amplitude of the *TA* (|*ΔT*/*T*|) increases slower at higher probe intensity than at lower probe intensity with increasing the pump intensity, just as have been observed in Fig. 4(c), while it decreases faster at higher pump intensity than at lower pump intensity with increasing the probe intensity. Therefore, we can conclude that the same pump bleaches the *TPA* more strongly for a higher than for a lower probe intensity, and that this kind of bleaching effect will be enhanced with increasing the pump intensity.

## 5. Conclusions

We have investigated the bleaching of two-photon absorption by single-photon excitation in F8 and demonstrated a nearly “pure-molecule” method to determine simultaneously the two-photon absorption and singlet exciton absorption cross-sections. By comparison between the measured TA data and the theoretical simulation, a two-photon absorption cross-section of 4.2×10^{-21} cm4/GW and a excited state absorption cross-section of 3.3×10^{-19} cm^{2} at 1.55 eV have been resolved for F8/*p*-Xylene solution. This method makes use of the mutual correlation between different transition channels and can be considered as a background-free technology, giving reliable evaluation on the absorption characteristics. In principle, the two-photon frequency does not necessarily equal half the single-photon frequency for excitation, therefore, this method can be extended for the measurement of the *TPA* cross-sections at different wavelengths using the same pump. Large two-photon absorption cross-section and large exciton absorption cross-section for the sequential excitation to higher lying states imply potentially efficient charge generation in this kind of conjugated polymers, which is important for photodetection devices.

## Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under the grant number GR/T11623/01.

## References

**
1
. **
A. J.
Bain
,
R. J.
Marsh
,
D. A.
Armoogum
,
O.
Mongint
,
L.
Porrest
, and
M.
Blanchard-Descet
, “
Time-resolved stimulated emission depletion in two-photon excited states
,”
Biochem. Soc. Trans.: Intermolecular Associations in 2D and 3D
**
31
**
,
1047
(
2003
). [CrossRef]

**
2
. **
Saulius
Juodkazis
,
Vygantas
Mizeikis
,
Kock Khuen
Seet
,
Masafumi
Miwa
, and
Hiroaki
Misawa
, “
Two-photon lithography of nanorods in SU-8 photoresist
,”
Nanotechnology
**
16
**
,
846
(
2005
). [CrossRef]

**
3
. **
G. J.
Brakenhoff
,
J.
Squier
,
T.
Norris
,
A. C.
Bliton
,
M. H.
Wade
, and
B.
Athey
, “
Real-time two-photon confocal microscopy using a femtosecond, amplified, Ti:Sapphire system
,”
J. Microscopy
**
181
**
,
253
(
1995
). [CrossRef]

**
4
. **
T.
Sun
,
Bosco K. K.
Fung
,
I. K.
Sou
,
G. K. L.
Wong
,
K. S.
Wong
, and
G.
Lanzani
, “
Two-photon absorption autocorrelation of visible to ultraviolet femtosecond laser pulses using ZnS-based photodetectors
,”
IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett.
**
14
**
,
86
(
2002
). [CrossRef]

**
5
. **
A.
Gambetta
,
T.
Virgili
, and
G.
Lanzani
, “
Ultrafast excitation cross-correlation photoconductivity in polyfluorene photodiodes
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
**
86
**
,
253509
(
2005
). [CrossRef]

**
6
. **
W.
Blau
and
A.
Penzkofer
, “
Intensity detection of picosecond ruby laser pulses by two photon absorption
,”
Opt. Commun.
**
36
**
,
419
(
1981
). [CrossRef]

**
7
. **
Guang S.
He
,
Tzu-Chau
Lin
, and
Paras N.
Prasad
, “
New technique for degenerate two-photon absorption spectral measurements using femtosecond continuum generation
,”
Opt. Express
**
10
**
,
566
(
2002
).
http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-10-13-566
[PubMed]

**
8
. **
N.
Mukherjee
,
A.
Mukherjee
, and
B. A.
Reinhardt
, “
Measurement of two-photon absorption cross sections of dye molecules doped in thin films of polymethylmethacrylate
,”
Appl. Phys. Lett.
**
70
**
,
1524
(
1997
). [CrossRef]

**
9
. **
R. A.
Negres
,
J. M.
Hales
,
A.
Kobyakov
,
D. J.
Hagan
, and
E. W. Van
Stryland
, “
Two-photon spectroscopy and analysis with a white-light continuum probe
,”
Opt. Lett.
**
27
**
,
270
(
2002
). [CrossRef]

**
10
. **
Guang S.
He
,
Gen C.
Xu
, and
Paras N.
Prasad
, “
Two-photon absorption and optical limiting properties of novel organic compounds
,”
Opt. Lett.
**
20
**
,
435
(
1994
). [CrossRef]

**
11
. **
Mikhail
Drobizhev
,
Yuriy
Stepanenko
,
Yuliya
Dzenis
,
Aliaksandr
Karotki
,
Aleksander
Rebane
,
Peter N.
Taylor
, and
Harry L.
Anderson
, “
Understanding Strong Two-Photon Absorption in -Conjugated Porphyrin Dimers via Double-Resonance Enhancement in a Three-Level Model
,”
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
**
126
**
,
15352
(
2004
). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**
12
. **
L. M.
Herz
and
R. T.
Phillips
, “
Effects of interchain interactions, polarization anisotropy, and photo-oxidation on the ultrafast photoluminescence decay from a polyfluorene
,”
Phys. Rev. B
**
61
**
,
13691
(
2000
). [CrossRef]

**
13
. **
Amena L. T.
Khan
,
Paiboon
Sreearunothai
,
Lura M.
Herz
,
Michael J.
Banach
, and
Anna
Kö
, “
Morphology-dependent energy transfer within polyfluorene thin films
,”
Phys. Rev. B
**
69
**
,
085201
(
2004
). [CrossRef]

**
14
. **
M. G.
Harrison
,
G.
Urbasch
,
R. F.
Mahrt
,
H.
Giessen
,
H.
Bässler
, and
U.
Scherf
, “
Two-photon fluorescence and femtosecond two-photon absorption studies of MeLPPP, a ladder-type poly(phenylene) with low intra-chain disorder
,”
Chem. Phys. Lett.
**
313
**
,
755
(
1999
). [CrossRef]

**
15
. **
S. V.
Frolov
,
Z.
Bao
,
M.
Wohlgenannt
, and
Z. V.
Vardeny
, “
Ultrafast Spectroscopy of Even-Parity States in pi -Conjugated Polymers
,”
Phys. Rev. Lett.
**
85
**
,
2196
(
2000
). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

**
16
. **
Mark A.
Stevens
,
Carlos
Silva
,
David M.
Russell
, and
Richard H.
Friend
, “
Exciton dissociation mechanisms in the polymeric semiconductors poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene) and poly(9,9-dioctylfluorene-co-benzothiadiazole)
,”
Phys. Rev. B
**
63
**
,
165213
(
2001
). [CrossRef]