Abstract

We demonstrate a compact 100 Gbit/s DP-QPSK receiver module that is only 18 mm (W) x 16 mm (D) x 2.8 mm (H). The module size is reduced by using a ball grid array (BGA) package with three-dimensional assembly technology and by applying a heterogeneous integrated PLC. Error-free DP-QPSK signal demodulation is successfully demonstrated.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. R. Kunkel, H.-G. Bach, D. Hoffmann, and C. M. Weinert, “First monolithic InP-based 90°-hybrid OEIC comprising balanced detectors for 100GE coherent frontends, ” in Proceedings of IPRM 2009, TuB2.2, (2009).
  2. C. R. Doerr, P. J. Winzer, S. Chandrasekhar, M. Rasras, M. P. Earnshaw, J. S. Weiner, D. M. Gill, and Y. Chen, “Monolithic silicon coherent receiver,” in Proceedings of OFC 2009, PDPB2. OTh1D.1 (2009).
    [CrossRef]
  3. P. D. Dobbelaere, S. Abdalla, S. Gloeckner, M. Mack, G. Masini, A. Mekis, T. Pinguet, S. Sahni, D. Guckenberger, M. Harrison, and A. Narasimha, Si photonics based high-speed optical transceivers,” in Proceedings of ECOC 2012, We.1.E.5, (2012).
  4. T. Mizuno, T. Saida, Y. Nasu, T. Yamada, Y. Hashizume, and H. Takahashi, “Ultra-compact and low-loss silica-based dual polarization optical hybrid for digital coherent receiver with excellent common-mode rejection ratio,” in Proceedings of OFC 2013, OTh3H.3, (2013).
    [CrossRef]
  5. Y. Kurata, Y. Nasu, M. Tamura, H. Yokoyama, and Y. Muramoto, “Heterogeneous integration of high-speed InP PDs on silicabased planar lightwave circuit platform,” in Proceedings of ECOC 2012, Mo.2.E.2, (2012).
  6. E. Yamazaki, S. Yamanaka, Y. Kisaka, T. Nakagawa, K. Murata, E. Yoshida, T. Sakano, M. Tomizawa, Y. Miyamoto, S. Matsuoka, J. Matsui, A. Shibayama, J. Abe, Y. Nakamura, H. Noguchi, K. Fukuchi, H. Onaka, K. Fukumitsu, K. Komaki, O. Takeuchi, Y. Sakamoto, H. Nakashima, T. Mizuochi, K. Kubo, Y. Miyata, H. Nishimoto, S. Hirano, K. Onohara, “Fast optical channel recovery in field demonstration of 100-Gbit/s Ethernet over OTN using real-time DSP,” Opt. Express 19(14), 13179–13184 (2011).
    [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2011 (1)

Abe, J.

Fukuchi, K.

Fukumitsu, K.

Hirano, S.

Kisaka, Y.

Komaki, K.

Kubo, K.

Matsui, J.

Matsuoka, S.

Miyamoto, Y.

Miyata, Y.

Mizuochi, T.

Murata, K.

Nakagawa, T.

Nakamura, Y.

Nakashima, H.

Nishimoto, H.

Noguchi, H.

Onaka, H.

Onohara, K.

Sakamoto, Y.

Sakano, T.

Shibayama, A.

Takeuchi, O.

Tomizawa, M.

Yamanaka, S.

Yamazaki, E.

Yoshida, E.

Opt. Express (1)

Other (5)

R. Kunkel, H.-G. Bach, D. Hoffmann, and C. M. Weinert, “First monolithic InP-based 90°-hybrid OEIC comprising balanced detectors for 100GE coherent frontends, ” in Proceedings of IPRM 2009, TuB2.2, (2009).

C. R. Doerr, P. J. Winzer, S. Chandrasekhar, M. Rasras, M. P. Earnshaw, J. S. Weiner, D. M. Gill, and Y. Chen, “Monolithic silicon coherent receiver,” in Proceedings of OFC 2009, PDPB2. OTh1D.1 (2009).
[CrossRef]

P. D. Dobbelaere, S. Abdalla, S. Gloeckner, M. Mack, G. Masini, A. Mekis, T. Pinguet, S. Sahni, D. Guckenberger, M. Harrison, and A. Narasimha, Si photonics based high-speed optical transceivers,” in Proceedings of ECOC 2012, We.1.E.5, (2012).

T. Mizuno, T. Saida, Y. Nasu, T. Yamada, Y. Hashizume, and H. Takahashi, “Ultra-compact and low-loss silica-based dual polarization optical hybrid for digital coherent receiver with excellent common-mode rejection ratio,” in Proceedings of OFC 2013, OTh3H.3, (2013).
[CrossRef]

Y. Kurata, Y. Nasu, M. Tamura, H. Yokoyama, and Y. Muramoto, “Heterogeneous integration of high-speed InP PDs on silicabased planar lightwave circuit platform,” in Proceedings of ECOC 2012, Mo.2.E.2, (2012).

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (10)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Compact optical coherent receiver module for 100G DP-QPSK demodulation.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Comparison of (a) conventional and (b) our concept receiver module.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

New concept for compact optical module.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Coefficients of temperature expansion for various printed circuit board materials.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Size of compact optical coherent receiver module.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Measured S-parameter of BGA package (a) transmission and (b) reflection coefficient.

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

(a) O/E response and (b) return loss of optical coherent receiver.

Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Measurement setup for Q-value evaluation.

Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Measured OSNR dependence of Q value.

Fig. 10
Fig. 10

Measured constellations.

Metrics