Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Absorption enhancing proximity effects in aperiodic nanowire arrays

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Aperiodic Nanowire (NW) arrays have higher absorption than equivalent periodic arrays, making them of interest for photovoltaic applications. An inevitable property of aperiodic arrays is the clustering of some NWs into closer proximity than in the equivalent periodic array. We focus on the modes of such clusters and show that the reduced symmetry associated with cluster formation allows external coupling into modes which are dark in periodic arrays, thus increasing absorption. To exploit such modes fully, arrays must include tightly clustered NWs that are unlikely to arise from fabrication variations but must be created intentionally.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Modal analysis of enhanced absorption in silicon nanowire arrays

Björn C. P. Sturmberg, Kokou B. Dossou, Lindsay C. Botten, Ara A. Asatryan, Christopher G. Poulton, C. Martijn de Sterke, and Ross C. McPhedran
Opt. Express 19(S5) A1067-A1081 (2011)

Efficient light management in vertical nanowire arrays for photovoltaics

Nicklas Anttu and H. Q. Xu
Opt. Express 21(S3) A558-A575 (2013)

Broadband absorption enhancement in elliptical silicon nanowire arrays for photovoltaic applications

Yonggang Wu, Zihuan Xia, Zhaoming Liang, Jian Zhou, Hongfei Jiao, Hong Cao, and Xuefei Qin
Opt. Express 22(S5) A1292-A1302 (2014)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Absorption spectra of NW arrays with a = 31 nm, f = 30%, with increasing clustering l = 0.0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 0.95. Inset shows cluster geometry where a is the NW radius, d is the unit cell dimension, g is the gap size between NW surfaces, and t is the distance a NW can be moved before touching its neighbour.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Ultimate efficiency increase δη versus the gap between NW surfaces. (a) Arrays of different volume fractions with fixed NW radius a = 31 nm. (b) Arrays with different NW radii but fixed volume fraction, f = 50%.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a)–(d) Electric field vector of Bloch modes where colour and length indicate the field strength at the arrows’ origin. (a) Fundamental mode of the unclustered array; (b) CKM of unclustered array; (c) CKM with l = 0.5; (d) CKM with l = 0.8. (e)–(h) Bloch mode energy Re(ε)|E|2 where red and blue indicates high and low energy density, respectively. (e) Fundamental mode of the unclustered array; (f) CKM with l = 0.5; (g) CKM with l = 0.8; (h) KM of an array with twice the radius, i.e., a = 62 nm. For all figures λ = 550 nm, d = 200 nm and in (a)–(g) a = 31 nm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Coupling coefficient (left axis) of the incident plane wave to the fundamental mode (blue upward triangles) and the second bright mode (green downward triangles) versus gap between NW surfaces. The ultimate efficiency η of the clusters is also shown (red circles and right axis).
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.