Abstract

Fresnel incoherent correlation holography (FINCH) records holograms under incoherent illumination. FINCH was implemented with two focal length diffractive lenses on a spatial light modulator (SLM). Improved image resolution over previous single lens systems and at wider bandwidths was observed. For a given image magnification and light source bandwidth, FINCH with two lenses of close focal lengths yields a better hologram in comparison to a single diffractive lens FINCH. Three techniques of lens multiplexing on the SLM were tested and the best method was randomly and uniformly distributing the two lenses. The improved quality of the hologram results from a reduced optical path difference of the interfering beams and increased efficiency.

©2012 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
OSA Recommended Articles
Optimal noise suppression in Fresnel incoherent correlation holography (FINCH) configured for maximum imaging resolution

Barak Katz, Dov Wulich, and Joseph Rosen
Appl. Opt. 49(30) 5757-5763 (2010)

Theoretical and experimental demonstration of resolution beyond the Rayleigh limit by FINCH fluorescence microscopic imaging

Joseph Rosen, Nisan Siegel, and Gary Brooker
Opt. Express 19(27) 26249-26268 (2011)

Point spread function and two-point resolution in Fresnel incoherent correlation holography

Petr Bouchal, Josef Kapitán, Radim Chmelík, and Zdeněk Bouchal
Opt. Express 19(16) 15603-15620 (2011)

More Recommended Articles

References

  • View by:
  • Article Order
  • |
  • Year
  • |
  • Author
  • |
  • Publication
  1. J. F. Heanue, M. C. Bashaw, and L. Hesselink, “Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data,” Science 265(5173), 749–752 (1994).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. F. Mok, J. Diep, H.-K. Liu, and D. Psaltis, “Real-time computer-generated hologram by means of liquid-crystal television spatial light modulator,” Opt. Lett. 11(11), 748–750 (1986).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. J. N. Mait and G. S. Himes, “Computer-generated holograms by means of a magnetooptic spatial light modulator,” Appl. Opt. 28(22), 4879–4887 (1989).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. J. Rosen, L. Shiv, J. Stein, and J. Shamir, “Electro-optic hologram generation on spatial light modulators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9(7), 1159–1166 (1992).
    [Crossref]
  5. C.-S. Guo, Z.-Y. Rong, H.-T. Wang, Y. Wang, and L. Z. Cai, “Phase-shifting with computer-generated holograms written on a spatial light modulator,” Appl. Opt. 42(35), 6975–6979 (2003).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. J. Rosen and G. Brooker, “Digital spatially incoherent Fresnel holography,” Opt. Lett. 32(8), 912–914 (2007).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. J. Rosen and G. Brooker, “Fluorescence incoherent color holography,” Opt. Express 15(5), 2244–2250 (2007).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. J. Rosen and G. Brooker, “Non-scanning motionless fluorescence three-dimensional holographic microscopy,” Nat. Photonics 2(3), 190–195 (2008).
    [Crossref]
  9. G. Brooker, N. Siegel, V. Wang, and J. Rosen, “Optimal resolution in Fresnel incoherent correlation holographic fluorescence microscopy,” Opt. Express 19(6), 5047–5062 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. B. Katz and J. Rosen, “Super-resolution in incoherent optical imaging using synthetic aperture with Fresnel elements,” Opt. Express 18(2), 962–972 (2010).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. B. Katz, D. Wulich, and J. Rosen, “Optimal noise suppression in Fresnel incoherent correlation holography (FINCH) configured for maximum imaging resolution,” Appl. Opt. 49(30), 5757–5763 (2010).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. P. Bouchal, J. Kapitán, R. Chmelík, and Z. Bouchal, “Point spread function and two-point resolution in Fresnel incoherent correlation holography,” Opt. Express 19(16), 15603–15620 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. J. Rosen, N. Siegel, and G. Brooker, “Theoretical and experimental demonstration of resolution beyond the Rayleigh limit by FINCH fluorescence microscopic imaging,” Opt. Express 19(27), 26249–26268 (2011).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts and Company Publishers, 2005).
  15. J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley, 1985).
  16. E. Wolf, Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light (Cambridge, 2007).

2011 (3)

2010 (2)

2008 (1)

J. Rosen and G. Brooker, “Non-scanning motionless fluorescence three-dimensional holographic microscopy,” Nat. Photonics 2(3), 190–195 (2008).
[Crossref]

2007 (2)

2003 (1)

1994 (1)

J. F. Heanue, M. C. Bashaw, and L. Hesselink, “Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data,” Science 265(5173), 749–752 (1994).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

1992 (1)

1989 (1)

1986 (1)

Bashaw, M. C.

J. F. Heanue, M. C. Bashaw, and L. Hesselink, “Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data,” Science 265(5173), 749–752 (1994).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Bouchal, P.

Bouchal, Z.

Brooker, G.

Cai, L. Z.

Chmelík, R.

Diep, J.

Guo, C.-S.

Heanue, J. F.

J. F. Heanue, M. C. Bashaw, and L. Hesselink, “Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data,” Science 265(5173), 749–752 (1994).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Hesselink, L.

J. F. Heanue, M. C. Bashaw, and L. Hesselink, “Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data,” Science 265(5173), 749–752 (1994).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Himes, G. S.

Kapitán, J.

Katz, B.

Liu, H.-K.

Mait, J. N.

Mok, F.

Psaltis, D.

Rong, Z.-Y.

Rosen, J.

Shamir, J.

Shiv, L.

Siegel, N.

Stein, J.

Wang, H.-T.

Wang, V.

Wang, Y.

Wulich, D.

Appl. Opt. (3)

J. Opt. Soc. Am. A (1)

Nat. Photonics (1)

J. Rosen and G. Brooker, “Non-scanning motionless fluorescence three-dimensional holographic microscopy,” Nat. Photonics 2(3), 190–195 (2008).
[Crossref]

Opt. Express (5)

Opt. Lett. (2)

Science (1)

J. F. Heanue, M. C. Bashaw, and L. Hesselink, “Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data,” Science 265(5173), 749–752 (1994).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Other (3)

J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts and Company Publishers, 2005).

J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics (Wiley, 1985).

E. Wolf, Introduction to the theory of coherence and polarization of light (Cambridge, 2007).

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 FINCH with two diffractive lenses created by the SLM. L1-collimating lens. SLM creates two lenses with focal length f1 and f2 with image focus at Image 1 and Image 2, respectively.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Three different methods of lens multiplexing: (a) random pixel method, (b) phase sum method and (c) random ring method. Magnified views of each pattern are shown in panels d, e and f below the complete pattern for each method. Only a single phase pattern (0°) is shown, but in practice, three phase patterns of 0°, 120° or 240° phase shift are sequentially displayed on the SLM during capture of the three holograms for each method.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Experimental setup. POL-Polarizer, BPF-Bandpass filter.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Best in-focus reconstructed images from holograms captured with (a) random pixel method, (b) phase sum method and (c) random ring method.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 The reference image of the input object.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 6
Fig. 6 MSE versus the distance between the two focuses calculated on the images of Fig. 4 in comparison with the reference image shown in Fig. 5.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Images which were taken by dual lens imaging system. The input lens is always L1 with focal lens of fo = 25cm. the output lens is a diffractive lens with the focal length of (a) 40cm, (b) 64.9cm (c) 45cm and (d) 55cm. The left-hand image in each group was recorded with the random pixel method, the central was recorded with the phase sum method, and the right-hand image in each group was recorded with the random ring method.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Equations (27)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

I H (u,v)=| I s C( r ¯ s )L( − r ¯ s f o )Q( 1 f o )Q( −1 f o )*Q( 1 d )   ×[ C 1 Q( −1 f 1 )+ C 2 exp(iθ)Q( −1 f 2 ) ]*Q( 1 z h )P( R H ) | 2 ,
H( ρ ¯ )=C' I s P( R H )L( r ¯ r z r )Q( 1 z r ),
z r =±| ( z h − f 1 )( z h − f 2 ) f 1 − f 2 |.
r ¯ r =( x r , y r )= r ¯ s z h f o .
h F ( r ¯ )=C' I s ν[ 1 λ z r ]ℱ{ L( r ¯ r z r )P( R H ) } =C'' I s Jinc( 2π R H λ z r ( x− M T x s ) 2 + ( y− M T y s ) 2 ),
C ″
ℱ
ν
ν[ a ]f( x )=f( ax )
r ¯ =( x,y )
Jinc
Jinc (r)=  J 1 (r)/r
J 1 (r)
Δ= 1.22λ z r R H M T = 1.22λ z r f o R H z h
R H = R o z h − f 1 f 1 = R o f 2 − z h f 2 ,
z h = 2 f 1 f 2 f 1 + f 2
Δ= 0.61λ f o R o = 0.61λ NA .
δ max ≤ C o Δν = λ 2 Δλ ,
δ max =| BH ¯ − AH ¯ |= ( R o + R H ) 2 + z h 2 − ( R o − R H ) 2 + z h 2 .
δ max = z h [ ( R o f 1 ) 2 +1 − ( R o f 2 ) 2 +1   ].
δ max ≅ R o 2 f 1 f 2 Δf,
Δ f max = δ max f 1 f 2   R o 2 ≅ 1 Δλ ( λ M T f o R o ) 2 .
Δ f min = π ( M T O max ) 4 128λ 3 .
tanφ=tan( tan −1 R o + R H z h + tan −1 R o − R H z h )≅ 2 R o z h ≤ λ 2 δ c ,
z h,min = 4 R o λ max{ δ c , δ s }.
MSE= 1 M⋅K ∑ i=1 M ∑ j=1 K [ P( i,j )−ξ⋅ P ˜ ( i,j ) ]  2 ,
ξ= [ ∑ i=1 M ∑ j=1 K P( i,j )⋅ P ˜ ( i,j ) ] / ∑ i=1 M ∑ j=1 K P ˜ ( i,j )⋅ P ˜ ( i,j ) .

Metrics