Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Conditions for highly efficient anti-Stokes conversion in gas-filled hollow core waveguides

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Using a four-mode theoretical analysis we show that highly efficient anti-Stokes conversion in waveguides is more challenging to realize in practice than previously thought. By including the dynamics of conversion to 2nd Stokes via stimulated Raman scattering and four-wave mixing, models predict only narrow, unstable regions of highly efficient anti-Stokes conversion. Experimental results of single-pass Raman conversion in confined capillary waveguides validate these predictions. This places more stringent conditions on systems that require highly efficient single-pass anti-Stokes conversion.

©2010 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Efficient anti-Stokes generation via intermodal stimulated Raman scattering in gas-filled hollow-core PCF

B. M. Trabold, A. Abdolvand, T. G. Euser, and P. St.J. Russell
Opt. Express 21(24) 29711-29718 (2013)

Anti-Stokes Raman conversion in silicon waveguides

R. Claps, V. Raghunathan, D. Dimitropoulos, and B. Jalali
Opt. Express 11(22) 2862-2872 (2003)

Matched cascade of bandgap-shift and frequency-conversion using stimulated Raman scattering in a tapered hollow-core photonic crystal fibre

B. Beaudou, F. Couny, Y. Y. Wang, P. S. Light, N. V. Wheeler, F. Gérôme, and F. Benabid
Opt. Express 18(12) 12381-12390 (2010)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) A plot of the normalized anti-Stokes power versus the phase-gain mismatch factor, Δk / g 0 = (2k p-k a-k s) / g 0 (where g 0 is the Raman gain coefficient times the peak power, which was assumed to be 10 kW), and L is the interaction length after Roos [5] and Nazarkin [9]. High efficiencies are predicted but require long interaction lengths. (b-d) Raman simulations with varying levels of complexity. (b) Raman conversion with FWM simulation including only pump (green), Stokes (red), and anti-Stokes (blue) fields. The effect of phase matching (SRS gain g 0 = 10, Δk / g 0 = 0.5 solid lines, Δk / g 0 =0.05 dashed lines) can be seen by the increased threshold and conversion efficiency to anti-Stokes. (c) Simulation including cascaded SRS to the 2nd Stokes field (black). (d) This simulation includes full FWM interaction between all four fields and shows rapid conversion into the 2nd Stokes and pump fields.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) A simplified schematic of the experimental setup. The capillary was strapped to an aluminum block with a V-groove, (b) shows perspective view and (c) an end on view, and placed entirely inside a windowed gas cell (not shown). Cameras were used to look into the cell to image the input (d) and output (e) faces of the capillary to aid in coupling the light into the capillary.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The temporal profiles of Raman converted pulses for 80 psi of CO2. (a) An experimental plot showing the various Raman converted pulses with an input pulse peak power of 1.2 MW. (b) Various experimental traces in ascending input peak power levels showing the threshold for Stokes conversion, the subsequent threshold for 2nd Stokes conversion, and evidence of conversion to 3rd Stokes. (c) Numerical simulation of conditions in (a) using Eq. (1). Note the scale change on the pump as compared to (a).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) The phase-gain mismatch factor as a function of pressure for H2 assuming a 10 kW peak power. Experimental spatial mode profiles are shown for 38 and 82 psi showing that higher order spatial modes can have lower thresholds than the fundamental as it becomes phase matched. (b) The conversion efficiencies for the various Raman modes using the four mode treatment of Eq. (1). A very narrow and therefore gain sensitive region of efficient anti-Stokes conversion is seen (solid blue) as compared to the three mode treatment (dashed blue).

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

E a z = i k a 2 n 2 [ χ * | E p | 2 E a + ε χ * E p 2 E s * + ε 2 χ * E p E s E s 2 * ] E p z = i k p 2 n 2 [ χ * | E s | 2 E p + χ | E a | 2 E p + ε 1 χ * E s 2 E s 2 * + ε 2 * χ * E a E s 2 E s * + ε * ( χ + χ * ) E p * E s E a ] E s z = i k s 2 n 2 [ χ | E p | 2 E s + χ * | E s 2 | 2 E s + ε χ E p 2 E a * + ε 2 * χ * E a E s 2 E p * + ε 1 * ( χ + χ * ) E s * E s 2 E p ] E s 2 z = i k s 2 2 n 2 [ χ | E s | 2 E s 2 + ε 1 χ E s 2 E p * + ε 2 χ E p E s E a * ] ε = exp [ i ( 2 k p k a k s ) ] , ε 1 = exp [ i ( 2 k s k p k s 2 ) ] , ε 2 = exp [ i ( k s + k p k a k s 2 ) ] ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.