Abstract

We propose to employ 8B10B line coding as a simple technique to mitigate the impact of non-uniform laser diode FM response on the system performance of directly-modulated CPFSK. Experimental results show its effectiveness in decreasing signal distortion and penalty.

©2008 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
OSA Recommended Articles
Mitigation of mode partition noise in quantum-dash Fabry-Perot mode-locked lasers using Manchester encoding and balanced detection

Mohamed Essghair Chaibi, Laurent Bramerie, Sébastien Lobo, and Christophe Peucheret
Opt. Express 25(14) 16300-16309 (2017)

Mitigation of relative intensity noise of quantum dash mode-locked lasers for PAM4 based optical interconnects using encoding techniques

Vidak Vujicic, Aravind P. Anthur, Arsalan Saljoghei, Vivek Panapakkam, Rui Zhou, Quentin Gaimard, Kamel Merghem, Francois Lelarge, Abderrahim Ramdane, and Liam P. Barry
Opt. Express 25(1) 20-29 (2017)

Simultaneous all-optical demodulation and format conversion for multi-channel (CS)RZ-DPSK signals

Zheng Zhang, Yu Yu, and Xinliang Zhang
Opt. Express 19(13) 12427-12433 (2011)

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. D. T. Schaafsma, E. Miles, and E. M. Bradley, “Comparison of conventional and gain-clamped semiconductor optical amplifiers for wavelength-division-multiplexed transmission systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 18, 922–925 (2000).
    [Crossref]
  2. R. Wyatt, D. W. Smith, T. G. Hodgkinson, R. A. Harmon, and W. J. Devlin, “140 Mbit/s optical FSK fibre heterodyne experiment at 1.54 µm,” Electron. Lett. 20, 912–913 (1984).
    [Crossref]
  3. B. Wedding, R. Jung, C. Haslach, and H. Söhnle, “10.7 Gbit/s FSK transmission with 61 dB power budget,” Proceedings of ECOC2003, Vol. 4, paper Th1.5.5 (21–25 Sep. 2003).
  4. K. Emura, T. Ono, A. Noda, and S. Yamazaki, “Requirements for high-frequency LD FM response in an optical CPFSK heterodyne delay demodulation system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 9, 1602–1608 (1991).
    [Crossref]
  5. K. Iwashita and T. Matsumoto, “Modulation and detection characteristics of optical continuous phase FSK,” J. Lightwave Technol. 5, 452–460 (1987).
    [Crossref]
  6. S. P. Mazunder, R. Gangopadhay, E. Forestieri, and G. Prati, “Sensitivity penalty for AMI-coded,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 7, 1207–1209 (1995).
  7. E. Forestieri and G. Prati, “Analysis of delay-and-multiply optical FSK receivers with line coding and nonflat laser FM response,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 13, 543–556 (1995).
    [Crossref]
  8. A. X. Widmer and P. A. Franaszek, “A DC-Balanced, partitioned-block, 8B/10B transmission code,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 27, 440–451 (1983).
    [Crossref]

2000 (1)

1995 (2)

S. P. Mazunder, R. Gangopadhay, E. Forestieri, and G. Prati, “Sensitivity penalty for AMI-coded,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 7, 1207–1209 (1995).

E. Forestieri and G. Prati, “Analysis of delay-and-multiply optical FSK receivers with line coding and nonflat laser FM response,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 13, 543–556 (1995).
[Crossref]

1991 (1)

K. Emura, T. Ono, A. Noda, and S. Yamazaki, “Requirements for high-frequency LD FM response in an optical CPFSK heterodyne delay demodulation system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 9, 1602–1608 (1991).
[Crossref]

1987 (1)

K. Iwashita and T. Matsumoto, “Modulation and detection characteristics of optical continuous phase FSK,” J. Lightwave Technol. 5, 452–460 (1987).
[Crossref]

1984 (1)

R. Wyatt, D. W. Smith, T. G. Hodgkinson, R. A. Harmon, and W. J. Devlin, “140 Mbit/s optical FSK fibre heterodyne experiment at 1.54 µm,” Electron. Lett. 20, 912–913 (1984).
[Crossref]

1983 (1)

A. X. Widmer and P. A. Franaszek, “A DC-Balanced, partitioned-block, 8B/10B transmission code,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 27, 440–451 (1983).
[Crossref]

Bradley, E. M.

Devlin, W. J.

R. Wyatt, D. W. Smith, T. G. Hodgkinson, R. A. Harmon, and W. J. Devlin, “140 Mbit/s optical FSK fibre heterodyne experiment at 1.54 µm,” Electron. Lett. 20, 912–913 (1984).
[Crossref]

Emura, K.

K. Emura, T. Ono, A. Noda, and S. Yamazaki, “Requirements for high-frequency LD FM response in an optical CPFSK heterodyne delay demodulation system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 9, 1602–1608 (1991).
[Crossref]

Forestieri, E.

S. P. Mazunder, R. Gangopadhay, E. Forestieri, and G. Prati, “Sensitivity penalty for AMI-coded,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 7, 1207–1209 (1995).

E. Forestieri and G. Prati, “Analysis of delay-and-multiply optical FSK receivers with line coding and nonflat laser FM response,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 13, 543–556 (1995).
[Crossref]

Franaszek, P. A.

A. X. Widmer and P. A. Franaszek, “A DC-Balanced, partitioned-block, 8B/10B transmission code,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 27, 440–451 (1983).
[Crossref]

Gangopadhay, R.

S. P. Mazunder, R. Gangopadhay, E. Forestieri, and G. Prati, “Sensitivity penalty for AMI-coded,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 7, 1207–1209 (1995).

Harmon, R. A.

R. Wyatt, D. W. Smith, T. G. Hodgkinson, R. A. Harmon, and W. J. Devlin, “140 Mbit/s optical FSK fibre heterodyne experiment at 1.54 µm,” Electron. Lett. 20, 912–913 (1984).
[Crossref]

Haslach, C.

B. Wedding, R. Jung, C. Haslach, and H. Söhnle, “10.7 Gbit/s FSK transmission with 61 dB power budget,” Proceedings of ECOC2003, Vol. 4, paper Th1.5.5 (21–25 Sep. 2003).

Hodgkinson, T. G.

R. Wyatt, D. W. Smith, T. G. Hodgkinson, R. A. Harmon, and W. J. Devlin, “140 Mbit/s optical FSK fibre heterodyne experiment at 1.54 µm,” Electron. Lett. 20, 912–913 (1984).
[Crossref]

Iwashita, K.

K. Iwashita and T. Matsumoto, “Modulation and detection characteristics of optical continuous phase FSK,” J. Lightwave Technol. 5, 452–460 (1987).
[Crossref]

Jung, R.

B. Wedding, R. Jung, C. Haslach, and H. Söhnle, “10.7 Gbit/s FSK transmission with 61 dB power budget,” Proceedings of ECOC2003, Vol. 4, paper Th1.5.5 (21–25 Sep. 2003).

Matsumoto, T.

K. Iwashita and T. Matsumoto, “Modulation and detection characteristics of optical continuous phase FSK,” J. Lightwave Technol. 5, 452–460 (1987).
[Crossref]

Mazunder, S. P.

S. P. Mazunder, R. Gangopadhay, E. Forestieri, and G. Prati, “Sensitivity penalty for AMI-coded,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 7, 1207–1209 (1995).

Miles, E.

Noda, A.

K. Emura, T. Ono, A. Noda, and S. Yamazaki, “Requirements for high-frequency LD FM response in an optical CPFSK heterodyne delay demodulation system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 9, 1602–1608 (1991).
[Crossref]

Ono, T.

K. Emura, T. Ono, A. Noda, and S. Yamazaki, “Requirements for high-frequency LD FM response in an optical CPFSK heterodyne delay demodulation system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 9, 1602–1608 (1991).
[Crossref]

Prati, G.

E. Forestieri and G. Prati, “Analysis of delay-and-multiply optical FSK receivers with line coding and nonflat laser FM response,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 13, 543–556 (1995).
[Crossref]

S. P. Mazunder, R. Gangopadhay, E. Forestieri, and G. Prati, “Sensitivity penalty for AMI-coded,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 7, 1207–1209 (1995).

Schaafsma, D. T.

Smith, D. W.

R. Wyatt, D. W. Smith, T. G. Hodgkinson, R. A. Harmon, and W. J. Devlin, “140 Mbit/s optical FSK fibre heterodyne experiment at 1.54 µm,” Electron. Lett. 20, 912–913 (1984).
[Crossref]

Söhnle, H.

B. Wedding, R. Jung, C. Haslach, and H. Söhnle, “10.7 Gbit/s FSK transmission with 61 dB power budget,” Proceedings of ECOC2003, Vol. 4, paper Th1.5.5 (21–25 Sep. 2003).

Wedding, B.

B. Wedding, R. Jung, C. Haslach, and H. Söhnle, “10.7 Gbit/s FSK transmission with 61 dB power budget,” Proceedings of ECOC2003, Vol. 4, paper Th1.5.5 (21–25 Sep. 2003).

Widmer, A. X.

A. X. Widmer and P. A. Franaszek, “A DC-Balanced, partitioned-block, 8B/10B transmission code,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 27, 440–451 (1983).
[Crossref]

Wyatt, R.

R. Wyatt, D. W. Smith, T. G. Hodgkinson, R. A. Harmon, and W. J. Devlin, “140 Mbit/s optical FSK fibre heterodyne experiment at 1.54 µm,” Electron. Lett. 20, 912–913 (1984).
[Crossref]

Yamazaki, S.

K. Emura, T. Ono, A. Noda, and S. Yamazaki, “Requirements for high-frequency LD FM response in an optical CPFSK heterodyne delay demodulation system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 9, 1602–1608 (1991).
[Crossref]

Electron. Lett. (1)

R. Wyatt, D. W. Smith, T. G. Hodgkinson, R. A. Harmon, and W. J. Devlin, “140 Mbit/s optical FSK fibre heterodyne experiment at 1.54 µm,” Electron. Lett. 20, 912–913 (1984).
[Crossref]

IBM J. Res. Dev. (1)

A. X. Widmer and P. A. Franaszek, “A DC-Balanced, partitioned-block, 8B/10B transmission code,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 27, 440–451 (1983).
[Crossref]

IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. (1)

E. Forestieri and G. Prati, “Analysis of delay-and-multiply optical FSK receivers with line coding and nonflat laser FM response,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 13, 543–556 (1995).
[Crossref]

IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. (1)

S. P. Mazunder, R. Gangopadhay, E. Forestieri, and G. Prati, “Sensitivity penalty for AMI-coded,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 7, 1207–1209 (1995).

J. Lightwave Technol. (3)

D. T. Schaafsma, E. Miles, and E. M. Bradley, “Comparison of conventional and gain-clamped semiconductor optical amplifiers for wavelength-division-multiplexed transmission systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 18, 922–925 (2000).
[Crossref]

K. Emura, T. Ono, A. Noda, and S. Yamazaki, “Requirements for high-frequency LD FM response in an optical CPFSK heterodyne delay demodulation system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 9, 1602–1608 (1991).
[Crossref]

K. Iwashita and T. Matsumoto, “Modulation and detection characteristics of optical continuous phase FSK,” J. Lightwave Technol. 5, 452–460 (1987).
[Crossref]

Other (1)

B. Wedding, R. Jung, C. Haslach, and H. Söhnle, “10.7 Gbit/s FSK transmission with 61 dB power budget,” Proceedings of ECOC2003, Vol. 4, paper Th1.5.5 (21–25 Sep. 2003).

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Spectra of an uncoded PRBS (solid line) and of a 8B10B coded PRBS (dashed line): the 8B10B coded sequence shows reduced levels at low frequencies.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Experimental set-up for BER vs. OSNR measurements using the noise loading technique.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Experimental results: BER vs. OSNR in back-to-back condition using Vpp=1.5 V. Comparison between PRBSs of different length and a 8B10B 220-1 coded sequence.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Sensitivity vs. modulation signal amplitude (Vpp). Comparison between measurements, carried out with a 27-1 PRBS sequence and a 8B10B 220-1 coded one, and simulation.

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Sensitivity vs. link length, using SMF fiber with D=17 ps/nm/km. Comparison between experimental results obtained using the 8B10B 220-1 coding and simulation.

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Eye diagrams measured at BER=10-6 when using the 8B10B coding with optimum driving voltage Vpp=1.5V. Top: L=0 km. Bottom: L=63 km. Time base scale: 20 ps/div. Amplitude scale: 35 mV/div.

Metrics