The numerical results, Figs. 16 and 18, for the double negative (DNG) metatmaterial Goos-Hänchen examples were incorrect. Corrected numerical results show closer agreement to predictions.

©2003 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article


  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. R. W. Ziolkowski, “Pulsed and CW Gaussian beam interactions with double negative metamaterial slabs,” Opt. Express 11, 662–681 (2003), http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=OPEX-11-7-662.
    [Crossref] [PubMed]

2003 (1)

Supplementary Material (1)

» Media 1: GIF (764 KB)     

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.

Figures (2)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (1.17 MB movie) Electric field intensity distribution for the interaction of a CW Gaussian beam that is incident at 40° in a DPS medium with ε r =9.0 and µ r =+1, i.e., n=+3; to a DNG slab having ε r =-3.0 and µ r =-1, i.e., n=-√3. The negative Goos-Hachen shift of this beam is observed.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The electric field intensity distribution measured at t=6000Δt at two cells in front of the TF-SF plane for the total internal reflection DNG slab case. The positions of the incident beam center and the specularly-reflected beam center are indicated by the vertical black lines. The theoretical negative Goös-Hachen shift is indicated by the vertical green line.