Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Fast and accurate model of underwater scalar irradiance for stratified Case 2 waters

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the derivation of a fast and accurate model of scalar irradiance for stratified Case 2 waters. Five strategies are formulated and employed in the new model, including (1) reallocating the sky radiance, (2) approximating the influence of the air-water interface, (3) constructing a look-up table of average cosine based on the single-scattering albedo and the backscatter fraction, (4) calculating the phase function of surrogate particles in Case 2 waters, and (5) using the average cosine as an index to cope with stratified waters. A comprehensive model-to-model comparison shows that the new model runs more than 1,400 times faster than the commercially-available Hydrolight model, while it limits the percentage error to 2.03% and the maximum error to less than 6.81%. This new model can be used interactively in models of the oceanic system, such as biogeochemical models or the heat budget part of global circulation models.

©2006 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Fast and accurate model of underwater scalar irradiance

Cheng-Chien Liu, Kendall L. Carder, Richard L. Miller, and James E. Ivey
Appl. Opt. 41(24) 4962-4974 (2002)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Illustration of the validity of Eq. (18). The computational conditions are set as typical Case 1 waters with θ s=30°, Cloudiness=0.0, Vwind =5.0 ms-1, and (a) Chl=l.0 mg∙m-3, BFp =0.00915, (b) Chl=10.0 mg∙m-3, BFp =0.00915, (c) Chl=1.0 mg∙m-3, BFp =0.0183, (d) Chl=10.0 mg∙m-3, BFp =0.0183, (e) Chl=l.0 mg∙m-3, BFp =0.0366, (f) Chl=l0.0 mg∙m-3, BFp =0.0366. The values of the atmospheric parameters used are the default settings in Hydrolight. Both Hydrolight and the new model are employed to simulate μ̄(ζ).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) The analytical phase functions for ocean water proposed by Fournier and Forand [20]. A large range in β(ψ) can be obtained by varying the value of BF. (b) An example of applying the technique of optimization to calculate BFp for simulating the phase function of surrogate particles in Case 2 waters.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Illustration of using average cosine as an index to cope with stratified waters. The computational conditions are θS = 30°, Cloud = 0.0, λ = 440 nm and Vwind = 5m∙s-1. The atmospheric parateters are those default settings in Hydrolight without consideration of inelastic scattering. (a) A profile of chlorophyll with one meter intervals. (b) A set of μ̄(z) that are calculated by considering eight cases of homogeneous bodies of water, each with one of those chlorophyll concentrations under the same conditions of incident light. (c) Combining these “layer solutions” of μ̄(z) to approximate the full solution of μ̄(z) for the corresponding case of an inhomogeneous body of water under the same conditions of incident light. (d) Comparison of the approximated E 0 to the Hydrolight simulated E 0.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Twenty cases of stratified Case 2 waters with vertical profiles of (a) Chl, (b) a g,440 and (c) M. The corresponding profiles of IOPs at wavelength 440 nm are illustrated as (d) a, (e) b and (f) BFp .
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Comparison of accuracy and speed in simulating E 0,PAR (z) (W m-2) between the new model and Hydrolight. A very high correlation (r = 0.999924) as well as a large CSR of 1402.8 was obtained for our model. The percentage error ε% is 2.03% and the maximum relative error ε max is not more than 6.81%.

Tables (5)

Tables Icon

Table 1. A section of LUT CW for quick reference to the corrective factor CW based on wind speed Vwind and albedo ω 0.

Tables Icon

Table 2. A section of the LUT μ for quick reference to a set of parameters (B 0, B 1, P, B 2, Q) used by the McCormick five-parameter model [21] of μ̄(ζ). This new LUT is based on two non-dimensional variables BF (0.0001 – 0.5) and ω 0(0.01 – 0.99).

Tables Icon

Table 3. A section of the LUT BF for quick reference to the value of backscattering fraction BFp simulating the phase function of surrogate particles in Case 2 waters. The LUT BF is based on three variables: ratiol (0.0 – 1.0), the backscattering fraction for large particles BFl (0.0001 – 0.0 the backscattering fraction for small particles BFs (0.018 – 0.3).

Tables Icon

Table 4. The randomly specified values of parameters for the 20 cases that are used in the model-to-model comparison to examine the accuracy, flexibility and applicability of the new model. The parameters include the solar zenith angle θS , cloudiness, surface wind speed Vwind , the backscattering fraction for large particles BFl , the backscattering fraction for mineral particles BFS , and the exponential coefficient of CDOM absorption γ.

Tables Icon

Table 5. The randomly specified values of parameters in Eq. (23) for describing the vertical profiles of chlorophyll concentration Chl(z) and the mineral particle concentration M(z), respectively. The CDOM absorption at a reference wavelength a g,440(z) is set to be varied linearly from the surface value ag,440Surface to the bottom value ag,440Bottom, which are specified randomly as well.

Equations (30)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

DL ( x ; ξ ̂ ; λ ) Dr = c ( x ; ξ ̂ ; λ ) L ( x ; ξ ̂ ; λ ) + L * + L * S ,
D Dr = 1 v D Dt = 1 v ( t + v ) = 1 v t + ξ ̂ = ξ ̂ ,
ξ ̂ L ( x ; ξ ̂ ; λ ) = c ( x ; λ ) L ( x ; ξ ̂ ; λ ) + ξ′ ̂ ∈Ξ L ( x ; ξ′ ̂ ; λ ) β ( x ; ξ ̂ ξ ̂ ; λ ) d Ω ( ξ ̂ )
cos θ dL ( z ; θ ; ϕ ; λ ) dz = c ( z ; λ ) L ( z ; θ ; ϕ ; λ ) + ϕ′ = 0 2 π θ′ = 0 π L ( z ; θ ; ϕ ; λ ) β ( z ; θ θ ; ϕ ϕ ; λ ) sin θ .
E 0 ( z ) = Ξ L ( z ; ξ ̂ ) d Ω = ϕ = 0 2 π θ = 0 π L ( z ; θ ; ϕ ) sin θd θdθ .
E d ( 0 + ) = ϕ = 0 2 π θ = 0 π 2 L ( 0 + ; θ ; ϕ ) cos θ sin θd θdϕ = θ = 0 π 2 L ̄ ( 0 + ; θ ; ϕ 0 ) cos θ sin θd θ ,
L ̅ ( 0 + ; θ ; ϕ 0 ) = ϕ = 0 2 π L ( 0 + ; θ ; ϕ ) .
E 0 ( z ) = θ = 0 π 2 E ̅ 0 ( z ; θ ; ϕ 0 ) L ̄ ( 0 + ; θ ; ϕ 0 ) cos θ sin θd θ .
CW ( θ ; ϕ 0 ) V wind V wind E ̄ 0 ( 0 ; θ ; ϕ 0 ) V wind E ̄ 0 ( 0 ; θ ; ϕ 0 ) V wind ,
E 0 ( z ) V ' wind = θ = 0 π 2 E ̄ 0 ( z ; θ ; ϕ 0 ) L ̄ ( 0 + ; θ ; ϕ 0 ) CW ( θ ; ϕ 0 ) V wind V ' wind cos θ sin θd θ .
1 μ ̄ ( ζ ) = B 0 + B 1 exp ( ) + B 2 exp ( ) .
μ ̄ ( z ) E ( z ) E 0 ( z ) .
K NET ( z ) = a ( z ) μ ̄ ( z ) .
K NET ( z ) d In E ( z ) dz = d In [ E d ( z ) E u ( z ) ] dz ,
BF ( λ ) b w ( λ ) b ( λ ) × BF w + b p ( λ ) b ( λ ) BF p ,
Δ ( 0 ) = ( 1 BF p BF ) [ μ ̄ p ( 0 ) μ ̄ ( 0 ) ] ,
Δ ( ζ ) = 1 2 [ μ ̄ p ( ζ ) μ ̄ p ( ζ ) ] .
μ ̄ ( ζ ) = μ ̄ p ( ζ ) + Δ ( ζ ) .
Δ ( ζ ) = [ Δ ( 0 ) Δ ( ζ ) ] [ μ ̄ p ( ζ ) μ ̄ p ( ζ ) μ ̄ p ( 0 ) μ ̄ p ( ζ ) ] .
β ˜ ( ψ ; λ ) b w ( λ ) b ( λ ) β ˜ w ( ψ ) + b l ( λ ) b ( λ ) β ˜ l ( ψ ; λ ) + b s ( λ ) b ( λ ) β ˜ s ( ψ ; λ ) .
β ˜ p ( ψ ; λ ) = b l ( λ ) b l ( λ ) + b s ( λ ) β ˜ l ( ψ ; λ ) + b s ( λ ) b l ( λ ) + b s ( λ ) β ˜ s ( ψ ; λ ) .
ratio l b l ( λ ) b l ( λ ) + b s ( λ ) .
C ( z ) = C o + h s 2 π exp [ 1 2 ( z z max s ) 2 ] .
a g z λ = a g , 440 ( z ) exp [ γ ( λ 440 ) ] ,
a c ( z ; λ ) = 0.06 a c * ( λ ) Chl ( z ) 0.65 ,
b c ( z ; λ ) = 0.30 ( 550 λ ) Chl ( z ) 0.62 ,
a m ( z ; λ ) = M ( z ) a m * ( λ ) ,
b m ( z ; λ ) = M ( z ) b m * ( λ ) .
ε % = 10 RMSE log 10 1 ,
RMSE log 10 = n = 1 N ( log 10 E 0 , PAR Model log 10 E 0 , PAR Hydrolight ) 2 N .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.