Pilot-aided carrier phase recovery for M-QAM using superscalar parallelization based PLL

Qunbi Zhuge; Mohamed Morsy-Osman; Xian Xu; Mohammad E. Mousa-Pasandi; Mathieu Chagnon; Ziad A. El-Sahn; David V. Plant

doi:10.1364/OE.20.019599

Abstract

In this paper, we present a carrier phase recovery (CPR) algorithm using a modified superscalar parallelization based phase locked loop (M-SSP-PLL) combined with a maximum-likelihood (ML) phase estimation. Compared to the original SSP-PLL, M-SSP-PLL + ML reduces the required buffer size using a novel superscalar structure. In addition, by removing the differential coding/decoding and employing ML phase recovery it also improves the performance. In simulation, we show that the laser linewidth tolerance of M-SSP-PLL + ML is comparable to blind phase search (BPS) algorithm, which is known to be one of the best CPR algorithms in terms of performance for arbitrary QAM formats. In 28 Gbaud QPSK (112 Gb/s) and 16-QAM (224 Gb/s), and 7 Gbaud 64-QAM (84 Gb/s) experiments, it is also demonstrated that M-SSP-PLL + ML can increase the transmission distance by at least 12% compared to BPS for each of them. Finally, the computational complexity is discussed and a significant reduction is shown for our algorithm with respect to BPS.

Full Article | PDF Article

OSA Recommended Articles

Joint carrier phase and frequency-offset estimation with parallel implementation for dual-polarization coherent receiver

Jianing Lu, Xiang Li, Songnian Fu, Ming Luo, Meng Xiang, Huibin Zhou, Ming Tang, and Deming Liu
Opt. Express 25(5) 5217-5231 (2017)

Feedforward carrier recovery via pilot-aided transmission for single-carrier systems with arbitrary M-QAM constellations

Mohamed Morsy-Osman, Qunbi Zhuge, Lawrence R. Chen, and David V. Plant
Opt. Express 19(24) 24331-24343 (2011)

Modulation-format-independent blind phase search algorithm for coherent optical square M-QAM systems

Xian Zhou, Kangping Zhong, Yuliang Gao, Chao Lu, Alan Pak Tao Lau, and Keping Long
Opt. Express 22(20) 24044-24054 (2014)

References

View by:
Article Order
|
Year
|
Author
|
Publication

P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, C. R. Doerr, M. Magarini, and L. L. Buhl, “Spectrally efficient long-haul optical networking using 112-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed 16-QAM,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28(4), 547–556 (2010).
[Crossref]
A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]
M. G. Taylor, “Phase estimation methods for optical coherent detection using digital signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(7), 901–914 (2009).
[Crossref]
T. Pfau, S. Hoffmann, and R. Noe, “Hardware-efficient coherent digital receiver concept with feedforward carrier recovery for M-QAM constellations,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(8), 989–999 (2009).
[Crossref]
E. Ip and J. M. Kahn, “Feedforward carrier recovery for coherent optical communications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(9), 2675–2692 (2007).
[Crossref]
I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Laser linewidth tolerance for 16-QAM coherent optical systems using QPSK partitioning,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(9), 631–633 (2010).
[Crossref]
Y. Gao, A. P. T. Lau, S. Yan, and C. Lu, “Low-complexity and phase noise tolerant carrier phase estimation for dual-polarization 16-QAM systems,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21717–21729 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]
Q. Zhuge, C. Chen, and D. V. Plant, “Low computation complexity two-stage feedforward carrier recovery algorithm for M-QAM,” in Proc. OFC'11, Paper. OMJ5.
X. Zhou, “An improved feed-forward carrier recovery algorithm for coherent receivers with M-QAM modulation format,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(14), 1051–1053 (2010).
[Crossref]
X. Zhou and Y. Sun, “Low-complexity, blind phase recovery for coherent receivers using QAM modulation,” in Proc. OFC'11, Paper. OMJ3.
K. Piyawanno, M. Kuschnerov, B. Spinnler, and B. Lankl, “Low complexity carrier recovery for coherent QAM using superscalar parallelization,” in Proc. ECOC'10, Paper. We.7.A.3.
Q. Zhuge, M. E. Pasandi, X. Xu, B. Châtelain, Z. Pan, M. Osman, and D. V. Plant, “Linewidth-tolerant low complexity pilot-aided carrier phase recovery for M-QAM using superscalar parallelization,” in Proc. OFC'12, Paper. OTu2G.2.
I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Blind equalization and carrier phase recovery in a 16-QAM optical coherent system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(15), 3042–3049 (2009).
[Crossref]
T. Nakagawa, M. Matsui, T. Kobayashi, K. Ishihara, R. Kudo, M. Mizoguchi, and Y. Miyamoto, “Non-data-aided wide-range frequency offset estimator for QAM optical coherent receivers,” in Proc. OFC'11, Paper. OMJ1.
X. Chen, A. Al Amin, and W. Shieh, “Characterization and monitoring of laser linewidths in coherent systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(17), 2533–2537 (2011).
[Crossref]

2012 (1)

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

2011 (2)

Y. Gao, A. P. T. Lau, S. Yan, and C. Lu, “Low-complexity and phase noise tolerant carrier phase estimation for dual-polarization 16-QAM systems,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21717–21729 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

X. Chen, A. Al Amin, and W. Shieh, “Characterization and monitoring of laser linewidths in coherent systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(17), 2533–2537 (2011).
[Crossref]

2010 (3)

X. Zhou, “An improved feed-forward carrier recovery algorithm for coherent receivers with M-QAM modulation format,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(14), 1051–1053 (2010).
[Crossref]

P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, C. R. Doerr, M. Magarini, and L. L. Buhl, “Spectrally efficient long-haul optical networking using 112-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed 16-QAM,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28(4), 547–556 (2010).
[Crossref]

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Laser linewidth tolerance for 16-QAM coherent optical systems using QPSK partitioning,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(9), 631–633 (2010).
[Crossref]

Fatadin, I.

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Laser linewidth tolerance for 16-QAM coherent optical systems using QPSK partitioning,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(9), 631–633 (2010).
[Crossref]

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Blind equalization and carrier phase recovery in a 16-QAM optical coherent system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(15), 3042–3049 (2009).
[Crossref]

Gao, Y.

Y. Gao, A. P. T. Lau, S. Yan, and C. Lu, “Low-complexity and phase noise tolerant carrier phase estimation for dual-polarization 16-QAM systems,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21717–21729 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Gnauck, A. H.

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, C. R. Doerr, M. Magarini, and L. L. Buhl, “Spectrally efficient long-haul optical networking using 112-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed 16-QAM,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28(4), 547–556 (2010).
[Crossref]

Hoffmann, S.

T. Pfau, S. Hoffmann, and R. Noe, “Hardware-efficient coherent digital receiver concept with feedforward carrier recovery for M-QAM constellations,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(8), 989–999 (2009).
[Crossref]

Ip, E.

E. Ip and J. M. Kahn, “Feedforward carrier recovery for coherent optical communications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(9), 2675–2692 (2007).
[Crossref]

Ives, D.

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Laser linewidth tolerance for 16-QAM coherent optical systems using QPSK partitioning,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(9), 631–633 (2010).
[Crossref]

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Blind equalization and carrier phase recovery in a 16-QAM optical coherent system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(15), 3042–3049 (2009).
[Crossref]

Jorge, F.

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

Kahn, J. M.

E. Ip and J. M. Kahn, “Feedforward carrier recovery for coherent optical communications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(9), 2675–2692 (2007).
[Crossref]

Konczykowska, A.

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

Lau, A. P. T.

Y. Gao, A. P. T. Lau, S. Yan, and C. Lu, “Low-complexity and phase noise tolerant carrier phase estimation for dual-polarization 16-QAM systems,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21717–21729 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Lu, C.

Y. Gao, A. P. T. Lau, S. Yan, and C. Lu, “Low-complexity and phase noise tolerant carrier phase estimation for dual-polarization 16-QAM systems,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21717–21729 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Magarini, M.

P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, C. R. Doerr, M. Magarini, and L. L. Buhl, “Spectrally efficient long-haul optical networking using 112-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed 16-QAM,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28(4), 547–556 (2010).
[Crossref]

Noe, R.

T. Pfau, S. Hoffmann, and R. Noe, “Hardware-efficient coherent digital receiver concept with feedforward carrier recovery for M-QAM constellations,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(8), 989–999 (2009).
[Crossref]

Peckham, D. W.

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

Pfau, T.

T. Pfau, S. Hoffmann, and R. Noe, “Hardware-efficient coherent digital receiver concept with feedforward carrier recovery for M-QAM constellations,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(8), 989–999 (2009).
[Crossref]

Riet, M.

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

Savory, S. J.

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Laser linewidth tolerance for 16-QAM coherent optical systems using QPSK partitioning,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(9), 631–633 (2010).
[Crossref]

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Blind equalization and carrier phase recovery in a 16-QAM optical coherent system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(15), 3042–3049 (2009).
[Crossref]

Shieh, W.

X. Chen, A. Al Amin, and W. Shieh, “Characterization and monitoring of laser linewidths in coherent systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(17), 2533–2537 (2011).
[Crossref]

Taylor, M. G.

M. G. Taylor, “Phase estimation methods for optical coherent detection using digital signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(7), 901–914 (2009).
[Crossref]

Winzer, P. J.

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, C. R. Doerr, M. Magarini, and L. L. Buhl, “Spectrally efficient long-haul optical networking using 112-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed 16-QAM,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28(4), 547–556 (2010).
[Crossref]

Yan, S.

Y. Gao, A. P. T. Lau, S. Yan, and C. Lu, “Low-complexity and phase noise tolerant carrier phase estimation for dual-polarization 16-QAM systems,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21717–21729 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Zhou, X.

X. Zhou, “An improved feed-forward carrier recovery algorithm for coherent receivers with M-QAM modulation format,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(14), 1051–1053 (2010).
[Crossref]

Zhu, B.

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. (2)

X. Zhou, “An improved feed-forward carrier recovery algorithm for coherent receivers with M-QAM modulation format,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(14), 1051–1053 (2010).
[Crossref]

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Laser linewidth tolerance for 16-QAM coherent optical systems using QPSK partitioning,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 22(9), 631–633 (2010).
[Crossref]

J. Lightwave Technol. (7)

I. Fatadin, D. Ives, and S. J. Savory, “Blind equalization and carrier phase recovery in a 16-QAM optical coherent system,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(15), 3042–3049 (2009).
[Crossref]

X. Chen, A. Al Amin, and W. Shieh, “Characterization and monitoring of laser linewidths in coherent systems,” J. Lightwave Technol. 29(17), 2533–2537 (2011).
[Crossref]

P. J. Winzer, A. H. Gnauck, C. R. Doerr, M. Magarini, and L. L. Buhl, “Spectrally efficient long-haul optical networking using 112-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed 16-QAM,” J. Lightwave Technol. 28(4), 547–556 (2010).
[Crossref]

A. H. Gnauck, P. J. Winzer, A. Konczykowska, F. Jorge, J. Dupuy, M. Riet, G. Charlet, B. Zhu, and D. W. Peckham, “Generation and transmission of 21.4-Gbaud PDM 64-QAM using a novel high-power DAC driving a single I/Q modulator,” J. Lightwave Technol. 30(4), 532–536 (2012).
[Crossref]

M. G. Taylor, “Phase estimation methods for optical coherent detection using digital signal processing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(7), 901–914 (2009).
[Crossref]

T. Pfau, S. Hoffmann, and R. Noe, “Hardware-efficient coherent digital receiver concept with feedforward carrier recovery for M-QAM constellations,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(8), 989–999 (2009).
[Crossref]

E. Ip and J. M. Kahn, “Feedforward carrier recovery for coherent optical communications,” J. Lightwave Technol. 25(9), 2675–2692 (2007).
[Crossref]

Opt. Express (1)

Y. Gao, A. P. T. Lau, S. Yan, and C. Lu, “Low-complexity and phase noise tolerant carrier phase estimation for dual-polarization 16-QAM systems,” Opt. Express 19(22), 21717–21729 (2011).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Other (5)

Q. Zhuge, C. Chen, and D. V. Plant, “Low computation complexity two-stage feedforward carrier recovery algorithm for M-QAM,” in Proc. OFC'11, Paper. OMJ5.

T. Nakagawa, M. Matsui, T. Kobayashi, K. Ishihara, R. Kudo, M. Mizoguchi, and Y. Miyamoto, “Non-data-aided wide-range frequency offset estimator for QAM optical coherent receivers,” in Proc. OFC'11, Paper. OMJ1.

X. Zhou and Y. Sun, “Low-complexity, blind phase recovery for coherent receivers using QAM modulation,” in Proc. OFC'11, Paper. OMJ3.

K. Piyawanno, M. Kuschnerov, B. Spinnler, and B. Lankl, “Low complexity carrier recovery for coherent QAM using superscalar parallelization,” in Proc. ECOC'10, Paper. We.7.A.3.

Q. Zhuge, M. E. Pasandi, X. Xu, B. Châtelain, Z. Pan, M. Osman, and D. V. Plant, “Linewidth-tolerant low complexity pilot-aided carrier phase recovery for M-QAM using superscalar parallelization,” in Proc. OFC'12, Paper. OTu2G.2.

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.

Click here to see a list of articles that cite this paper

Fig. 1

(a) The block diagram of a first-order PLL. (b) The interleaving implementation of PLL in parallelized processing.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 2

(a) The original superscalar buffer structure in [11]. (b) The proposed superscalar buffer structure. CH: channel.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 3

The combination of the modified SSP-PLL algorithm with a ML carrier recovery.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 4

(a) The simulation setup. Simulated linewidth tolerance of various algorithms for (b) QPSK, (c) 16-QAM and (d) 64-QAM.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 5

Experimental setup. ODL: optical delay line, PBS/PBC: polarization beam splitter/combiner, PC: polarization controller, SW: switch.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 6

(a) BER vs. block length with 2 pilot symbols for QPSK and 4 pilot symbols for both 16-QAM and 64-QAM. (b) BER vs. number of pilot symbols with S = 100 for QPSK and S = 200 for both 16-QAM and 64-QAM.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 7

Constellations of (a) QPSK (4800 km), (b) 16-QAM (640 km) and (c) 64-QAM  (320 km).

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 8

(a) BER vs. OSNR at back-to-back transmission and (b) BER vs. distance for QPSK with one 2.6 MHz and one 0.6 MHz linewidth DFB laser at the two ends.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 9

(a) BER vs. OSNR at back-to-back transmission and (b) BER vs. distance for 16-QAM with two ECLs.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 10

(a) BER vs. OSNR at back-to-back transmission and (b) BER vs. distance for 16-QAM with one ECL and one 1.3 MHz linewidth DFB laser.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 11

(a) BER vs. OSNR at back-to-back transmission and (b) BER vs. distance for 16-QAM with one ECL and one 2.6 MHz linewidth DFB laser.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Fig. 12

(a) BER vs. OSNR at back-to-back transmission and (b) BER vs. distance for 64-QAM with two ECLs.

Download Full Size | PPT Slide | PDF

Tables (2)

Table 1 Summary of Laser Linewidth Tolerance.

View Table | View all tables in this article

Table 2 Complexity comparison between CPR algorithms

View Table | View all tables in this article

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

O v e r h e a d = \frac{N_{P S}}{S}

H_{k} = \sum_{n = k - N}^{k + N} r_{n} {[{\hat{r^{'}}}_{n}]}^{*}

ϕ_{k}^{M L} = \tan^{- 1} (Im [H_{k}] / Re [H_{k}])

O v e r h e a d = \frac{N_{P S} / 2}{S}

	BPS	ILP-PLL + ML	O-SSP-PLL	M-SSP-PLL + ML
QPSK	3 × 10⁻⁴	6.9 × 10⁻⁵	3.5 × 10⁻⁵	5.4 × 10⁻⁴
16-QAM	9.3 × 10⁻⁵	1.4 × 10⁻⁵	1.5 × 10⁻⁵	1.3 × 10⁻⁴
64-QAM	3.6 × 10⁻⁵	3.5 × 10⁻⁶	5.8 × 10⁻⁶	2.7 × 10⁻⁵

	Real Multiplier	Real Adder	Slicer	Buffer Units
M-SSP-PLL + ML	15	2L + 6 (48)	2	2S₁ + L (221/421)
BPS	6B (192/384)	(L + 6)B (864/1728)	B (32/64)	L·B (672/1344)
O-SSP-PLL	7	4	1	2S₂ (>1024)
ILP-SSP-PLL	15	2L + 6 (48)	2	L (21)

	BPS	ILP-PLL + ML	O-SSP-PLL	M-SSP-PLL + ML
QPSK	3 × 10⁻⁴	6.9 × 10⁻⁵	3.5 × 10⁻⁵	5.4 × 10⁻⁴
16-QAM	9.3 × 10⁻⁵	1.4 × 10⁻⁵	1.5 × 10⁻⁵	1.3 × 10⁻⁴
64-QAM	3.6 × 10⁻⁵	3.5 × 10⁻⁶	5.8 × 10⁻⁶	2.7 × 10⁻⁵

	Real Multiplier	Real Adder	Slicer	Buffer Units
M-SSP-PLL + ML	15	2L + 6 (48)	2	2S₁ + L (221/421)
BPS	6B (192/384)	(L + 6)B (864/1728)	B (32/64)	L·B (672/1344)
O-SSP-PLL	7	4	1	2S₂ (>1024)
ILP-SSP-PLL	15	2L + 6 (48)	2	L (21)

Abstract

References

2012 (1)

2011 (2)

2010 (3)

2009 (3)

2007 (1)

Al Amin, A.

Buhl, L. L.

Charlet, G.

Chen, X.

Doerr, C. R.

Dupuy, J.

Fatadin, I.

Gao, Y.

Gnauck, A. H.

Hoffmann, S.

Ip, E.

Ives, D.

Jorge, F.

Kahn, J. M.

Konczykowska, A.

Lau, A. P. T.

Lu, C.

Magarini, M.

Noe, R.

Peckham, D. W.

Pfau, T.

Riet, M.

Savory, S. J.

Shieh, W.

Taylor, M. G.

Winzer, P. J.

Yan, S.

Zhou, X.

Zhu, B.

IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. (2)

J. Lightwave Technol. (7)

Opt. Express (1)

Other (5)

Cited By

Figures (12)

Tables (2)

Equations (4)

Metrics

Login or Create Account