Abstract

The boundary conditions in Eq. (2) were used incorrectly, which influenced the numerical results in Fig. 3(a) correspondingly. The corrected calculated mode intensity profile matches better with the measured one.

© 2008 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. Q1. Z. He, Y. Li, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, L. Liu, and Lei Xu, "Low-loss channel waveguides and Y-splitter formed by ion-exchange in silica-on-silicon," Opt. Express 16, 3172-3177 (2008).
    [CrossRef] [PubMed]

2008

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

The characteristic of channel waveguide. (a) Contours of the numerical simulation of mode intensity profile (dashed lines) and the near field intensity distribution at 1550 nm of the waveguide (solid lines), corresponding to 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 times the maximum mode intensity value. The background is the measured near field intensity of the channel waveguide; (b) Loss characteristic of the channel waveguide measured by cutback method at 1550 nm.

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

C A t = D ( 2 C A x 2 + 2 C A y 2 ) ,
{ C A ( x , 0 , t > 0 ) = C 0 for x w 2 , C A ( x , 0 , t > 0 ) y = 0 for x > w 2 , C A ( x , h , t > 0 ) y = 0 for < x < + ,
C A ( x , y , t = 0 ) = 0 for < x < + , y < 0 .

Metrics