Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Power dependence of dynamic spatial replenishment of femtosecond pulses propagating in air

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Numerical simulations of nonlinear pulse propagation in air show an initial pulse formed, absorbed by plasma generation, and subsequently replenished by power from the trailing edge. Here we show that this scenario implies that the length scale for filament propagation is relatively insensitive to the peak input power beyond the threshold for filament generation.

©1999 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Dynamic spatial replenishment of femtosecond pulses propagating in air

M. Mlejnek, E. M. Wright, and J. V. Moloney
Opt. Lett. 23(5) 382-384 (1998)

Spatial evolution of multiple filaments in air induced by femtosecond laser pulses

Zuo-Qiang Hao, Jie Zhang, Xin Lu, Ting-Ting Xi, Yu-Tong Li, Xiao-Hui Yuan, Zhi-Yuan Zheng, Zhao-Hua Wang, Wei-Jun Ling, and Zhi-Yi Wei
Opt. Express 14(2) 773-778 (2006)

Influence of the external focusing and the pulse parameters on the propagation of femtosecond annular Gaussian filaments in air

ZhiFang Feng, Wei Li, ChengXin Yu, Xun Liu, Yuan Liu, Jie Liu, and LiBin Fu
Opt. Express 24(6) 6381-6390 (2016)

Supplementary Material (4)

Media 1: MOV (2232 KB)     
Media 2: MOV (2356 KB)     
Media 3: MOV (2558 KB)     
Media 4: MOV (2690 KB)     

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Global maximum over time of the on-axis intensity as a function of propagation distance z for peak input power of ~ 4Pcr . The Rayleigh range was in this case ~ 2 m. (Dashed line … n 2 without the Raman contribution.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Global maximum over time of the on-axis intensity as a function of propagation distance z for peak input power of ~ 6Pcr . The Rayleigh range was in this case ~ 2 m. (Dashed line … n 2 without the Raman contribution.)
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Global maximum over time of the on-axis intensity as a function of propagation distance z for peak input power of ~ 6.5Pcr . The Rayleigh range was in this case ~ 2 m. Dashed line … n 2 without the Raman contribution.)
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Global maximum over time of the on-axis intensity as a function of propagation distance z for peak input power of ~ 7Pcr . The Rayleigh range was in this case ~ 2 m. (Dashed line … n 2 without the Raman contribution.)
Figure 5.
Figure 5. The intensity of The field for the case shown in Fig. 1 (Raman response included) at the propagation distance of 1 m.
Figure 6.
Figure 6. The intensity of the field for the case shown in Fig. 1 (Raman response included) at the propagation distance of 2.8 m.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ε z = i 2 k ( 2 r 2 + 1 r r ) ε ik 2 2 ε t 2 σ 2 ( 1 + iωτ ) ρε β ( K ) 2 ε 2 K 2 ε
+ i k 0 ( 1 f ) n 2 ε 2 ε + i k 0 f n 2 [ dt R ( t t ) ε ( t ) 2 ] ε ,
R ( t ) = θ ( t ) Ω 2 e Γ t / 2 sin ( Λ t ) Λ , Λ = Ω 2 Γ 2 / 4 ,
ρ t = 1 n b 2 σ E g ρ ε 2 + β ( K ) ε 2 K Kħω a ρ 2 .
ε ( r , 0 , t ) = 2 P in π ω 0 2 exp ( r 2 ω 0 2 t 2 t p 2 ) ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.