Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Site and lattice resonances in metallic hole arrays

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A powerful analytical approach is followed to study light transmission through subwavelength holes drilled in thick perfect-conductor films, showing that full transmission (100%) is attainable in arrays of arbitrarily narrow holes as compared to the film thickness. The interplay between resonances localized in individual holes and lattice resonances originating in the array periodicity reveals new mechanisms of transmission enhancement and suppression. In particular, localized resonances obtained by filling the holes with high-index-of-refraction material are examined and experimentally observed through large enhancement in the transmission of individual holes.

©2006 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Optical transmission through circular hole arrays in optically thick metal films

L. Martín-Moreno and F. J. García-Vidal
Opt. Express 12(16) 3619-3628 (2004)

Theory of transmission of light by sub-wavelength cylindrical holes in metallic films

N. García and Ming Bai
Opt. Express 14(21) 10028-10042 (2006)

Resonant terahertz transmission in subwavelength metallic hole arrays of sub-skin-depth thickness

Abul K. Azad and Weili Zhang
Opt. Lett. 30(21) 2945-2947 (2005)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) The field scattered by a subwavelength hole drilled in a perfect-conductor film in response to external electric (E 0) and magnetic (H 0) fields is equivalent (at a large distance compared to the radius a) to that of effective electric (p) and magnetic (m) dipoles, which allow defining polarizabilities (α E and α M , respectively) both on the same side as the external fields (α v ) and on the opposite side (α´ v ). Only the perpendicular component of the electric field and the parallel component of the magnetic field induce dipoles. (b)- (c) Real part of the hole response functions g± v for ε = μ = 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Light transmittance through a circular hole drilled in a perfect-conductor film and filled with dielectric material for different values of the permittivity ε (see labels). The transmitted power is normalized to the incoming flux times the hole area. The ratio of the film thickness to the hole radius is 0.1. The left inset shows the transmission for ε = 50 in log scale. (b) Ratio of transmission for ε = 10.2 dielectric filling and ε = 1 (air) under the same conditions as in (a): theory (solid curve) vs experiment (symbols). The transmission through an infinite ε = 10.2 dielectric of the same thickness is shown as a dashed curve for comparison (dashed and solid curves approach each other in the high-frequency limit).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Lattice sum Gz [Eq. (2)] for a square lattice of period d as a function of parallel momentum k and wavelength.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Zeroth order light transmittance through square arrays of circular holes drilled in perfect-conductor films as a function of parallel momentum k and wavelength λ. The ratio of the hole radius to the lattice spacing is taken as a/d = 0.2. Different values of the film thickness t and the dielectric constant inside the holes ε are considered, as shown by labels. Both p-polarized (H parallel to the film) and s-polarized (E parallel to the film) incident light are examined.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Normal-incidence transmittance (top), lattice sums and hole response functions (middle), and hole polarizability [bottom; see Fig. 1(a)] under the same conditions as in Fig. 4(j) (a/d = 0.2, t/a = 0.1, ε = 100).

Equations (19)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

Im { g v ± } = Im { 1 α v ± α ' v } = 2 k 3 3 ,
P = α E ( E z ext + G z P Hm ) + α ' E ( G z P ' Hm ' )
P ' = α ' E ( E z ext + G z P Hm ) + α E ( G z P ' Hm ' )
m = α M ( H y ext + G y m Hp ) + α ' M ( G y m ' Hp ' )
m ' = α ' M ( H y ext + G y m Hp ) + α M ( G y m ' + Hp ' ) ,
G j = R 0 e i k x ( k 2 + j j ) e i kR R
H = i k R 0 e i k x x e i kR R .
p ± p ' = 2 [ ( g M ± G y ) k k + H ] Δ ±
m ± m ' = 2 [ ( g E ± G z ) + H k k ] Δ ±
Δ ± = ( g E ± G z ) ( g M ± G y ) H 2 .
E trans ( r 1 ) = [ ( p ' ( k 2 + 1 z 1 ) ikm ' y ̂ × 1 ] e i k r 1 r r 1 r
= [ ( p ' ( k 2 + 1 z 1 ) ikm ' y ̂ × 1 ] d 2 k ' i 2 π k ' z e ik ' ( r 1 r )
= d 2 k ' i 2 π k ' z e ik ' ( r 1 r ) [ ( k ' z x ̂ k ' x z ̂ ) km ' ( k ' x k ' z x ̂ + k ' y k ' z y ̂ k ' 2 z ̂ ) p ' ] ,
E trans ( r 1 ) = 2 πi A k z e ik r 1 ( k z x ̂ k z ̂ ) ( km ' k p ' ) .
T = ( 2 π k z A ) 2 1 g M + G x 1 g M G x 2
= 1 1 + iA 2 π k z Re { g M + G x } 1 1 + iA 2 π k z Re { g M G x } 2 .
G j 1 ( k + 2 πn d ) 2 + ( 2 πl d ) 2 k 2 .
1 + ( A 2 π k z ) 2 Re { g M + G x } Re { g M G x } = 0
A 2 π k z g M + g M > 1 ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.