Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Numerical modeling of optical levitation and trapping of the “stuck” particles with a pulsed optical tweezers

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We present the theoretical analysis and the numerical modeling of optical levitation and trapping of the stuck particles with a pulsed optical tweezers. In our model, a pulsed laser was used to generate a large gradient force within a short duration that overcame the adhesive interaction between the stuck particles and the surface; and then a low power continuous-wave (cw) laser was used to capture the levitated particle. We describe the gradient force generated by the pulsed optical tweezers and model the binding interaction between the stuck beads and glass surface by the dominative van der Waals force with a randomly distributed binding strength. We numerically calculate the single pulse levitation efficiency for polystyrene beads as the function of the pulse energy, the axial displacement from the surface to the pulsed laser focus and the pulse duration. The result of our numerical modeling is qualitatively consistent with the experimental result.

©2005 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Optical levitation and manipulation of stuck particles with pulsed optical tweezers

Amol Ashok Ambardekar and Yong-qing Li
Opt. Lett. 30(14) 1797-1799 (2005)

Axial optical trapping forces on two particles trapped simultaneously by optical tweezers

Shenghua Xu, Yinmei Li, and Liren Lou
Appl. Opt. 44(13) 2667-2672 (2005)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematics of the pulsed optical tweezers
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) The beads were stuck on the surface. (b) The marked bead was levitated with a pulse and moved to the focus.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The position h of the bead versus time at the different pulse energy. Curve a is for E=1.1×10-5Ns/m; b for E=7×10-7Ns/m; c for E=0.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The levitation efficiency versus the E with a fixed z0=6µm andτ=45µs.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. The dependence of the levitation efficiency on the displacement z0 with the fixed E=1.1×10-6Ns/m and τ=45µs.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. The dependence of the levitation efficiency on the pulse duration τ with the fixed E=1.1×10-6Ns/m and z0=6µm.

Equations (12)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

I ( x , y , z , t ) = I 0 ω 0 2 ω ( z ) 2 exp ( 2 ( x 2 + y 2 ) ω ( z ) 2 )
+ 2 U τ π ω 0 2 ω ( z ) 2 exp ( ( t τ ) 2 ) exp ( 2 ( x 2 + y 2 ) ω ( z ) 2 ) ,
ω ( z ) = ω 0 ( 1 + ( z z s ) 2 ) 1 2 ,
F cw = k z z ( 1 + ( z z s ) 2 ) 2 ,
F cw = k z z ( 1 + ( z z s ) 2 ) 2 exp ( ( z z s ) 4 )
F pulse = 2 E τ π z ( 1 + ( z z s ) 2 ) 2 exp ( ( t τ ) 2 ) exp ( ( z z s ) 4 )
m z ̈ = F cw + F pulse + F S + F V ,
F V = Aa 6 h 2 f ( p ) ,
F S = 6 π a η λ z ˙ = D z ˙
λ = 1 1 9 8 ( a h + a ) + 1 2 ( a h + a ) 3 .
p { A } = 1 2 π σ e ( A ζ ) 2 2 σ 2 ,
P { A } = 1 2 π σ A e ( t ζ ) 2 2 σ 2 dt = Φ ( A ζ σ ) ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.