Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Source of polarization entanglement in a single periodically poled KTiOPO4 crystal with overlapping emission cones

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We present a simple polarization entanglemenet source based on type-II phase-matched parametric down-conversion in periodically poled KTiOPO4. By use of noncritical phase matching in a noncollinear geometry the single-crystal source emits a cone of polarization-entangled photons. Two beams on opposite sides of the cone are selected for measurements to yield an observed flux of 820 pairs/s per mW of pump power with a two-photon fringe visibility of 96%. With this source we measure a violation of Bell’s inequality of 140 standard deviations in 160 s.

©2005 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Bright, single-spatial-mode source of frequency non-degenerate, polarization-entangled photon pairs using periodically poled KTP

Matthew Pelton, Philip Marsden, Daniel Ljunggren, Maria Tengner, Anders Karlsson, Anna Fragemann, Carlota Canalias, and Fredrik Laurell
Opt. Express 12(15) 3573-3580 (2004)

Broadband nondegenerate optical parametric amplification in the mid infrared with periodically poled KTiOPO4

A. Fragemann, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell
Opt. Lett. 30(17) 2296-2298 (2005)

Observation of triply coincident nonlinearities in periodically poled KTiOPO4

Raphael C. Pooser and Olivier Pfister
Opt. Lett. 30(19) 2635-2637 (2005)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Definition of angles δ and ϕ to denote the direction of wave vectors. The axes of reference coincide with the crystal’s principal axes, z is the direction along which the ferroelectric domains are oriented. The pump propagates along x and is polarized along y. For collinear down-conversion signal and idler are polarized along y and z, respectively.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Plot of phase-matched wavelengths versus external propagation angle δ for signal (solid blue) and idler (dashed red), calculated for ϕ=0. Operating condition: collinear frequency-degenerate signal and idler at δ=0. Green line represents the degenerate wavelength equal to 2λp =797.2 nm.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Plot of phase-matched wavelengths versus external propagation angle δ for signal (solid blue) and idler (dashed red), calculated for ϕ=0. Operating condition: noncollinear frequency-degenerate signal and idler in two overlapping cones. Green line represents the degenerate wavelength equal to 2λp =797.2 nm.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. External propagation angles for degenerate down-converted signal (λs =2λp =797.2 nm). Operating conditions: (a) collinear output T=35.65°C, (b) noncollinear output cone with ~14 mrad full divergence T=34.7°C, and (c) noncollinear output cone with ~24 mrad full divergence T=32.8°C. Propagation cones are slightly flattened on the sides due to crystal birefringence.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Snapshots (in false colors) of (a) signal and (b) idler down-converted photons taken with a CCD camera. Images were taken with a 10-mm-long PPKTP crystal (9 µm poling period) kept at a temperature of 22°C and pumped with a 398.54-nm continuous-wave pump. Images were taken with a 0.11-nm interference filter centered around the degenerate wavelength of 797.08 nm; exposure time: 20 s. Ring diameters are ~3.6 mm corresponding to a full angle aperture of ~24 mrad.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Schematic of experimental setup used to verify polarization entanglement. CC, compensating crystal; PA, polarization analyzer composed of a half-wave plate and a polarizer; IF, 1-nm interference filter centered at 797 nm.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Coincidence counts for the polarization-entangled triplet state versus analyzer angle θ A in arm A for analyzer angle θ B in arm B set to 0° (solid triangles), 45° (open diamonds), 90° (open circles) and -45° (solid squares). Each data point is the result of an average over 10 s and the curves are best fits to the data. Pump power, 5 mW; iris diameter, 1 mm; 1-nm interference filter centered at 797 nm.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. Plot of visibility V + B =+45°) versus iris diameter for output triplet state. Inset: coincidence counts/s per mW of pump power versus iris diameter. A 1-nm interference filter centered at 797 nm was used.

Equations (7)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ω p = ω s + ω i ,
k p = k s + k i ,
k j = 2 π n j ( T , λ j , δ j , ϕ j ) λ j
k p = k s + k i + 2 π Λ x .
n p T T = 20 ° C = 28 × 10 6 ° C .
C ( θ A ) = A 1 sin 2 ( θ A θ B ) + A 2 ,
ψ = ( H A V B + V A H B ) 2 ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.