Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Investigation and optimization of bidirectionally dual-order pumped distributed Raman amplifiers

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A theoretical investigation of bidirectionally dual-order pumped distributed Raman amplifiers is presented in detail, and comparisons with other Raman amplification schemes, i.e., bidirectional first-order pumping and Raman-plus-erbium-doped fiber hybrid amplification, are carried out, for the first time to the authors’ knowledge, at identical nonlinear phase shifts. The results show that symmetric bidirectional dual-order pumping can achieve the best optical signal-to-noise ratio performance by appropriate choice of the second-order pump wavelength and second-to-first-order pump power ratio for both short- and long-span conditions, which will be helpful for designing long-haul transmission systems.

©2004 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Noise and transmission performance improvement of broadband distributed Raman amplifier using bidirectional Raman pumping with dual order co-pumps

M. A. Iqbal, M. Tan, L. Krzczanowicz, A. E. El-Taher, W. Forysiak, J. D. Ania-Castañón, and P. Harper
Opt. Express 25(22) 27533-27542 (2017)

Optimizing gain profile and noise performance for distributed fiber Raman amplifiers

Xueming Liu, Jian Chen, Chao Lu, and Xiaoqun Zhou
Opt. Express 12(24) 6053-6066 (2004)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (11)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Three span amplification configurations discussed in this paper. (a) Bi-directional dual order pumping (type 1). (b) Bi-directional first order pumping (type 2). (c) Raman+EDFA hybrid amplification structure (type 3).
Fig.2
Fig.2 Contour maps of output OSNR versus r 1 and rf · rb is 13dB for (a) and 20dB for (b). ‘+’ denotes the optimal OSNR value.
Fig.3
Fig.3 Optimized OSNR versus rf · KNL =0.072rad for (a), while KNL =0.16rad for (b). Symmetric pumping structure is used.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Optimized OSNR of three types against (a) KNL and (b) fiber loss.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Signal distribution curves of three pumping schemes
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Contour maps of output OSNR versus r 1 and rf · rb is 13dB for (a) and 20dB for (b). ‘+’ denotes the optimal OSNR value. L=160km.
Fig.7
Fig.7 Calculated OSNR versus (a) rf and (b) second-order pump wavelength. Symmetric pumping scheme is used, and r=36dB in (b).
Fig.8
Fig.8 Calculated OSNR versus λ P2 when Rs=8× 10-5km-1 and span net gain is 4dB. The optimal λ P2 becomes 1400nm.
Fig.9
Fig.9 Signal and pump distribution of the BiDP scheme. The second-order pump wavelength is 1395nm, and rf is 4000:1.
Fig.10
Fig.10 Optimized (a) total OSNR, (b) corresponding OSNR with ASE only and (c) corresponding OSNR with DRB only of three types versus span length. KNL-ref=0.09rad.
Fig.11
Fig.11 Optimized OSNR of three types versus (a) KNL, (b) signal loss and (c) RS. Span span length is 200 km.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

d P ± ( z , v ) dz = α ( v ) P ± ( z , v ) ± R s ( v ) P ( z , v ) ± P ± ( z , v ) · ξ > v g r ( v ξ ) K eff A eff ( ξ ) · [ P ± ( z , ξ ) + P ( z , ξ ) ]
± hv ξ > v g r ( v ξ ) A eff ( ξ ) [ P ± ( z , ξ ) + P ( z , ξ ) ] · [ 1 + 1 e h ( ξ v ) k T 1 ] Δ v
P ± ( z , v ) · ξ > v v ξ · g r ( v ξ ) A eff ( v ) K eff · [ P ± ( z , ξ ) + P ( z , ξ ) ]
2 hv P ± ( z , v ) · ξ < v g r ( v ξ ) A eff ( v ) · [ 1 + 1 e h ( v ζ ) j k T 1 ] Δ v ,
OSNR = P s ( 0 ) · G Raman · T [ P ASE ( L ) + P DRB ( L ) ] ,
OSNR = P s ( 0 ) · G Raman · G EDFA · T [ P ASE ( L ) + P DRB ( L ) ] · G EDFA + 2 h ν Δ ν · n s p · ( G EDFA 1 ) ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.