Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Low polarization dependent diffraction grating for wavelength demultimlexing

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A low polarization dependent, high diffraction efficiency grating for wavelength demultiplexer is proposed, manufactured by standard crystallographic etching of Si surface. Light is incident and diffracted inside the wafer, which is covered with reflecting metal. Optimized groove form results in a flat spectral response for TE and TM polarizations.

©2004 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Two-dimensional gratings for low polarization dependent wavelength demultiplexing

John Hoose and Evgeny Popov
Appl. Opt. 47(25) 4574-4578 (2008)

Fabrication and evaluation of an etched infrared diffraction grating

U. U. Graf, D. T. Jaffe, E. J. Kim, J. H. Lacy, H. Ling, J. T. Moore, and G. Rebeiz
Appl. Opt. 33(1) 96-102 (1994)

Polarization dependence of diffraction gratings that have total internal reflection facets

S. Yu. Sadov and K. A. McGreer
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17(9) 1590-1593 (2000)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Measured profile of the echelette grating (master no. 1117 ruled by Richardson Grating Laboratory, Spectronic Instruments, Inc., Thermo Optek Co.).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Diffraction efficiency of three different echelette gratings with profiles presented in the inset. 600 gr/mm, measurements at 8° angular deviation (A.D.) (a) TE polarization, (b) TM polarization.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. SEM picture of a Si grating with triangular profile and flat top region.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Theoretical (a) and experimental (b) efficiency of a Si grating covered with Au layer and measured from the wafer side. Period 0.4 µm, flat region 148 nm, angle of incidence inside the wafer 33.7°.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Spectral variation of the polarization difference (TE minus TM efficiency).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Mean efficiency and mean polarization difference within the spectral region 1.52–1.57 µm as a function of the flat region width of the profile.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Schematical representation and general view of the device.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.