Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Determining nuclear morphology using an improved angle-resolved low coherence interferometry system

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We outline the process for determining the morphology of subsurface epithelial cell nuclei using depth-resolved light scattering measurements. The measurements are accomplished using a second generation angle-resolved low coherence interferometry system. The new system greatly improves data acquisition and analysis times compared to the initial prototype system. The calibration of the new system is demonstrated in scattering studies to determine the size distribution of polystyrene microspheres in a turbid sample. The process for determining the size of cell nuclei is discussed by analyzing measurements of basal cells in a sub-surface layer of intact, unstained epithelial tissue.

©2003 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Nuclear morphology measurements using Fourier domain low coherence interferometry

Robert N. Graf and Adam Wax
Opt. Express 13(12) 4693-4698 (2005)

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (13)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a). Schematic of new a/LCI system. L1-L5 - lenses, BS1,BS2 - beamsplitters, D1,D2 - balanced detectors, RR - retroreflector. Shaded area shows scattered light. (b) Diagram illustrating angle selectivity by scanning lens L2 perpendicular to the beam. Light at the top of the collimated beam entering L3 is directed to the detector in the top figure. Light at the center is directed to the detector in the bottom figure.
Fig. 2. (a)
Fig. 2. (a) Contour plot showing angular scattering by suspension of polystyrene microspheres as a function of depth. Light areas indicate increased intensity on a log scale. (b) Angular distributions vs. depth. Top left 0–100 µm, top right 100–200 µm, bottom left, 200–300 µm, bottom right 300–400 µm.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Fitted angular distribution from surface layer
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Minimization of chi-squared value to determine best fit.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Raw and filtered scattering data from basal cell nuclei
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Filtered data from Fig.5 with low order fit
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Oscillatory component of data with best fit.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. Chi-squared minimization to find best fit. The values are parabolic (solid line) near the minimum. The uncertainty is given by double the minimum value.
Fig 9.
Fig 9. Original microsphere data and data adjusted by adding a low order polynomial
Fig. 10.
Fig. 10. Best fit yields incorrect size when an incorrect slowly varying background is present
Fig. 11.
Fig. 11. Best fit yields correct size when slowly varying background is removed using a low order polynomial prior to fitting. Readjusted data corrects the slowly varying background.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 12. Micrograph of microspheres (bars=10, 50 µm)
Fig. 13.
Fig. 13. Fourier transform of a portion of image in Fig. 12
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.