The comment by Macke and Ségard [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 450–452 (2011)] of our recently published paper [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 1664–1670 (2010)] is shown here to be primarily due to a misunderstanding of the raison d’être of our paper.
© 2011 Optical Society of AmericaFull Article | PDF Article