Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Computational color prediction versus least-dissimilar matching

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

The performance of color prediction methods CIECAM02, KSM2, Waypoint, Best Linear, Metamer Mismatch Volume Center, and Relit color signal are compared in terms of how well they explain Logvinenko and Tokunaga’s asymmetric color matching results [Seeing Perceiving 24, 407 (2011)]. In their experiment, four observers were asked to determine (three repeats) for a given Munsell paper under a test illuminant which of 22 other Munsell papers was the least-dissimilar under a match illuminant. Their use of “least-dissimilar” as opposed to “matching” is an important aspect of their experiment. Their results raise several questions. Question 1: Are observers choosing the original Munsell paper under the match illuminant? If they are, then the average (over 12 matches) color signal (i.e., cone LMS or CIE XYZ) made under a given illuminant condition should correspond to that of the test paper’s color signal under the match illuminant. Computation shows that the mean color signal of the matched papers is close to the color signal of the physically identical paper under the match illuminant. Question 2: Which color prediction method most closely predicts the observers’ average least-dissimilar match? Question 3: Given the variability between observers, how do individual observers compare to the computational methods in predicting the average observer matches? A leave-one-observer-out comparison shows that individual observers, somewhat surprisingly, predict the average matches of the remaining observers better than any of the above color prediction methods.

© 2018 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article
More Like This
Metamer mismatching in practice versus theory

Xiandou Zhang, Brian Funt, and Hamidreza Mirzaei
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 33(3) A238-A247 (2016)

Object-color-signal prediction using wraparound Gaussian metamers

Hamidreza Mirzaei and Brian Funt
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 31(7) 1680-1687 (2014)

Color metamerism and the structure of illuminant space

Arash Akbarinia and Karl R. Gegenfurtner
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 35(4) B231-B238 (2018)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (2)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (4)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (1)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.