When is polarimetric imaging preferable to intensity imaging for target detection?

François Goudail; J. Scott Tyo

doi:10.1364/JOSAA.28.000046

When is polarimetric imaging preferable to intensity imaging for target detection?

François Goudail and J. Scott Tyo

Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Vol. 28,
Issue 1,
pp. 46-53
(2011)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.28.000046

Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
François Goudail and J. Scott Tyo, "When is polarimetric imaging preferable to intensity imaging for target detection?," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 46-53 (2011)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Get PDF (513 KB)
Set citation alerts
Save article

Related Topics
Table of Contents Category
- Physical Optics
Optics & Photonics Topics
?

The topics in this list come from the OSA Optics and Photonics Topics applied to this article.
Previously assigned OCIS codes
- Noise in imaging systems (030.4280)
- Polarization (260.5430)

About this Article
History
- Original Manuscript: October 18, 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: November 14, 2010
- Published: December 23, 2010

Not Accessible

Your account may give you access

Abstract

We consider target detection in images perturbed with additive noise. We determine the conditions in which polarimetric imaging, which consists of analyzing of the polarization of the light scattered by the scene before forming the image, yields better performance than classical intensity imaging. These results give important information to assess the interest of polarimetric imaging in a given application.

Full Article | PDF Article

OSA Recommended Articles

Polarimetric target detection under uneven illumination

Bingjing Huang, Tiegen Liu, Jiahui Han, and Haofeng Hu
Opt. Express 23(18) 23603-23612 (2015)

Fundamental limits of target detection performance in passive polarization imaging

François Goudail and Matthieu Boffety
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 34(4) 506-512 (2017)

Comparison of different active polarimetric imaging modes for target detection in outdoor environment

Nicolas Vannier, François Goudail, Corentin Plassart, Matthieu Boffety, Patrick Feneyrou, Luc Leviandier, Frédéric Galland, and Nicolas Bertaux
Appl. Opt. 55(11) 2881-2891 (2016)

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Figures (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Tables (2)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Equations (45)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Metrics

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Configuration		Detector Noise ( ${SNR}_{D} \times$ )	Background Noise ( ${SNR}_{B} \times$ )
One measurement	pp	$\frac{1}{16} \times \max_{s} [F (s)]$	$\frac{1}{8} \times \max_{s} [F (s)]$
	pi	$\frac{1}{4} \times (\| D_{00} \| + ∥ m ∥)^{2}$	$\frac{1}{4} \times (\| D_{00} \| + ∥ m ∥)^{2}$
	up	$\frac{1}{4} \times (\| D_{00} \| + ∥ n ∥)^{2}$	$\frac{1}{2} \times (\| D_{00} \| + ∥ n ∥)^{2}$
	ui	$D_{00}^{2}$	$D_{00}^{2}$
Two measurements	$p 2$	$\frac{1}{8} \times \max_{s} [G (s)]$	$\frac{1}{4} \times \max_{s} [G (s)]$
Two measurements	$u 2$	$\frac{1}{2} \times (\| D_{00} \|^{2} + ∥ n ∥^{2})$	$\| D_{00} \|^{2} + ∥ n ∥^{2}$

Configuration		Detector Noise ( ${SNR}_{D} \times$ )	Background Noise ( ${SNR}_{B} \times$ )
One measurement	p	$\frac{1}{4} \times \max_{s} [F (s)]$	$\frac{1}{2} \times \max_{s} [F (s)]$
One measurement	i	$(\| D_{00} \| + ∥ m ∥)^{2}$	$(\| D_{00} \| + ∥ m ∥)^{2}$
Two measurements	$p 2$	$\frac{1}{2} \times \max_{s} [G (s)]$	$\max_{s} [G (s)]$

Configuration		Detector Noise ( ${SNR}_{D} \times$ )	Background Noise ( ${SNR}_{B} \times$ )
One measurement	pp	$\frac{1}{16} \times \max_{s} [F (s)]$	$\frac{1}{8} \times \max_{s} [F (s)]$
	pi	$\frac{1}{4} \times (\| D_{00} \| + ∥ m ∥)^{2}$	$\frac{1}{4} \times (\| D_{00} \| + ∥ m ∥)^{2}$
	up	$\frac{1}{4} \times (\| D_{00} \| + ∥ n ∥)^{2}$	$\frac{1}{2} \times (\| D_{00} \| + ∥ n ∥)^{2}$
	ui	$D_{00}^{2}$	$D_{00}^{2}$
Two measurements	$p 2$	$\frac{1}{8} \times \max_{s} [G (s)]$	$\frac{1}{4} \times \max_{s} [G (s)]$
Two measurements	$u 2$	$\frac{1}{2} \times (\| D_{00} \|^{2} + ∥ n ∥^{2})$	$\| D_{00} \|^{2} + ∥ n ∥^{2}$

Configuration		Detector Noise ( ${SNR}_{D} \times$ )	Background Noise ( ${SNR}_{B} \times$ )
One measurement	p	$\frac{1}{4} \times \max_{s} [F (s)]$	$\frac{1}{2} \times \max_{s} [F (s)]$
One measurement	i	$(\| D_{00} \| + ∥ m ∥)^{2}$	$(\| D_{00} \| + ∥ m ∥)^{2}$
Two measurements	$p 2$	$\frac{1}{2} \times \max_{s} [G (s)]$	$\max_{s} [G (s)]$

Abstract

References

Cited By

Figures (3)

Tables (2)

Equations (45)

Metrics

Login or Create Account