Abstract
Hannay’s comment [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23, 1530 (2006) ; this issue] is based on an argument that is mathematically inconsistent when applied to superluminal sources. Moreover, it ignores our published experimental data [e.g., J. Appl. Phys. 96, 7760(E) (2004) ] that completely support the conclusions of our theoretical paper.
© 2006 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
J. H. Hannay
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23(6) 1530-1534 (2006)
Houshang Ardavan, Arzhang Ardavan, and John Singleton
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21(5) 858-872 (2004)
Houshang Ardavan, Arzhang Ardavan, John Singleton, Joseph Fasel, and Andrea Schmidt
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 25(9) 2167-2169 (2008)