Abstract

The effect of contrast gain control mechanisms on discrimination between highly similar simple and complex stimuli is examined, with a focus on how discrimination accuracy changes as a function of the contrast of stimulus components. Two models of contrast gain control are evaluated. In both, the response of each pathway is attenuated by a factor determined by the total activity in a large pool of pathways. One model bases attenuation on the sum of linear filter responses within this pool; the other, based on Heeger’s contrast energy-driven model [J. Neurophysiol. 70, 1885 (1993)], uses squared filter responses. Predictions generated from the models are compared with data from experiments reported here and from the literature. Predictions are made for simple grating stimuli of different sizes and for stimuli to which a second grating component is added either as a second cue or as a mask. With one exception, predictions of the models agree closely with each other and with the data. The exception is a masking study that differentiates the models and supports the filter-driven model over the energy-driven model.

© 1997 Optical Society of America

Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations

Lynn A. Olzak and Pentti I. Laurinen
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22(10) 2230-2238 (2005)

Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking

Andrew B. Watson and Joshua A. Solomon
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(9) 2379-2391 (1997)

Motion thresholds can be predicted from contrast discrimination

Bettina L. Beard, Stanley A. Klein, and Thom Carney
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14(9) 2449-2470 (1997)

Why are some spatial discriminations independent of contrast?

Barbara Gouled Smith and James P. Thomas
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6(5) 713-724 (1989)

Spatial pooling of contrast in contrast gain control

Michael D’Zmura and Benjamin Singer
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 13(11) 2135-2140 (1996)