Abstract

A Bayesian model of Snellen visual acuity (VA) has been developed that, as far as we know, is the first one that includes the three main stages of VA: (1) optical degradations, (2) neural image representation and contrast thresholding, and (3) character recognition. The retinal image of a Snellen test chart is obtained from experimental wave-aberration data. Then a subband image decomposition with a set of visual channels tuned to different spatial frequencies and orientations is applied to the retinal image, as in standard computational models of early cortical image representation. A neural threshold is applied to the contrast responses to include the effect of the neural contrast sensitivity. The resulting image representation is the base of a Bayesian pattern-recognition method robust to the presence of optical aberrations. The model is applied to images containing sets of letter optotypes at different scales, and the number of correct answers is obtained at each scale; the final output is the decimal Snellen VA. The model has no free parameters to adjust. The main input data are the eye’s optical aberrations, and standard values are used for all other parameters, including the Stiles–Crawford effect, visual channels, and neural contrast threshold, when no subject specific values are available. When aberrations are large, Snellen VA involving pattern recognition differs from grating acuity, which is based on a simpler detection (or orientation-discrimination) task and hence is basically unaffected by phase distortions introduced by the optical transfer function. A preliminary test of the model in one subject produced close agreement between actual measurements and predicted VA values. Two examples are also included: (1) application of the method to the prediction of the VA in refractive-surgery patients and (2) simulation of the VA attainable by correcting ocular aberrations.

© 2003 Optical Society of America

Relating wavefront error to visual acuity in pre- and post-LASIK eyes: a comparison of methods

Edward Dehoog, Robert Van Dine, Lindsay Fitzgerald-Dehoog, and Jim Schwiegerling
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 37(2) 192-198 (2020)

Impact of positive coupling of the eye’s trefoil and coma in retinal image quality and visual acuity

Eloy A. Villegas, Encarna Alcón, and Pablo Artal
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 29(8) 1667-1672 (2012)

Binocular enhancement of visual acuity

Ron Cagenello, Aries Arditi, and D. Lynn Halpern
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10(8) 1841-1848 (1993)

Influence of Stiles–Crawford apodization on visual acuity

David A. Atchison, Dion H. Scott, Niall C. Strang, and Pablo Artal
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 19(6) 1073-1083 (2002)

Predicting the effects of defocus blur on contrast sensitivity with a model-based metric of retinal image quality

Charles Leroux, Christophe Fontvieille, Conor Leahy, Isabelle Marc, and Fabrice Bardin
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 39(10) 1866-1873 (2022)