Abstract

© 1976 Optical Society of America

PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |

  1. Compare S. Shlaer, J. Gen. Physiol. 21, 165 (1937) and C. G. Mueller and V. V. Lloyd, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 34, 223 (1948).
  2. S. Shlaer, E. L. Smith, and A. M. Chase, J. Gen. Physiol. 25, 553 (1942); R. H. Young and A. Lit, Percep. Psychophys. 11, 213 (1972).
  3. C. D. Hendley, J. Gen. Physiol. 31, 433 (1948); A. Lit, J. P. Finn, and W. M. Vicars, Vision Res. 12, 1241 (1972).
  4. J. Mandelbaum and L. L. Sloan, Am. J. Ophthal. 31, 581 (1947); K. N. Ogle, Researches in Binocular Vision (Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., 1950).
  5. A. Burg and S. F. Hulbert, J. Appl. Psychol. 45, 111 (1961); A. Lit, Am. J. Optom. 43, 283 (1966).
  6. E. Ludvigh and J. W. Miller, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 799 (1958); S. M. Luria and S. Weissman, J. Exp. Psychol. 76, 51 (1968).
  7. W. H. Teichner, S. L. Kobrick, and R. F. Wehrkamp, Am. J. Psychol. 68, 193 (1955); E. Freeman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 22, 285 (1932).
  8. H. R. Blackwell. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38. 1097 (1948); K. N. Ogle, ibid. 48, 794 (1958).
  9. S. M. Luria and J. A. S. Kinney, Percep. Psychophys. 13, 76 (1973).
  10. P. W. Cobb, Am. J. Physiol. 36, 355 (1915).
  11. H. Leibowitz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 416 (1952).
  12. J. Krauskopf, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1046 (1962); G. Westheimer and F. W. Campbell, ibid. 52, 1040 (1962). 1040 (1962).
  13. F. W. Campbell and A. H. Gregory, Nature 187, 1121 (1960); F. W. Campbell and D. G. Green, J. Physiol. London 181, 576 (1965).
  14. K. N. Ogle, Ref. 4.
  15. Although an analysis of variance showed these means to be significantly different (F = 4.89, dƒ = 3/12, p< .05), the rise in variability when the pupil diameter was increased to 6.0 mm was not significant, according to the Tukey (a) test. But only one of the five subjects showed less variability with the 6.0 than with the 4.0 mm pupil.

Blackwell, H. R.

H. R. Blackwell. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38. 1097 (1948); K. N. Ogle, ibid. 48, 794 (1958).

Burg, A.

A. Burg and S. F. Hulbert, J. Appl. Psychol. 45, 111 (1961); A. Lit, Am. J. Optom. 43, 283 (1966).

Campbell, F. W.

F. W. Campbell and A. H. Gregory, Nature 187, 1121 (1960); F. W. Campbell and D. G. Green, J. Physiol. London 181, 576 (1965).

Chase, A. M.

S. Shlaer, E. L. Smith, and A. M. Chase, J. Gen. Physiol. 25, 553 (1942); R. H. Young and A. Lit, Percep. Psychophys. 11, 213 (1972).

Cobb, P. W.

P. W. Cobb, Am. J. Physiol. 36, 355 (1915).

Gregory, A. H.

F. W. Campbell and A. H. Gregory, Nature 187, 1121 (1960); F. W. Campbell and D. G. Green, J. Physiol. London 181, 576 (1965).

Hendley, C. D.

C. D. Hendley, J. Gen. Physiol. 31, 433 (1948); A. Lit, J. P. Finn, and W. M. Vicars, Vision Res. 12, 1241 (1972).

Hulbert, S. F.

A. Burg and S. F. Hulbert, J. Appl. Psychol. 45, 111 (1961); A. Lit, Am. J. Optom. 43, 283 (1966).

Kinney, J. A. S.

S. M. Luria and J. A. S. Kinney, Percep. Psychophys. 13, 76 (1973).

Kobrick, S. L.

W. H. Teichner, S. L. Kobrick, and R. F. Wehrkamp, Am. J. Psychol. 68, 193 (1955); E. Freeman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 22, 285 (1932).

Krauskopf, J.

J. Krauskopf, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1046 (1962); G. Westheimer and F. W. Campbell, ibid. 52, 1040 (1962). 1040 (1962).

Leibowitz, H.

H. Leibowitz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 416 (1952).

Ludvigh, E.

E. Ludvigh and J. W. Miller, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 799 (1958); S. M. Luria and S. Weissman, J. Exp. Psychol. 76, 51 (1968).

Luria, S. M.

S. M. Luria and J. A. S. Kinney, Percep. Psychophys. 13, 76 (1973).

Mandelbaum, J.

J. Mandelbaum and L. L. Sloan, Am. J. Ophthal. 31, 581 (1947); K. N. Ogle, Researches in Binocular Vision (Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., 1950).

Miller, J. W.

E. Ludvigh and J. W. Miller, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 799 (1958); S. M. Luria and S. Weissman, J. Exp. Psychol. 76, 51 (1968).

Ogle, K. N.

K. N. Ogle, Ref. 4.

Shlaer, Compare S.

Compare S. Shlaer, J. Gen. Physiol. 21, 165 (1937) and C. G. Mueller and V. V. Lloyd, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 34, 223 (1948).

Shlaer, S.

S. Shlaer, E. L. Smith, and A. M. Chase, J. Gen. Physiol. 25, 553 (1942); R. H. Young and A. Lit, Percep. Psychophys. 11, 213 (1972).

Sloan, L. L.

J. Mandelbaum and L. L. Sloan, Am. J. Ophthal. 31, 581 (1947); K. N. Ogle, Researches in Binocular Vision (Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., 1950).

Smith, E. L.

S. Shlaer, E. L. Smith, and A. M. Chase, J. Gen. Physiol. 25, 553 (1942); R. H. Young and A. Lit, Percep. Psychophys. 11, 213 (1972).

Teichner, W. H.

W. H. Teichner, S. L. Kobrick, and R. F. Wehrkamp, Am. J. Psychol. 68, 193 (1955); E. Freeman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 22, 285 (1932).

Wehrkamp, R. F.

W. H. Teichner, S. L. Kobrick, and R. F. Wehrkamp, Am. J. Psychol. 68, 193 (1955); E. Freeman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 22, 285 (1932).

Other (15)

Compare S. Shlaer, J. Gen. Physiol. 21, 165 (1937) and C. G. Mueller and V. V. Lloyd, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 34, 223 (1948).

S. Shlaer, E. L. Smith, and A. M. Chase, J. Gen. Physiol. 25, 553 (1942); R. H. Young and A. Lit, Percep. Psychophys. 11, 213 (1972).

C. D. Hendley, J. Gen. Physiol. 31, 433 (1948); A. Lit, J. P. Finn, and W. M. Vicars, Vision Res. 12, 1241 (1972).

J. Mandelbaum and L. L. Sloan, Am. J. Ophthal. 31, 581 (1947); K. N. Ogle, Researches in Binocular Vision (Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa., 1950).

A. Burg and S. F. Hulbert, J. Appl. Psychol. 45, 111 (1961); A. Lit, Am. J. Optom. 43, 283 (1966).

E. Ludvigh and J. W. Miller, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 48, 799 (1958); S. M. Luria and S. Weissman, J. Exp. Psychol. 76, 51 (1968).

W. H. Teichner, S. L. Kobrick, and R. F. Wehrkamp, Am. J. Psychol. 68, 193 (1955); E. Freeman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 22, 285 (1932).

H. R. Blackwell. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 38. 1097 (1948); K. N. Ogle, ibid. 48, 794 (1958).

S. M. Luria and J. A. S. Kinney, Percep. Psychophys. 13, 76 (1973).

P. W. Cobb, Am. J. Physiol. 36, 355 (1915).

H. Leibowitz, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 42, 416 (1952).

J. Krauskopf, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1046 (1962); G. Westheimer and F. W. Campbell, ibid. 52, 1040 (1962). 1040 (1962).

F. W. Campbell and A. H. Gregory, Nature 187, 1121 (1960); F. W. Campbell and D. G. Green, J. Physiol. London 181, 576 (1965).

K. N. Ogle, Ref. 4.

Although an analysis of variance showed these means to be significantly different (F = 4.89, dƒ = 3/12, p< .05), the rise in variability when the pupil diameter was increased to 6.0 mm was not significant, according to the Tukey (a) test. But only one of the five subjects showed less variability with the 6.0 than with the 4.0 mm pupil.

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.