Abstract

Mathematical expressions for the primary aberrations of a thin, meniscus Fresnel lens (grooved on both surfaces) are derived and compared to the corresponding expressions for the case of a thin, flat Fresnel lens. It is shown that the only aberrations that differ are spherical aberration and line coma, both of which are independent of stop position. Moreover, a meniscus Fresnel lens has an additional degree of freedom available for aberration correction. Some applications of the theory are discussed.

© 1976 Optical Society of America

PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. E. Delano, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 459 (1974).
  2. Note that the values of ΔSl* and ΔS2l* given in Eqs. (11) are not to be confused with the values given in Eqs. (30) and (31) in I, which refer to the effect of figuring, and which is independent of the effect of using a meniscus.

1974

E. Delano, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 459 (1974).

Delano, E.

E. Delano, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 459 (1974).

Other

E. Delano, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 64, 459 (1974).

Note that the values of ΔSl* and ΔS2l* given in Eqs. (11) are not to be confused with the values given in Eqs. (30) and (31) in I, which refer to the effect of figuring, and which is independent of the effect of using a meniscus.

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.